ADVERTISEMENT

Knox father arrested at state tourney match

Apparently Knox’s mom wasn’t even in the stands despite their statement. This whole thing is a mess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: njsportsphan
I disagree as recently the supreme court has ruled that while students have due process rights that apply to the overall educational experience, it doesn't however extend to individual parts of the educational process such participating in athletic and extracurricular activities. Unless NJSIAA rules state that he is entitled to due process the courts have ruled that there is no free-standing property interest in participating. Just imagine if a school had to provide due process for all discipline items? They would have to have a hearing for something as simple as detention.
That is exactly one of the arguments made by the attorney for the NJSIAA
 
The Family argument is he was in street clothes after his match...Hes 19 years old and was on video punching a 16 year old at a HS event...Hes probably lucky he was just dq from State tournament...Thats a Felony in NJ at a Youth event
 
The Family argument is he was in street clothes after his match...Hes 19 years old and was on video punching a 16 year old at a HS event...Hes probably lucky he was just dq from State tournament...Thats a Felony in NJ at a Youth event
The plot thickens. I wouldn't be surprised given the publicity this has generated if charges don't come about. Me thinks Knox Family should zip it and hope this fizzles into nothing. If they press the issue, authorities just might seek to charge Sr. and Jr. which they already might be in the process of doing. I haven't seen anything, but I wonder what the people attacked have said to the police. Eventually, a suit wouldn't surprise me to snag some of that NIL money (still?) coming to Fort Knox. Given the litigious society we live in and the video evidence, it's possible and I'd expect it.
 
The plot thickens. I wouldn't be surprised given the publicity this has generated if charges don't come about. Me thinks Knox Family should zip it and hope this fizzles into nothing. If they press the issue, authorities just might seek to charge Sr. and Jr. which they already might be in the process of doing. I haven't seen anything, but I wonder what the people attacked have said to the police. Eventually, a suit wouldn't surprise me to snag some of that NIL money (still?) coming to Fort Knox. Given the litigious society we live in and the video evidence, it's possible and I'd expect it.
In the hearing today the defendant's attorney said they submitted a statement from a witness saying Knox Jr had punched him. This is not corraborated by police. He also said the police detained only Sr and Jr and are investigating to decide if any charges should be brought.
 
In the hearing today the defendant's attorney said they submitted a statement from a witness saying Knox Jr had punched him. This is not corraborated by police. He also said the police detained only Sr and Jr and are investigating to decide if any charges should be brought.
FWIW, someone on NJ wrestling Facebook said the minor's family is pressing charges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldenanimal
Here's a twist
By NJSIAA rules, “any player that leaves the bench area during an altercation, regardless of whether the player engages in the altercation, shall be disqualified,” meaning any wrestler identified in the brawl would be DQ’d for the rest of the season.
There wasn't a "bench". Wrestlers not in a match were sitting in the stands, just saying, not defending the action, so there's that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Leonard23
Here's a twist

There wasn't a "bench". Wrestlers not in a match were sitting in the stands, just saying, not defending the action, so there's that.
Some districts caution tape section of the crowd and they’re labeled for each participating team. Not all districts do that however and rather just stick a piece of paper on the wall.

Moving forward, I think the state is going to require some sort of distinction where host schools have to clearly demonstrate where bench areas are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers NJ
Districts and Regions don't have a bench area. The wrestlers and coaches sit in the stands with everyone else. Some Districts and Regions may break down to one mat for the finals. Schools will place chairs on both sides of the mat for the wrestlers. That can be considered a bench area for the finals.
I think the violation he committed was going into the stands while the team was still participating in a NJSIAA school sanction event. I would think any wrestler would have to follow the sportsmanship policy until the event is finished.
 
The argument is that Collingswood did not set up individual areas in the stands for the individual team fans so the security measures were not handled properly.

The lawsuit states that the proper site environment was not put in place therefore it led to the endangerment of the fans and children.

He’s gonna wrestle!

The one thing everybody is overlooking is the poor kid who took a district 4th that got the phone call he was moving to regions. He has to make weight today and he thinks he’s gonna wrestle today and then at 2 o’clock they’re gonna tell him oh no Anthony Knox is gonna wrestle go back home?
 
The argument is that Collingswood did not set up individual areas in the stands for the individual team fans so the security measures were not handled properly.

The lawsuit states that the proper site environment was not put in place therefore it led to the endangerment of the fans and children.

He’s gonna wrestle!

The one thing everybody is overlooking is the poor kid who took a district 4th that got the phone call he was moving to regions. He has to make weight today and he thinks he’s gonna wrestle today and then at 2 o’clock they’re gonna tell him oh no Anthony Knox is gonna wrestle go back home?
I get the argument that there wasn't an actual bench area to leave but that doesn't take away from the fact that he was throwing punches up in the stands. Its not like he just wandered out fo the bench area to break up the fight.
 
Districts and Regions don't have a bench area. The wrestlers and coaches sit in the stands with everyone else. Some Districts and Regions may break down to one mat for the finals. Schools will place chairs on both sides of the mat for the wrestlers. That can be considered a bench area for the finals.
I think the violation he committed was going into the stands while the team was still participating in a NJSIAA school sanction event. I would think any wrestler would have to follow the sportsmanship policy until the event is finished.
You also have to consider intent. Look how he went into the stands? He didn’t walk up and try to separate people. He ran from halfway across the gym and darted up 4-5 bleachers. It’s a shame it all happened, but there are rules, and flying into the bleachers to confront a spectator would appear to violate those rules
 
There’s a lot of variables in the story and hopefully it leads to changes in the way districts are formulated. Vianney should have never been in that district, a bunch of kids made it their mission to overly harass the Vianney wrestlers, and then some parent escalated it even further leading to a giant mess for everyone involved. It was the perfect storm with a number of guilty parties and the only one who gets punished for it, right or wrong, is Knox Jr.

Ultimately I hope the they let him wrestle but there’s going to be controversy no matter what decision they make.
 
There’s a lot of variables in the story and hopefully it leads to changes in the way districts are formulated. Vianney should have never been in that district, a bunch of kids made it their mission to overly harass the Vianney wrestlers, and then some parent escalated it even further leading to a giant mess for everyone involved. It was the perfect storm with a number of guilty parties and the only one who gets punished for it, right or wrong, is Knox Jr.

Ultimately I hope the they let him wrestle but there’s going to be controversy no matter what decision they make.
The Parochials rotate through districts, it’s the only way to do it unless you want to give their their own districts and regions. You can’t have the same parochials sitting in the same district year after year. Interestingly, for years region 2 had bergen, bosco and joes in it and no one complained.

If the parochials get segregated at the district/region level then NJ should consider not wreslting to a single state champ as the whole complexion of the tournament would change.
 
The Parochials rotate through districts, it’s the only way to do it unless you want to give their their own districts and regions. You can’t have the same parochials sitting in the same district year after year. Interestingly, for years region 2 had bergen, bosco and joes in it and no one complained.

If the parochials get segregated at the district/region level then NJ should consider not wreslting to a single state champ as the whole complexion of the tournament would change.
I’ve argued that you can structure a segregated district and region lineup that doesn’t change the field at AC much. I don’t think it would be that difficult either.
 
I’ve argued that you can structure a segregated district and region lineup that doesn’t change the field at AC much. I don’t think it would be that difficult either.
Regions 1-8 (Public) get 3 qualifiers per weight class (24)
Region 9 (Parochials) get 8 qualifiers per weight class.
Nothing changes 32 state qualifiers per weight class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leonard23
Regions 1-8 (Public) get 3 qualifiers per weight class (24)
Region 9 (Parochials) get 8 qualifiers per weight class.
Nothing changes 32 state qualifiers per weight class.
I actually like this proposal. Well done Mike!
 
Regions 1-8 (Public) get 3 qualifiers per weight class (24)
Region 9 (Parochials) get 8 qualifiers per weight class.
Nothing changes 32 state qualifiers per weight class.
Yeah I think this could be tweaked slightly but in general I’m on board with something along those lines. It wouldn’t water down the AC field at all, but the path to get there would be cleaner.
 
Ehhh… probably be the wrong decision morally but admittedly, I’m happy that he gets a chance to make history

Again, it’s not very often that somebody this talented comes around, and although I may not agree with how things were handled on their end, the kid is a generational talent
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Leonard23
Ehhh… probably be the wrong decision morally but admittedly, I’m happy that he gets a chance to make history

Again, it’s not very often that somebody this talented comes around, and although I may not agree with how things were handled on their end, the kid is a generational talent
I bet you would feel differently if your son was one of the kids Knox assaulted
 
I bet you would feel differently if your son was one of the kids Knox assaulted
I’m sure I would, and as I said, from a moral standpoint, it was the wrong move

Also, we do not know what precipitated him going up there, by all accounts these kids were bagging on him pretty bad the entire day, so although it was not a wise move to go up there and engage him, they likely had it coming

From a strictly sports centric standpoint, where witnessing greatness is not an every day thing, him being able to defend his title and go for a historic for 4-peat is something I’m looking forward to watching
 
Ehhh… probably be the wrong decision morally but admittedly, I’m happy that he gets a chance to make history

Again, it’s not very often that somebody this talented comes around, and although I may not agree with how things were handled on their end, the kid is a generational talent
How can you be happy about someone who assaulted a minor and is allowed to skirt around the rules of the system just because he is a generational talent?
 
How can you be happy about someone who assaulted a minor and is allowed to skirt around the rules of the system just because he is a generational talent?
I’m happy he gets a chance to make history, not necessarily happy with how things turned out from a moral standpoint

I can separate the two, and be happy for a sports standpoint, but disappointed from moral standpoint
 
I’m happy he gets a chance to make history, not necessarily happy with how things turned out from a moral standpoint

I can separate the two, and be happy for a sports standpoint, but disappointed from moral standpoint
JayDogSmooth

You’re a rare dude…in most of humanity it’s difficult to laud the accomplishments of those who do bad things

Kudos to you sir
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: BossNJ and TRU2RU
JayDogSmooth

You’re a rare dude…in most of humanity it’s difficult to laud the accomplishments of those who do bad things

Kudos to you sir
Do any of us know the full story?
Are we jumping to conclusions?
Were any of us there, or involved?

Again, for the third time, from a moral standpoint, it is not the right decision

From a sports standpoint, yes, I’m looking forward to him attempting to make history

I voted for a guy twice who is currently in office who under no circumstances would I want my daughter to marry

I can separate the two, as I’m voting for the policies, not the person

It is the same in this instance, as I’m clearly not in favor of his actions, but can appreciate generational talents, athletic wise
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT