KSU and Utah would not have only played their way in, but either 1 or both could have gotten a bye too depending on the Clemson game outcome.This will be so much easier in a couple of years. Screw sitting home waving a resume. Win your conference & move on.
Agree. Bama is a no noAlabama should not be in then that is for sure. They lost to #7 and #14 (both 2 loss teams) while beating #20 and #24. Best guess from such limited data is they are a team that should be around #15-19. No evidence otherwise other than name on the uniform, etc. OSU only loss was to #2 so has a much better resume than the fighting sabans.
They could go to 4, I’m just saying I wouldn’t say that for sure.Agree. Bama is a no no
I think tcu goes to 4
Their conference is weak, not sure how their record compares to be honest. I think tcu gets lit up against mich, osu, GA,OSU should get in but people think for sure it’ll be at 3 passing over TCU and bumping TCU down to 4.
That could happen but it’s recency bias imo. If you look at the full resume for the season, TCU compares favorably to OSU and can stay at 3 imo.
Actually IIRC, the ESPN CFP show said TCU’s SOS was better than OSU’s and Alabama’s going into the champ games.Their conference is weak, not sure how their record compares to be honest. I think tcu gets lit up against mich, osu, GA,
Stop, just stop. You can cite all the stats u want but they are not transitive. Neither team played defense today, 2 solid hits all game and soft slow play. GA, osu, mich is lighting them up.Actually IIRC, the ESPN CFP show said TCU’s SOS was better than OSU’s and Alabama’s going into the champ games.
My mistake it was better SOS than UGA and Michigan. But it’s comparable to OSU just one spot behind. Found a tweet that gave the stats from the ESPN CFP show.Actually IIRC, the ESPN CFP show said TCU’s SOS was better than OSU’s and Alabama’s going into the champ games.
UGA yes. Michigan probably too. OSU, I wouldn’t say for sure. Texas can be a very tough hard hitting physical team and they were toe to toe with them in that game on physicality.Stop, just stop. You can cite all the stats u want but they are not transitive. Neither team played defense today, 2 solid hits all game and soft slow play. GA, osu, mich is lighting them up.
Rutgers hoops best Indiana, but only by 15.
FIRE PIKE!!
Have to agree on that. Didn't know he was injured. This actually probably sewed it up!Not if the voters watched the game and saw him gutting it out on a bad hammy.
No we want big teamsEveryone's rooting for Purdue, right?
We don't want another boring blue bloods in the CFP?
Plus we could end up with 2 teams from the same conference (UM, OSU) and e everyone hates that.
Hello no. Michigan and Ohio State would put 2 teams in the playoffs. Why do you want Michigan to lose??Everyone's rooting for Purdue, right?
We don't want another boring blue bloods in the CFP?
Plus we could end up with 2 teams from the same conference (UM, OSU) and e everyone hates that.
Hello no. Michigan and Ohio State would put 2 teams in the playoffs. Why do you want Michigan to lose??
Everyone's rooting for Purdue, right?
We don't want another boring blue bloods in the CFP?
Plus we could end up with 2 teams from the same conference (UM, OSU) and e everyone hates that.
So you hate the Big Ten??I thought everyone hated and didn't think it was fair for 2 conference teams (for example Georgia and Alabama last year) to be in the CFP?
ExactlyHello no. Michigan and Ohio State would put 2 teams in the playoffs. Why do you want Michigan to lose??
Right. We only want 2 boring blue bloods from the same conference if it's the SEC
So you hate the Big Ten??
You and knightshift are full on retarded and very shortsided in this view
He’s not saying it seriously, he’s being sarcastic. When it’s the SEC getting two in a lot of people say it’s biased or not right but if it’s the B10 it’s okay. That’s his point.You and knightshift are full on retarded and very shortsided in this view
Not only that but it looks like a Michigan OSU rematch in the first game…for the right to get crushed by GeorgiaHe’s not saying it seriously, he’s being sarcastic. When it’s the SEC getting two in a lot of people say it’s biased or not right but if it’s the B10 it’s okay. That’s his point.
I think the B10 will get two in regardless of the outcome of the B10 champ game.
I think there is some SEC bias and I do root against the SEC because I don’t want to see the same teams but if they have a resume’ worthy of it I live with it.What's shortsided?
I don't care about Georgia/Alabama last year and don't care about UM/OSU.
Make 3 teams from the same conference - if they are the best teams.
I would say "full on retarded" is crying and moaning about bias and unfair outcomes then completely changing the tune when it benefits the Big Ten or Rutgers.
Wonder if Cal regrets firing Tedford for one very bad season in 2012 after becoming their winningest coach. They went 7-6 the year before and made it to a bowl. There were other issues such as the lowest graduation rate in the PAC 12, but still:Tulane in close one with UCF. 31-28 Tulane.
Fresno up 28-16 on Boise in Boise 3 min left.
60yd TD reception with a bunch of YAC…Tulane back up 10…38-28
Another TD drive for Tulane after the turnover on downs. It’s over now. I think Tulane was like -3 in TOs too. Good job Willie Fritz. 11 win season and AAC title and NY6 bowl. 45-28 Tulane
2002 | California | 7–5 | 4–4 | T–4th | |||
2003 | California | 8–6 | 5–3 | T–3rd | W Insight | ||
2004 | California | 10–2 | 7–1 | 2nd | L Holiday | 9 | 9 |
2005 | California | 8–4 | 4–4 | T–4th | W Las Vegas | 25 | 25 |
2006 | California | 10–3 | 7–2 | T–1st | W Holiday | 14 | 14 |
2007 | California | 7–6 | 3–6 | T–7th | W Armed Forces | ||
2008 | California | 9–4 | 6–3 | 4th | W Emerald | 25 | |
2009 | California | 8–5 | 5–4 | T–5th | L Poinsettia | ||
2010 | California | 5–7 | 3–6 | 8th | |||
2011 | California | 7–6 | 4–5 | 4th (North) | L Holiday | ||
2012 | California | 3–9 | 2–7 | 5th (North) | |||
California: | 82–57 | 50–45 |
2017 | Fresno State | 10–4 | 7–1 | 1st (West) | W Hawaii | ||
2018 | Fresno State | 12–2 | 7–1 | 1st (West) | W Las Vegas | 18 | 18 |
2019 | Fresno State | 4–8 | 2–6 | T–4th (West) | |||
Fresno State Bulldogs (Mountain West Conference) (2022–present) | |||||||
2022 | Fresno State | 9–4 | 7–1 | 1st (West) | |||
Fresno State: | 35–18 | 23–9 |
That guy using the "r" word as an insult and "shortsided" in the same sentence:What's shortsided?
I don't care about Georgia/Alabama last year and don't care about UM/OSU.
Make 3 teams from the same conference - if they are the best teams.
I would say "full on retarded" is crying and moaning about bias and unfair outcomes then completely changing the tune when it benefits the Big Ten or Rutgers.
But maybe that's my integrity getting in the way?
IMO, these are the two scenarios.Not only that but it looks like a Michigan OSU rematch in the first game…for the right to get crushed by Georgia