Reps from UNC will meet today in Indianapolis. Per Dan Kane of the N&O, "UNC-Chapel Hill is expected to argue at a special NCAA hearing Friday that it shouldn’t be hit with infractions over the long-running academic fraud case because NCAA investigators took no action five years ago when it began to surface.
At that time, the NCAA was pursuing violations of impermissible perks from agents and impermissible academic help from a tutor, all involving the football team. The NCAA says it didn’t know how significant the scheme of bogus classes was at the time, in part because UNC didn’t produce all the information it could have then.
It’s an argument that the public would find hard to assess. That’s because the university has refused numerous times to produce the bulk of information obtained in the summer of 2011 – in particular transcripts of those interviewed jointly by the university and the NCAA."
Read full article here: http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/unc-scandal/article110920142.html
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/unc-scandal/article110920142.html
Remember, at the conclusion of his UNC-directed "review" of improprieties within the AFAM department and the delivery of his "report," Ken Wainstein offered to look into those other six or so departments that also were involved in bogus classes, grade changes, etc. involving student-athletes. UNC said, "no thanks."
At that time, the NCAA was pursuing violations of impermissible perks from agents and impermissible academic help from a tutor, all involving the football team. The NCAA says it didn’t know how significant the scheme of bogus classes was at the time, in part because UNC didn’t produce all the information it could have then.
It’s an argument that the public would find hard to assess. That’s because the university has refused numerous times to produce the bulk of information obtained in the summer of 2011 – in particular transcripts of those interviewed jointly by the university and the NCAA."
Read full article here: http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/unc-scandal/article110920142.html
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/unc-scandal/article110920142.html
Remember, at the conclusion of his UNC-directed "review" of improprieties within the AFAM department and the delivery of his "report," Ken Wainstein offered to look into those other six or so departments that also were involved in bogus classes, grade changes, etc. involving student-athletes. UNC said, "no thanks."