ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Yardley/Newtown PA Home Soon to Market

Nope, stay away. The reason I say this is COAH + people wanting the true suburban life with yards etc.

Why COAH? Alot of towns in NJ are far behind their mandated amount of affordable housing. Therefore theyre basically being forced to allow builders to come in as “interveners” and propose large multi-family housing developments on lands not zoned for it and the towns are obligated to approve if theyre behind. For example, my small hometown of Roseland was behind about 360 affordable housing units. It’s a town with a population of about 5,500 +/- . Obviously no builder will only build affordable so they often propose projects with 10% affordable units AND also apply for abatements and PILOT’s and the towns have no choice but to accept.

the above is an issue for towns/condo and townhome owners for a few reasons laid out below.

1) if you have a townhome/condo built in the 80’s/90’s or early 2000’s and you go to sell when 1,000 brand new ones just hit the market, good luck. Simple function of supply and demand

2) infrastructure: these towns werent built to support that many people. Schools arent big enough, not enough police, fire, teachers, but more important the sewer systems and water supply were not intended to handle that type of capacity.

the above is what trump acting like a caveman meant when he said “THEY WANT TO RUIN THE SUBURBS”. If you had a clue how to articulate it, the message wouldve come through as reasonable and rather than racist.

When you consider that every town in NJ has COAH obligations and that many of them are often part of single family communities as well...it doesn't really hold that much water.

Depending on the place condos/townhomes will accrue major value and I am seeing it right now all over NJ.
 
The thing with living in Florida or North Carolina is that you have to live in Florida or North Carolina.

Which likely does not mean rolling out of your apartment in a place like Hoboken or Jersey City, walking to everything in 10 minutes or less, and being surrounded by 20s-30s professionals looking for the same things you are. It's also giving up being across the river from NYC.

If you don't care about any of that, I'm sure it's great. But most people do, and thus why a 2BR in Hoboken is at least 600k.
 
So I watched the video and I have to ask why you did not offset the investment gain of putting down less money against the investment gain of investing the extra $600 a month?

I also have to mention as a conservative investor when I am told to expect 15% gain year over year I get leery. It all my well be true but I never go into any investment expecting that return consistently over time without thinking it comes with great risk. So before I would invest in that vehicle I would have to have other assets diversified among a number of other investments.
Not following the bolded, not sure what youre trying to say.

2) 15% is very conservative. If youre putting down 20% then even just 2% appreciation annually would be 10% (as it’s a leveraged return) and then when you take into consideration cash flow, if you cant obtain at least 5% cash on cash annually youve really f’d up.
 
In my lifetime there have been several Real Estate reversals/bubbles that have struck the home owner/investor.

Those able to ride it out and continue to pay their monthly mortgage and tax bill have usually been OK, or able to get out clear. Those looking to move, lost their primary income have been destroyed or lost money.

There is ONLY ONE RULE; Location, Location, Location.

I had a friend that loved to pick up income property near US Coast Guard Stations. He would advertise and go to the USCG places to get those renters. Why ? The Coast Guard would sent him the rent checks directly to him, so that he didn't have to deal with the actual Coasties. He ALWAYS got paid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking
In my lifetime there have been several Real Estate reversals/bubbles that have struck the home owner/investor.

Those able to ride it out and continue to pay their monthly mortgage and tax bill have usually been OK, or able to get out clear. Those looking to move, lost their primary income have been destroyed or lost money.

There is ONLY ONE RULE; Location, Location, Location.

I had a friend that loved to pick up income property near US Coast Guard Stations. He would advertise and go to the USCG places to get those renters. Why ? The Coast Guard would sent him the rent checks directly to him, so that he didn't have to deal with the actual Coasties. He ALWAYS got paid.
The risk is they move. As someone who invests in multi-family, the lending requirements are very stringent when you have a concentration of employment/tenants like that. Specifically military bases.

and regarding investment properties, my rule is always invest for cash flow, never bank on appreciation. Markets go up and down but when they go down capital appreciation/depreciation wise its irrelevant as long as cash flow can service debt and you have solid long-term debt on the property.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigWill
When you consider that every town in NJ has COAH obligations and that many of them are often part of single family communities as well...it doesn't really hold that much water.

Depending on the place condos/townhomes will accrue major value and I am seeing it right now all over NJ.
Show your stats. Condos and townhome values while going up, they havent come close to SFH. Do you have stats that show otherwise? I have stats from our MLS
 
The thing with living in Florida or North Carolina is that you have to live in Florida or North Carolina.

Which likely does not mean rolling out of your apartment in a place like Hoboken or Jersey City, walking to everything in 10 minutes or less, and being surrounded by 20s-30s professionals looking for the same things you are. It's also giving up being across the river from NYC.

If you don't care about any of that, I'm sure it's great. But most people do, and thus why a 2BR in Hoboken is at least 600k.
I dont think youve been to florida or the carolinas lol. Have you been to charlotte, raleigh, charleston, greenville? Have you been to miami, boca, delray, jupiter, tampa, orlando to just name a few?
 
My home on Jupiter Island I knew was worth a number. Around 100 % from my purchase price, that had been a FSBO by a guy in Texas.

My family had moved back to NJ, I missed them, so I sold for just around a 10 % appreciation factor.

It did eventually sell again for that 100 % appreciation price.

But that $ meant nothing compared to the homes that my BIL talked me out of buying in Spring Lake and Sea Girt, when we first moved to the Jersey Shore from Bloomfield back in my NJSP time.
 
Show your stats. Condos and townhome values while going up, they havent come close to SFH. Do you have stats that show otherwise? I have stats from our MLS

I didn't say they were on the same level. I said they're going up and not affected by affordable housing laws, which have been in effect for decades.

I can point you to specific developments all over NJ where you could see this. The last major NJ COAH case was a Toll Brothers development in West Windsor, that has a mix of apartments for rent, townhomes and single family. Values are astronomical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
I dont think youve been to florida or the carolinas lol. Have you been to charlotte, raleigh, charleston, greenville? Have you been to miami, boca, delray, jupiter, tampa, orlando to just name a few?

Been to all 3. Would rather live in Jersey City.

Again I'm sure there are people who would rather live in those places. But more people moved from NYC to Hoboken (70k people) than to Miami post COVID, never mind Jersey City.

Supply and demand...there's a reason why it's $1400 in Raleigh vs $3000 here, it's not some free ride or other game but rather more people would rather live in Hoboken. And rent is higher in Manhattan and then even higher in some places in Brooklyn, and San Fran more than that, but I prefer to live here, everyone has choices. It's just not proven that everyone is making the choice you would like to think they are. This board is great evidence, for all the crying about the cost of NJ most stay here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
this is a controversial opinion of mine but imo your principal residence shouldnt be viewed as an investment. And if you ever do buy rather than rent put down the absolute minimum downpayment. This is a vid i made for some of my students

What you are advocating is an extremely risky strategy. There is no such thing as a 15% long-term risk free return. Full stop. Any time that you put down less on a home purchase, and put the other available cash at risk, you have now made a heavily leveraged investment in an asset that can go down in value. Leverage boosts returns on the way up and accelerates your losses on the way down. We just saw a major family office collapse due to excessive leverage which cascaded to losses for major I-Banks.

Now, if you want to speculate, and you learned that many people who put down little to nothing in the last housing collapse and simply flipped the keys to the lenders while stripping anything of value that wasn't nailed down on their way out, leveraged to the hilt makes sense. Heads I win (home buyer), tails you lose (lenders).
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking
What you are advocating is an extremely risky strategy. There is no such thing as a 15% long-term risk free return. Full stop. Any time that you put down less on a home purchase, and put the other available cash at risk, you have now made a heavily leveraged investment in an asset that can go down in value. Leverage boosts returns on the way up and accelerates your losses on the way down. We just saw a major family office collapse due to excessive leverage which cascaded to losses for major I-Banks.

Now, if you want to speculate, and you learned that many people who put down little to nothing in the last housing collapse and simply flipped the keys to the lenders while stripping anything of value that wasn't nailed down on their way out, leveraged to the hilt makes sense. Heads I win (home buyer), tails you lose (lenders).
You only flip the keys to your lender on your principal residence if you cant make your mortgage payments. Whether your house goes up or down in value is totally irrelevant.

tbh, i was being uber conservative on that 15% number. 20-25% down, 1.3+ DSCR, tax free cash out refi at 1.3 DSCR after 5-10 years depending on market conditions,
Now you have zero $ at risk + cash flow (aka infinite return) and redeploy capital from refi into another asset. It’s really not complicated. I get to someone in stocks, this sounds like a huge return and unrealistic but thats why most in the stock market dont amass the wealth RE investors do.

happy to hop on a call and further discuss and show you how you can get into these
 
You only flip the keys to your lender on your principal residence if you cant make your mortgage payments. Whether your house goes up or down in value is totally irrelevant.

tbh, i was being uber conservative on that 15% number. 20-25% down, 1.3+ DSCR, tax free cash out refi at 1.3 DSCR after 5-10 years depending on market conditions,
Now you have zero $ at risk + cash flow (aka infinite return) and redeploy capital from refi into another asset. It’s really not complicated. I get to someone in stocks, this sounds like a huge return and unrealistic but thats why most in the stock market dont amass the wealth RE investors do.

happy to hop on a call and further discuss and show you how you can get into these
You are a good guy but young and will learn over time. I was much more confident about taking risk when I was your age as well. Many people flipped the keys to lenders during the crisis even if they could easily make the payments. They just had not put much down and were deeply underwater. So, the house value going down was extremely relevant to that decision. Plenty of history of overconfident RE investors going bankrupt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking
You are a good guy but young and will learn over time. I was much more confident about taking risk when I was your age as well. Many people flipped the keys to lenders during the crisis even if they could easily make the payments. They just had not put much down and were deeply underwater. So, the house value going down was extremely relevant to that decision. Plenty of history of overconfident RE investors going bankrupt.
If you flipped keys to the bank just because your house lost value over 2 years and you could “easily” afford your monthly payments, then im sorry youre stupid.

buy for cashflow and not on speculation and its about as conservative as one could invest. You go your route, ill go mine and we’ll check back in a decade.

cant wrap my head around someone buying at the height in ‘07, affording monthly payments and just voluntarily handing keys to the bank lol. Logically makes zero sense. I need an explanation of the thought process here.

fyi, default rate on multi-fam in the great recession of 2008? 1%
 
If you flipped keys to the bank just because your house lost value over 2 years and you could “easily” afford your monthly payments, then im sorry youre stupid.

buy for cashflow and not on speculation and its about as conservative as one could invest. You go your route, ill go mine and we’ll check back in a decade.

cant wrap my head around someone buying at the height in ‘07, affording monthly payments and just voluntarily handing keys to the bank lol. Logically makes zero sense. I need an explanation of the thought process here.

fyi, default rate on multi-fam in the great recession of 2008? 1%

Pretty simple thought process actually. Buy house outside Las Vegas or Phoenix for $250,000 in mid-2000's, put 3.5% down ($8,750) so basically no "skin in the game" as we lenders call it, crisis hits, whole neighborhood for sale, comp sells for $175K, now underwater by 30%, recovery now looking like it will be years if not decades away, stop paying mortgage, remain in residence due to foreclosure moratorium for next 2 years, tear out the appliances and even take any copper piping for scrap value, exit Stage Left. Bank is stuck with damaged, non livable house that they are anxious to rid themselves of. Please note, I'm not advocating any of this and would never buy a principal residence without putting down a large down payment.
 
Pretty simple thought process actually. Buy house outside Las Vegas or Phoenix for $250,000 in mid-2000's, put 3.5% down ($8,750) so basically no "skin in the game" as we lenders call it, crisis hits, whole neighborhood for sale, comp sells for $175K, now underwater by 30%, recovery now looking like it will be years if not decades away, stop paying mortgage, remain in residence due to foreclosure moratorium for next 2 years, tear out the appliances and even take any copper piping for scrap value, exit Stage Left. Bank is stuck with damaged, non livable house that they are anxious to rid themselves of. Please note, I'm not advocating any of this and would never buy a principal residence without putting down a large down payment.
Haha so you basically just are agreeing with my premise that youd have to be stupid to do that. You wont be able to get a loan to buy a house for 7 years after that process by which time prices are back to the level you originally bought at
 
KYK, the problem with your model is that most people are not equipped or comfortable jumping into the type of investments you are pushing here. I think the stock market example is better.

Furthermore as you stated earlier, in this market if you're not putting 20% down you're homeless. But I agree we are dealing with a different animal right now.
 
Haha so you basically just are agreeing with my premise that youd have to be stupid to do that. You wont be able to get a loan to buy a house for 7 years after that process by which time prices are back to the level you originally bought at

That's with 20/20 hindsight. When home prices were collapsing, the thought that they would rebound to get your neck back above water was wishful. And they took years to rebound unlike last year's one month sell off in equities. Many people bailed, and I agree, many would have been better off waiting out the storm.
 
Didn't watch the video but isn't the risk less associated with appreciation/depreciation and more with the monthly payments no longer being easy to make (due to job loss or some other event) and/or stocks/whatever your alternative investment is suffering from systemic collapse?

Agree that nobody should rely on property appreciating and that primary residences shouldn't be seen as investments, especially in states like NJ where you're potentially paying $25K+ a year in property taxes, upkeep, and insurance.
In the 2008 downturn the lowest collections ever got in Dallas was 87% I can tell you as thats my market. And thats before dallas exploded with populations and jobs. Usually breakeven economic occupancy (paying tenants) hovers around 65%. Buy for cashflow, hope for appreciation and you cant go wrong.

lowest our collections got march 2020- march 2021 was 93% and we fell 1.5% below proforma. I know it sounds crazy to people not in tune with RE but 15% is a super conservative estimate
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope sojo got his answer as we always go off track a bit...lol
My OP was essentially a shot in the dark to see if I could find someone that lives in Yardley/Newtown or knows someone who lives there who’s thinking about selling. Both parties could could put nearly 20k better without realtors involved. Get a private sale before listing. I live in Yardley now love the area. Some helpful PMs but no one selling.

Thanks to those who reached out.
 
I grew up in Yardley. Actually, most of the area is known as Lower Makefield Township, but we all called it Yardley. Pennsbury is the High School that has traditionally sent players to Penn State. It’s a great area. Drive up the River on the Pennsy side, New Hope, great shopping town, and lots of terrific restaurants. But if you order a sub you’ll be out of luck. They’re called hoagies there. And with Trenton across the River, it’s pork roll. Good luck in your search.
 
Agenda much? No surprise given the soulless-sleepy-town-is-paradise position you have espoused here before. You should have considered my qualifier "for those looking for that option" because while cities/urban areas might not meet your needs they certainly appeal to some others and may represent opportune timing for them. To each their own.

I need a neat, clean, safe neighborhood with good public schools. Any cities come close?
 
Selective facts perhaps, as blanket statements such as "cities are in decay" are not the complete picture. Obviously anyone in the market should be doing their homework and weighing all of the factors that they feel should be prioritized based on their personal circumstances, preferences, life stage, etc. Alas, some folks are still moving into cities even in this climate, no doubt more of the renters/20-somethings (as opposed to families looking to buy) so they are not necessarily making long term decisions. They must have their reasons however flawed they may be.


Hipsters move into cities for work and to party. When they are ready to start a family they move out.

Which cities are attracting middle and upper class families? Can you name one politician who sends his kids to a non charter public high school in those cities?
 
That’s a real informed sweeping generalization.
How about those conservative bastions in Alabama and Mississippi? The thriving metropolis’ of the Dakotas?


If you check the mississippi or bama state election maps the problem areas vote blue. Want to guess the area of Kentucky with the most murders, demographics and voting trends? Louisville.

The OP is moving to a more conservative area with lower taxes, lower crime and better schools.

It is ironic that liberals always want to expand the failed welfare model in Mississippi and they complain about the successful capitalism model used on wall street or silicon valley.
 
Last edited:
That’s a real informed sweeping generalization.
How about those conservative bastions in Alabama and Mississippi? The thriving metropolis’ of the Dakotas?


Can you name the beat, clean, safe city with good public high schools?

Council rock > philly. 20,000 reported crimes in philly schools each year.
 
If you check the mississippi or bama state election maps the problem areas vote blue. Want to guess the area of Kentucky with the most murders, demographics and voting trends? Louisville.

The OP is moving to a more conservative area with lower taxes, lower crime and better schools.

It is ironic that liberals always want to expand the failed welfare model in Mississippi and they complain about the successful capitalism model used on wall street or silicon valley.

The entirety of West Virginia or Oklahoma destroys this argument.

Also pretty sure Wall Street is located in a CITY. Pretty sure also that people who work there live mostly in places like Greenwich that all destroy your argument.

But thanks for your effort to lock this thread after 3 pages of mostly respectful and constructive discussion.
 
Pretty simple thought process actually. Buy house outside Las Vegas or Phoenix for $250,000 in mid-2000's, put 3.5% down ($8,750) so basically no "skin in the game" as we lenders call it, crisis hits, whole neighborhood for sale, comp sells for $175K, now underwater by 30%, recovery now looking like it will be years if not decades away, stop paying mortgage, remain in residence due to foreclosure moratorium for next 2 years, tear out the appliances and even take any copper piping for scrap value, exit Stage Left. Bank is stuck with damaged, non livable house that they are anxious to rid themselves of. Please note, I'm not advocating any of this and would never buy a principal residence without putting down a large down payment.

Depending on the state, the foreclosure docket was still pending with these kinds of cases pre-COVID- NJ was the slowest of any state- and now there's all kinds of moratoriums that will keep those non-payers in the properties.

I just have to laugh, real estate, stocks, whatever it is, there's no free money or everyone would do it. Now of course, real estate tends to be a good investment, and that's why home ownership is an aspiration for most. But there's no guarantees.

As you stated a lot of people who thought they were being sharp are still probably behind even after this latest bump, because the prices in the Sun Belt while up are not up like they are in say Montclair.

The real winners are the people who came in at 175k, fixed it up, and could charge high rents to people who could no longer afford to buy. If/when the current prices collapse the winners will again be the people who come in at the low point.
 
I grew up in Yardley. Actually, most of the area is known as Lower Makefield Township, but we all called it Yardley. Pennsbury is the High School that has traditionally sent players to Penn State. It’s a great area. Drive up the River on the Pennsy side, New Hope, great shopping town, and lots of terrific restaurants. But if you order a sub you’ll be out of luck. They’re called hoagies there. And with Trenton across the River, it’s pork roll. Good luck in your search.
There’s a Jersey Mike’s in new hope and a Delorenzos in Newtown now. Jersey slowly taking over bucks county
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigWill
The entirety of West Virginia or Oklahoma destroys this argument.

Also pretty sure Wall Street is located in a CITY. Pretty sure also that people who work there live mostly in places like Greenwich that all destroy your argument.

But thanks for your effort to lock this thread after 3 pages of mostly respectful and constructive discussion.


People who work on wall street live in the burbs because the city is a ghetto.

Greenwich is a good example. Dems promote diversity amd low income housing. You won't find much of either in greenwich.



Liberal policies destroy neighborhoods.

Ever notice affluent dems support the Republican policies in their own neighborhoods, schools and professions? Affluent dems support tax breaks in their own profession. You wont see any diversity or low income housing in Clinton's, Kennedy's or Biden's neighborhoods.
 
Last edited:
People who work on wall street live in the burbs because the city is a ghetto.

Greenwich is a good example. Dems promote diversity amd low income housing. You won't find much of either in greenwich.



Liberal policies destroy neighborhoods.

Ever notice affluent dems support the Republican policies in their own neighborhoods, schools and professions? Affluent dems support tax breaks in their own profession. You wont see any diversity or low income housing in Clinton's, Kennedy's or Biden's neighborhoods.

Many, many people who work in financial services in NYC live in NYC. And, like any jurisdiction, there are plenty of good public schools for families in NY. All depends on where you live in NYC. Also, Greenwich does have a section with low income housing. Those students have access, and attend, Greenwich public schools. Regarding NYC high schools, depending on which ranking you look at, 4-5 of the top 25 ranked public high schools in the country are in NYC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse
Why move to Pennsylvania? So far away NJ is where it’s at. New Providence NJ is a great town I highly recommend it. Our neighbor towns of Berkeley Heights Mountainside and Summit are outstanding and all have top ranked schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse
Many, many people who work in financial services in NYC live in NYC. And, like any jurisdiction, there are plenty of good public schools for families in NY. All depends on where you live in NYC. Also, Greenwich does have a section with low income housing. Those students have access, and attend, Greenwich public schools. Regarding NYC high schools, depending on which ranking you look at, 4-5 of the top 25 ranked public high schools in the country are in NYC.


Name the good non charter public high schools in any city. Parents dont want to campout for three days to get their kid in a lottery for a 1 in 100 shot of getting into a charter.


Cities used to have good public schools. Liberals destroyed the public schools when they ignored school violence. Now they need charters to weed out the criminals. Back in the day the bad kids got kicked out of school. Now the good kids have to leave.


The worst schools in NYC have the same funding. What is holding them down? Bad parenting and culture.
They don't need charters in Greenwich.
 
Last edited:
Name the good non charter public high schools in any city. Parents dont want to campout for three days to get their kid in a lottery for a 1 in 100 shot of getting into a charter.


Cities used to have good public schools. Liberals destroyed the public schools when they ignored school violence. Now they need charters to weed out the criminals. Back in the day the bad kids got kicked out of school. Now the good kids have to leave.


The worst schools in NYC have the same funding. What is holding them down? Bad parenting and culture.
They don't need charters in Greenwich.

The schools included in the rankings I mentioned are not charter schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT