ADVERTISEMENT

COVID-19 Pandemic: Transmissions, Deaths, Treatments, Vaccines, Interventions and More...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your worst post ever. Maybe 10% of the country, i.e., the far, far right, who have almost no command of reality, believes the NY Times is not legitimate.


really...because it doesnt look like your paying attention to the fake news you are posting, trust me I have researched the Russian hoax beyond most could imagine. Its great when we have fbi agents that actually make memos that refute direct lies being reported from the nytimes from early 2017 but you want read that there

the 1619 project is propaganda clearly....their reporting of Kavanaugh was completely bogus several times, they just screwed up the Russian bounty story that was also phony, shall I go on, there are receipts for these lies
 
I will disagree with you on this. But this is not the thread and I will not go any further, But see the 1619 project and the resignation letter of Bari Weiss
Sometimes intelligent people ( book smart only) feel they can be condescending. Sorry Numbers the NYT has gone down the rabbit hole and is not even close to what they were back when you were a teen ... IRAN??????
 
really...because it doesnt look like your paying attention to the fake news you are posting, trust me I have researched the Russian hoax beyond most could imagine. Its great when we have fbi agents that actually make memos that refute direct lies being reported from the nytimes from early 2017 but you want read that there

the 1619 project is propaganda clearly....their reporting of Kavanaugh was completely bogus several times, they just screwed up the Russian bounty story that was also phony, shall I go on, there are receipts for these lies
Way, way off topic and wrong, of course. Please keep to the topic.
 
um his rebutall and it wasnt his as he has dementia, if you noticed his appearance before Congress was not even about what we are talking about which is the media creating a phony narrative. Listen I have researched this over and over and over and everyone knows what I posted on the currrent events board while people like you listened to ny times and cnn talk about indictments everyday.

but bac to covid because that is this thread but be aware if you question sources like a few of you have done in the past few day, be sure to include all sources

id start reading the WSJ because they have been covering the Russia hoax excellently,
Keep your politics out of the thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutino and scripts
yeah your posts on the current events board on this subject were pretty embarrassing for you, straight regurgitation from the ny times, its okay you got it wrong, just admit and move on

Only thing embarrassing right now is you. Did you lick asphalt when trying to give evidence about your fake heatwave?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
You're not making any sense - how would this effect their other products? And you seem to have a blind spot to the big picture here, I'm kinda baffled how you don't see how big of a win this is for the company that develops the vaccine for Covid-19.
It wouldn't. That's my point. If they are not making money on this, then sure they get name recognition, but if they don't continue to make other products that work then how do the monetize the benefit?
 
It wouldn't. That's my point. If they are not making money on this, then sure they get name recognition, but if they don't continue to make other products that work then how do the monetize the benefit?
I think about it like this. If people who would be using their other drugs (for cancer, diabities, and other medical conditions) are being killed off like crazy by Corona or not being diagnosed as having these conditions because they are scared of getting Corona then those people aren't buying their regular medications because they are dead or undiagnosed. Thus, the company will see declining sales of their existing products.
 
I think about it like this. If people who would be using their other drugs (for cancer, diabities, and other medical conditions) are being killed off like crazy by Corona or not being diagnosed as having these conditions because they are scared of getting Corona then those people aren't buying their regular medications because they are dead or undiagnosed. Thus, the company will see declining sales of their existing products.
huh? that's more than a bit of a stretch. the benefit of having a working vaccine that helps the world is good for the world far exceeds the potential lost sales of existing products. pharma companies essentially need to reinvent themselves every decade to just maintain their position.
 
huh? that's more than a bit of a stretch. the benefit of having a working vaccine that helps the world is good for the world far exceeds the potential lost sales of existing products. pharma companies essentially need to reinvent themselves every decade to just maintain their position.
I didn't say it was the sole reason. But it is certainly something to consider for why they would do it at no cost.
 
I think about it like this. If people who would be using their other drugs (for cancer, diabities, and other medical conditions) are being killed off like crazy by Corona or not being diagnosed as having these conditions because they are scared of getting Corona then those people aren't buying their regular medications because they are dead or undiagnosed. Thus, the company will see declining sales of their existing products.
So by saving people from dying they are ensuring they have customers to buy their other products?

I'm OK with that.
 
They stand to make $1 billion in profit.

Source?

The CEO said verbatim that they’ll be making a profit.

WhiteBus, I probably disagree with you more than agree, but T2k is an admitted troll and consistently does not discuss in good faith. So if I were you I’d ignore him from now on. Just stick to correcting his blatant falsehoods.

https://time.com/newsletter/sample-the-leadership-brief/

The verbatim is actually this:

"I think we will make profit, but we will make a very, very marginal profit at this stage."
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
Source?



The verbatim is actually this:

"I think we will make profit, but we will make a very, very marginal profit at this stage."
Marginal in Pharmacy lingo means not price gouging. They said they would approach $1billion to make/approve and produce 100milion vaccines they will be paid $2billion 2nd grade math.
 
yeah your posts on the current events board on this subject were pretty embarrassing for you, straight regurgitation from the ny times, its okay you got it wrong, just admit and move on
Which part? The part where I said Trump would be impeached, since there was a ton of evidence of collusion and obstruction? Or the part where I predicted there would also be indictments and convictions of a number of Trump aides? Or the part where I said the Republican Senate would have none of it in any vote on impeachment? Enough of this way off topic crap.

@Richard Schnyderite - if you don't mind, this post (and by that, I mean my post here) and a whole bunch of others need to be deleted from the last page or two, as they're way off-topic. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Marginal in Pharmacy lingo means not price gouging. They said they would approach $1billion to make/approve and produce 100milion vaccines they will be paid $2billion 2nd grade math.
Seriously though, Source?
 
really...because it doesnt look like your paying attention to the fake news you are posting, trust me I have researched the Russian hoax beyond most could imagine. Its great when we have fbi agents that actually make memos that refute direct lies being reported from the nytimes from early 2017 but you want read that there

the 1619 project is propaganda clearly....their reporting of Kavanaugh was completely bogus several times, they just screwed up the Russian bounty story that was also phony, shall I go on, there are receipts for these lies

had to do it...it will be deleted by mods soon anyway...Enjoy!
 
Which part? The part where I said Trump would be impeached, since there was a ton of evidence of collusion and obstruction? Or the part where I predicted there would also be indictments and convictions of a number of Trump aides? Or the part where I said the Republican Senate would have none of it in any vote on impeachment? Enough of this way off topic crap.

@Richard Schnyderite - if you don't mind, this post and a whole bunch of others need to be deleted from the last page or two, as they're way off-topic. Thanks.


exactly..the usual routine, you go off and get your say on a topic and then call for the admin..what a crybaby...grow up. anyone there were zero indictments for any Trump associate for anything to do with Russia..womp womp

collusion..you mean the stuff they never charged..what do you speak of...3 plus years and they found zero..read the report. Obstruction? obstruction of what..obstruction of non crimes on a hit job with fake fisa warrants...better catsup to the story


all i am asking is for people to stop with the source thing...let people judge for themselves...fox news is just as credible as anything, if someone wants to post a breibart link that is fine too. the NY Times and Wa Post are not holy grails given their failures on every single major story the past few years
 
Let's try to get back on topic, shall we? Excellent summary/review article on where we are now with vaccines in Nature (one of the 2-3 best science journals in the world). After a nice summary of status, the last section is really worth reading, with regard to how we're going to compare vaccines being tested and analyzed in parallel, often with differing analytical procedures for measuring things like antibody and T-cell responses. Warp Speed is supposed to address this, at least for the US-backed vaccines.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41...nnc&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=naturenews

Compare and contrast
Such data — known as a correlate of protection — could make it easier to interpret early-stage trial results like those released in this week. But such comparisons are also thwarted by the fickle nature of the tests researchers use to measure neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses. The same test can return widely different values when performed in different labs or even on different days of the week.

“It’s hard for us to compare our vaccine results to other people’s,” Adrian Hill, an Oxford vaccinologist, said in the briefing. “We would really like to see different vaccines being tested in the same lab by the same people.” The US government’s effort to support COVID-19 vaccines, known as Project Warp Speed, is supposed to be making such comparisons, notes Hotez. The World Health Organization in Geneva and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness in Oslo, which has provided financial support to nine vaccine developers, have also announced plans to support this work.

It is vitally important to be able to identify immune correlates of protection and to be able to compare vaccines, says Daniel Altmann, an immunologist at Imperial College London. “The stakes have never been higher,” he says. "We so desperately need it."
 
We should all agree to move off the topic of the NYT's, Tucker Carlson and other media outlets.

We should also agree to tone down the insults.


i agree too. let people post what they want. I saw Numbers call out Tango for his post and link..to me that is pretty poor behavior and he has some hubris to determine what is and what should be relevant. Last I checked this isnt the NUMBERS only thread, its everyone gets to post. Numbers attacked a mod because he posted his thoughts here...inexcusable.
 
i agree too. let people post what they want. I saw Numbers call out Tango for his post and link..to me that is pretty poor behavior and he has some hubris to determine what is and what should be relevant. Last I checked this isnt the NUMBERS only thread, its everyone gets to post. Numbers attacked a mod because he posted his thoughts here...inexcusable.
lol hubris. Why should he not be able to attack a mod's source, but you attack his sources. Tango is a Mod, not a God.
 
i agree too. let people post what they want. I saw Numbers call out Tango for his post and link..to me that is pretty poor behavior and he has some hubris to determine what is and what should be relevant. Last I checked this isnt the NUMBERS only thread, its everyone gets to post. Numbers attacked a mod because he posted his thoughts here...inexcusable.
I'll agree that Tango can post his link. And if that article looks super shaky (I didn't click the link, but on it's face it looked shaky) then people should just dispute points in the article.

All this other garbage is just garbage.
 
i agree too. let people post what they want. I saw Numbers call out Tango for his post and link..to me that is pretty poor behavior and he has some hubris to determine what is and what should be relevant. Last I checked this isnt the NUMBERS only thread, its everyone gets to post. Numbers attacked a mod because he posted his thoughts here...inexcusable.
####s really needs a timeout. Plenty of other posters here can link good topic-related info too while he is cooling his jets in the sin bin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RocktheRac
the point is let people post what they want and from where...we are all adults and can determine our own truth. No one here has been 100% right that is for sure as if it is a contest even though some appear to post like it is
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
Seriously though, Source?
I think it was you TK and several others blasting me when I said they would take the money. And they did. My recent source @T2Kplus10 who is Pfizer defender to the death, he must own a share or two, said this earlier today.
"Read carefully. I said "this deal". Let's deal with the future as it happens. And remember, if this vaccine doesn't get approved, they will lose hundreds of millions (perhaps a billion). Huge risk for Pfizer."
BTW I was right 3 weeks ago. They took the money.
 
the point is let people post what they want and from where...we are all adults and can determine our own truth. No one here has been 100% right that is for sure as if it is a contest even though some appear to post like it is
Except when it's data you don't like about a surge happening in Pennsylvania, then you say it's fake, and call people a phony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thegock
I think it was you TK and several others blasting me when I said they would take the money. And they did. My recent source @T2Kplus10 who is Pfizer defender to the death, he must own a share or two, said this earlier today.
"Read carefully. I said "this deal". Let's deal with the future as it happens. And remember, if this vaccine doesn't get approved, they will lose hundreds of millions (perhaps a billion). Huge risk for Pfizer."
BTW I was right 3 weeks ago. They took the money.
Yeah, they didn't take the money. That money was to cover the costs of developing the vaccine. Today they announced a deal to SELL the vaccine if approved.

Understand?

apples-oranges-fresh-garden-isolated-260nw-142738159.jpg
 
Which part? The part where I said Trump would be impeached, since there was a ton of evidence of collusion and obstruction? Or the part where I predicted there would also be indictments and convictions of a number of Trump aides? Or the part where I said the Republican Senate would have none of it in any vote on impeachment? Enough of this way off topic crap.

@Richard Schnyderite - if you don't mind, this post (and by that, I mean my post here) and a whole bunch of others need to be deleted from the last page or two, as they're way off-topic. Thanks.
Proof of you running to a mod. Saving for the next time you lie about this.

#priceless
 
The Big Surge In Coronavirus Deaths Is A Media-Fed Myth



Almost daily now we’ve been reading about how daily deaths from COVID-19 have reached record highs. It’s a scary prospect. But the truth is the mainstream press is grossly misleading the public by misreporting the death counts.

...

The last story is particularly illuminating because the website the PBS article links to includes a chart of daily deaths in the state. It lists only six deaths on July 19. What’s more, the chart shows that there have only been two days where deaths exceeded 65.

So where did that scary 147 number come from? The same place all the other “surging” numbers come from. Each day Arizona and other states file reports on how many people died from COVID-19. It’s not a measure of how many died that day. In most cases, the people died days or even weeks earlier.

In fact, in Arizona’s case, 106 of the reported deaths on Saturday resulted from a periodic review of death certificates.



More Here:

https://issuesinsights.com/2020/07/22/the-big-surge-in-coronavirus-deaths-is-a-media-fed-myth
I had to go back and look, and this article falls into the same trap that Horowitz fell into a month and a half ago.

Not realizing there is a lag in data reporting.

Including a link to the same AZ dashboard Horowitz linked to no less. Although similar lags can be seen on most dashboards, as a Covid death will not be officially reported as such immediately. Hospitals may report probable death is a covid death(and that is what PBS was alluding to) but will take a bit longer to ensure a death is a covid death before they make it official.

Bottom line. Deaths have increased dramatically in AZ over the last month.
 
Yeah, they didn't take the money. That money was to cover the costs of developing the vaccine. Today they announced a deal to SELL the vaccine if approved.

Understand?

apples-oranges-fresh-garden-isolated-260nw-142738159.jpg
They didn't take the money? $2 billion is chump change? The took the money just like all the rest! Understand? No because you said they wouldn't! BTW isn't their vaccine already developed?? Just have to go to trials. Or are they starting from scratch with this new $2billion?
 
Which part? The part where I said Trump would be impeached, since there was a ton of evidence of collusion and obstruction? Or the part where I predicted there would also be indictments and convictions of a number of Trump aides? Or the part where I said the Republican Senate would have none of it in any vote on impeachment? Enough of this way off topic crap.

@Richard Schnyderite - if you don't mind, this post (and by that, I mean my post here) and a whole bunch of others need to be deleted from the last page or two, as they're way off-topic. Thanks.


The Swami has spoken. So shall it be written. So shall it be done.
 
I think it was you TK and several others blasting me when I said they would take the money. And they did. My recent source @T2Kplus10 who is Pfizer defender to the death, he must own a share or two, said this earlier today.
"Read carefully. I said "this deal". Let's deal with the future as it happens. And remember, if this vaccine doesn't get approved, they will lose hundreds of millions (perhaps a billion). Huge risk for Pfizer."
BTW I was right 3 weeks ago. They took the money.
You were not right. The money people were talking about 3 weeks ago was money to help them develop a vaccine, that money came with no contingency of an actual product. This deal is a sale, contingent upon an actual product.

Were you expecting Pfizer would put $1 billion into making a vaccine and then give it away for free? I didn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT