ADVERTISEMENT

Big Man

Your statement was that GG is a better shooter than Ace. GG shot .320 overall and .282 from 3. I guess you dont think Ace can beat that.
My statement was, as a recruit GG was projected to be a better outside shooter. So, there’s no basis today to proclaim Ace will be a better shooter.

Shooting isn’t why Ace is the 2 or 3 national recruit.
 
My statement was, as a recruit GG was projected to be a better outside shooter. So, there’s no basis today to proclaim Ace will be a better shooter.

Shooting isn’t why Ace is the 2 or 3 national recruit.
Actually that is a very big part of why he is rated so highly. He averaged 33.4 points his senior year, including a ton of made 3s.
 
Actually that is a very big part of why he is rated so highly. He averaged 33.4 points his senior year, including a ton of made 3s.
Projected to be a better perimeter shooter than GG, yes or no ? You know the answer to that.

Of course projected to be better all-around player, but that's not what I am refuting.

I believe he's going to have the same problem GG did, which is getting good looks in a ball dominant guard-centric offense.
 
Projected to be a better perimeter shooter than GG, yes or no ? You know the answer to that.

Of course projected to be better all-around player, but that's not what I am refuting.

I believe he's going to have the same problem GG did, which is getting good looks in a ball dominant guard-centric offense.
Unlike GG, he can score at will at all three levels. You can’t overplay him on the perimeter, otherwise he will blow by the defender. Will get easier long range shots as a result and will shoot appreciably better than GG.
 
Unlike GG, he can score at will at all three levels. You can’t overplay him on the perimeter, otherwise he will blow by the defender. Will get easier long range shots as a result and will shoot appreciably better than GG.
Ha ha. Score at will at three levels. Not happening. College isn't high school.

You didn't answer. Yes or No ? Not who's a better prospect.
 
Unlike GG, he can score at will at all three levels. You can’t overplay him on the perimeter, otherwise he will blow by the defender. Will get easier long range shots as a result and will shoot appreciably better than GG.

Nothing to do with Ace or this discussion at all.

But I can't see "three level scorer" without laughing and thinking about someone calling Reiber a "three level scorer" and mocking me for doubting it.
 
Ha ha. Score at will at three levels. Not happening. College isn't high school.

You didn't answer. Yes or No ? Not who's a better prospect.
Ace, hands down. Look at the season Jayson Tatum had at Duke his one year in college. Expect something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
Nothing to do with Ace or this discussion at all.

But I can't see "three level scorer" without laughing and thinking about someone calling Reiber a "three level scorer" and mocking me for doubting it.
poster probably meant "3 ppg scorer". Reiber was softer than a stick of butter on a Havana sidewalk in August.
 
Projected to be a better perimeter shooter than GG, yes or no ? You know the answer to that.

Of course projected to be better all-around player, but that's not what I am refuting.

I believe he's going to have the same problem GG did, which is getting good looks in a ball dominant guard-centric offense.
LOL..hard time getting open looks in a guard centric offense. You just continue to spew crap out of your rear. Give it up already. You're awful at trolling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DRC79 and TRU2RU
My statement was, as a recruit GG was projected to be a better outside shooter. So, there’s no basis today to proclaim Ace will be a better shooter.

Shooting isn’t why Ace is the 2 or 3 national recruit.

Um, here's what you actually said in this thread.....

If Martini starts, and is the only outside shooter, that makes him the 3. There needs to be at least 1 3pt shooter in the starting lineup.

then for spacing reasons, this means Ace mostly runs the baseline back and forth like was GG’s fate. Maybe DH and JWill can find him, or maybe he gets lost and misused. And despite GG’s shortcomings he’s still a better shooter than Ace.
 
Projected to be a better perimeter shooter than GG, yes or no ? You know the answer to that.

Of course projected to be better all-around player, but that's not what I am refuting.

I believe he's going to have the same problem GG did, which is getting good looks in a ball dominant guard-centric offense.

You can’t compare players this way. Gavin’s scouting report said he’d be a lights out shooter and that’s entirely what his ranking was based on. He wasn’t supposed to be elite at most other things and it turned out he was further behind in D and some other areas of the game than projected to start. When his shots didn’t fall early - it was hard to keep him on the court, because he wasn’t bringing other things of value to the table. When he got his opportunities, he panicked and forced shots to try to live up to the hype in the area he was supposed to excel.

In Ace’s case - we’re talking about a completely different trajectory. He’s projected to excel in many areas. Perimeter shooting isn’t specifically called out as a major strength but he’s also not bad at it. There’s no reason more to assume he will shoot like GG did last year than to assume he’ll shoot like Geo did as a frosh from 3, or anyone else really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-
It should be noted, Acuffs best shooting seasons were when he was off ball more. I still think with Pike offenses guys that are just offball scorers aren’t very effective.

We added Marini btw, the definition of an off-ball shooter. Also Pikes offense, for better or for worse, has always been about guys making plays, not running it through someone then getting it to off ball guys, he operates best with guys who can do something themselves. Acuff had his best shooting days as an offball guy so he can do that even if he can handle the ball. Seems like we may add PJ Hayes who can shoot it too. I think we will be fine.
Don’t disagree but that’s not a power 5 offense and why Pike needs an offensive minded assistant. “He operates best with guys who can do something themselves.”
Hoping a guy can win one on one off the bounce is not an offensive strategy.
 
JWill, Dylan, Ace, Martini, Center

That would be interesting and certainly help with surrounding Ace/Dylan with shooting that will make defenses hesitate to double team them.
Agreed! Having Ace and Dylan running pick and roll will be interesting and effective as well. Their ability to get to the rim and speed will be a problem.

JWill needs to be moved to the bench and run the second team offense. He does not compliment Dylan and Ace and is a liability on offense for them. Any team wanting to stop Dylan and Ace doubles off JWill and leaves him open on the perimeter.(not a threat). Forcing Dylan and Ace to play 2 on 3.

if Dylan and Ace are as advertised. We will face a lot of zone defenses limiting drives and forcing us to shoot from the perimeter. Once again, limiting Jwilll effectiveness playing alongside Dylan and Ace. We need a shooter!! I understand Martini is supposed to be that guy but he is limited defensively and we know how Pike quickly will pull defensible liabilities.
 
Griffiths was recruited as a Shot Maker "from 30 feet in" and athlete. Ace has been recruited almost universally based on his explosiveness and upside. What you are essentially doing is picking at the edges to cast negative doubt by making a comparison that doesn't even make sense. If you want a better comparison, here's what you are essentially looking at in terms of #2 vs. #42 over the past 5 years:

2019 - #2 Recruit was Anthony Edwards (#42 was Anton Watson)
2020 - #2 Recruit was Jalen Green (#42 was Mady Sissoko)
2021 - #2 Recruit was Paulo Banchero (#42 was Josh Minnot)
2022 - #2 Darriq Whitehead (#42 Terrance Arceneaux)
2023 - #2 Justin Edwards (#42 - Gavin Griffiths)
It's an interesting list for #2. Green went G-league so hard to compare him to others. Banchero would be, by far, my choice for best year of college. Edwards shot a lot and hit at 40% over all and 29% from three, his shooting stats actually reminded me of Griffiths, except Edwards shot even more and better at the rim. Whitehead and Edwards were used more in typical freshman roles and averaged 8 a game on decent efficiency.

Those #42 performances show just how oversized expectations were for Griffiths
 
did you watch GG tape in hs ? or Jaden Jones ? were they talented shooters in hs ?

Ace will not be a solid perimeter shooter in college. he'll run the baseline end to end like GG was forced to, allowing the guards room to drive and/or pick and roll with our 5 TBD, and also stay clear of Martini or Acuff to spot up for threes.

Ace will hopefully be much more effective driving to the basket than GG. That's where he will hopefully shine.
Season 3 What GIF by The Lonely Island
 
Don’t disagree but that’s not a power 5 offense and why Pike needs an offensive minded assistant. “He operates best with guys who can do something themselves.”
Hoping a guy can win one on one off the bounce is not an offensive strategy.
correction' it's not any viable college offense, let alone P5. it's 'beat your man' and hope for the best. not much cohesion.
 
GG was rated the 177th recruit. Ace is #2 (or #1).

I assume you're being intentionally obstinate, but you might want to pick a different argument as to why Rutgers will stink next year. Because right now, you're comparing apples to oranges.

P.S. Ace does EVERYTHING well. Rebound, pass, plays defense, scores inside and outside. That's how and why he's #2 ... duh.

EDIT: I see GG was actually 23rd (surprising enough) ... 177th as a transfer portal. Still think it's an orange vs apples comparison.
If he were eligible, Ace would be the #1 pick in the NBA draft this year, as a 17yr old.

You can be sure he’s got mad talent and won’t be an another GG.
 
It's an interesting list for #2. Green went G-league so hard to compare him to others. Banchero would be, by far, my choice for best year of college. Edwards shot a lot and hit at 40% over all and 29% from three, his shooting stats actually reminded me of Griffiths, except Edwards shot even more and better at the rim. Whitehead and Edwards were used more in typical freshman roles and averaged 8 a game on decent efficiency.

Those #42 performances show just how oversized expectations were for Griffiths

True. I would expect Anthony Edwards college shooting percentages to be worst case for Ace. However Edwards usage was high at 33mpg and he did not have the luxury of having a Dylan Harper on the floor with him to draw attention and create open looks.
 
True. I would expect Anthony Edwards college shooting percentages to be worst case for Ace. However Edwards usage was high at 33mpg and he did not have the luxury of having a Dylan Harper on the floor with him to draw attention and create open looks.
True, that Georgia team, while having three or four other top 100 freshman and a couple other top 100 players didn't exactly have another alpha. Think they're best three point shooter was around 35%, so no one to spread the floor for him either.
 
It's an interesting list for #2. Green went G-league so hard to compare him to others. Banchero would be, by far, my choice for best year of college. Edwards shot a lot and hit at 40% over all and 29% from three, his shooting stats actually reminded me of Griffiths, except Edwards shot even more and better at the rim. Whitehead and Edwards were used more in typical freshman roles and averaged 8 a game on decent efficiency.

Those #42 performances show just how oversized expectations were for Griffiths
Dariq Whitehead, broke his foot in preseason and had surgery, missed the first several games, came back and played on one leg, and had a second surgery after the season, so I would not list his college stats as typical of a #2 rated recruit.
 
Ace is in a different stratosphere than Gavin. Athletically in a different world. Played against much better competition in HS. Is a true alpha

There is really no point comparing the 2
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT