With this deli worth 100 million Wawa owners might be richer than Bezos
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blast from the past, ha. Don Lapre, completely forgot about that dude....wonder what he's up to these days!
Oops, didn't realize he offed himself a decade ago while in prison. No disrespect intended.wonder what he's up to these days!
Sad ending. We were huge fans of those commercials.Oops, didn't realize he offed himself a decade ago while in prison. No disrespect intended.
Nope, stay away. The reason I say this is COAH + people wanting the true suburban life with yards etc.
Why COAH? Alot of towns in NJ are far behind their mandated amount of affordable housing. Therefore theyre basically being forced to allow builders to come in as “interveners” and propose large multi-family housing developments on lands not zoned for it and the towns are obligated to approve if theyre behind. For example, my small hometown of Roseland was behind about 360 affordable housing units. It’s a town with a population of about 5,500 +/- . Obviously no builder will only build affordable so they often propose projects with 10% affordable units AND also apply for abatements and PILOT’s and the towns have no choice but to accept.
the above is an issue for towns/condo and townhome owners for a few reasons laid out below.
1) if you have a townhome/condo built in the 80’s/90’s or early 2000’s and you go to sell when 1,000 brand new ones just hit the market, good luck. Simple function of supply and demand
2) infrastructure: these towns werent built to support that many people. Schools arent big enough, not enough police, fire, teachers, but more important the sewer systems and water supply were not intended to handle that type of capacity.
the above is what trump acting like a caveman meant when he said “THEY WANT TO RUIN THE SUBURBS”. If you had a clue how to articulate it, the message wouldve come through as reasonable and rather than racist.
Not following the bolded, not sure what youre trying to say.So I watched the video and I have to ask why you did not offset the investment gain of putting down less money against the investment gain of investing the extra $600 a month?
I also have to mention as a conservative investor when I am told to expect 15% gain year over year I get leery. It all my well be true but I never go into any investment expecting that return consistently over time without thinking it comes with great risk. So before I would invest in that vehicle I would have to have other assets diversified among a number of other investments.
The risk is they move. As someone who invests in multi-family, the lending requirements are very stringent when you have a concentration of employment/tenants like that. Specifically military bases.In my lifetime there have been several Real Estate reversals/bubbles that have struck the home owner/investor.
Those able to ride it out and continue to pay their monthly mortgage and tax bill have usually been OK, or able to get out clear. Those looking to move, lost their primary income have been destroyed or lost money.
There is ONLY ONE RULE; Location, Location, Location.
I had a friend that loved to pick up income property near US Coast Guard Stations. He would advertise and go to the USCG places to get those renters. Why ? The Coast Guard would sent him the rent checks directly to him, so that he didn't have to deal with the actual Coasties. He ALWAYS got paid.
Show your stats. Condos and townhome values while going up, they havent come close to SFH. Do you have stats that show otherwise? I have stats from our MLSWhen you consider that every town in NJ has COAH obligations and that many of them are often part of single family communities as well...it doesn't really hold that much water.
Depending on the place condos/townhomes will accrue major value and I am seeing it right now all over NJ.
I dont think youve been to florida or the carolinas lol. Have you been to charlotte, raleigh, charleston, greenville? Have you been to miami, boca, delray, jupiter, tampa, orlando to just name a few?The thing with living in Florida or North Carolina is that you have to live in Florida or North Carolina.
Which likely does not mean rolling out of your apartment in a place like Hoboken or Jersey City, walking to everything in 10 minutes or less, and being surrounded by 20s-30s professionals looking for the same things you are. It's also giving up being across the river from NYC.
If you don't care about any of that, I'm sure it's great. But most people do, and thus why a 2BR in Hoboken is at least 600k.
Show your stats. Condos and townhome values while going up, they havent come close to SFH. Do you have stats that show otherwise? I have stats from our MLS
I dont think youve been to florida or the carolinas lol. Have you been to charlotte, raleigh, charleston, greenville? Have you been to miami, boca, delray, jupiter, tampa, orlando to just name a few?
this is a controversial opinion of mine but imo your principal residence shouldnt be viewed as an investment. And if you ever do buy rather than rent put down the absolute minimum downpayment. This is a vid i made for some of my students
You only flip the keys to your lender on your principal residence if you cant make your mortgage payments. Whether your house goes up or down in value is totally irrelevant.What you are advocating is an extremely risky strategy. There is no such thing as a 15% long-term risk free return. Full stop. Any time that you put down less on a home purchase, and put the other available cash at risk, you have now made a heavily leveraged investment in an asset that can go down in value. Leverage boosts returns on the way up and accelerates your losses on the way down. We just saw a major family office collapse due to excessive leverage which cascaded to losses for major I-Banks.
Now, if you want to speculate, and you learned that many people who put down little to nothing in the last housing collapse and simply flipped the keys to the lenders while stripping anything of value that wasn't nailed down on their way out, leveraged to the hilt makes sense. Heads I win (home buyer), tails you lose (lenders).
You are a good guy but young and will learn over time. I was much more confident about taking risk when I was your age as well. Many people flipped the keys to lenders during the crisis even if they could easily make the payments. They just had not put much down and were deeply underwater. So, the house value going down was extremely relevant to that decision. Plenty of history of overconfident RE investors going bankrupt.You only flip the keys to your lender on your principal residence if you cant make your mortgage payments. Whether your house goes up or down in value is totally irrelevant.
tbh, i was being uber conservative on that 15% number. 20-25% down, 1.3+ DSCR, tax free cash out refi at 1.3 DSCR after 5-10 years depending on market conditions,
Now you have zero $ at risk + cash flow (aka infinite return) and redeploy capital from refi into another asset. It’s really not complicated. I get to someone in stocks, this sounds like a huge return and unrealistic but thats why most in the stock market dont amass the wealth RE investors do.
happy to hop on a call and further discuss and show you how you can get into these
If you flipped keys to the bank just because your house lost value over 2 years and you could “easily” afford your monthly payments, then im sorry youre stupid.You are a good guy but young and will learn over time. I was much more confident about taking risk when I was your age as well. Many people flipped the keys to lenders during the crisis even if they could easily make the payments. They just had not put much down and were deeply underwater. So, the house value going down was extremely relevant to that decision. Plenty of history of overconfident RE investors going bankrupt.
If you flipped keys to the bank just because your house lost value over 2 years and you could “easily” afford your monthly payments, then im sorry youre stupid.
buy for cashflow and not on speculation and its about as conservative as one could invest. You go your route, ill go mine and we’ll check back in a decade.
cant wrap my head around someone buying at the height in ‘07, affording monthly payments and just voluntarily handing keys to the bank lol. Logically makes zero sense. I need an explanation of the thought process here.
fyi, default rate on multi-fam in the great recession of 2008? 1%
Haha so you basically just are agreeing with my premise that youd have to be stupid to do that. You wont be able to get a loan to buy a house for 7 years after that process by which time prices are back to the level you originally bought atPretty simple thought process actually. Buy house outside Las Vegas or Phoenix for $250,000 in mid-2000's, put 3.5% down ($8,750) so basically no "skin in the game" as we lenders call it, crisis hits, whole neighborhood for sale, comp sells for $175K, now underwater by 30%, recovery now looking like it will be years if not decades away, stop paying mortgage, remain in residence due to foreclosure moratorium for next 2 years, tear out the appliances and even take any copper piping for scrap value, exit Stage Left. Bank is stuck with damaged, non livable house that they are anxious to rid themselves of. Please note, I'm not advocating any of this and would never buy a principal residence without putting down a large down payment.
Haha so you basically just are agreeing with my premise that youd have to be stupid to do that. You wont be able to get a loan to buy a house for 7 years after that process by which time prices are back to the level you originally bought at
In the 2008 downturn the lowest collections ever got in Dallas was 87% I can tell you as thats my market. And thats before dallas exploded with populations and jobs. Usually breakeven economic occupancy (paying tenants) hovers around 65%. Buy for cashflow, hope for appreciation and you cant go wrong.Didn't watch the video but isn't the risk less associated with appreciation/depreciation and more with the monthly payments no longer being easy to make (due to job loss or some other event) and/or stocks/whatever your alternative investment is suffering from systemic collapse?
Agree that nobody should rely on property appreciating and that primary residences shouldn't be seen as investments, especially in states like NJ where you're potentially paying $25K+ a year in property taxes, upkeep, and insurance.
My OP was essentially a shot in the dark to see if I could find someone that lives in Yardley/Newtown or knows someone who lives there who’s thinking about selling. Both parties could could put nearly 20k better without realtors involved. Get a private sale before listing. I live in Yardley now love the area. Some helpful PMs but no one selling.I hope sojo got his answer as we always go off track a bit...lol
Awful time. Cities were dumps to begin with and now they are in worse shape. Companies and jobs are leaving and many will never return.
Agenda much? No surprise given the soulless-sleepy-town-is-paradise position you have espoused here before. You should have considered my qualifier "for those looking for that option" because while cities/urban areas might not meet your needs they certainly appeal to some others and may represent opportune timing for them. To each their own.
Selective facts perhaps, as blanket statements such as "cities are in decay" are not the complete picture. Obviously anyone in the market should be doing their homework and weighing all of the factors that they feel should be prioritized based on their personal circumstances, preferences, life stage, etc. Alas, some folks are still moving into cities even in this climate, no doubt more of the renters/20-somethings (as opposed to families looking to buy) so they are not necessarily making long term decisions. They must have their reasons however flawed they may be.
That’s a real informed sweeping generalization.Cities were great before liberals turned them into crime infested ghettos.
That’s a real informed sweeping generalization.
How about those conservative bastions in Alabama and Mississippi? The thriving metropolis’ of the Dakotas?
That’s a real informed sweeping generalization.
How about those conservative bastions in Alabama and Mississippi? The thriving metropolis’ of the Dakotas?
If you check the mississippi or bama state election maps the problem areas vote blue. Want to guess the area of Kentucky with the most murders, demographics and voting trends? Louisville.
The OP is moving to a more conservative area with lower taxes, lower crime and better schools.
It is ironic that liberals always want to expand the failed welfare model in Mississippi and they complain about the successful capitalism model used on wall street or silicon valley.
Pretty simple thought process actually. Buy house outside Las Vegas or Phoenix for $250,000 in mid-2000's, put 3.5% down ($8,750) so basically no "skin in the game" as we lenders call it, crisis hits, whole neighborhood for sale, comp sells for $175K, now underwater by 30%, recovery now looking like it will be years if not decades away, stop paying mortgage, remain in residence due to foreclosure moratorium for next 2 years, tear out the appliances and even take any copper piping for scrap value, exit Stage Left. Bank is stuck with damaged, non livable house that they are anxious to rid themselves of. Please note, I'm not advocating any of this and would never buy a principal residence without putting down a large down payment.
There’s a Jersey Mike’s in new hope and a Delorenzos in Newtown now. Jersey slowly taking over bucks countyI grew up in Yardley. Actually, most of the area is known as Lower Makefield Township, but we all called it Yardley. Pennsbury is the High School that has traditionally sent players to Penn State. It’s a great area. Drive up the River on the Pennsy side, New Hope, great shopping town, and lots of terrific restaurants. But if you order a sub you’ll be out of luck. They’re called hoagies there. And with Trenton across the River, it’s pork roll. Good luck in your search.
The entirety of West Virginia or Oklahoma destroys this argument.
Also pretty sure Wall Street is located in a CITY. Pretty sure also that people who work there live mostly in places like Greenwich that all destroy your argument.
But thanks for your effort to lock this thread after 3 pages of mostly respectful and constructive discussion.
People who work on wall street live in the burbs because the city is a ghetto.
Greenwich is a good example. Dems promote diversity amd low income housing. You won't find much of either in greenwich.
Liberal policies destroy neighborhoods.
Ever notice affluent dems support the Republican policies in their own neighborhoods, schools and professions? Affluent dems support tax breaks in their own profession. You wont see any diversity or low income housing in Clinton's, Kennedy's or Biden's neighborhoods.
Many, many people who work in financial services in NYC live in NYC. And, like any jurisdiction, there are plenty of good public schools for families in NY. All depends on where you live in NYC. Also, Greenwich does have a section with low income housing. Those students have access, and attend, Greenwich public schools. Regarding NYC high schools, depending on which ranking you look at, 4-5 of the top 25 ranked public high schools in the country are in NYC.
Name the good non charter public high schools in any city. Parents dont want to campout for three days to get their kid in a lottery for a 1 in 100 shot of getting into a charter.
Cities used to have good public schools. Liberals destroyed the public schools when they ignored school violence. Now they need charters to weed out the criminals. Back in the day the bad kids got kicked out of school. Now the good kids have to leave.
The worst schools in NYC have the same funding. What is holding them down? Bad parenting and culture.
They don't need charters in Greenwich.