Doesn’t make sense with Panik at 5 but he has been hitting Alonso 2nd for a few games and Alonso had his most consistent streak of the year at number 2.Mickey Moron’s lineup tonight is a joke. Panik batting 5th, Alonzo 2nd and why is Lagares in the lineup at all. He’s an idiot.
-3.5
Completely agree on Lagares. Nimmo was recalled. Play him. Lagares is a rally killer.Mickey Moron’s lineup tonight is a joke. Panik batting 5th, Alonzo 2nd and why is Lagares in the lineup at all? He’s an idiot.
ESPN broadcast is intolerable. First, wtf is it with that loud Pop! everytime the catcher catches the ball. Second, A-rod is an awful announcer. The whole announcing team sucks.
Lugo was not available.There goes that bullpen again. Why do they recycle the same bums thinking the results will be different? Classic example of insanity
They don't recycle the same bums. The Mets have used 29 different pitchers this year. TWENTY-NINE. Anybody who can get anybody out in Syracuse gets a shot. Can't blame Mickey for that.There goes that bullpen again. Why do they recycle the same bums thinking the results will be different? Classic example of insanity
Hope that clears the way for Ruben Tejada's return!!!!:Wink:In other news, Dilson Herrera has exercised an opt-out and has elected free agency.
Syracuse is one game out of a playoff position with one to go. They need a win and a Scranton loss tomorrow or their season is over. If it is, we will no doubt see Lowrie on Tuesday, and maybe a couple of others.
Actually, it may. Tejada cleared waivers and re-signed with Syracuse. They may just bring him back as soon as Tuesday.Hope that clears the way for Ruben Tejada's return!!!!:Wink:
@BigEastPhil will welcome him back.Actually, it may. Tejada cleared waivers and re-signed with Syracuse. They may just bring him back as soon as Tuesday.
They may have used 29 players, but the same 3 or 4 players are responsible for the majority of blown game. That's my problem.They don't recycle the same bums. The Mets have used 29 different pitchers this year. TWENTY-NINE. Anybody who can get anybody out in Syracuse gets a shot. Can't blame Mickey for that.
Now if you want to rip the team for having no MLB ready pitching depth anywhere in the organization, well that's a whole 'nother story.
Familia had actually been pretty decent since the AS break. As have a number of their guys in the BP...They may have used 29 players, but the same 3 or 4 players are responsible for the majority of blown game. That's my problem.
Familia had actually been pretty decent since the AS break. As have a number of their guys in the BP...
Most of their losses since the AS break have come from bad SP performances or lack of timely hitting with men on.
Oh yeah- also our manager...in what F-omg baseball universe does Panik hit 5th? If in the lineup, he hits 7th at best (if JL is playing) and 8th all other times.
Less then 30 games left and most likely no playoffs. As a Manager- no one gets a day off the rest of the way unless injured.
Slump, no slump whatever. You all get in there and play.
What was up with the bunt? Go for the kill especially on the road. He plays as if we have a lights out bullpen.Mickey was so bad yet again last night. Bringing in Zamora to face Harper and having Guillorme PH and bunt instead of letting JD Davis bat were all kinds of awful.
Hell, not putting in Davis to hit at that point was just stupidWhat was up with the bunt? Go for the kill especially on the road. He plays as if we have a lights out bullpen.
C'mon guys. Bunting in that situation is the standard "book" play which most managers would do. Get the tying run to third and go ahead to second. Play for two runs and the lead.Hell, not putting in Davis to hit at that point was just stupid
I no longer know what to say about this guy..,
C'mon guys. Bunting in that situation is the standard "book" play which most managers would do. Get the tying run to third and go ahead to second. Play for two runs and the lead.
I think the Phillies surprised Mickey by bringing the infield in, rather than conceding the tying run . They certainly surprised me!
A case can certainly be made that given the Mets bullpen, it's better to play for the big inning than a one run lead. I could go either way on that. Either approach is justifiable and neither is just stupid.
C'mon guys. Bunting in that situation is the standard "book" play which most managers would do. Get the tying run to third and go ahead to second. Play for two runs and the lead.
I think the Phillies surprised Mickey by bringing the infield in, rather than conceding the tying run . They certainly surprised me!
A case can certainly be made that given the Mets bullpen, it's better to play for the big inning than a one run lead. I could go either way on that. Either approach is justifiable and neither is just stupid.
The Wilpons don't give a damn about what any fans think. So sorry I can't take responsibility for their cheap-ass machinations.As much as I hate Philly, that's the problem. As lone as the Wilps sees that this is what their fans want, they will keep going on the cheap with the managers and GMs, who will keep making the I'll decisions that a Maddon, a Girardi, or a Chaim Bloom will make.
In that situation, the bunt is not playing for the tie, it is playing for the lead. You are moving the lead run into scoring position. If it were just a runner on first, I agree the bunt would be a bad play. As it is, I see both sides of the argument.We are playing in Philly...cant play for a tie and hope they dont score again. If it was the same situation and we are at home...I maybe lean toward the bunt but not playing in Phily.
There are lots of ways to play it and bunt is a fairly safe managerial call. But, we cannot play safe at this point. Even if for no other reason, to let other teams know we are not going quietly.In that situation, the bunt is not playing for the tie, it is playing for the lead. You are moving the lead run into scoring position. If it were just a runner on first, I agree the bunt would be a bad play. As it is, I see both sides of the argument.
If you are playing for a one run lead and have to protect it for three or more innings, I would say bad decision. If you only have to protect it for one inning, I would say good decision. For two innings, I can go either way.
There are lots of ways to play it and bunt is a fairly safe managerial call. But, we cannot play safe at this point. Even if for no other reason, to let other teams know we are not going quietly.
Agree, but disagree, and don't be afraid.Nice win but... Too little too late, I'm afraid.
Hopefully the 7 with 17 left (or whatever it is now) will be in the Mets favor this time around. We'll see.Agree, but disagree, and don't be afraid.
25 left, of which 17 are at home, albeit against tough competition.Hopefully the 7 with 17 left (or whatever it is now) will be in the Mets favor this time around. We'll see.
Yeah I'm curious about that too. Maybe Noah said he was tiring. Or maybe Regan noticed something. Or maybe theyre just trying to save him a few pitches with the (faint) hope that they'll be needing him deep into October.So- was there a reason to take out Noah after 90 pitches? Glad we were up by more than 3...