Huh? There's no political bias in saying the CDC and USA have badly bungled testing. CDC used to be the ones who came up with tests for the world given their scientific prowess, but they dropped the ball completely here. And when they did, even in early Feb when they were having major issues with their tests, they could've simply adopted the German or SK tests, but did not for reasons we'll likely never know. All that needed to change was making a simple decision to value testing over having an in-house test, so no, the government didn't do anywhere near everything they could to fix the problem.Yeah, you know, look. It's pretty clear you have a political bias. That's OK, most of us do and I celebrate the fact that we can all express our thoughts without fear of negative repercussions, unlike Dr. Li in China. However, you know damn well, having spent your career in the business, that it's not the government's job in this country to develop the testing methods or distribute the tests and so forth. We rely on private industry to do that. In that regard, the government has done everything they can to expedite the process. At the end of the day, would you rather have the inefficient process we have or politicians making political decisions, like they did in China, jailing Dr Li and many others?
That has nothing to do with private industry in any way. Massive failure. And, IMO, just like in sports, when the star player (CDC) screws up, the manager (HHS Secy) and Owner (POTUS) also share responsibility for not stepping in and getting the problem fixed. That's not political bias - it's management 101. And for the record, I've been very complimentary of the Administration's early position to ban travel from China, which gave us probably a month or more "cushion" in the virus establishing a toehold in the US and that's not what a partisan would do. I also have no clue what your point is on China and Dr. Li - we can respect people and have good decision-making at the same time.