Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We know there are quite a few schools with inflated records because of their inferior competition. This team would most likely be bowl eligible already if we were not in the BIG East.
That said, I think we would probably say yes.
I had no idea that happened.
None whatsoever (and I am NOT a fan of sub-.500 teams getting bowl bids.
Agreed. Add to that if we didn't have to play 9 conference games as well. Just wished outside recognized this stuff. They'll just (hopefully not) see 5 n 7 and not the annual SOS. Cause they're shallow.Making a bowl doesn't mean that much anymore, compared to when I was a kid. But don't you think that 5-7, playing in the Big Ten East, is as worthy as 6-6 or 7-5, playing in the ACC or a non-P5 conference? I think it is, given today's low bowl standards.
I personally liked it better when making a bowl meant something. But that's not how it is right now...
if that is the case, why did we turn it down last year when all teams were bowl eligible?Why does anyone ever question if we would accept a bowl at 5 wins? There is zero downside to taking a bowl at any number of wins.
was it ever even a real option with all the cancellations and opt outs?if that is the case, why did we turn it down last year when all teams were bowl eligible?
IIRC, not exactly. After we lost vs. Nebraska to finish 3-6, Schiano stated in the postgame interview that we were done. There is no evidence (to my knowledge anyway) that we were offered a bid. Nor do we know what would GS would have done had we beaten Nebraska to finish 4-5 - in which case we probably would have been offered a bid, but we don't know that either.Last year we declined .
Yes you’re right . We declined the opportunity to say we would go to a bowl if selected . We opted out before we could get selected.IIRC, not exactly. After we lost vs. Nebraska to finish 3-6, Schiano stated in the postgame interview that we were done. There is no evidence (to my knowledge anyway) that we were offered a bid. Nor do we know what would GS would have done had we beaten Nebraska to finish 4-5 - in which case we probably would have been offered a bid, but we don't know that either.
I struggle to believe we deserve to go at 5-7 but that's the darn issue with number of bowls and Greg/team's call IF so. I could see him say yes to reward some guys plus the recruiting effect. Hoping it doesn't come down to this of course.
So you're saying you'd rather be in the ACC? I'm happy where we are.Boston College has only 8 conference games, wish we had their schedule. We might have 6 wins already.
Perhaps a hybrid of the Big Ten and the ACC. We could call it the Atlantic Ten? No, that's taken. The Big Coast Conference!So you're saying you'd rather be in the ACC? I'm happy where we are.
Exactly.No. Getting an extra full month of practice in will never be turned down.
Jerry Palm of cbs has us in at 5-7
It's first shot at a bowl for these kids. I would take it and extra practices. Now if we are 4-5 years in & have gone bowling then agree with not going.I struggle to believe we deserve to go at 5-7 but that's the darn issue with number of bowls and Greg/team's call IF so. I could see him say yes to reward some guys plus the recruiting effect. Hoping it doesn't come down to this of course.
Interesting take . I am not buying it . Eric LeGrand led us out of the tunnel against wvu in 2011 and we lost . Those were teammates and friends of his and the picture was the sports photo of the year on the cover of sports illustrated . That team went out there and honored him with a loss. You still have to play the game.everyone seems to forget that was a special day for nw....the 1996 rose bowl team was being honored.........no way in hell were they gonna lose ......pat fitzgerald played in that game.....bye week had nothing to do with it....losing to ru on that special day wasn't going to happen...........the motivation factor was in full effect.
which is not my call and I would certainly understand the logic. I'd be cool with either call. And make plans to go if possible. Bowls are fun times.It's first shot at a bowl for these kids. I would take it and extra practices. Now if we are 4-5 years in & have gone bowling then agree with not going.
We never were invited to any bowl last yearwas it ever even a real option with all the cancellations and opt outs?
Canceled bowls (16): Bahamas, Birmingham, Celebration, Fenway, Frisco, Guaranteed Rate, Hawai'i, Holiday, Independence, LA, Las Vegas, Military, Pinstripe, Quick Lane, Redbox, Sun, tEXAS
Teams that opted out (22): Tennessee, South Carolina, Boise State, Boston College, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Kansas State, Louisville, LSU (self-imposed bowl ban), Maryland, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Penn State, Pittsburgh, San Diego State, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Utah, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Washington, Washington State
On top of that, to use last year as an example to any other year makes no sense.We never were invited to any bowl last year
The Pinstripe Bowl would be the perfect bowl for a 5-7 Rutgers team.
The only folks that think this way are people that won't be motivated enough to tune in their TV sets for a likely uninspiring match-up of a game.Why does anyone ever question if we would accept a bowl at 5 wins? There is zero downside to taking a bowl at any number of wins.
We lost to NW because of a total collapse on our Offense. OL had it’s worse game of the year.Interesting take . I am not buying it . Eric LeGrand led us out of the tunnel against wvu in 2011 and we lost . Those were teammates and friends of his and the picture was the sports photo of the year on the cover of sports illustrated . That team went out there and honored him with a loss. You still have to play the game.
Maybe northwestern should have planned those festivities better so they can knock off Michigan or Iowa .
No…. Forget that phony bowl.The Pinstripe Bowl would be the perfect bowl for a 5-7 Rutgers team.
Maybe not, a 5-7 record most likely gets us in those bowl game that are played the 17th, 18th. Bowl bids won’t be announced until the 4th.Real benefit of getting a bowl bid -- 15 extra practices to develop players. Basically, a jump start on next year.
Winner of the Maryland game plays WVU in Arizona. Loser goes to the Pinstripe and earns a paycheck for the conference.Across the board mediocrity? I hear ya.
Not sure I understand. All I’m saying is value of any Bowl bid at this time is those 15 extra practices. That is critical to continue player development.Maybe not, a 5-7 record most likely gets us in those bowl game that are played the 17th, 18th. Bowl bids won’t be announced until the 4th.
We lost to NW because our entire team looked/played both physically and mentally exhausted that day WHILE NW had a "bye" the previous week. We, on the other hand, had our 7th straight game and just ended the "Mich/OSU/MSU" gauntlet the week before. Lots of injuries, as well, IIRC.We lost to NW because of a total collapse on our Offense. OL had it’s worse game of the year.
Maryland is our #1 "rival" in this conference right now. Great series thus far, proximity and even some recruiting battles. NO REASON WHATSOEVER this shouldn't have a "trophy" by now. Blows my mind.Winner of the Maryland game plays WVU in Arizona. Loser goes to the Pinstripe and earns a paycheck for the conference.
There's your trophy game.
What would the trophy be ? The “Fridge” in honor of Ralph friegden.Maryland is our #1 "rival" in this conference right now. Great series thus far, proximity and even some recruiting battles. NO REASON WHATSOEVER this shouldn't have a "trophy" by now. Blows my mind.
What would the trophy be ? The “Fridge” in honor of Ralph friegden.
WVU has always been Greg’s Achilles heel.We are now predicted to play WVU in Arizona. Sign me up!