Thanks. Get used to it, blowhard.so great, your posts here are all stalkerish
Thanks. Get used to it, blowhard.so great, your posts here are all stalkerish
Yeah I don’t understand how they can say a 17-15 team deserves an at-large. Weird.Ohio State falls to 11-15 in Q1/2/3......the analysts on Peacock seem oblivious to this trying to lobby for them.....3-11 vs field
for the record, Iowa is 10-15, Northwestern is 12-15 and 3-8 vs field
This is bacs season right here.and..so...the thing is you are still reading my work
not since 2001 has a team only 2 games above 500 ever made it as an at large...Georgia at 16-14 and they played a ridiculous scheduleYeah I don’t understand how they can say a 17-15 team deserves an at-large. Weird.
because the rest of the bubble has been atrocious....Nebbys resume now looks better than OSU because one less loss and better winsI know it’s not how it works, but Nebraska still in the conversation is crazy. How can you make the NCAA Tournament if you don’t even qualify for your conference tournament.
Good stuff BAC. I love the updates!and..so...the thing is you are still reading my work
Ohio St. is out. If not, there should be an investigation.Ohio State falls to 11-15 in Q1/2/3......the analysts on Peacock seem oblivious to this trying to lobby for them.....3-11 vs field
for the record, Iowa is 10-15, Northwestern is 12-15 and 3-8 vs field
agree...will be the Big 10 top seed in the CrownOhio St. is out. If not, there should be an investigation.
the bubble really is this bad that UNC is in this holding spot at the last spot...the prettiest ugly girl in the room right now whose parents have the most moneyHaven’t read this all year, too depressed, but love your work. Two things
1. How can a 1-11 Q1 UNC make it? Is it on name pedigree only?
2. How sad will we be if OSU gets in at 17-15 - what could have been for us.
yeah impressive....and ohio state doesnt have anywhere close to thisTo add context to that 2001 Georgia team that got in at 16-14, just to show what an outlier they were...here are their results under today's Quad system, using the final KenPom rating in place of NET rating (since it didn't exist in 2001, but is a relatively close comparison)...
Q1: 5-10
Q2: 8-3
Q3: 2-1
Q4: 1-0
1 Quad 4 game all season, and only 4 games against the bottom two Quads. That's pretty insane.
Good stuff BAC. I love the updates!