Your jinx failed tonight. All around crap performance tonight. It happens. F'in Braves.Down to 4 soon 🤦♂️
No reverse jinx intended. Obvious as can be what was coming at time of post.Your jinx failed tonight. All around crap performance tonight. It happens. F'in Braves.
I mean they were facing a cy young winner. Braves will eventually have to play a winning teamDown to 4 soon 🤦♂️
It's why I cautioned not to look at the standings until around July 4. Gives a more clear picture. Yes the Mets had a big lead but it's because it was still a small sample and need teams to get around the schedule a bit. Not you personally but if you thought the Mets were going to have a 10 game lead all year with no one challenging them then your heads are in the clouds.I do not think the Braves current pace is sustainable. In fact I am quite certain it is not sustainable, as no team has ever won 112 in a row.
Just keep winning series and we'll be fine. There'll be time enough for counting when the dealing's done.
I am guessing that in most seasons there are more no hitters than immaculate innings.Not Mets related but noteworthy nonetheless:
In the second inning of yesterday's Houston-Texas game, Houston pitcher Luis Garcia threw an immaculate inning. Nine pitches, nine strikes, three K's. Rare, but it happens occasionally.
Then in the seventh, Houston reliever Phil Maton threw another immaculate inning! Against the same three batters!
What are the odds?
I don't think anyone thought the Mets would run and hide from Atlanta... at least not without deGrom and Scherzer. Atlanta is hot with a crazy winning streak, and they are still looking up. What that tells me is the Mets have been consistent, and that's without their two big guns. Also, plenty of experts are not sold on Atlanta because the current run has been against sub-.500 teams. Atlanta has a sub-.500 against teams with a winning record. It's been close to a month since the Braves have played a team with a winning record. That was against Milwaukee, who took 2 of 3 from them. The previous series was San Diego, who also took 2 of 3 games. Here are the terrible teams Atlanta has faced during this run:It's why I cautioned not to look at the standings until around July 4. Gives a more clear picture. Yes the Mets had a big lead but it's because it was still a small sample and need teams to get around the schedule a bit. Not you personally but if you thought the Mets were going to have a 10 game lead all year with no one challenging them then your heads are in the clouds.
They sent down Lee yesterday before the game. Yoan Lopez came up.Assuming Marte is OK, I would think that the Mets would make a roster move soon to send down either Lee or Plummer. No point is rostering them both as their skill sets are virtually identical.
Who comes up? Smith, Vientos, or a trade acquisition?
I did that in Little League baseball once. It was my Polk HS 4 TDs moment. When I moved up to the "major league" division 2 years later, my neck got sore from watching all the balls being hit over the fences. 🤣Not Mets related but noteworthy nonetheless:
In the second inning of yesterday's Houston-Texas game, Houston pitcher Luis Garcia threw an immaculate inning. Nine pitches, nine strikes, three K's. Rare, but it happens occasionally.
Then in the seventh, Houston reliever Phil Maton threw another immaculate inning! Against the same three batters!
What are the odds?
I guess I should pay more attention!They sent down Lee yesterday before the game. Yoan Lopez came up.
Not that I know. The other thing to keep an eye on is you can only option players down 5 times before they are subject to waivers. I think Medina and Nogosek are close to that which is why they brought Lopez up this time and not Medina.I guess I should pay more attention!
So, the Mets are again carrying 14 pitchers, which as of June 20 will be illegal. Unless they extend that deadline again.
Oh, Al the superstar.I did that in Little League baseball once. I was my Polk HS 4 TDs moment. When I moved up to the "major league" division 2 years later, my neck got sore from watching all the balls being hit over the fences. 🤣
I would bring back Smith to see if has regained his swing. I would probably wait until after the AS break to give Vientos more at bats and experience at AAA. Cannot see the point of bringing him up to sit.Assuming Marte is OK, I would think that the Mets would make a roster move soon to send down either Lee or Plummer. No point is rostering them both as their skill sets are virtually identical.
Who comes up? Smith, Vientos, or a trade acquisition?
I think they have gone 5-6 since the west road trip startedI am not concerned one bit. My point is you have people complaining the Mets blew a big lead when they did nothing of the sort.
6-6 actuallyI think they have gone 5-6 since the west road trip started
that is not blowing a lead, it is a period of .500 or so, just a mediocre stretch
Under normal circumstances a second place team might have picked up 3 games or so on the Mets.
Couldn’t figure the Braves winning everything right now. Each of the six Met
Losses cost them a game lead
Couldn't swear to it, but I think this is the first time all year that the catcher hasn't batted ninth.
Meh. DP ball that was perfectly placed and found a hole.And Chasen "the sieve" Shreve
I was more referring to not being able to put away the lefty at 0-2. He just doesnt have the type of southpaw stuff that is nasty on lefties.Meh. DP ball that was perfectly placed and found a hole.
That is true. He is not the classic lefty specialist. But then, the three batter rule has pretty much legislated the classic lefty specialist out of the game.I was more referring to not being able to put away the lefty at 0-2. He just doesnt have the type of southpaw stuff that is nasty on lefties.
Honestly that did cross my mind also.That is true. He is not the classic lefty specialist. But then, the three batter rule has pretty much legislated the classic lefty specialist out of the game.
BTW, if the Mets had been shifting on the AB is question, it's an easy DP and we're out of the inning tied at 1-1. I point that out because we all remember the times when the shift backfires. We don't remember when not shifting backfires. I submit that the latter instances are the more frequent.