I don't disagree that there is a trickle down effect of any decision and certainly that your priority is what it is. But also the reason to not build something on a piece of land that is used 6-7 times a year as opposed to year-round, is not enough of a reason.
We all want better for the program and a true indoor facility would help not only football, but could/would help some of the other athletic programs (and the university) as well.
If we're looking to get into comparative reasons why an opinion may matter more, I'll have at it. I've been a season ticket holder since 2005 and was out of state for the last 7 years and flew back for several games each year. The reason I come back is for the game and to support the program, which everything else is revolved around. Yes fan experience is part of it, but success leads to fans, which leads to revenue.
I'll agree that the cultivation of fans by Rutgers has not always been their strong suit and don't always follow through. But, if the program isn't successful, you're not going to be able to have the chance to cultivate any of that. A facility let's you do that and winning is the ultimate cultivator.
If I'm priced out to the RAC to park, then so be it. That means we have been sucessful beyond our wildest dreams. I'll tailgate in a parking lot (true NJ style) and catch the bus to support the program.