What a ridiculous plan! Rutgers BB finally creating enough excitement to boost ticket sales and he’s going to squeeze loyal fans by taking or moving their seats, unless they pay much more than now.
Having 7700 seats at a school the size of RU and playing in the most successful conference in the country is an embarrassment. If the AD is hell bent on premium seating the answer is easy - build new.The primary mandate of any RAC upgrade program is to maximize revenue.
I agree it sucks that we might actually have fewer seats than we have now. Doesn’t seem like progress from the fan perspective.
A plan that results in the worst of both worlds. Lower capacity and lackluster premium spaces. Rutgers decision making at its finest. Just build new.What a ridiculous plan! Rutgers BB finally creating enough excitement to boost ticket sales and he’s going to squeeze loyal fans by taking or moving their seats, unless they pay much more than now.
Stop being denseWhat a ridiculous plan! Rutgers BB finally creating enough excitement to boost ticket sales and he’s going to squeeze loyal fans by taking or moving their seats, unless they pay much more than now.
Ok, I'll play...who is paying for this brand new arena, genius?Having 7700 seats at a school the size of RU and playing in the most successful conference in the country is an embarrassment. If the AD is hell bent on premium seating the answer is easy - build new.
Ok, I'll play...who is paying for this brand new arena, genius?
Patrick said it. Listen to the podcast.Why does this whole thread have a troll vibe to it? Just me?
It could also potentially destroy the best home court advantage in the countrySame folks who are going to shell out a two hundred million for the RAC upgrades. Might as well drop 500 million on a new venue.
A larger arena would open up more avenues for revenue. Could add premium amenities and more seats. Host concerts and shows.
While I do not think we have the money to build a new arena, if we did. Why would it have to be cookie cutter and lose our home court advantage?Building a modern cookie cutter arena vs maintaining a competitive advantage of an extremely loud and unique arena. I’d argue who really had the ridiculous take.
For the same reason you can’t replace Fenway Park, it wouldn’t matter how much you spent or tried.While I do not think we have the money to build a new arena, if we did. Why would it have to be cookie cutter and lose our home court advantage?
The problem is the state is putting up more money than anyone else. Do you think they would foot the entire bill? Besides, with all the complaining on this board, it's clear we lack enough support to raise the money to build things the right way. $30 for parking is enough to cause a riot on this board. 🤣Same folks who are going to shell out a two hundred million for the RAC upgrades. Might as well drop 500 million on a new venue.
A larger arena would open up more avenues for revenue. Could add premium amenities and more seats. Host concerts and shows.
Two big reasons. One is that the dimensions of the RAC that make it great - namely the very steep angle of the seating placing fans right on top of the game - is no longer ok. Not sure if it’s technically not up the code, or no longer acceptable practice, but everyone agrees it’s off the table.While I do not think we have the money to build a new arena, if we did. Why would it have to be cookie cutter and lose our home court advantage?
Their job is to pocket the money, not enhance the experienceAre you telling me that an architect with a several hundred million dollar job in hand can’t come up with a way to keep a home court advantage!
It is not the only arena that provides a home court advantage. It is a moot point anyway, we don’t have the money to build a new one.For the same reason you can’t replace Fenway Park, it wouldn’t matter how much you spent or tried.
The Trapezoid is our Fenway, and any non bias basketball aficionado who takes a game in there agrees.
200 million?? Where is that number ftom!?Same folks who are going to shell out a two hundred million for the RAC upgrades. Might as well drop 500 million on a new venue.
A larger arena would open up more avenues for revenue. Could add premium amenities and more seats. Host concerts and shows.
When the RAC opened in 1977, it sat between 9k and 10k. Over time, the RAC had to meet certain codes and new laws such American Disability Act. That reduces the capacity. Now revenue is the problem. To earn enough revenue, Rutgers may have to sacrifice total capacity for revenue-generating seats that are fewer in number. That revenue will help Rutgers to compete with other schools.I just think it’s embarrassing to have a 8k arena. Would have thought we at least push towards 9k
Teams that have larger seating still have a enormous home court advantage.Purdue,Illinois,Michigan ,Michigan State are just four names and Indiana and Wisconsin also apply.While I do not think we have the money to build a new arena, if we did. Why would it have to be cookie cutter and lose our home court advantage?
Not Legally!! Facility is grandfathered as is.Are you telling me that an architect with a several hundred million dollar job in hand can’t come up with a way to keep a home court advantage!
That's sort of what Hobbs said, and a couple of these jokers are freaking the F out...We need premium seating, we need to add revenue. The RAC is built in a very unique way and it's likely difficult and costly to blow out any side of it. I think they might be over thinking it. Just add some club seating options, bathrooms and keep the place a snake pit.
So do not go and let someone else buy your tix if so embarrassing.I just think it’s embarrassing to have a 8k arena. Would have thought we at least push towards 9k