In my opinion the treaty and its results were the biggest cause of WWII.Ww2 actually began the day the Versailles treaty ended world war 1.
In my opinion the treaty and its results were the biggest cause of WWII.Ww2 actually began the day the Versailles treaty ended world war 1.
no DEMOCRATIC nation not even the USA, had the stomach for more war.
Should we have? That's a hard call. I think, maybe, yes.. that was the chance to end communism perhaps forever...
I’m not going to turn this into a domestic political debate about the rise of Nationalism here because that will end predictably. There is a big difference between sending American troops somewhere and fully supporting NATO and allies in Europe. Regarding the immigration issue, there is nothing new here, historically there has always been rising anxiety , fear, paranoia, nativism during migration surges. Whether it was the mid 19th century, the late 19th - early 20th century or the last 20 years. Rising Nationalism in the late 19th century led directly to the outbreak of WW1 and WW2 in Europe. The US will not be able to avoid involvement if something similar happens today.
Yeah.. I was thinking of adding the nuke factor into what I had said.. we could live in a world now where teh USA dropped atomic bombs on Russian manufacturing centers or even teh front lines tank battalions in Germany and Poland. Then did the same like MacArthur wanted vs China during the Korean War... because if we dropped more on Russia.. why not a few more to finish off the scourge of Communism?We'd had wartime conditions for almost 4 years, to continue would have caused great stress at home. A good chance the American people wouldn't have supported it. That was one of the factors that went into the decision to drop atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima: that there was waning enthusiasm and support for a long, bloody, drawn-out invasion of Japan by conventional means.
Seems to be pretty clear that the military-industrial complex.. and I'll add that the "complex" includes DC politicians and Wall Street firms and the international investor class... want war.. want chaos that causes wars... and crimes of all kinds.. like terrorism and CoVid.. because they can then just print money and take their cuts (both legally and illegally.. aka un-auditable spending)... get beyond rich now off the debt of future taxpayers.NATO allies got their economies wrecked with sanctions that backfired (and Germany's pipeline blown-up by US just before winter). Certain elements in US/EU want Ukraine for themselves (US staged a coup in Ukraine 10 yrs ago for the kick-off).
The US Revolution and Constitution were populist. Now the 1A is being gutted and they want the 2A, electoral college and SCOTUS gutted (gangs outside justice homes aren't "populist") . They've been running lawfare for 6 years while denying real scandals and persecuting anyone not complying (currently Musk is main target). Mike Benz (formerly State Dept) explained how US intel designed for foreign surveillance was turned on citizens using EU, Australia and others. Anything true becomes 'misinformation"
The border was intentionally destroyed .
The US might lose a war with China, congressional commission says
Insufficient industry, readiness, innovation, and funding hamper military’s ability to prevail in conflict, key experts find.www.defenseone.com
America Is a Heartbeat Away From a War It Could Lose
Global war is neither a theoretical contingency nor the fever dream of hawks and militarists.foreignpolicy.com
They DECLARED war....that's all they did. They didn't attack Germany.Not sure I understand this.
UK and France went to war to defend Poland and it ended up in a world war costing millions of lives.
They DECLARED war....that's all they did. They didn't attack Germany.
We'd had wartime conditions for almost 4 years, to continue would have caused great stress at home. A good chance the American people wouldn't have supported it. That was one of the factors that went into the decision to drop atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima: that there was waning enthusiasm and support for a long, bloody, drawn-out invasion of Japan by conventional means.
I've been arguing about things like this since the Sixties and my days at Rutgers. One thing I've learned is that when someone starts spouting nonsense like you just did...it's time to talk about Rutgers football.Seems to be pretty clear that the military-industrial complex.. and I'll add that the "complex" includes DC politicians and Wall Street firms and the international investor class... want war.. want chaos that causes wars... and crimes of all kinds.. like terrorism and CoVid.. because they can then just print money and take their cuts (both legally and illegally.. aka un-auditable spending)... get beyond rich now off the debt of future taxpayers.
Yeah.. my father and some of his brothers and the fathers of many posters here would have most likely paid the ultimate price in any invasion of Japan. So, the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has always been a tough one for me.What drove the decision to drop the nukes was the possibility of almost as many KIA as the US had suffered thus far in the war and hundred of thousands of wounded. Even with rationing the US home front was not suffering significantly up to that point
Yeah... I see you follow your own advice about your nonsense regarding some distinction between declaring war and attacking Germany.I've been arguing about things like this since the Sixties and my days at Rutgers. One thing I've learned is that when someone starts spouting nonsense like you just did...it's time to talk about Rutgers football.
To quote the comedian Ron White...."You can't fix stupid."
I was trying to be nice. I really wanted to say that I learned long ago not to waste my time with idiotic conspiracy nonsense from dumbasses.Yeah... I see you follow your own advice about your nonsense regarding some distinction between declaring war and attacking Germany.
So.. the tactic now is to declare victory in an argument without bothering to make an argument? That's typical.
As a person of Polish decent, its quite clear cut really - Russia has never wanted an independent Poland (I don't want to get into a CE board debate, but there are parallels to Ukraine today). From 1795, to the Polish-Soviet War in 1920, to the Katyn Massacre of 1940, to the failure of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising, the selling out of the Yalta Conference, and finally the denial of allowing Polish Veterans to march in the London Victory Parade of 1946.Not sure I understand this.
UK and France went to war to defend Poland and it ended up in a world war costing millions of lives. After the war, no country,.. no DEMOCRATIC nation not even the USA, had the stomach for more war. The USSR and Communist China and Communists in Korea had no such limitations.
Should we have? That's a hard call. I think, maybe, yes.. that was the chance to end communism perhaps forever... but we had helped arm the USSR to defeat Germany... could we have fought them and finished off Japan and successfully occupied Germany and Japan while fighting the USSR?
Dunno.
oh.. it was not because you had no response? Okay.. let hear it.I was trying to be nice. I really wanted to say that I learned long ago not to waste my time with idiotic conspiracy nonsense from dumbasses.
Never a good idea to overly punish your former adversary (dating back to at least the 1st and 2nd Punic Wars). The US/UK did very well with Germany and Japan after WW2. The US could have done a lot better after the Cold War with Russia. That was a historic wasted opportunity.Ww2 actually began the day the Versailles treaty ended world war 1.
Again.. how far should the Allies have gone to thwart Soviet aggression and territorial control demands? The Soviet Army was in Germany, never mind Poland. From the Soviet point of view, why wouldn't they want a cushion of territory so that Moscow couldn't be threatened so quickly from the west.As a person of Polish decent, its quite clear cut really - Russia has never wanted an independent Poland (I don't want to get into a CE board debate, but there are parallels to Ukraine today). From 1795, to the Polish-Soviet War in 1920, to the Katyn Massacre of 1940, to the failure of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising, the selling out of the Yalta Conference, and finally the denial of allowing Polish Veterans to march in the London Victory Parade of 1946.
Western Betrayal
London Victory Parade
Again.. how far should the Allies have gone to thwart Soviet aggression and territorial control demands? The Soviet Army was in Germany, never mind Poland. From the Soviet point of view, why wouldn't they want a cushion of territory so that Moscow couldn't be threatened so quickly from the west.
Was it fair to Poland.. no. But go talk to Russia and whatever left of the USSR about that. As for teh invitation to the Victory parade.. wow.. so many different takes on this out there. What seems most logical is that the USSR pressuring both the UK Government AND the Poles in Britain who had family in Soviet-controlled Poland... seems like it was a sticky issue and maybe it worked out for the best.
Poland is in good shape now and did not have to suffer another war across its lands. Feelings hurt? Small price to pay.
No, it only had to suffer another 50 years behind the Iron Curtain. You just don't get it apparently.Again.. how far should the Allies have gone to thwart Soviet aggression and territorial control demands? The Soviet Army was in Germany, never mind Poland. From the Soviet point of view, why wouldn't they want a cushion of territory so that Moscow couldn't be threatened so quickly from the west.
Was it fair to Poland.. no. But go talk to Russia and whatever left of the USSR about that. As for teh invitation to the Victory parade.. wow.. so many different takes on this out there. What seems most logical is that the USSR pressuring both the UK Government AND the Poles in Britain who had family in Soviet-controlled Poland... seems like it was a sticky issue and maybe it worked out for the best.
Poland is in good shape now and did not have to suffer another war across its lands. Feelings hurt? Small price to pay.
Yeah.. I was thinking of adding the nuke factor into what I had said.. we could live in a world now where teh USA dropped atomic bombs on Russian manufacturing centers or even teh front lines tank battalions in Germany and Poland. Then did the same like MacArthur wanted vs China during the Korean War... because if we dropped more on Russia.. why not a few more to finish off the scourge of Communism?
What drove the decision to drop the nukes was the possibility of almost as many KIA as the US had suffered thus far in the war and hundred of thousands of wounded. Even with rationing the US home front was not suffering significantly up to that point
Poland is in good shape now and did not have to suffer another war across its lands. Feelings hurt? Small price to pay.
My father was training for Operation Downfall, the invasion of mainland Japan. He would have been in the initial wave. Always said Truman saved his life.They had estimated around 600K casualties to take Japan by conventional means. Once they occupied Japan and saw how heavily defended it was along with the people's fanatical devotion to the emperor, they upped those casualty estimate to between 2 and 3 million.
Tell that to the 2 generations which were born and raised behind the Iron Curtain for 45 years.
My father was training for Operation Downfall, the invasion of mainland Japan. He would have been in the initial wave. Always said Truman saved his life.
Might have saved him tooAt the beginning of August my dad was a month away from being deployed to the Pacific Theater as a navigator in a B-29.
My dad was a navigator on a B29 based out of Tinian. Flew many bombing missions over Japan. Still have most of his gear on shelves and in his locker trunk.At the beginning of August my dad was a month away from being deployed to the Pacific Theater as a navigator in a B-29.
Tinian? Any a-bomb runs? :)My dad was a navigator on a B29 based out of Tinian. Flew many bombing missions over Japan. Still have most of his gear on shelves and in his locker trunk.
No neither A-bomb run. Have a couple dollar bills when he wrote the date and bomb site from each run.Tinian? Any a-bomb runs? :)
Exactly.ummm... what? The nationalist movement here says stop it with all the foreign wars.
If anything the bigger fear for world war is this internationalist movement that is aiming to erase borders and community identities in favor of totalitarian control by the internationalist set.
Seems to be pretty clear that the military-industrial complex.. and I'll add that the "complex" includes DC politicians and Wall Street firms and the international investor class... want war.. want chaos that causes wars... and crimes of all kinds.. like terrorism and CoVid.. because they can then just print money and take their cuts (both legally and illegally.. aka un-auditable spending)... get beyond rich now off the debt of future taxpayers.
The fact that this load of hyper-partisan political crap is allowed to remain in this thread speaks volumes.NATO allies got their economies wrecked with sanctions that backfired (and Germany's pipeline blown-up by US just before winter). Certain elements in US/EU want Ukraine for themselves (US staged a coup in Ukraine 10 yrs ago for the kick-off).
The US Revolution and Constitution were populist. Now the 1A is being gutted and they want the 2A, electoral college and SCOTUS gutted (gangs outside justice homes aren't "populist") . They've been running lawfare for 6 years while denying real scandals and persecuting anyone not complying (currently Musk is main target). Mike Benz (formerly State Dept) explained how US intel designed for foreign surveillance was turned on citizens using EU, Australia and others. Anything true becomes 'misinformation"
The border was intentionally destroyed .
The US might lose a war with China, congressional commission says
Insufficient industry, readiness, innovation, and funding hamper military’s ability to prevail in conflict, key experts find.www.defenseone.com
America Is a Heartbeat Away From a War It Could Lose
Global war is neither a theoretical contingency nor the fever dream of hawks and militarists.foreignpolicy.com
You have to listen to Mike Benz who worked cyber for State Dept.
The CIA is joined at the hips with DOD and State.
Together with the military they initially worked to secure US business interests/dominance.
As time went on the pols wanted in and everyone was going for dollars.
US agencies and UK, EU, Australia et al all came to get in bed with each other,
They came to see populism as a threat to their arrangements.
"Democracy" got redefined and its not about the people's government but the institutions and bureaucracies that make the gov up.
US cant officially spy on its people but foreign agencies can
US relies on them to do their dirty work.
They use things like phone calls to Russia to rubber stamp investigations.
The Brazilians going after Musk and the French going after Turov and Telegram are part of international web that's risen globally. NATO is the hub were global political movements are hatched monitored
Check Mike Benz while he's still alive/free - the guy knows where all the bodies are buried (and he knows who controls Soros who is an asset and not a free agent).
The fact that this load of hyper-partisan political crap is allowed to remain in this thread speaks volumes.
Sigh. Seek mental health counseling. conspiracy piled on conspiracy. What a strange world view.
Our military is more fragile than people think. Weak links (global weapon sourcing, realiance on satelite for targeting and comms) can be exploited that would blunt its effectiveness. Also, keep in mind our navy still seems to be preparing for the last war, not the next one by continuing to build giant vulnerable aircraft carriers for the next 12 years. IMO, the bureaucracy of the military is simply not evolving quickly enough to respond to new threats.France was widely considered to have the strongest army in 1939. They just weren’t ready for blitzkrieg.
How in the world is the USA possibly worse off now than in 1939? We have far and away the world’s most powerful military.
Looking for it on Amazon. Need a good beach book. ThanksAgreed . Great read
No. You don't get it. What would have happened had a war vs the USSR been fought to free Poland?No, it only had to suffer another 50 years behind the Iron Curtain. You just don't get it apparently.
I just responded to HP~.. at what price was Poland's freedom for 50 years worth? They always say blood and treasure.. forget the cost in treasure.. focus on the blood. Poland survived and today they care more about their heritage and ethnicity than every other western European nation, it seems, where caring about such things gets you called an evil "nationalist". Should a war have been fought then so many Poles alive today never would have been born.. nor would many Americans and Brits and Francs and Russians (not that anyone cares about them).They had estimated around 600K casualties to take Japan by conventional means. Once they occupied Japan and saw how heavily defended it was along with the people's fanatical devotion to the emperor, they upped those casualty estimate to between 2 and 3 million.
Tell that to the 2 generations which were born and raised behind the Iron Curtain for 45 years.
Read Churchill's war by David Irving. In fact, read all of his books if you're interested in WWIII was just in London and visited the war rooms, I’m consuming everything I can about Churchill.
I’m guessing if someone asked him in 1939 at the height of the Battle of Britain about Japan, he would have rolled his eyes and said “please one dictator at a time”
Oh.. the Mike Benz Tucker interview is very enlightening. You should track down Tucker's Alex Jones interview. I know, I know.. boogeyman conspiracy nut Alex Jones.. I bought that description of him too... until I saw that interview. So did Tucker.. until he saw something that caused him to rethink it all and he invited Jones on. I think a lot of people would be surprised while watching that Tucker interview... same for his Benz interview. The Sachs interview.. cannot recommend that.. I cannot decide if Sachs is honestly as peace-loving as he sounds and brainwashed or if he is just on the take from the internationalists and China.You have to listen to Mike Benz who worked cyber for State Dept.
The CIA is joined at the hips with DOD and State.
Together with the military they initially worked to secure US business interests/dominance.
As time went on the pols wanted in and everyone was going for dollars.
US agencies and UK, EU, Australia et al all came to get in bed with each other,
They came to see populism as a threat to their arrangements.
"Democracy" got redefined and its not about the people's government but the institutions and bureaucracies that make the gov up.
US cant officially spy on its people but foreign agencies can
US relies on them to do their dirty work.
They use things like phone calls to Russia to rubber stamp investigations.
The Brazilians going after Musk and the French going after Turov and Telegram are part of international web that's risen globally. NATO is the hub were global political movements are hatched monitored
Check Mike Benz while he's still alive/free - the guy knows where all the bodies are buried (and he knows who controls Soros who is an asset and not a free agent).