When you say crowd funding sites I think there is a need to be more specific. There apparently is a "crowd funding" program in place at the Foundation which has been outlined elsewhere. This is in essence the official one the Foundation has an agreement with and is very specific as it outline terms, conditions and rules to setting up a Foundation approved project or fund. All others do not seem to have this approval by the Foundation regardless of what may be implied or interpreted incorrectly. Notice the key words here IMPLIED and INTERPRETED INCORRECTLY and is not an official endorsement or contractual agreement as outlined in the terms and conditions in the crowd funding program approved by the Foundation which has been presented to all for review.
Destructive Approach by Some is Alarming
- Thread starter ScarletKid2008
- Start date
Just to be clear, I am not a Floodie, idiot and just as concerned as many regarding the entire program and what we see on and off the field. The difference is there is a proper and sound way to express oneself and effectuate changed whatever they may be. There are many people here who get it and a handful who don't and seem to try and yell the loudest with little real facts to support there position. I hate losing and poor performances just like most everyone else! But sometimes it isn't always wins and losses.
ou
our way was proper and effective. just because you dont agree with it doesnt mean its not proper
