He's taking a ton of open shots and making 30% from 3.lol.....com'on Mike....put this guy in an offense where people are getting him open looks and he's easily our best shooter. Not even close.
Yeah but we need his scoring to open things up for the rest of the offense.Hes the least of this teams troubles
It would be one thing if Simpson was jacking up bricks to the detriment of other good shooters, but this is not the case. Someone has to shoot.Just because you think you're a good shooter doesn't mean you are.
No. He’s playing great defense and in a major shooting slump. I doubt he will be some all-time great but major recruiting miss is a huge exaggeration.
Yeah but we need his scoring to open things up for the rest of the offense.
I wouldn’t call him a miss yet, he gave us some quality minutes last year and even took over some games against good competition.Derek is a MAJOR recruiting miss
It would be one thing if Simpson was jacking up bricks to the detriment of other good shooters, but this is not the case. Someone has to shoot.
A lot of the midrange shots are bad but that’s a coaching issue tbh. The open threes.. he has to learn to shoot those well enough for them to be good shots or he can’t realistically play at this level. I don’t think guard who doesn’t take open threes is a role that can exist on a good D1 team.Simpson’s shots would be better served going to Hyatt, Fernandes and Mag. I understand he has to shoot some, but he forced up too many bad shots today.
This team will be sitting home at the end of the year.
We shot 50% from three in that game. If we did that today we would’ve won as well.The SHU win looks like an anomaly, no idea how they beat them as SHU actually looks like they could have a hope at tourney, NIT also possible for them. RU has no post season prospects unfortunately.
I wouldn’t call him a miss yet, he gave us some quality minutes last year and even took over some games against good competition.
The problem is he is NOT a Geo and shouldn’t be allowed to play as if he is. He a complementary player and can only take over games when he has solid talent around him.
just today?Simpson took mostly good shots. Just didn’t have it today.
We shot 50% from three in that game. If we did that today we would’ve won as well.
I didn’t say it was. But your post said you didn’t understand how we beat Seton Hall. We did it by shooting well.50% from three is not a realistic path for consistent winning. Rebounding, effort, defense and toughness are always there to assist with getting wins if you have those traits as a team. Unfortunately, this group lacks those traits.
Pikiell emphasis when he took over the program was to first concentrate on defense with mostly 3 star recruits.The scoring came mostly from Sanders and Baker and in later years Harper,Yeboah and Young contributed .The team reached the stage of being a NCAA bubble team in recent years but still lacked consistent scoring.With the departure of Cam,Paul and Caleb this seasons team has lots of flaws on both ends of the court.Fans are hopeful with next years recruiting class Rutgers will finally have multiple scoring threats on the court which should reduce the length of time scoring droughts last.The unknown is whether 2025 recruiting will follow the uptick of 2024 or fall back to previous seasons where far too many recruits turned out to be role players.Pike got lucky that Geo and RHJ outperformed their rankings. He CANNOT build a roster. Too enamored with “his” type of guy. Terrible talent. We peaked in the second half vs Houston March 2021
I didn’t say it was. But your post said you didn’t understand how we beat Seton Hall. We did it by shooting well.
I mean that’s fair, I wouldn’t call this team a good team. But they aren’t so dreadful they can’t win when playing well. Sometimes they will play well, shoot well, and they will win.Sorry about that, taking me literally. What I meant to get across with sarcasm is this team is bad, and SHU is actually better, sarcastically saying how did we get a win against them. This team really looks like bottom four Big Ten. I fully understand we shot the three well that night, my point being we have hardly done that this year. Either way, this team was sold as playing fast paced, with improved three point shooting and we really have not seen much of that at all from this group. They’re just not very good and have near zero on court chemistry as a group.
Fair enough, they’re dreadful when you measure them up against the standard of being a tourney team or at least being on the bubble. They can win occasional games when they’re shooting is hot and the opponent is off, but the fact that they’ll get crushed on the boards every game is going to cause a lot of losses. I don’t see how they finish with an above .500 record.I mean that’s fair, I wouldn’t call this team a good team. But they aren’t so dreadful they can’t win when playing well. Sometimes they will play well, shoot well, and they will win.
Yeah, I mean I’m mostly with you. Maybe slightly less pessimistic; I think they could finish above .500. But unless there is a lot of improvement it is not a tournament team.Fair enough, they’re dreadful when you measure them up against the standard of being a tourney team or at least being on the bubble. They can win occasional games when they’re shooting is hot and the opponent is off, but the fact that they’ll get crushed on the boards every game is going to cause a lot of losses. I don’t see how they finish with an above .500 record.
Yeah, I mean I’m mostly with you. Maybe slightly less pessimistic; I think they could finish above .500. But unless there is a lot of improvement it is not a tournament team.
Yeah. I think they will shoot better than they have so far (almost impossible not to). I expect some improvement in rebounding. But this will always be a bad rebounding team.I get what you’re saying about the fact they need to improve. Problem is I don’t think this group has what it takes to improve the rebounding. Without improvement in this area, they will lose more than they win this year. Starts and ends with rebounding. Cliff and Mag combining for 1 rebound is almost comically bad.
Yeah but we need his scoring to open things up for the rest of the offense.
Simpson looks like a winner until he gets to the basket. Good defense, fast and shifty...but then it all comes tumbling down as he takes some awful shots. Actually surprised that he doesn't draw more fouls. Could be that the other teams have been instructed to let him take the shot based on his inability to get points.
Simpson has the skillset to create shots but can't make layups or jump shots on a consistent basis.The roster is filled with role players with Hyatt being the closest Rutgers has to a consistent double digit scorer.Role player but Pike brought him to be a starter
Thats my issue