ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Major West Coast winter storm where some will see over 150 inches of snow

First time, long timer here.

I love these threads. Not because they are helpful, or that I actually use any info.

I just love that numbers does it. It’s his thing, and in a way, it’s our thing. I do honestly try to read his posts, but about 2.5 sentences in, I nod off like a narcoleptic on Ambien.

So, @RU848789 , you should just let your snow freak flag fly. We all know it, so just let it go. So what if you howl like a marauding Viking shoveling in a blizzard at 2am with just a tube sock over your junk. It’s all good.

Plus, the bickering, my god, the bickering. I love it. Whatever makes more people nuts, the better. It’s fantastic.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing #'s. We are skiers/snowboarders. Unfortunately only get out 5 or 6 weekends per season in the northeast so we like to know in advance what the weather predictions are. Especially with Covid this year, mountains have been putting a cap on the number of lift tickets available for the day. So if you don’t have a season pass or buy in advance, you could get shut out for the weekend days you were trying to ski/snowboard.
All the vitriol with the haters is just really stupid. If you don't want to read something dont read it.
 
Last edited:
Here is the latest GFS model just in for the potential winter storm next week. Most models show a storm with snow. The question remains what will the track be and how much will people get. Lots on uncertainty remains. This is a model projection not a forecast


143574514_3813171865393038_8816880636513110697_o.jpg
 
Seeing as how I’m a broken record on many things these days, I’ll just repeat my usual go big or go home sentiment with regards to snowstorms, which is this...

I want a bare minimum of 36” out of this storm. I don’t care about genesis bombs or cyclists crashing or whatever.

Just either make it snow HUGE or make it go away entirely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru1869
Should run vegas spreads for these events .
The early line for metuchen is snow -7.5 inches
 
I just love that numbers does it. It’s his thing, * and in a way, it’s our thing. I do honestly try to read his posts, but about 2.5 sentences in, I nod off like a narcoleptic on Ambien.

So, @RU848789 , you should just let your snow freak flag fly. We all know it, so just let it go. So what if you howl like a marauding Viking shoveling in a blizzard at 2am with just a tube sock over your junk. It’s all good.

* Wish more of you would understand this part.
 
In Covid times with people having appointments for vaccines its pretty important for any snowfall to be as benign as possible.

with the GFS solution even as it gives 6 plus inches of snow its a long duration type of evolution of the storm which really wouldnt be giving us any heavy snow but just an extended period of snowfall that adds up over 36 hours.

its best that we dont have a storm that impacts life for 2 days.
 
In Covid times with people having appointments for vaccines its pretty important for any snowfall to be as benign as possible.

with the GFS solution even as it gives 6 plus inches of snow its a long duration type of evolution of the storm which really wouldnt be giving us any heavy snow but just an extended period of snowfall that adds up over 36 hours.

its best that we dont have a storm that impacts life for 2 days.

You really over-think snow don't ya?
 
Why would I do that? It's not like we have control over it one way or another.

Maybe you should lobby the gov to put more money into snow removal ; )
 
In Covid times with people having appointments for vaccines its pretty important for any snowfall to be as benign as possible.

with the GFS solution even as it gives 6 plus inches of snow its a long duration type of evolution of the storm which really wouldnt be giving us any heavy snow but just an extended period of snowfall that adds up over 36 hours.

its best that we dont have a storm that impacts life for 2 days.
Totally agree with this. In my amateur observations over the years, it seems the models tend to overplay long-duration events. We will see.
 
Water rights are not a federal issue. Only if there is an interstate compact (like the Colorado River, amybe the Delaware?). Different staes have different approaches to water rights (first in time, riparian). Snow falling in the Sierra and used in the California valleys is a state issue.

BTW I am partially to blame for the entire California drought. I eat a handful of almonds every day. One almond requires a gallon of water to produce! If I eat 5000 almonds in a year, my consumption requires 5000 gallons of water for irrigation, or .0153444 acre feet.
I'm with you on the almond thing. I eat some most days and feel guilty when I buy them due to the volume water used to grow them. And I used to live in California so it's not like this was all new to me. When I lived there, houses in Sacramento didn't even have water meters - but this was 35 yrs ago and I'm thinking things are different now.
 
Euro was a huge bomb...central jersey special..over a foot plus

however note it was further south and east from its earlier runs so watch that

just one more model solution to consider of many
 
Well, given that all 4 major models (Euro, UK, CMC, and GFS, as well as every lesser known model) are showing a major winter storm traversing the US from the west coast (currently getting crushed with rain and mountain snows) today and tomorrow, through the central Plains by Saturday and the Ohio Valley on Sunday, reaching our area late Sunday/early Monday (depending on the model) and then redeveloping off the NC/VA coast and hammering most of our area with generally 8-12" of snow (only the UK shows a bit less - more like 5-9") and more than 12" for many (and this storm is hitting everywhere from DC to Maine), mostly from late Sunday through Monday (but into Tuesday on some), it's time to start a new thread, as we're now within 5 days of the start of the event. I don't intend to paste a bunch of model runs in this thread until we're maybe 3 days out (like Thurs night; others can, of course), as they're going to shift some (maybe a lot) until we're closer to the event (and the system isn't over land, with better data inputs to the models until tomorrow afternoon).

Like any potential major storm, the details are highly uncertain 4-5 days out, with outcomes being somewhat different across the models which is to be expected this far out. The point isn't to debate the exact details of who will get how much snow/rain and when, but just to recognize that a significant winter storm is looking likely for our area, with a wide range of potential wintry outcomes. Just as a point of comparison, though, this system looks to be at least as imposing as the 12/16 system did at 4-5 days out on the models.

It's possible that the cold air in place could still suppress the storm causing it to largely miss us to the south, although even the least snowy case is likely still a few inches for everyone from the initial low before it redevelops off the coast). And it's also possible the storm takes a track much closer to the coast bringing in much more rain, especially for 95 and SE of there. A third thing that could go "wrong" is that the northern and southern stream systems don't "phase" well, leading to a much weaker storm with less precip. But right now the models are all showing a pretty classic Miller B system approaching from the west (with the lighter snows possible on Sunday) and then transferring its energy to a coastal low, which heads NE as a nor'easter bringing heavy wintry precip to our area.

With respect to the models, the Euro is a major snowstorm with 8-14" for everyone except less, due to rain, about 20-30 miles SE of 95 and maybe only a few inches at the coast. The Euro is the slowest model, bringing precip in early Monday and lasting into late Tuesday. The Canadian shows 7-12" (with a few lollipops up to 15") for essentially everyone, except near Cape May, due to some mixing; it starts late Sunday night and goes through early Tuesday. The GFS shows 8-14" for everyone N of 276/195, with 4-8" south of that line due to mixing; the GFS starts with some light snow Sunday afternoon, but the main snow is late Sunday through late Monday. Finally, the UK is showing a bit less snowfall than the other models, as it's a bit further offshore, so less precip - it's showing 6-9" for NYC metro and NENJ from Monmouth/Middlesex up through Bergen, but less N and W of there (4-6") and south of 195 (3-6"); the UK also shows precip from late Sunday through early Tuesday. Lots more to come, I'm sure. The usual links below...

https://www.weather.gov/phi/
https://www.33andrain.com/topic/201...inter-storm-threat-discussion-2-12-2/page/18/
https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic...um-late-sunday-jan-31-early-tue-feb-2/page/6/

And with regard to what's heading here, this is a really good tweet thread from Jim Sullivan from WeatherWorks (a local outfit many here like) on why he thinks this could be a significant winter storm for the midwest and mid-Atlantic/Northeast. He explains the teleconnections and drivers pretty well.



Need you to help me calibrate with your verbiage:

Minor 1"
Major 2" to 4"
Historic 5" to 8"
Snowmageddon >9"

Is that about right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATIOH
Last statistics I saw said over 80 percent of California's snow melt ends up in the ocean. It is just complete incompetence that we have any water problems at all in this state. Of course, we still can't build because of the red legged frog, and farmers can't plant on or redirect water from anything that meets the Corps of Engineer's (Federal) definition of a wetland. There is a good chance that many of you have a government defined "wetland" on your property and don't even know it.
 
It was our weekly poker night (COVID home game is on line now - will start a thread on that if people are interested in the on-line site we use), so I missed all the bickering and will try to not engage since it's pointless. I will just say this though: I didn't start any of the arguing and I never post about my love for snow in these threads since some dislike that so I leave it out, in an attempt to not start arguments.

Anyway back to the storm. Tonight's 0Z models are all in and there is even a bit higher confidence in a major (major is 8-12" to me) winter storm for most of the Philly-NJ-NYC region (and most places from DC to Boston). We're still about 4 days out from the start of the storm, as depicted by every model now (they all start with some light snow by late Sunday afternoon to Sunday late evening (the spread on start/end times was about 18 hours, 12 hours ago and is now <6 hours, which indicates better consensus/confidence); the end times are Tues morning/afternoon on all of the models (it's a long duration storm, as modeled). And 3 of the 4 global models show widespread "historic" snowfall amounts (12-20" for me; one can debate the descriptor, so that's why I include the amounts) for most of CNJ/NNJ/NYC. With respect to the big picture model details...
  • The Euro shows a major to historic snowstorm for all of CNJ/NNJ/NYC/EPA with 12-16" of snow for everyone N of 195/276 and 6-12" everywhere else in EPA/SNJ S of 195/276, except for about 3-6" for SE of Salem to Toms River. These lower amounts are due to mixing/change to sleet/rain at times.
  • The Canadian shows a historic snowstorm for all of CNJ/NNJ/NYC/LI and Monmouth/Ocean with a range of 12-20", but with 20-26" for the eastern parts of Middlesex to Bergen and all of NYC/LI. The CMC has a general 8-12" for EPA and the rest of SNJ/Phillly (even down to Cape May. The CMC probably represents the ceiling with this storm and nobody is going to predict that as an outcome without every other model in line with it <1 day out.
  • The GFS shows 12-16" for NENJ from Monmouth up to Bergen and for NYC/LI and 8-12" for the western 1/3 of CNJ/NNJ (Merceer-Hunterdon-Warren) and E-PA N of 276 and has 3-6" for SEPA and SNJ S of 276/195 (except much of Monmouth, as per above) and only a few inches for SENJ, again due to sleet/rain.
  • Finally, the UK is now only showing a little less snowfall than the other models, as it's no longer further offshore (it had a fair amount less earlier today). It's showing 6-12" for everywhere in EPA/NJ N of 276/195 and for NYC/LI, including a decent area of 12-16" N of 80 in NNJ and the HV. South of 276/195 is about 3-6" with less towards the coast and far SNJ, due to mixing/changeover.
  • One other thing to keep in mind: if this storm ends up being anything like modeled, there will be mesoscale deformation snowbands that setup which will put down an extra several inches of snow in some spots (these are normally SW to NE oriented and well inland of the surface low and are often about 20 miles wide by 50-75 miles long), but we won't know where they set up until the storm hits.
  • With the primary surface low still off the US West Coast, the data inputs are still sparser than they'll be tomorrow afternoon, after the system comes ashore, so, in theory, we should have higher confidence forecasts starting tomorrow night, as the data inputs will be more complete and we'll be closer to the event. But that doesn't always happen that way. Figure I'll post snowfall maps starting tomorrow night (another reason not to is that they don't always remain for reasons I can't figure out, as I host them on imgur - those big red X's). The usual links below including to the free model output sites I usually use and which are pretty easy to use.
So, some will read all that and think I'm predicting an 8-12" or even 12-20" snowstorm for most of us. No, I'd never do that this far out, but confidence is pretty high in at least several inches of snow and is growing in getting at least 8", but a coastal hugger track bringing a fair amount of rain to the 95 corridor/coast is still on the table, as is a mostly suppressed storm to our south that might only given a few to several inches of snow primarily SE of 95 and towards the coast. A complete whiff is almost off the table (and will be if we still have a pretty good consensus tomorrow night), but a storm that's just weaker with less precip is also possible.

For some perspective, we're 4 days out and in the modern era of numerical weather prediction (last 20-25 years or so) we've had one horrible complete bust for everyone in this area (March 2001, which was off by 100+ miles) vs. what was forecasted right up until the storm start and one mostly bad bust for this area (Jan-2015, where the forecast for Philly and most of NJ was way way off, while eastern NJ/coastal NJ/NYC were off, but not nearly as badly. Those two and especially Jan-2015, which was recent, as some major advances have been made in modeling since 2001, will always make any forecasters reluctant to predict big snowstorms 4 days out let alone even 2-3 days out.

We've also had some other modest busts on some big storms, where some areas busted, but other areas didn't (like last month on 12/16) and we've also had some pretty good forecasts on big storms from a few days out (not always 4 days, though), including Jan-96, Dec-2000, Feb-2003, Dec-2003, Feb-2006, Feb-2010, Dec-2010, Jan-2011, Feb-2014, and Jan-2016, which were all 12" or more storms in NYC (and much of CNJ/NNJ). The point is, for forecasted big storms, most of them have been forecasted pretty decently (never perfectly) from a few to several days out, with a few major busts.

Quick update on the 12Z models, as I'm actually working today. The Euro, CMC, and GFS continue to show a major winter storm (8-12") for almost the entire area, with 12-20" for many in the 95 corridor. However, the UK threw a curveball as it shows no snow north of 276/195, due to suppression (the cold air pressing down too much from the north, shunting the precip south), which is always a risk with strong confluence from the north (need just enough for snow, but not so much that it leads to suppression).

Of course, the weenies just say "toss that run - it's an outlier" which is foolish. The overwhelming evidence is that a major winter storm is still a decent probability, especially when looking at the ensembles of the GFS/CMC/Euro, which all look quite snowy (ensembles are when the model is run with variations on the initial conditions, since they're not all well defined with a storm over the Pacific Ocean and just to see the sensitivity of the main operational model run to these conditions), but suppression can't be discounted as a risk - especially when more than a few of the individual ensemble members show suppression (these get averaged out by some ensemble member runs being coastal huggers or inland).

On to the next set of model runs tonight (0Z) and these will hopefully be "better" since the primary energy for this storm is coming ashore by 7 pm tonight, which will hopefully mean much richer input data for the initial conditions. Close call on that, so we might not have this system fully sampled until tomorrow's 12Z runs. Plus, obviously as we get closer, the models will always converge on a more accurate solution (models are nearly perfect in predicting 1 hour in the future, for example, but become less accurate further away from an event). I'd say if we have model consensus on a major winter storm tonight or certainly by tomorrow, then that's when we'll likely start to see the pros making actual snowfall forecasts (7 am tomorrow morning is about 60 hours from the start of the storm on most models (i.e., about 7 pm Sunday).
 
The Euro ensembles are almost half of the OP...like 8 inches and about 15 of its 50 members are complete whiffs..something to keep in mind as you also take the Ukie into consideration
 
Need you to help me calibrate with your verbiage:

Minor 1"
Major 2" to 4"
Historic 5" to 8"
Snowmageddon >9"

Is that about right?
This is just my system - there's no agreement on this and there have been whole threads on this stuff on the weather boards. Kind of like trying to agree on recruiting rankings, lol. I use the data from NYC for calibration, since it's very good/complete and at least fairly representative of much of NNJ/CNJ (at least east of 287 from Bridgewater to the NY line and north of 195).

Minor: 1-2"
Moderate: 2-4"
Significant: 4-8" (and a "significant east coast snowstorm" is SECS or "sexy" - I kid you not)
Major: 8-12"
Historic: 12-20" - there have been 36 such storms in NYC in 152 years (1 every 4-5 years)
Biblical: >20" - there have been 7 storms over 20" in NYC in 152 years

Some have significant from 6-10" and major from 10-18" and historic from 18-24" (11 storms in 151 years) with biblical beyond 24" (3 storms ever). I used to use ranges like that many years ago, but I thought it was too few storms in the historic/biblical categories and to me, over 8" is pretty major. Whatever - as long as one says what their ranges are.

GAesNNz.png
 
The Euro ensembles are almost half of the OP...like 8 inches and about 15 of its 50 members are complete whiffs..something to keep in mind as you also take the Ukie into consideration
The ensemble mean is always some/much less than the operational, so that's not an issue at all (by definition they include a number of extreme solutions which show little snow, due to either rain or no precip/suppression, and these get averaged in with member that are like the operational). And the ensemble mean on the Euro has been in the 8" range for 3-4 days which is remarkably consistent. But yes, having 15 out of 50 members as whiffs is a bit on the high side, so it's a concern, especially given the UK solution. It's why getting a serious snowstorm in these parts doesn't happen that often. Here's the post from esteemed NWS met Walt Drag on the Euro ensemble mean consistency so far.

https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic...rly-tue-feb-2/?do=findComment&comment=5834253
 
Last edited:
Our resident weather expert didn't take that class...
If you're sarcastically referring to me, do you see me throwing out any "snow guesses?" Maybe you missed this part in my post last night: "So, some will read all that and think I'm predicting an 8-12" or even 12-20" snowstorm for most of us. No, I'd never do that this far out, but confidence is pretty high in at least several inches of snow and is growing in getting at least 8", but a coastal hugger track bringing a fair amount of rain to the 95 corridor/coast is still on the table, as is a mostly suppressed storm to our south that might only give a few to several inches of snow primarily SE of 95 and towards the coast."
 
* Wish more of you would understand this part.
We bitch and moan and fight and even agree sometimes. Sometimes things get pretty nasty, but mostly people get over it. Some folks get along better with other folks. All of which is pretty much how most large families operate, in my experience. Or dysfunctional families, at least. 😀

I don't really know if this is how other sports team forums work or not. Other forums I regularly participate in are a community too, but somehow don't quite match this place for the kind of at-home, dinner-table feel it has. Maybe because many people here have more in common than, say, in an automotive brand forum or a technical forum where the membership have fewer things in common?
 
We bitch and moan and fight and even agree sometimes. Sometimes things get pretty nasty, but mostly people get over it. Some folks get along better with other folks. All of which is pretty much how most large families operate, in my experience. Or dysfunctional families, at least. 😀

I don't really know if this is how other sports team forums work or not. Other forums I regularly participate in are a community too, but somehow don't quite match this place for the kind of at-home, dinner-table feel it has. Maybe because many people here have more in common than, say, in an automotive brand forum or a technical forum where the membership have fewer things in common?
Pretty sure not as many people have hookers and blow in common as you think. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: mildone
Minor: 1-2"
Moderate: 2-4"
Significant: 4-8" (and a "significant east coast snowstorm" is SECS or "sexy" - I kid you not)
Major: 8-12"
Historic: 12-20" - there have been 36 such storms in NYC in 152 years (1 every 4-5 years)
Biblical: 20"-35" - there have been 7 storms over 20" in NYC in 152 years

Mildone-esque: - 36" or more
FIFY

Although I suppose this would be even better:

Crap: 0"-35"
Mildone-esque: - 36" or more
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT