ADVERTISEMENT

The shine is off Coach Schiano

They were not “really good teams”..there is a reason we were favored today.

Washington got slaughtered today (and again, we were extremely LUCKY to win that game).

Va tech…bottom of ACC as of now. To say those were two “very good teams”….ehhhhh totally disagree.

I am not surprised that someone who thinks we should be 12-0 every year disagrees, lol. Would be disappointing if you admitted the BS agenda now.

Washington beat a ranked Michigan team. Both UW and VT have certainly done better against good teams than Indiana. VT pretty much beat Miami as well.
 
Again, why? Why can no one else but him have this job?

Why can’t curt cignetti..who took a 3-9 team and has them in top 20 after 6 games…do that here? He can do it at Indiana..a school that is much more invested in their hoops program..

In a salary about 3 million less than Greg’s?…this mindset that only Greg can have the Rutgers job is insane.
We tried and failed. I’ll reserve judgement on Indiana. Like to see how he does in recruiting and if he can sustain it. Our Washington win beats any of their win so far.
 
Why is this a tough job? Again, this mindset has to stop. Best league in the country. One of the best public schools in the country. Largest market in the country. Fantastic recruiting base. It’s not hard if we have a coach that wins…
It's not hard if we had a proper big time donor base. We do not. NIL, unless changes are made to the rules, is gonna handcuff anyone who coaches on The Banks. Those who are complaining about Steve Pikiell's less than stellar 2025 recruiting class so far need also look no further than the lack of a sufficient NIL war chest.
 
I am not surprised that someone who thinks we should be 12-0 every year disagrees, lol. Would be disappointing if you admitted the BS agenda now.

Washington beat a ranked Michigan team. Both UW and VT have certainly done better against good teams than Indiana. VT pretty much beat Miami as well.

I never said we should be 12-0 every year. you must be confusing me with rutgersal.


Many teams beat ranked teams. Doesn’t make them “very good” teams.

Upsets happen all the time. I’ll admit they were good wins…any power 5 win is good. But that seems to be programs ceiling..getting these types of wins. It’s not a bad thing after 5 years I’d like to see a bit more than that
 
Huh? Why make sh*t up to prove your point? Because maybe your point isn't as strong as you think it is. VT is nowhere near the bottom of the ACC.

It's the same people who said VT and NW were not good wins last year.

Next it will be- "They're good, but we wouldn't win now!" That was went they went with last year.

But for a bad call VT would be undefeated in the ACC now. But facts don't matter.

The negatoids prayed for today like manna from heaven, they're not going to let it go. And chances we beat UCLA next week, they may have to go pick apples rather than lie here. It's a tough life.
 
I never said we should be 12-0 every year. you must be confusing me with rutgersal.


Many teams beat ranked teams. Doesn’t make them “very good” teams.

Upsets happen all the time. I’ll admit they were good wins…any power 5 win is good. But that seems to be programs ceiling..getting these types of wins. It’s not a bad thing after 5 years I’d like to see a bit more than that

You don't put a prediction out of what you think is reasonable because that would interfere with the troll. Most people said 7-9. We are on track for that. It's actually that simple.
 
We tried and failed. I’ll reserve judgement on Indiana. Like to see how he does in recruiting and if he can sustain it. Our Washington win beats any of their win so far.

You have the right to reserve judgement on Indiana.

But 999 out of 1000 fans would rather be where Indiana is right now in week 6 of cignetti than where Rutgers is right now in YEAR 5 of Schiano,

You’re fooling yourself if you don’t agree.
 
You don't put a prediction out of what you think is reasonable because that would interfere with the troll. Most people said 7-9. We are on track for that. It's actually that simple.

I never make predictions. What is the point?

“Reasonable” to me is not having these types of games on year 5 of a tenure.

“Reasonable” to me would be scoring more than 2 touchdowns in the last 10 quarters. That’s really not too much to ask
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randal7
This probably one of the toughest jobs in the country. Schiano did get a bowl last year and we did beat VTech on the road and Washington. Wisconsin is just a bad matchup. Not having the full D hurts but Schiano is to blame for the lack of O continuously. Forget the score and let’s see what next week brings
Here come the excuses, right on schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewbagel423
You have the right to reserve judgement on Indiana.

But 999 out of 1000 fans would rather be where Indiana is right now in week 6 of cignetti than where Rutgers is right now in YEAR 5 of Schiano,

You’re fooling yourself if you don’t agree.
Just take Indiana for example. They rode the hype with the last coach + Penix. Fast forward Penix transfers and it became a train wreck.
 
I never make predictions. What is the point?

“Reasonable” to me is not having these types of games on year 5 of a tenure.

“Reasonable” to me would be scoring more than 2 touchdowns in the last 10 quarters. That’s really not too much to ask

Exactly, so you can do what you're doing now and insist being undefeated at this point would be the logical result. Again, credit, it's a great troll.
 
You have the right to reserve judgement on Indiana.

But 999 out of 1000 fans would rather be where Indiana is right now in week 6 of cignetti than where Rutgers is right now in YEAR 5 of Schiano,

You’re fooling yourself if you don’t agree.

Definitely I'd rather their cupcake laden schedule, yes. And absolutely you play only the cards you're dealt, and you know we were dealt a much tougher deck, but yet continue.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gchicago
Definitely I'd rather their cupcake laden schedule, yes. And absolutely you play only the cards you're dealt, and you know we were dealt a much tougher deck, but yet continue.

Definitely I'd rather their cupcake laden schedule, yes. And absolutely you play only the cards you're dealt, and you know we were dealt a much tougher deck, but yet continue.


Obviously only one outlet. But our SOS’s aren’t too far off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gchicago
You lost me…..

If you were to say like 99% of this board "I expect 7-9 wins" and then claimed now as you are that GS should be fired at 4-2, people could question the consistency. But instead, you don't, and just say any loss is unacceptable, which doesn't even happen at Bama. Even Ohio State and Michigan get blown out sometimes. It's CFB. But when you just set out with no rubric and only the desire to grind an axe, you get your posts.
 
If you were to say like 99% of this board "I expect 7-9 wins" and then claimed now as you are that GS should be fired at 4-2, people could question the consistency. But instead, you don't, and just say any loss is unacceptable, which doesn't even happen at Bama. Even Ohio State and Michigan get blown out sometimes. It's CFB. But when you just set out with no rubric and only the desire to grind an axe, you get your posts.

I never said any loss is unacceptable.

What I said is “unacceptable” is 2 TDs in the last 10 quarters.

What I said is “unacceptable” is having this type of game in year 5.

If we looked good but lost to a team in a competitive game, I’d have very little issue.
 


Great tweet that illustrates our problem and the causes. Again, unacceptable in year 5..imo
OMG you just posted a tweet from the biggest dick to ever grace this board. This kid's a complete asshole and was kicked off for outing someone. If I was you, I'd delete this post. @mikemarc1 I like arguing with you it's civil and just banter. But this kid's a douche and went into someone's personal life and made it public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU and RUfromNJ
I never said any loss is unacceptable.

What I said is “unacceptable” is 2 TDs in the last 10 quarters.

What I said is “unacceptable” is having this type of game in year 5.

If we looked good but lost to a team in a competitive game, I’d have very little issue.

LOL. Dude. You have been at the same grind making the same comments during close losses.

What is this type of a game? You love Flood. In year 4 of Flood, he was blown out by bad teams weekly. The team actually improved massively when he was suspended lol. Were you just giving it a few months? One loss was to Wisconsin 42-10 lol!

The only time you have no comment is a win.
 
OMG you just posted a tweet from the biggest dick to ever grace this board. This kid's a complete asshole and was kicked off for outing someone. If I was you, I'd delete this post. @mikemarc1 I like arguing with you it's civil and just banter, but this kid's a douche and went into someone's personal life.

No clue about the history so apologies for posting something from a so-called bad guy…..

But is it false? Is the tweet inaccurate?

We haven’t had a QB in 5 years. Our best WR is a FCS kid.

Our starting TE was converted from defense, our play calling extremely suspect.
 
Totally disagree. He is the best value for Rutgers. I will change my mind if we don’t go bowling this year.
Seriously. That's the bar for a schedule set up for 8+ wins and all the players coming back? Wow. So he just has to go 4-6 vs. fbs teams not named Ohio State, Mich, Penn State, Iowa, Oregon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh
LOL. Dude. You have been at the same grind making the same comments during close losses.

What is this type of a game? You love Flood. In year 4 of Flood, he was blown out by bad teams weekly. The team actually improved massively when he was suspended lol. Were you just giving it a few months? One loss was to Wisconsin 42-10 lol!

The only time you have no comment is a win.

I’ve commented plenty after the wins. Our best win was Virginia Tech and I was extremely happy after that.
 
No clue about the history so apologies for posting something from a so-called bad guy…..
Not so-called, he's a fvcking prick and no I wasn't the one he outed. Could careless what he says.
 
September was a tough month. They're letting it all out now because less of a chance to whine next week.
With the current set of injuries to our best players, while there’s less chance of a loss next week, maybe, there’s also much less chance of a win. We lack quality depth in most position groups, and after Brown’s injury today, the depth in the RB room, probably the deepest position group, is now in question as well.

Anybody who looks at the list of injured players and hasn’t adjusted expectations for the season is struggling with acknowledging reality.

Even if we get half the injured players back by next game, they won’t likely be 100% right away. The second bye week will help, but maybe not enough. And we should expect more injuries ‘cause, well, this is football. At this point, making a bowl game will be tough, IMO. Nobody, including UCLA, can be considered a likely win.

On the plus side, a lot of backup players are getting lots of experience which will help next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IL Lusciato
With the current set of injuries to our best players, while there’s less chance of a loss next week, maybe, there’s also much less chance of a win. We lack quality depth in most position groups, and after Brown’s injury today, the depth in the RB room, probably the deepest position group, is now in question as well.

Anybody who looks at the list of injured players and hasn’t adjusted expectations for the season is struggling with acknowledging reality.

Even if we get half the injured players back by next game, they won’t likely be 100% right away. The second bye week will help, but maybe not enough. And we should expect more injuries ‘cause, well, this is football. At this point, making a bowl game will be tough, IMO. Nobody, including UCLA, can be considered a likely win.

On the plus side, a lot of backup players are getting lots of experience which will help next season.

Greg said going into the season we finally have the depth to make a real difference. I guess not..
 
Seriously. That's the bar for a schedule set up for 8+ wins and all the players coming back? Wow. So he just has to go 4-6 vs. fbs teams not named Ohio State, Mich, Penn State, Iowa, Oregon.
Maybe it’s just semantics, but IMO, the schedule was never set up for 8+ wins. That was always an unrealistic expectation where people were counting as wins games against opponents we’ve struggled against (like Nebraska and Wisconsin).

Was it reasonably possible? Yes. Was there any logical reason to expect it to happen? No. We were never so good as to make any Big Ten game a should-win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru1869
Let's see how he handles this adversity. But, at a minimum, light a fire under the ass of the OC... that O ridiculous.

Is it time to give the ball to Sheppard? See what he can do?
 
The hype was waaaay of the hook for RU ball this year.
Of course with seniors coming back some expectations were legit.
With new WRs coming on their were legit expectations.
However the QB was hyped as a big transfer when he wasn't.
RU passing was 127th last year and Minn was 126th.
RU wont be improving on that.

I of course saw that coming - and not to put all blame on AK.
GS and KC on offense are like throwing a bag of bricks to a drowning man.
Minn has same hitchy legacy
B1G teams are racing in muscle cars and RU offense is a Pinto
My sister had a Pinto. It was cute.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gchicago
LOL. By this standard, g5 programs are the real winners. They look good playing no one!

We blew out 2 cupcakes and beat two really good teams and lost by one score in a controversial way in another. It's just juvenile.
Not sure what game you were watching but we were manhandled on both lines today as well as last week. He’s in year 5 and he can’t recruit and develop lines on either side of the ball? Today, their ability to run the ball opened up everything in the playbook. They stacked the box and we couldn’t run, then when we tried to pass we couldn’t pass protect.

This is frankly embarrassing. Yeah we took care of the patsies, but against real lines we’ve been completely outplayed.
 
Maybe it’s just semantics, but IMO, the schedule was never set up for 8+ wins. That was always an unrealistic expectation where people were counting as wins games against opponents we’ve struggled against (like Nebraska and Wisconsin).

Was it reasonably possible? Yes. Was there any logical reason to expect it to happen? No. We were never so good as to make any Big Ten game a should-win.
So called experts we're even talking about outside playoff Cinderella..which I NEVER bought into. But winning 6 last year and having your whole team back with a perceived QB improvement and removing 3 guaranteed losses OSU, mich,PSU.. ..that's gotta feel like 7-8 realistic.

8 felt right to me not the + part. We're going nowhere if in year 5 we can't start beating 1 or 2 if these teams.
 
Not sure what game you were watching but we were manhandled on both lines today as well as last week. He’s in year 5 and he can’t recruit and develop lines on both sides of the ball. Today, their ability to run the ball opened up everything in the playbook. They stacked the box and we couldn’t run, then when we tried to pass we couldn’t pass protect.

This is frankly embarrassing. Yeah we took care of the patsies, but against real lines we’ve been completely outplayed.
That is true and is also the primary reason our skill players are struggling. Although receivers dropping passes is very problematic and has nothing, or at least very little, to do with OL play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BossNJ
Maybe it’s just semantics, but IMO, the schedule was never set up for 8+ wins. That was always an unrealistic expectation where people were counting as wins games against opponents we’ve struggled against (like Nebraska and Wisconsin).

Was it reasonably possible? Yes. Was there any logical reason to expect it to happen? No. We were never so good as to make any Big Ten game a should-win.

If this year's schedule without PSU/UM/OSU, UW replacing their entire team, Nebraska with a heralded but still true freshman QB, Wisconsin at home - wasn't set up for 8+ wins then will we ever have a schedule where we should expect 8+ wins?
Returning Big Ten leading rusher and many seniors who opted not to enter the draft.

Is it just a lost cause to consider that we should expect an 8+ win season ever?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT