For those interested in the ongoing saga of the UNC scandal, as you may recall, in August of last year UNC "self-reported" a few additional violations to the NCAA (minor affairs involving WBB and Soccer), just two days or so before UNC's official response to the NCAA's original Notice of Allegations was due. This "move" effectively reset the timeline for UNC's response, and bought UNC time which allowed the Men's BB team to make its expected run toward the ACC and then the National Championship. The NCAA, you see, was forced to rework its NOA, and then present UNC with an Amended Notice of Allegations (ANOA).
Almost worked. But the NCAA apparently did not appreciate being played, and effectively turned the table on UNC. This week the NCAA has apparently released its ANOA to UNC, adding a SIXTH Level One infraction: Academic Fraud. UNC is astonished, as a result, and is smarting.
As you may recall, UNC issued a response to their accreditation agency (SACS) following the NCAA's original NOA to UNC. In its response to SACS, UNC admitted to instances of Academic Fraud dating back to 1989, involving student-athletes in the Men's BB program under Dean Smith; 22 of the first 25 students participating in these well-documented "irregular" classes were Smith's players.
In any case, the original NOA identified 1993 as the beginning of UNC's cheating scandal, a date taken from the school's Wainstein Report, following the former FBI Special Agent's investigation into UNC's situation. In it's newly Amended NOA, the NCAA synced the start of the cheating to correspond with the SACS admission of 1989. And it adds "Academic Fraud" as the new Level One infraction, so say "sources."
This update it based solely on info from a few individuals who have in the past proven to be accurate, with connectivity to "inside" info. UNC thought they had both influence and "friends" in Indianapolis. Apparently, they had neither.
A heavily redacted ANOA is expected to be released by UNC, soon.
Almost worked. But the NCAA apparently did not appreciate being played, and effectively turned the table on UNC. This week the NCAA has apparently released its ANOA to UNC, adding a SIXTH Level One infraction: Academic Fraud. UNC is astonished, as a result, and is smarting.
As you may recall, UNC issued a response to their accreditation agency (SACS) following the NCAA's original NOA to UNC. In its response to SACS, UNC admitted to instances of Academic Fraud dating back to 1989, involving student-athletes in the Men's BB program under Dean Smith; 22 of the first 25 students participating in these well-documented "irregular" classes were Smith's players.
In any case, the original NOA identified 1993 as the beginning of UNC's cheating scandal, a date taken from the school's Wainstein Report, following the former FBI Special Agent's investigation into UNC's situation. In it's newly Amended NOA, the NCAA synced the start of the cheating to correspond with the SACS admission of 1989. And it adds "Academic Fraud" as the new Level One infraction, so say "sources."
This update it based solely on info from a few individuals who have in the past proven to be accurate, with connectivity to "inside" info. UNC thought they had both influence and "friends" in Indianapolis. Apparently, they had neither.
A heavily redacted ANOA is expected to be released by UNC, soon.