Obviously, you haven't seen the S Class Maybach trim levels.
I was referring to the Maybach. They do not make the most high end car you can buy. It is nice that you love them but lets not go crazy.
Obviously, you haven't seen the S Class Maybach trim levels.
I actually hate them. But to say they're only as high end as the base level Rolls or Bentley is false, period. I've checked them all out closely.
You're thinking of Pittsburgh a few decades ago. They've been one of the few rust belt cities that have adapted, mostly due to solid tax policy and incentives.respectfully, you think a place like Pittsburgh is going to have a lot of foreign cars on the road?
obviously my last part was tongue in cheek however, if you dont' think overselling and discounting lower end models of 'elite' brands doesn't devalue the product then you are smoking what you are fermenting :). MB and BMW are not considered high end luxury anywhere near what they were 20, 30, 40+ years ago and that is because everyone seemingly owns one. You can get into a 3 series for 300, a 5 series for low 500s. That's not out of reach for dental assistants much less middle income families in most epicenters of the country.The whole conversation about "devaluing the brand" is stupid. Every high-production manufacturer has entry-level cars and halo cars. A CLA 250 doesn't "devalue" Mercedes and it doesn't discourage the few people who have the coin for an S 550. The A3 doesn't discourage people who are thinking about an R8 anymore than a Sonic discourages would-be 'Vette customers.
And you don't "see more beamers and mb's on the road than chevies". Again - please do math before you position yourself into the conversation.
I agree with thisYes, the highest end MB can complete with the "entry level" Bentley and Rolls, but those companies start at that point and go up from there. That is apples and oranges. You shouldn't even go there. That is the world where the Acura NSX which starts at $167,000 is consider a good "bargain", since it is so much cheaper than other supercars.
A middle class person can afford a MB or BMW, few people can afford Bentley,Lambo, Aston Martin, etc. Those are the cars of the ultra rich. Comparing the two is like comparing Red lobster to a michelin star seafood restaurant. Sure they both sell lobsters but it is not really the same thing.:sunglasses:
It also has nothing to do with any car that anyone here could ever afford in their lifetimes or Rutgers Stadium would be named after them :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
Audi give you leather. Standard.
Sunroof. Standard.
I disagree that they now offer models without AWD. An A3 with FWD and a 1.8 engine is a leathered-up Volkswagen.
Lexus, Acura, and BMW give those things standard. The only thing extra you pay for is navigation, etc. MB does not. They are really bare bones because MB is Ultra Luxury or something.
I guess you haven't seen that nearly all BMWs come with Sensatec? AKA not leather.Lexus, Acura, and BMW give those things standard. The only thing extra you pay for is navigation, etc. MB does not. They are really bare bones because MB is Ultra Luxury or something.
But for Lexus it is just a really nice Prius for Acura they give you a dolled up Civic... I mean... its pretty silly.
Unless someone can get a great deal and get those for the almost same price, why bother?
IMHO, if you are going to upgrade you should really upgrade, you should get the models that do not have a standard brand (VW for Audi) counterparts. Not everyone agrees with me. Some people just love that logo too much to say no.
I guess you haven't seen that nearly all BMWs come with Sensatec? AKA not leather.
Not sure where you are looking. Sensatec is the standard interior for x1. It is a "leatherette". If you go to Build your own, you will see that the sensatec is checked. Leather comes as part of other packages. I was test driving 428I with stickers in excess of 50K and they came with Sensatec. Very big turn off.You might be right, as I don't have one, I went to their website and "leather" was listed as the default. I went to the cheapest model which is a X1.
obviously my last part was tongue in cheek however, if you dont' think overselling and discounting lower end models of 'elite' brands doesn't devalue the product then you are smoking what you are fermenting :). MB and BMW are not considered high end luxury anywhere near what they were 20, 30, 40+ years ago and that is because everyone seemingly owns one. You can get into a 3 series for 300, a 5 series for low 500s. That's not out of reach for dental assistants much less middle income families in most epicenters of the country.
I wouldn't want anyone to be discouraged from buying what they like but the discussion was regarding elite brands as it relates to devaluation from increased discounting and over selling of a product.
I think Audi and Acura are the only two luxury or near-luxury brands to still offer real leather as a standard feature. When checking out the A4/IS300/Q50/328xi/TLX range, only the Acura and Audi didn't come with standard pleather.
And Audi has conquered the "black leather" issue. Some (not all) dealers will offer it as a selling point. They've done something to make the leather not get hot to the touch. I mean at all. Not even a little bit. I have no idea what manner of witchcraft is involved in this feat but it's truly amazing.
Maybe it's just me, but it really chaps my ass that I could be spending upwards of $50k on a car and it would have (admittedly improved) vinyl seats like my parents had in their circa 1983 econobox that cost $8k. And every salesman tries to sell it like "oh, if you didn't look it up, you wouldn't even know. plus, its so much easier to clean." motherf'er, i know what leather feels like and this sure as hell ain't it.
My 2014 A 6 loaded with 6 cylinder supercharged was $62,000 out the door when bought in 2013. I could of saved $15k on a MB or little less on a BMWAudi give you leather. Standard.
Sunroof. Standard.
I disagree that they now offer models without AWD. An A3 with FWD and a 1.8 engine is a leathered-up Volkswagen.
i'll go a little off topic.
i think one of GM failings, is it's marriage to the old school logos.
that yellow in the Chevy logo looks bad on anything other than a yellow car.
and the outline of Chevy's main logo outline isn't symetrical, which i don't like.
and i Caddy logo has a lot of red in it, and just looks old school bulky.
on further thought, i think it just looks a little too gaudy. (though their cars look great other than that).
GM needs to go sleeker with the logos, and lose all the color.
take the trim off, and you can't tell one manufacturer from another.
trim matters.
on the other side, i think Audi has far and away the coolest looking logo, and i think that elevates the look of their cars.
I agree that they do and fully appreciate why. I don't know anyone really that thinks of MB or BMW as luxury cars any longer. the BMW has become the 'me too' car imho. In reality, what used to be thought of as luxury is now standard in many brands and many lines, I'm not even sure 'luxury' is 'luxury' any longer. Hell, what does a Bentley offer that a decked out cls 550 or 7 series doesn't offer and I mean that realistically. Actually, I'm not sure the Bentley self parks?But all luxury companies offer a range of products, right down to "entry level luxury." So what luxury brands are so much more prestigious than "devalued" MB and BMW?
I agree that they do and fully appreciate why. I don't know anyone really that thinks of MB or BMW as luxury cars any longer. the BMW has become the 'me too' car imho. In reality, what used to be thought of as luxury is now standard in many brands and many lines, I'm not even sure 'luxury' is 'luxury' any longer. Hell, what does a Bentley offer that a decked out cls 550 or 7 series doesn't offer and I mean that realistically. Actually, I'm not sure the Bentley self parks?
anyway, you get my meaning :)
LOL i love rental car companies. Thats not in the same class as a rav4, Rav 4 equivalent would be the equinox from chevy not the trax. The Trax is tiny and help comply with the new CAFE standards the government decided to impose. Get ready to be like europe... we'll all be driving tiny vehicles by 2025.My wife and I rented a "small SUV" for a business road trip that she needed a lot of luggage for this week. Sample car on website was "Rav 4 or similar."
We got there and they gave us a Chevy Trax. It's smaller than my Prius. I'm not exaggerating. Crappiest car ever.
I agree that they do and fully appreciate why. I don't know anyone really that thinks of MB or BMW as luxury cars any longer. the BMW has become the 'me too' car imho. In reality, what used to be thought of as luxury is now standard in many brands and many lines, I'm not even sure 'luxury' is 'luxury' any longer. Hell, what does a Bentley offer that a decked out cls 550 or 7 series doesn't offer and I mean that realistically. Actually, I'm not sure the Bentley self parks?
anyway, you get my meaning :)
World record times on ice?
![]()
Interesting points and surely part of the reason the secondhand classic/vintage market is absolutely flourishing and so many classic and sports cars are great investments. More records just set in Monterey. Luxury, ultra-luxury and supercar brands are also pushing their customization/bespoke services and offering super limited editions.
Only so much you can really do to make a luxury car stand out - diamond headlamps for $3 million and rare whale penis leather make nice headlines, but don't think they make that many customers.
whale penis leather....for the win!!!!! lolololol well done
true story since we're on classic/vintage market. I had to go to the Marina last night as my port motor isn't getting fuel (a line went kaput from the tank, no biggie) and I had to meet the mechanic. Long story short, I pull in my classic car as I like to stretch her legs every now and then. I follow a convertible Bentley into the parking area. I get out and start walking and the guy comes up, oohs and ahhs, asks if I want to trade (joking of course, he'd owe me cash too::) . As we were walking on the docks he gives me his card as ask that I point him to some resources to pick one up.
Everyone loves a classic, I barely noticed his car...lol
Without some details around the definition of "classic" this post is kinda challenging.
I'm a huge car guy who hates old cars. By old cars, I mean 50s and earlier. Museum pieces are for museums.
I like 60s & 70s muscle cars, owned a couple in my youth and every once in awhile I'll consider tossing out the shekels for a showroom condition '70 Chevy SS or maybe a '78 Trans Am. Then I realize that they're no faster than my daily driver, they don't handle as well, the air conditioning is always fussy and the power windows often don't work.
They don't build 'em like they used to. Thank God.
if that is your thing then brag away:) I'd rather have an Eleanor or 63 split window
much truth to that for sure and agree that many daily drivers are as fast in the 0-60 area but on the highway, the horsepower & acceleration of some of these muscle cars is beyond impressive, even by today's standards.
I saw a real nice 78 Trans Am last night. The car was mint with only 13k on it.
if that is your thing then brag away:) I'd rather have an Eleanor or 63 split window