Do you really think seeding is always correct ? NCAA controls the Nit now so the same computer models are making Nebraska Number 5 just like the same models left them out of the NCAA over Oklahoma and Arizona State. Your great computer arguments are hypocritical when a team like Oklahoma State beat Oklahoma twice, Kansas twice home and away and Texas Tech and others. There was absolutely no justification for taking Oklahoma over State , none. You think the Big 10 was down, then what do you think the PAC 12 was? Arizona State had a losing conference record in the worst PAC 12 season historically but still made the tourney because of November. Do you really think Arizona State would beat Xavier or Kansas over the last 10 games of the year? Let me answer. No chance. Computers are not everything, they are one tool to use, then you have humans on the committee that are supposed to take an overall look at the teams and use their basketball sense, which they clearly failed miserably .I'm not poking holes in anything. If Nebraska was such a slam dunk NCAA tourney team, how come they were a 5 seed in the NIT? Why didn't anybody that is paid to pay attention think so? Why did the computers hate them so much? I'm giving realistic explanations for WHY they were not in the tourney.
The goalposts have never moved. It's always about who you beat and where. Nebraska finished the season with 1 win over a tourney team and it was at home. A near total lack of quality wins imploded their chances. Everyone sees 13-5 Big Ten, but nobody sees they played almost the easiest schedule possible in a very down year for the Big Ten.