I don't see how a jury convicts, but you never know . :
http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.s...ver_fatal_beating_of_c.html#incart_river_home
http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.s...ver_fatal_beating_of_c.html#incart_river_home
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Circumstantial evidence. Defendant does not seem like a squeaky clean guy though.
I find it interesting the suspect lived on plum street.
Enjoy the rice pudding, we the jury find the defendant guilty. Take care, brush that hair.
I believe that Puskas is a multiple offense felon with a well documented hard drug habit and plenty of motive to commit this crime.
If he is not guilty of this crime then I never attended a day of classes at RU.
You can't convict someone of murder because he's not a "squeaky clean guy." Unless I"m missing something, he should be acquitted. The motive is absolutely ridiculous. He's pissed that his roomates were stealing from him so he brutally murders a random person with a crowbar, steals nothing. Manages not to get any blood, DNA or anything anywhere. Like wtf.
Pretty sure this dude is wanted for murder in another case. I'm sure its just a coincidence though...
BingoYou cannot make any judgments on a Case based on news reports of the trial. . .
I disagree with Trayvon Martin for the exact same reasons. The media portrayed him as a squeaky clean kid trying to eat some skittles. What they didn't focus on is that everything he bought at the 7/11 is used to make a drink to get high off of. Don't want to turn this political nor do I condone Following him or even shooting him, just trying to make the point the media doesn't care about an outcome of a trial. All they care about is views and what will keep the topic in the news for longer.You cannot make any judgments on a Case based on news reports of the trial. Reporters don't know what they're looking at and report a bunch of stuff that is not always pertinent to the outcome. For example the Trayvon Martin trial as reported should have resulted in a conviction. But when you read the transcripts of the evidence there's no way they could have convicted. We have no idea what the evidence was presented in this case.
You cannot make any judgments on a Case based on news reports of the trial. Reporters don't know what they're looking at and report a bunch of stuff that is not always pertinent to the outcome. For example the Trayvon Martin trial as reported should have resulted in a conviction. But when you read the transcripts of the evidence there's no way they could have convicted. We have no idea what the evidence was presented in this case.
He's not wanted for another murder. The other case was a vehicular homicide. He hit someone while driving but left the scene. That's different than brutally bludgeoning someone to death though.
He admitted killkng the kid to a woman giving details only the suspect would know. He told the women he would kill her and her family if she told anyone. He was arrested on Another charge and while in the county the lady went straight to police bc she knew he couldn't retaliate. A very very brutal killing. Detectives told me worse they where saw. Guy is a total POS.
He admitted killkng the kid to a woman giving details only the suspect would know. He told the women he would kill her and her family if she told anyone. He was arrested on Another charge and while in the county the lady went straight to police bc she knew he couldn't retaliate. A very very brutal killing. Detectives told me worse they where saw. Guy is a total POS.
Not saying you're wrong but I hadn't read the suspect talking to a woman. Where was that reported?
That is the somebody who heard somebody who saw something that nobody else knew part that puts the coppers on the right trail. Loose lips sink ships !Not saying you're wrong but I hadn't read the suspect talking to a woman. Where was that reported?
It wasn'tNot saying you're wrong but I hadn't read the suspect talking to a woman. Where was that reported?
Considering who this poster is and the guy who liked it I'm cool with putting this to bed.JRZEER knows more than you. Let it go. He is correct. Everyone else just guessing and making assumptions from a headline and what's not reported. The police usually know what they're doing
Dude also is a LL in NB who was known for using rent money on drugs and throwing students down stairs. Please by all means though continue to white knight the guy.
many defendants have been convicted without DNA ..and based upon testimony and circumstatial evidence..just because there is no DNA or a confession does not been hes innocent and police are corrupt..Wow, I knew the NB police were corrupt and incompetent, but this.....
Well he couldn't have been in on the hit and run (which he has since pled guilty to), since he was out on bail for it at the time he allegedly commited the murder. I do seem to remember it being reported at the time though, that he was already in the county jail when he was charged? So what was this other charge he was picked up on?It wasn't
He was in custody for an "unrelated aggravated-assault charge" when he was charged with this murder.http://www.coloradoan.com/story/new...brunswick-called-danger-to-community/6923241/Not 100% what he was booked in the county for but if my memory serves me correctly is was Agg assault and CDS possesion.
He was in custody for an "unrelated aggravated-assault charge" when he was charged with this murder.http://www.coloradoan.com/story/new...brunswick-called-danger-to-community/6923241/
Not disputing the accuracy of this article. But why is a newspaper or site, that is located in Colorado, covering this ?