Wait until the annual "Best NJ Pizza" thread comes around!Originally posted by West Point Knight:
Dang these weather threads turn vicious!![]()
Wait until the annual "Best NJ Pizza" thread comes around!Originally posted by West Point Knight:
Dang these weather threads turn vicious!![]()
I'll be sure not to join that one...I can see how that one might hit close to home!!!Originally posted by DJ Spanky:
Wait until the annual "Best NJ Pizza" thread comes around!Originally posted by West Point Knight:
Dang these weather threads turn vicious!![]()
Temperatures forecast for the rest of the week are low. High 39/ low 26 for Wednesday. Anyone remember the April 1982 blizzard? Or the significant snowfall in April 2003?Originally posted by RU848789:
4Real - good, glad you could admit you were wrong. I admitted I was wrong on those storms last year and admitted I was wrong even in this thread, so not sure what your point is. Sure, I also try to explain it, when I'm wrong, because I think it's important to know the root cause and there are some people interested in the explanation. If you're not, fine, don't read it.
Also, my degrees in chemical eng'g are about as close as one can get to meteorology without majoring in it, so your point on that was completely irrelevant - let me know if you'd like me to explain how much more similar chemical eng'g is to meteorology than geology.
And, oh my god, I talked about myself on a board full of people who talk about themselves, including you. We just focus on different OT topics. Also, I guess I'd rather be known for making some long winded posts than being the board's resident 10-year old bully, who regularly threatens other posters.
Oh yeah, for those of you who hate snow, next weekend could suck. Always a long shot to have snow in late March, but some of the models are showing the potential for an early spring mixed wintry precip event (with the risk of snow higher inland - tougher to get snow on the coastal plain this late in the season).
http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/45967-mar-10-31-modelthreat-discussion-thread/page-14
this is a week away...you've been hanging with that nutjob PB too muchOriginally posted by RU848789:
4Real - good, glad you could admit you were wrong. I admitted I was wrong on those storms last year and admitted I was wrong even in this thread, so not sure what your point is. Sure, I also try to explain it, when I'm wrong, because I think it's important to know the root cause and there are some people interested in the explanation. If you're not, fine, don't read it.
Also, my degrees in chemical eng'g are about as close as one can get to meteorology without majoring in it, so your point on that was completely irrelevant - let me know if you'd like me to explain how much more similar chemical eng'g is to meteorology than geology.
And, oh my god, I talked about myself on a board full of people who talk about themselves, including you. We just focus on different OT topics. Also, I guess I'd rather be known for making some long winded posts than being the board's resident 10-year old bully, who regularly threatens other posters.
Oh yeah, for those of you who hate snow, next weekend could suck. Always a long shot to have snow in late March, but some of the models are showing the potential for an early spring mixed wintry precip event (with the risk of snow higher inland - tougher to get snow on the coastal plain this late in the season).
http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/45967-mar-10-31-modelthreat-discussion-thread/page-14
Originally posted by RU848789:
4Real - good, glad you could admit you were wrong. I admitted I was wrong on those storms last year and admitted I was wrong even in this thread, so not sure what your point is. Sure, I also try to explain it, when I'm wrong, because I think it's important to know the root cause and there are some people interested in the explanation. If you're not, fine, don't read it.
Also, my degrees in chemical eng'g are about as close as one can get to meteorology without majoring in it, so your point on that was completely irrelevant - let me know if you'd like me to explain how much more similar chemical eng'g is to meteorology than geology.
And, oh my god, I talked about myself on a board full of people who talk about themselves, including you. We just focus on different OT topics. Also, I guess I'd rather be known for making some long winded posts than being the board's resident 10-year old bully, who regularly threatens other posters.
Congrats on learning how to use the font tools. I think most would expect lots of I's and me's in the middle of a "conversation" of sorts with 4Real, who uses just as many I's and me's that you somehow failed to highlight. On the other hand, most of my weather forecast/discussion posts don't say I/me/we, as I generally just report what I've been reading with an occasional opinion or two.Originally posted by e5fdny:
Originally posted by RU848789:
4Real - good, glad you could admit you were wrong. I admitted I was wrong on those storms last year and admitted I was wrong even in this thread, so not sure what your point is. Sure, I also try to explain it, when I'm wrong, because I think it's important to know the root cause and there are some people interested in the explanation. If you're not, fine, don't read it.
Also, my degrees in chemical eng'g are about as close as one can get to meteorology without majoring in it, so your point on that was completely irrelevant - let me know if you'd like me to explain how much more similar chemical eng'g is to meteorology than geology.
And, oh my god, I talked about myself on a board full of people who talk about themselves, including you. We just focus on different OT topics. Also, I guess I'd rather be known for making some long winded posts than being the board's resident 10-year old bully, who regularly threatens other posters.
![]()
Why stop here, why not the whole thing? LOLOriginally posted by camdenlawprof:
deleted message
This post was edited on 3/16 5:31 PM by camdenlawprof
I meant the whole thread Camden. Not just your post. LOLOriginally posted by camdenlawprof:
my apologies -- I don't know how to do that.
Has anyone heard anything new about the possibility of a Friday storm? Or is it just too soon to say? (I suspect it is, but I saw a twitter posting by Gary S. of NWS Mount Holly that the "map is looking snowier." )
Yes, I've posted about it a couple of times. Major snowstorms are pretty unlikely this time of year, but they do occur and when they do, they're often not forecasted well, as many early spring snowstorms are right on the edge of snow and rain given climatology and expected warmer conditions this time of year.Originally posted by camdenlawprof:
my apologies -- I don't know how to do that.
Has anyone heard anything new about the possibility of a Friday storm? Or is it just too soon to say? (I suspect it is, but I saw a twitter posting by Gary S. of NWS Mount Holly that the "map is looking snowier." )
While #'s does an excellent job of keeping us posted on the weather, I think he is the main resistance to new threads. He has stated in the past that he does not use a smart phone. In fact I believe his cell phone is one of the first generation types which come in a big carrying case roughly the size of a 2 slice toaster.Originally posted by camdenlawprof:
I must say that I do not understand the resistance to new threads for new storms, but what do I know?
Sounds like you have a valid claim to get what's owed to you. I suggest you give the law firm of Dewey, Cheatem & Howe a call for a free initial consultation. Their number is 1-888-SUE-MDRY (783-6379).Originally posted by BigLou:
What he does not realize is that those of us using the mobile site have to scroll through 400 plus messages to get his most current forecasts. I myself am in physical therapy for a strained ligament in my right pointer finger from all of the screen swipes needed to get to the most current posts while using my phone.
While I have stated my preference for keeping things in one thread (I like having all the info in one place, especially on a board where we only have a few days of storage), where possible, based on feedback from quite a few folks, I started doing new threads for each game and each weather event last winter and then this past football season.Originally posted by BigLou:
While #'s does an excellent job of keeping us posted on the weather, I think he is the main resistance to new threads. He has stated in the past that he does not use a smart phone. In fact I believe his cell phone is one of the first generation types which come in a big carrying case roughly the size of a 2 slice toaster.Originally posted by camdenlawprof:
I must say that I do not understand the resistance to new threads for new storms, but what do I know?
What he does not realize is that those of us using the mobile site have to scroll through 400 plus messages to get his most current forecasts. I myself am in physical therapy for a strained ligament in my right pointer finger from all of the screen swipes needed to get to the most current posts while using my phone.
All that said, I did work through the pain to see his most current forecast for Friday. Its wishful thinking in his part - if we get any snow it will be a coating that is gone within hours - even if I need to use a blow torch to melt it off my property.
My comment was not directed at you. I know that as time goes on, you have become more willing to start new threads. I am sorry that you are no longer starting weather threads and are considering not posting here. I understand your frustration, but except for a few idiots, people appreciate what you do. My comment was actually more directed at bac, who a few days back turned down without explanation a request for a new thread.Originally posted by RU848789:
While I have stated my preference for keeping things in one thread (I like having all the info in one place, especially on a board where we only have a few days of storage), where possible, based on feedback from quite a few folks, I started doing new threads for each game and each weather event last winter and then this past football season.Originally posted by BigLou:
While #'s does an excellent job of keeping us posted on the weather, I think he is the main resistance to new threads. He has stated in the past that he does not use a smart phone. In fact I believe his cell phone is one of the first generation types which come in a big carrying case roughly the size of a 2 slice toaster.Originally posted by camdenlawprof:
I must say that I do not understand the resistance to new threads for new storms, but what do I know?
What he does not realize is that those of us using the mobile site have to scroll through 400 plus messages to get his most current forecasts. I myself am in physical therapy for a strained ligament in my right pointer finger from all of the screen swipes needed to get to the most current posts while using my phone.
All that said, I did work through the pain to see his most current forecast for Friday. Its wishful thinking in his part - if we get any snow it will be a coating that is gone within hours - even if I need to use a blow torch to melt it off my property.
I don't use a smart phone, so I never realized that people need to actually scroll to the end - why is that, by the way - why can't you just go right to the end by clicking on the last page (and doing a little scrolling), like I do from my PC?
But I haven't been starting weather threads for awhile and am not sure I will be in the future or even posting on the weather here (haven't decided yet - see my post a few pages back - it's a lot of work, I don't have a lot of free time and the grief quotient has gotten pretty high around here), so don't blame me for not having new threads for new storms - take it up with bac for this one.
at that point we were deep into discussing the upcoming storm so why bother starting the new oneOriginally posted by camdenlawprof:
My comment was not directed at you. I know that as time goes on, you have become more willing to start new threads. I am sorry that you are no longer starting weather threads and are considering not posting here. I understand your frustration, but except for a few idiots, people appreciate what you do. My comment was actually more directed at bac, who a few days back turned down without explanation a request for a new thread.Originally posted by RU848789:
While I have stated my preference for keeping things in one thread (I like having all the info in one place, especially on a board where we only have a few days of storage), where possible, based on feedback from quite a few folks, I started doing new threads for each game and each weather event last winter and then this past football season.Originally posted by BigLou:
While #'s does an excellent job of keeping us posted on the weather, I think he is the main resistance to new threads. He has stated in the past that he does not use a smart phone. In fact I believe his cell phone is one of the first generation types which come in a big carrying case roughly the size of a 2 slice toaster.Originally posted by camdenlawprof:
I must say that I do not understand the resistance to new threads for new storms, but what do I know?
What he does not realize is that those of us using the mobile site have to scroll through 400 plus messages to get his most current forecasts. I myself am in physical therapy for a strained ligament in my right pointer finger from all of the screen swipes needed to get to the most current posts while using my phone.
All that said, I did work through the pain to see his most current forecast for Friday. Its wishful thinking in his part - if we get any snow it will be a coating that is gone within hours - even if I need to use a blow torch to melt it off my property.
I don't use a smart phone, so I never realized that people need to actually scroll to the end - why is that, by the way - why can't you just go right to the end by clicking on the last page (and doing a little scrolling), like I do from my PC?
But I haven't been starting weather threads for awhile and am not sure I will be in the future or even posting on the weather here (haven't decided yet - see my post a few pages back - it's a lot of work, I don't have a lot of free time and the grief quotient has gotten pretty high around here), so don't blame me for not having new threads for new storms - take it up with bac for this one.
First, I hope you did not mistake my attempt at humor to be serious ball busting, it was certainly not meant that way.Originally posted by RU848789:
While I have stated my preference for keeping things in one thread (I like having all the info in one place, especially on a board where we only have a few days of storage), where possible, based on feedback from quite a few folks, I started doing new threads for each game and each weather event last winter and then this past football season.Originally posted by BigLou:
While #'s does an excellent job of keeping us posted on the weather, I think he is the main resistance to new threads. He has stated in the past that he does not use a smart phone. In fact I believe his cell phone is one of the first generation types which come in a big carrying case roughly the size of a 2 slice toaster.Originally posted by camdenlawprof:
I must say that I do not understand the resistance to new threads for new storms, but what do I know?
What he does not realize is that those of us using the mobile site have to scroll through 400 plus messages to get his most current forecasts. I myself am in physical therapy for a strained ligament in my right pointer finger from all of the screen swipes needed to get to the most current posts while using my phone.
All that said, I did work through the pain to see his most current forecast for Friday. Its wishful thinking in his part - if we get any snow it will be a coating that is gone within hours - even if I need to use a blow torch to melt it off my property.
I don't use a smart phone, so I never realized that people need to actually scroll to the end - why is that, by the way - why can't you just go right to the end by clicking on the last page (and doing a little scrolling), like I do from my PC?
But I haven't been starting weather threads for awhile and am not sure I will be in the future or even posting on the weather here (haven't decided yet - see my post a few pages back - it's a lot of work, I don't have a lot of free time and the grief quotient has gotten pretty high around here), so don't blame me for not having new threads for new storms - take it up with bac for this one.
I use the regular site on the ipad but find it to be difficult to read without constantly stretching the screen on the phone.Originally posted by bac2therac:
You don't have to use the mobile site on the phone...I prefer the regular one and have no issues seeing 9 page threads
Lou - no issue at all with people who have made their points about smart phones, even if they "complained." Which is why I was doing new threads for the past year or more - figured ease of access was more important than my relatively unimportant desire to have long threads.Originally posted by BigLou:
First, I hope you did not mistake my attempt at humor to be serious ball busting, it was certainly not meant that way.
Second, I bought up the smart phone thing since you don't have one and I have long suspected that you did not realize some of the limitations of the mobile site. the real site does not translate to a smart phone screen. the mobile site does but has limitations, one of which is that you cannot go directly to the last post as you can on a computer. You have now confirmed that you did not realize this. While on a computer you can select a page and go directly there (this thread is 9 pages) on a phone you have to scroll. I bet most of the grief you get about new threads are from people using phones who don't like scrolling through 400 replies.
Oh and another thing, most of us do what I did here which is quote the post in the response. Well this actually makes it a longer scroll on a smart phone. Very frustrating to scroll through hundreds of long replies, many with several other messages embedded in them, especially when the actually reply is not part of the meaningful discussion,. Also, fyi, on the mobile site you cannot quote a prior reply.
Hopefully this clears up some of the new thread reasoning.
Not gonna say a word...Originally posted by RU848789:
Lou - no issue at all with people who have made their points about smart phones, even if they "complained." Which is why I was doing new threads for the past year or more - figured ease of access was more important than my relatively unimportant desire to have long threads.Originally posted by BigLou:
First, I hope you did not mistake my attempt at humor to be serious ball busting, it was certainly not meant that way.
Second, I bought up the smart phone thing since you don't have one and I have long suspected that you did not realize some of the limitations of the mobile site. the real site does not translate to a smart phone screen. the mobile site does but has limitations, one of which is that you cannot go directly to the last post as you can on a computer. You have now confirmed that you did not realize this. While on a computer you can select a page and go directly there (this thread is 9 pages) on a phone you have to scroll. I bet most of the grief you get about new threads are from people using phones who don't like scrolling through 400 replies.
Oh and another thing, most of us do what I did here which is quote the post in the response. Well this actually makes it a longer scroll on a smart phone. Very frustrating to scroll through hundreds of long replies, many with several other messages embedded in them, especially when the actually reply is not part of the meaningful discussion,. Also, fyi, on the mobile site you cannot quote a prior reply.
Hopefully this clears up some of the new thread reasoning.
At the risk of further annoying e5fdny and some others, here comes an I/me post. What has annoyed me is the baiting, trolling, finger-pointing, and downright douchebaggery of a small but vocal minority who either don't like snow or me or both. I have no idea why people like that wouldn't just ignore these threads, but they don't. I don't mind ball-busting at all (I do it, too - just look at some of my exchanges with 4Real - he'll at least argue from knowledge and data - we may disagree, but I think we respect each other, even if he gets a little crazy sometimes, lol) and I don't mind people disagreeing. It's the mean-spirited, "you suck/you're wrong" type stuff that is wearing - I should just ignore it, but I'm not good at that.
I imagine many have no idea that I often spend an hour or two per day perusing various websites (mostly the NWS, as they're the best, IMO), looking at model output, emailing with a few experts in the field, and then trying to deliver a message that helps people understand what might happen, while acknowledging the uncertainty of the forecast, which often can change significantly, even at the last minute.
When I started doing this about 15 years ago, I posted here and had a small email list and almost everyone seemed to at least appreciate the effort. Over the years, I haven't changed much in what I post here, but the site has grown a lot and the tenor, in general, is simply more confrontational and negative; on the other hand, my small email list of 15-20 people has grown into a "blog" style intranet website at work with over 1000 subscribers and a friends/family email list of nearly 200, plus I started posting the same info on Facebook.
I never get grief from any of them, even when a forecast busts, like the "blizzard" (sure, I got my share of teasing, but it was good-natured). Like anyone, I like positive feedback and I get a ton of that from these other outlets, which is why I've considered not making weather posts here anymore. I do appreciate the very nice feedback many have given me in these threads here, so I'm not trying to milk more positive feedback - just trying to explain my thought process. My guess is I'll continue to post about winter weather and gameday weather (and hurricanes, like Sandy), but I'll likely be more low key in doing it (less thread starting and less arguing with obvious trolls).
By the way, looks like 2 feet of snow on Friday. I kid, I kid - see Knight Shift's thread - maybe 1-2" of snow on Friday N/W of I-95 (especially north of 78), with not much on pavement due to temps in the low/mid 30s and the March sun angle.
.
You suck. You're wrong.Originally posted by RU848789:
It's the mean-spirited, "you suck/you're wrong" type stuff that is wearing - I should just ignore it, but I'm not good at that.
I agree with you and am in the same predicament regarding my business. That being said, some of the guys rooting for snow could be the exact opposite of us. Maybe they plow, work at resorts, own second homes they rent during ski season, own a hardware store etc etc.....Originally posted by wonchobody:
I think it's just the hoping for snow that irritates people. You're entitled to your opinion, but for me when it snows it wipes out my business during a season when I'm already historically down. For alot of people 2 or 3 bad months can put them under. Which is why I check these threads because I find the information really accurate for the most part, to see if I need to stress out for the next three or four days.
So for me, when you cheer for snow, you are indirectly, but not intentionally, rooting for me to fail. And if others are like me, then yes, they might be irritated. So can you really blame people for that at times? I don't say anything, but that's just me. Others though, are going to be much more vocal about it. So maybe, ease down the cheerleading a bit? Reporting what's on the horizon is fine, but really hoping for it is a little troubling for people like myself. It doesn't have to be about liking your opinion AND the report.
Again, I appreciate what you do. Just my .02
Originally posted by mildone:
Originally posted by RU848789:
It's the mean-spirited, "you suck/you're wrong" type stuff that is wearing - I should just ignore it, but I'm not good at that.
You suck. You're wrong.
![]()
+1.
RU848789, if you're not good at that why in the world would you venture over to the RWCJ board where that sort of stuff predominates ? Just saying.
When you get the answer, please let us know. ;)Originally posted by RC1978:
Could someone explain to me the reason this thread is a 8 pages long and why a new thread is not started for every major weather event?
Originally posted by RC1978:
Could someone explain to me the reason this thread is a 8 pages long and why a new thread is not started for every major weather event?