As I said. . . .
Bingo.
I respect
@RU848789 's years of experience in pharmaceutical research and development. He has a valid opinion and raises valid points that are subject to fair debate, something people in this country used to do, before everything turned into screaming insults, MAGA, libtard, etc, etc. That was my point. He is better than debating a couple of numbskull troublemakers. You get lumped in with them, and I don't think that is fair.
It's cute when you and numbers have pharma bro hugs. Europe disagrees with your view as to "most people" and "extremely safe," which would require some quantification. That is a fair point of debate in terms of benefit-harm, for example, why are they being touted for very young people (e.g., under 30, and in particular teens to 20's? We are in the endemic stage--unless a young person has a condition or co-morbidity, Europe is not recommending annual shots. But their governmental authorities do not seem to be in a perpetual embrace and under the thumb of Big Pharma, which is real problem in this country.
But you are correct that there is plenty of data out there for folks to make their own decisions, and hopefully they choose wisely . It should have always been that way. But for one group of people it became religion, and some of them were even wishing and/or celebrating the deaths of unvaccinated persons. That's a sad reflection on society.
I'm done. I said I was done, but got lots to do. Will jump in for breaks on football threads. Go RU!!!