Looked at the remaining schedule. Listed hardest to easiest (based on games remaining against over .500 teams)
1) PHI: 25 of 38
2) NYM: 24 of 38
3) CHI: 23 of 38
4) STL: 23 of 40
5) MIL: 18 of 38
Looked at the remaining schedule. Listed hardest to easiest (based on games remaining against over .500 teams)
1) PHI: 25 of 38
2) NYM: 24 of 38
3) CHI: 23 of 38
4) STL: 23 of 40
5) MIL: 18 of 38
He is swinging at hittible pitches out of the strike zone but not swinging at pitches in his eyes or in the dirt.The only meaningful stat I've seen on this is the lack of increase in walks, in fact the drop in walks in August. And it's clear that Rosario is hot. With that, I'm not sure I see the basis of concluding that he "seems to be" more selective. His better hitting can be explained by his being hot, shortening his swing, or something else. Increased selectivity will, however, result in increased walks, even if not a massive increase. We haven't seen that. In fact, the opposite. But we can all agree he's hitting the snot out of the ball and has been for a few weeks.
No Nationals?
Why, there bullpen is terrible and can go further south at any point.I have the Nats penned in for 1 of the 2 spots
Looked at the remaining schedule. Listed hardest to easiest (based on games remaining against over .500 teams)
1) WAS: 27 of 39 (+1.5)
2) PHI: 25 of 38 (-2)
3) NYM: 24 of 38 (-2)
4) CHI: 23 of 38 (-0)
5) STL: 23 of 40 (-0)
6) MIL: 18 of 38 (-2)
Glad you did as they easily have the toughest schedule by your calculations.Added WAS. Almost stopped when I saw they play the next 4 against PIT, but I continued.
Glad you did as they easily have the toughest schedule by your calculations.
He's batting .384 with a .408 obp in august, if this is not being selective, then I'm down with Rosario throwing selectiveness out the window.The only meaningful stat I've seen on this is the lack of increase in walks, in fact the drop in walks in August. And it's clear that Rosario is hot. With that, I'm not sure I see the basis of concluding that he "seems to be" more selective. His better hitting can be explained by his being hot, shortening his swing, or something else. Increased selectivity will, however, result in increased walks, even if not a massive increase. We haven't seen that. In fact, the opposite. But we can all agree he's hitting the snot out of the ball and has been for a few weeks.
You are setting the bar way too high. I mean 16-8 is a .667 win %, there is not a team in baseball with that high of a %. 20-5 is just an absolutely blistering pace.I would say the Mets will be in good shape if they go 16-8 in the next 24 games.
*(I broke this down in simple math in saying they must win 2 of 3 games in each of their next 8, 3 game series)
*(Also went conservative with 16-8 since most of you still think the Mets can easily coast into a WC spot while the NL Central cannibalize each other. Remember... THIS IS STILL THE METS and IMO, they must squeeze everyone's neck with their foot (starting rotation) and go at least 20-5 to put all doubt to rest.)
Hopefully all the home games will be the difference this year.
He's batting .384 with a .408 obp in august, if this is not being selective, then I'm down with Rosario throwing selectiveness out the window.
I think we all agree that Rosario is never going to walk 80-100 times and won’t continue hitting in the high .300’sget back to me on that when he’s not white hot
Not many players will have those high walk totals anymore. Its all about launch angles and BaBiff (or whatever thats called). McNeil proved that he wasnt a fluke from last year. Heres hoping Rosario does this for the next 5-10 years.I think we all agree that Rosario is never going to walk 80-100 times and won’t continue hitting in the high .300’s
But you are making the statement that a good eye or selective= walks
Maybe the best eye on the club and selective, is McNeil...in 400 ABs, he has 28 walks. Just saying
I think I hear the Met announcers say that he has something like the highest % of making contact on pitches in the strike zone or something like that.If there is one thing that Jeff McNeil is not its selective. He swings at the first pitch just as often as not. He also seems to have a knock for hitting or fouling away "pitcher's pitches that a lot of guys flail at helplessly.
BaBiff? Do you mean BABIP? (Batting Average on Balls In Play?)Not many players will have those high walk totals anymore. Its all about launch angles and BaBiff (or whatever thats called). McNeil proved that he wasnt a fluke from last year. Heres hoping Rosario does this for the next 5-10 years.
If only everyone in the Mets lineup takes this approach instead of swining at that slider away in the dirt with 2 strikes.I think I hear the Met announcers say that he has something like the highest % of making contact on pitches in the strike zone or something like that.
What it really is, is seeing the ball and knowing what you can drive, what you can hit with some degree of control and what you feel you can at least make contact with to keep an AB alive. And staying away from the pitch that you have no chance for. Discipline
And yes, all of this will usually lead to more walks, so I am not going to say it isn't. And maybe it does lead to more walks for Rosario. Or maybe it just continues to mean he makes better contact on pitches in or near the strike zone and stays away from swinging at pitches he has no chance of making contact with.
In bot McNeil and Rosario's case, having Alonso/Conforto/Davis and Ramos hot, also helps both get better pitches to hit and less walks. If you have 2 or 3 balls on either guy, regardless of the number of strikes, you are more likely going to try to get your pitch in as a strike rather than trying to get them to swing at a pitch in the dirt.
YA GOTTA BELIEVE if they win 2/3 vs the Indians, the Mets are legit playoff contenders!!!!!!Bravos appear to be all in on this year. Meanwhile in Gotham we get the Tribe with their new look lineup. Lagares playing like a young Willie Mays. :cool2: Ya Gotta Believe!
A fire hydrant would be an upgrade over AASo Billy Hamilton is released and picked up by Braves. I do not know his contract but he would be an upgrade over AA.
2 of 3 against the Indians would be huge. 5/4 or 6/3 is almost a must in this next brutal 9 games. Bless the fact we play at home!YA GOTTA BELIEVE if they win 2/3 vs the Indians, the Mets are legit playoff contenders!!!!!!
#LFGM
I saw a postgame stat that, I believe, showed that recently he is swinging and missing less , particularly on curveballs and maybe on fastballs. Whatever it was precisely, I read it to suggest that he's, you know, swinging and missing less. He's hitting more pitches, missing less. He's hot. A breakdown on whether he's swinging at pitches out of the strike zone less, however, would be much more indicative of actual selectivity. Now, if you'd like, you can make the inferential leap that he's missing less because he's swinging at better pitches to hit. But not necessarily. There are stats that can show that, and I haven't seen them yet. I have seen, however, 2 walks in August.I think I hear the Met announcers say that he has something like the highest % of making contact on pitches in the strike zone or something like that. . . . .
My gut tells me that if he were hitting 7th, he would walk more or be making more outs. Now that he is been moved up, he is protected and pitchers are more afraid to throw in the dirt or out of the strike zone as they do not want to walk him with Alonso, Conforto, Davis coming up behind him. Early in the year, it seemed they always went into the dirt and way out of the strike zone in an effort to get him to swing at them. If they would have lost him to a walk, not as dangerous.I saw a postgame stat that, I believe, showed that recently he is swinging and missing less , particularly on curveballs and maybe on fastballs. Whatever it was precisely, I read it to suggest that he's, you know, swinging and missing less. He's hitting more pitches, missing less. He's hot. A breakdown on whether he's swinging at pitches out of the strike zone less, however, would be much more indicative of actual selectivity. Now, if you'd like, you can make the inferential leap that he's missing less because he's swinging at better pitches to hit. But not necessarily. There are stats that can show that, and I haven't seen them yet. I have seen, however, 2 walks in August.
. . .
But you are making the statement that a good eye or selective= walks
Maybe the best eye on the club and selective, is McNeil...in 400 ABs, he has 28 walks. Just saying
My gut tells me that if he were hitting 7th, he would walk more or be making more outs. Now that he is been moved up . . . .
The Mets are going to have to start winning games against good teams. Almost their entire streak was based on bad teams. It's good that they ripped through those teams. But they won't get a wild card if from here on out they don't win more than lose--as you say, at home--against good teams. And a lot of the games are home, more than any other team battling for the NL wild card. So the schedule is set up for them.2 of 3 against the Indians would be huge. 5/4 or 6/3 is almost a must in this next brutal 9 games. Bless the fact we play at home! . . .
I don't think it's just a matter of approach. It's also a matter of skill sets. McNeil has a great ability to get the bat on the ball. Admittedly, He is smart about cutting down his swing with 2 strikes and looking to punch it anywhere, which is approach. But even that isn't as easy as it looks. I'd bet that Nimmo, selective or not, just doesn't have the talent to put the bat on the ball that McNeil has. Few do. Now, I wish McNeil was also more selective. But maybe that's a skill too, some sort of mental skill that allows you to better recognize the strike zone and not swing even though you're confident that you can make some kind of contact. If I recall correctly, there was a portion of that Moneyball book in which teams--maybe just the As at the time--tried to teach selectivity throughout their system, but that it wasn't highly successful.I don't think it's surprising that an aggressive hitter like McNeil would have both low walks and low strikeouts. If you swing early in the count and put the ball in play, that's what happens.
A guy like Nimmo is on the other extreme. Deep counts, high walks, high strikeouts.
The Mets are going to have to start winning games against good teams. Almost their entire streak was based on bad teams. It's good that they ripped through those teams. But they won't get a wild card if from here on out they don't win more than lose--as you say, at home--against good teams. And a lot of the games are home, more than any other team battling for the NL wild card. So the schedule is set up for them.
Depending on how Nimmo and Lowrie react to their long time off, and if they show themselves to be truly healthy and produce as they have in the past, it makes the Mets better, not completely different. They would be good additions at a crucial time.Nimmo, Lowrey, McNeil, Davis all healthy makes this a completely different team...just need to hold our own and hopefully even gain some ground before they all are
Agree but there are also the intangibles they bring too. Nimmo, is just a positive force...Lowrey, is just a "professional" baseball player. Even if their bats are a little slow, they can't be worse then we have but they are the type of players that winning teams usually have on them.Depending on how Nimmo and Lowrie react to their long time off, and if they show themselves to be truly healthy and produce as they have in the past, it makes the Mets better, not completely different. They would be good additions at a crucial time.
Nimmo, Lowrey, McNeil, Davis all healthy makes this a completely different team...just need to hold our own and hopefully even gain some ground before they all are