"the same complainers now were the same complainers back in early Greg Schiano...those folks wanted a B1Gtime coach"
Doubt it. I'm sure many people (like me) that want to see another coach were excited about the Schiano hire -- a young guy from Jersey coming off a good coordinator resume at Miami. Flood did not have a strong resume, Schiano did with his defensive work at Miami. The idea that people are just always going to complain about the coach or want someone better is wrong. Flood basically got the job by default. That bothers a lot of people.
"Schiano would likely cost in the range of $3 mil per year for his salary alone. Not sure how you classify that as "cheap" for 6-7 wins."
Do people ever stop and think that there are far more things of value than just getting an extra 2-3 wins a year. Schiano installed an identity for the program. He got people excited about the program and the university. Think back to the 90s, how many cars had R stickers on them? How many students chose to wear Rutgers gear as opposed to gear from places like Penn State or Syracuse? I'd say he helped double attendance as well. Between the merchandise, extra revenue from the games, and bowl games -- his value marketing wise was well worth his salary and facility improvements imo.
Best argument for keeping Flood
The BEST ARGUMENT I've heard for giving Flood another year is the idea that he's earned a down year after the success of last year. Regardless of the blowout losses, last year was a successful start to Big Ten football for RU. Few people nationally predicted 8 wins and a bowl game for Rutgers. I can buy the idea that he deserves another year because of that.
Worst argument for keeping Flood
Don't say he deserves to come back because the team is young, inexperienced, or he's using a new QB. This is college football, that stuff happens to everyone, every year. If other programs used that logic, coaches would never get replaced.