And yet they’re still ranked #2 in the world in the 2022 FIFA rankings only behind Brazil.They’re older now. Were never going deep IMHO.
And yet they’re still ranked #2 in the world in the 2022 FIFA rankings only behind Brazil.They’re older now. Were never going deep IMHO.
Our team speed is a lot more competitive than it once was. We're less defenseless against elite speed forwards than we have been in prior WCs.BTW - I said months ago I didn’t want to play anyone from Africa in our group (and not because of “culture” HOWEVER due to proximity (HUGE fan presence from Morocco and Tunisia) and speed (always gives us issues).
I was thinking has the "spread offense/air raid" come to soccer to equalize talent disparity lol.See. The NIL isn't all bad.
More than well aware of both our injury issues from the past season and our experience level. Thanks.Our team speed is a lot more competitive than it once was. We're less defenseless against elite speed forwards than we have been in prior WCs.
In the recent past, our biggest problem with speed was at the back where most of our defenders were too slow, particularly against teams with very quick forwards. But I think this latest iteration of the team is pretty fast everywhere, even on D, with the starters, at least.
In this world cup, my concerns are inexperience and fitness. A lot of key players for us were injured in the not-too-distant past. That impacted the amount of playing time they got with their club teams as they recovered. Perhaps due to that, we appear to not be quite as fit in this WC as in prior WCs.
Agree with this. One world class player nowadays besides the goalie. Soccer can age you quick.They’re older now. Were never going deep IMHO.
The round is considered the Group Stage. The entire tournament is considered the Finals, of which the Group Stage is a part.Always heard this round was considered the Group Stage.
Uhhhh, it's "Morocco."Morrocco fans tore the roof off the place, and sucked the energy out of these Europeans. But we should tell those Morroccans how to spell their country's name right, right? The one dude Zayich played for Chelsea, didn't he?
Uh, on a Moroccan fans hat it was spelled Marocco, in fact on the scoreboards it's MAR, No?Uhhhh, it's "Morocco."
The answer is complicated, as per the Wiki entry below. My only point in correcting you was that nobody currently spells it with 2 r's and since this is 'Merica, I suggest you spell it "Morocco." 😊Uh, on a Moroccan fans hat it was spelled Marocco, in fact on the scoreboards it's MAR, No?
They played poorly most of the game. Some inexplicably bad defending by a team that had a very solid defense during qualifying.Canada is out
Well, after 3 days together, 24/7 in DC for Thanksgiving, visiting her grumpy, spinster sister, can you blame me, lol? FWIW, below is ironclad proof of the spelling, since it's on the internet. And it's Rowquoquo, with the alternate Chilean spelling, Rococoa.geez, you must not be talking to your wife much either, huh? Good work, but if Morocco is derived from Marrakesh, what happened to the two "r"s, and in Spanish it's Marruecos, thereby the "A" after the "M". I believe that the World Cup group points board shows "MAR", but don't correct me if I'm wrong. Talk to your wife.
And where the hell is Rococo?
Poor shape, but even poorer effort - they looked out of shape relative to the Croatians. There were plenty of promising Canadian attacks that started out about 3 on 3 or 4 on 4 that quickly became 3 or 4 on 6 or 7. And the opposite was true in the Canadian end, where Serbia often not only had numbers, but roamed freely without being challenged.They played poorly most of the game. Some inexplicably bad defending by a team that had a very solid defense during qualifying.
Yep, the effort was really awful, and that always leads to a cascading effect on shape as late first defenders force second defenders into compromised positioning.Poor shape, but even poorer effort - they looked out of shape relative to the Croatians. There were plenty of promising Canadian attacks that started out about 3 on 3 or 4 on 4 that quickly became 3 or 4 on 6 or 7. And the opposite was true in the Canadian end, where Serbia often not only had numbers, but roamed freely without being challenged.
"Serbians"?Poor shape, but even poorer effort - they looked out of shape relative to the Croatians. There were plenty of promising Canadian attacks that started out about 3 on 3 or 4 on 4 that quickly became 3 or 4 on 6 or 7. And the opposite was true in the Canadian end, where Serbia often not only had numbers, but roamed freely without being challenged.
I can't see how these guys get hit with rocket balls like these in the chest, thigh, knee, get up and keep running. Players holding their family jewels in front of penalty kicks can be excused, but professionally you're supposed to offer your face to deflect the ball? Contact sport.
Those guys are wusses with the helmets and pads. And they need sticks.Less frequent and not involving your face but try taking a 90-100 mph lacrosse ball to your body.