I don’t think marginalizing is the right word either. Does Harold Baines being in the HoF marginalize Ricky Henderson’s stature ? Hardly. Greatness isn’t a black and white distinction. Context matters. Baines was elected by the Veterans Committee. Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl and was released anyway.Perhaps “insult” is the wrong word. I’ll put it another way - let’s say academic distinction at a school was obtained by averaging an A across all subjects. Not too many students met the requirements so the school decides to expand the pool to include students who average a B+ or better to recognize more kids. My view is that this decision would marginalize the significance of the accomplishment for the kids in the pool who attained the original A average requirement in this made up example.
When folks label guys like Gavin Wimsatt Rutgers “all stars” I see it the same way. To me - the term “All Star” should be reserved for guys like Ray Rice, Caroo, etc. who truly did special things at RU. Expanding the definition to include serviceable QBs marginalizes the meaning of “star” in a similar way to my example above. Again - it’s just my opinion and I understand not everyone will see it this way.
I think GW was a god-awful, illegitimate college QB who was along for the ride on a good team, propped up by a coach who bent over backwards to keep his baby happy. The worst QB in the country was certainly not a star. That’s ridiculous. So I agree with your assessment of him.
No knowledgeable fan would consider GW a star player. Comparing his legacy to Rice, Carroo and all RU’s top players is simple: he was terrible and they weren’t.
Last edited: