Gottlieb on now.
24% of Texas hospitalizations are peoples between the ages of 20-29.
Where is the point of spread? Bars likely.
protests
Gottlieb on now.
24% of Texas hospitalizations are peoples between the ages of 20-29.
Where is the point of spread? Bars likely.
The 2nd wave is improbable only if restrictions(not all of them mind you) are kept in place.The problem might be them trying to recover the optional procedures and if there is a second wave worse than this one they will be full at the improbable next wave.
Yet NY and PA are not showing similar increases?protests
I was contributing to your point, not arguing against it.I'm not sure what you are getting at here. I know plenty well enough to understand the progression of CV-19. If it is pointed out the most current data shows "in use" ICU beds and ventilators are at an all time high I go with it. Next weeks lagged data is sure to be worse, unfortunately.
Gottlieb on now.
24% of Texas hospitalizations are peoples between the ages of 20-29.
Where is the point of spread? Bars likely.
This would make sense except no similar jumps in NY and PA.Protest also started 2 or 3 weeks ago the majority of the protesters were in that age group If there were a superspreader at those events. And I believe Dallas saw the biggest protests in Texas.
Protest also started 2 or 3 weeks ago the majority of the protesters were in that age group If there were a superspreader at those events. And I believe Dallas saw the biggest protests in Texas.
Oh he thought Vent and ICU bed use was cumulative?Late to the party? You are at a different party all together. You said numbers have continued to decline. Current numbers of inpatients, critical care and ventilator patients associated with CV-19 are at an all time high. The article points them out as "in use" metrics. Meaning right now. Not cumulative. So you can "duh" yourself.
The second wave is improbable only if mutates to being worse. Most don'tThe 2nd wave is improbable only if restrictions(not all of them mind you) are kept in place.
It’s simple Bags...keep your mask on ... evidently you look better with a cover over your face...Can I get this translated in english, guy?
I've responded to this before, but it could mutate to a lesser form and still be a major disrupter. It could still be a major disupter even if it weakens AND we are much better at treating it.The second wave is improbable only if mutates to being worse. Most don't
I think that when I get a bit older, I'm going to start taking roids.Yup just posted it a couple above you. I always said that steroids, not aspirin, is the wonder drug.
If it mutates to something lesser than its over. Which would the end of the crazinessI've responded to this before, but it could mutate to a lesser form and still be a major disrupter. It could still be a major disupter even if it weakens AND we are much better at treating it.
It's unfortunate that people are forgetting how bad this thing hit NYC.
Even if it is only slightly weaker?If it mutates to something lesser than its over. Which would the end of the craziness
Yet NY and PA are not showing similar increases?
The point was the cases in NY and PA are not rising.https://www.thecity.nyc/coronavirus...protest-questions-even-amid-fears-of-new-wave
We'll never know if these protests/riots in NYC will be a source of infection because it won't be reported by anyone. DeBlasio has decided that when testing people for Covid 19, It's unlawful to ask if they attended a protest.
According to the CDC we are still averaging around 27,000 new cases every day and around 750 deaths every day nationwide so the number of cases has just moved to the rest of the country and I am no scientist but if this was seasonal like the flu than we should see the numbers decreasing but they don't seem to be it has just moved from NY/NJ to the rest of the countryThe point was the cases in NY and PA are not rising.
How could the protests be the cause of the current spike in Texas, but NY which also had protests, continues to trend downward?
Ya, not seeing much of a seasonal effect.According to the CDC we are still averaging around 27,000 new cases every day and around 750 deaths every day nationwide so the number of cases has just moved to the rest of the country and I am no scientist but if this was seasonal like the flu than we should see the numbers decreasing but they don't seem to be it has just moved from NY/NJ to the rest of the country
Why go there?BS
Protests in Arkansas, Oklahoma, Arizona, etc.
Fool
Ya, not seeing much of a seasonal effect.
Or even worse, we are seeing a seasonal effect.
True, the heat drives everyone indoors.As somebody mentioned at some point Arizona has seen some record high temperatures with May at ave of 95 and June at 104. (hey I remember a guy on this site that use to be really good with weather threads..what happened to that guy?) could be an indoor effect with respect to air conditioning.
Wrong. ru-05 has been hyperventilating about an update to a 2-week old hospitalization by date---again---by date count, which has been declining since June 2---over 2 weeks. That is what I said.Late to the party? You are at a different party all together. You said numbers have continued to decline. Current numbers of inpatients, critical care and ventilator patients associated with CV-19 are at an all time high. The article points them out as "in use" metrics. Meaning right now. Not cumulative. So you can "duh" yourself.
I've been saying this re: hospitalized patient progression...so not sure who you are responding to...If you don't accept the lag in reporting, you'd think that every new covid patient goes directly to a ventilator.
This is incredible.Wrong. ru-05 has been hyperventilating about an update to a 2-week old hospitalization by date---again---by date count, which has been declining since June 2---over 2 weeks. That is what I said.
So here's your free basic math and stat class: If the numbers are 10, then 9, then 8, etc., down to 1, yeh the cumulative numbers increase but the by-date trend is declining...duh.
Now maybe you can keep up the next time you want to chime in from the peanut gallery.
Sure Jan...the concept of lagging data is so complicated..lol. I thought you were going to keep your eyes on the chart and alert us when the covid hospitalizations spike higher than the 75 on June 2 in AZ. Thanks smart guy.This is incredible.
The day trends are increasing. You are just not able to comprehend the concept of lagging data.
I will, but first let me note that at the time of the article Horowitz was using June 2nd and 3rd as evidence of a steep decline in new admissions.Sure Jan...the concept of lagging data is so complicated..lol. I thought you were going to keep your eyes on the chart and alert us when the covid hospitalizations spike higher than the 75 on June 2 in AZ. Thanks smart guy.
This is incredible.
The day trends are increasing. You are just not able to comprehend the concept of lagging data.
We haven't seen an spikes in the NE region from the protests and in most cases around here they were bright sunny days. So outdoors seems to be a lot safer than indoors.True, the heat drives everyone indoors.
So is there a reverse seasonal effect in those states? Do we see that with the flu? I doubt that, as the "flu season" is universally considered the winter months. Maybe Covid is different?
If there is something to that, then maybe those states see relief when the weather cools down? Unfortunately that is months away.
I think the lag is longer then 2 weeks(and that was just the start of the protests), the openings in the south took about 4 weeks to show themselves, but I agree, the outdoor aspect could be a factor as well.We haven't seen an spikes in the NE region from the protests and in most cases around here they were bright sunny days. So outdoors seems to be a lot safer than indoors.
Wrong. ru-05 has been hyperventilating about an update to a 2-week old hospitalization by date---again---by date count, which has been declining since June 2---over 2 weeks. That is what I said.
So here's your free basic math and stat class: If the numbers are 10, then 9, then 8, etc., down to 1, yeh the cumulative numbers increase but the by-date trend is declining...duh.
Now maybe you can keep up the next time you want to chime in from the peanut gallery.
I will, but first let me note that at the time of the article Horowitz was using June 2nd and 3rd as evidence of a steep decline in new admissions.
2 weeks later it's the peak.
Let's drop it for now and check back in 2 weeks.
Loser buys beers.
B.S--I never said rates were falling why must you lie? ru05 has had his panties in a bunch over the Jun 3 hospitalizations-by-date count being updated which is still well below the Jun 2 high.You are clearly not following what I and RU-05 are cotinually telling you...he is even saying it right above here. You said rates are falling and they are clearly not. I've had enough trying to explain something so simple to you.
I second that..put up or shut up BBBBigRed.
You have the facts wrong. Again.I will, but first let me note that at the time of the article Horowitz was using June 2nd and 3rd as evidence of a steep decline in new admissions.
2 weeks later it's the peak.
Let's drop it for now and check back in 2 weeks.
Loser buys beers.