ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Vendee Globe Has Begun!

Good review of that boat here.

I have been staying away from perusing yacht sales because buying one to live on has been a semi-formed plan of mine for about five or six years now. Not quite ready yet, so I've avoided looking at boats. 'Cause once I start...

It's only very recently lately that a very different type of move to Wyoming or Montana (or hell, maybe just upstate NY) has started to gain ground on the sailboat with a berth in BVI (or similar) plan.

I once, many years ago, applied for a job with Sparkman & Stephens. I didn't get it, of course. I wasn't remotely qualified. But I do own a copy of Desirable and Undesirable Characteristics of Offshore Yachts, which features considerable text by Olin Stephens.

As for plans... I figure as long as the wife keeps threatening to outlive me I've got little to no shot at moving to Wyoming or Montana. I have a much better chance of landing an offshore cruiser in the 40' range, like this Tartan, or a Bristol 40. You can get one of the latter perfectly restored for less than the price of a new A4 and it's probably my favorite of all the Ted Hood designs. A boat like that won't win at Wednesday night buoy racing, but having crewed on a racing boat I fully understand that trying to wrangle a full crew is a monumental pain in the ass. I'll crew, I'll sail single or double-handed as an owner, but I will never own a crewed racing yacht.
 
Last edited:
Conversations like this will invariably send me to Yachtworld so that I can run a search and find things like this 1973 Tartan 41 for sale in Halifax (favorable exchange rate!) with a perfect hull, nice interior, full electronics including an Autohelm 4000 and Furuno radar, wind and solar power and a 6 man inflatable liferaft. It's already done multiple crossings, so it's ready to go.
I see this in your futures. I own this, BTW.
WFB CN
 
I see this in your futures. I own this, BTW.
WFB CN

This picture (from the listing) is pretty much the best description of what a Sparkman and Stephens design is all about.

3022036_20150810120443642_1_XLARGE.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: mildone
Celestial navigation is the wave of the future. Or some kind of wave.

It's no longer taught, which is a shame. I never found the sextant to be all that befuddling. And it's kinda fun.

GPS-based chartplotters are basically THE navigation tool, now. But to me, there's something very special about drawing lines on a paper chart.
 
It's no longer taught, which is a shame. I never found the sextant to be all that befuddling. And it's kinda fun.

GPS-based chartplotters are basically THE navigation tool, now. But to me, there's something very special about drawing lines on a paper chart.
I still marvel at how they navigated centuries ago. The charts, the measurements in rough seas, the corrections, such a part of human achievement.
 
I once, many years ago, applied for a job with Sparkman & Stephens. I didn't get it, of course. I wasn't remotely qualified. But I do own a copy of Desirable and Undesirable Characteristics of Offshore Yachts, which features considerable text by Olin Stephens.

As for plans... I figure as long as the wife keeps threatening to outlive me I've got little to no shot at moving to Wyoming or Montana. I have a much better chance of landing an offshore cruiser in the 40' range, like this Tartan, or a Bristol 40. You can get one of the latter perfectly restored for less than the price of a new A4 and it's probably my favorite of all the Ted Hood designs. A boat like that won't win at Wednesday night buoy racing, but having crewed on a racing boat I fully understand that trying to wrangle a full crew is a monumental pain in the ass. I'll crew, I'll sail single or double-handed as an owner, but I will never own a crewed racing yacht.
I'm mostly in the same place, I think, in terms of boating interest. Not really interested in owning a racing yacht - too much work and stress. I'm looking to relax and cruise and enjoy being on the water.
 
The Boats

Like nearly all ocean races, the Vendee Globe is a "class race", meaning that all of the boats, the crews, the teams, subscribe to a specific set of rules which serves to level the playing field. Generally speaking, there are two types of sailing classes, one design and open.

One design sailing rules dictate that the boats be exactly the same, often made by a single manufacturer. The hulls, the sails, the keels, even the maximum weight of the combined crew - all the same. One design racing has been immensely popular around the world for decades and some very desirable, classic sailboats have come from one design racing.

In open class racing the boats do not have to be identical, but most often are designed to what is known as a "box rule" - a set of standard dimensions and features which allow some amount of design flexibility and innovation.

The IMOCA 60 yachts used in the Vendee Globe are designed to such a box rule. What makes the IMOCA 60 rule so interesting is that it's evolutionary. There have been no fewer than six generations of IMOCA 60 yachts and while each generation's base dimensions are all the same, innovation from one generation to the next has seen considerable development of the boats. In the IMOCA class, all generations are allowed to compete and so the Vendee will see racers in each generation of yacht - and in many cases, sailing yachts that have competed previously under a different skipper.

So what makes one of these ocean-going thoroughbreds different from an ordinary cruising boat, or even an "ordinary" racing boat?

The first thing that differentiates an IMOCA 60 is its sheer size. The class rule says that the boats must be 60 feet long overall, with a beam of 18.7 feet and a draft of 14.7 feet. The mast height is 86 feet above the water. They are big, but they're also very light - total displacement of the boat is just over 16,000 lbs. By comparison, the displacement of a Beneteau Oceanis 60, a modern cruising boat roughly the same size as an IMOCA 60 (and sharing some of the same design heritage) is 48,600 lbs.

In addition to being very big, yet very light, an IMOCA 60 is equipped with an unusual number of appendages. Most sailboats have two, the keel and the rudder. Some production sailboats based loosely on racing hulls are beamy enough at the stern as to support the need for dual rudders. The boats of the Vendee Globe are allowed five appendages: the canting keel, dual rudders and two daggerboards (or foils) on either side of the boat, adjacent to the mast. The purpose of the daggerboards, a feature of the fifth generation boats introduced in 2008, is to prevent leeway - the quality of a sailboat to move somewhat sideways through the water under the pressure of its sails.

The sixth generation boats, new for this running of the Vendee, swaps the daggerboards for curved foils - wing-like structures that literally lift the boat partially out of the water when heeled over. This lifting effect reduces the friction of wetted surface of the boat as it moves through the water and allows it to sail faster.

So we have a boat that is very big, very light and built to run at higher speeds than any previous sail-powered vessel. The next, most critical element, then, is safety. All of the IMOCA 60s are built from exotic materials. Their hulls are Kevlar and carbon fiber, the masts are carbon fiber. The hull itself is built around a lightweight, high-strength steel box that contains the support bearings for the canting keel. There are numerous collision bulkheads built into the hull structure and all of the hatches are watertight.

Additionally, the IMOCA 60 is a showcase of modern electronics. There are redundant systems for navigation and piloting as well as the most up to date communications and emergency locator radios. While the boats can obviously be steered from the open cockpit, like any sailboat, the solo Vendee Globe racers spend a great deal of their time monitoring the autopilot from the relative comfort of the navigation station below decks.

Like everything else, the sails of an IMOCA racer are absolute state of the art. There's no more canvas in the inventory of as many as 11 sails (one mainsail and ten headsails, three of which can, in theory, be flown at the same time). Like the rest of the boat, there is a mix of exotic materials used in the sails and a full inventory can cost as much as $350,000. The proper use of these sails in conjunction with the boat's design can net speeds of as much as 25 mph.

Flying_Acciona_Open_60_des.jpg

The 5th Generation IMOCA 60 'acciona' on on close reach at about 18 knots



The 6th Generation 'SAFRAN'. Note how the downwind foil lifts the hull. Also note the canted keel to windward. This helps keep the boat upright and allows it to carry more sail.
12015208_1072022489482183_3423437843697922091_o.jpg
 
I once, many years ago, applied for a job with Sparkman & Stephens. I didn't get it, of course. I wasn't remotely qualified. But I do own a copy of Desirable and Undesirable Characteristics of Offshore Yachts, which features considerable text by Olin Stephens.

As for plans... I figure as long as the wife keeps threatening to outlive me I've got little to no shot at moving to Wyoming or Montana. I have a much better chance of landing an offshore cruiser in the 40' range, like this Tartan, or a Bristol 40. You can get one of the latter perfectly restored for less than the price of a new A4 and it's probably my favorite of all the Ted Hood designs. A boat like that won't win at Wednesday night buoy racing, but having crewed on a racing boat I fully understand that trying to wrangle a full crew is a monumental pain in the ass. I'll crew, I'll sail single or double-handed as an owner, but I will never own a crewed racing yacht.

Crewman checking in!
 
You do know that sleep schedules are seriously disrupted during an ocean race, right? :)
While this is true, I have to say that on most ocean races I've done, we've been on 4 hour watch schedules. Everybody's up the first 12 hours or so, but after that, you're mostly sleeping half of each day away, except when certain sail changes occur or when the SHTF due to incoming bad weather.

To that last point, there's nothing like being awakened from a deep slumber at 3:00am to rush up on deck in the middle of a squall 300 miles offshore with lightning strikes hitting everywhere while standing next to the tallest metal object on the horizon.

Still, what with all that sleep, I've almost always come away better rested than when I'm not doing an ocean race.
 
While this is true, I have to say that on most ocean races I've done, we've been on 4 hour watch schedules. Everybody's up the first 12 hours or so, but after that, you're mostly sleeping half of each day away, except when certain sail changes occur or when the SHTF due to incoming bad weather.

To that last point, there's nothing like being awakened from a deep slumber at 3:00am to rush up on deck in the middle of a squall 300 miles offshore with lightning strikes hitting everywhere while standing next to the tallest metal object on the horizon.

Still, what with all that sleep, I've almost always come away better rested than when I'm not doing an ocean race.

With larger crews that works well. Doing something like a double-handed Bermuda race makes it a little tougher.

I generally agree with you, though. Mostly I was bustin' balls on @RUScrew85, who is a notorious sleeper.

We did a J/105 event one year up at Cedar Point. The owner got two hotel rooms for the crew Saturday night, which meant 3 guys to a room. I don't do three guys to a room. After the club party I just said, "You guys go on ahead, I'll sleep on the boat." I spent a couple hours drinking with some nice people on a Beneteau 36.7 and then retired to the starboard settee on the J. Slept like a baby.
 
With larger crews that works well. Doing something like a double-handed Bermuda race makes it a little tougher.

I generally agree with you, though. Mostly I was bustin' balls on @RUScrew85, who is a notorious sleeper.

We did a J/105 event one year up at Cedar Point. The owner got two hotel rooms for the crew Saturday night, which meant 3 guys to a room. I don't do three guys to a room. After the club party I just said, "You guys go on ahead, I'll sleep on the boat." I spent a couple hours drinking with some nice people on a Beneteau 36.7 and then retired to the starboard settee on the J. Slept like a baby.
I knew you were busting his balls. He's the famous napping Screw. And let's face it, being a notorious sleeper is a pretty good quality, especially for the sleeper.

Sleeping on the water is the best. Except for when it's outrageously hot and humid (unless the boat has A/C). When possible, sleeping on deck on a boat is even better. I've had some pretty good naps while sail-tied to a stanchion on the high-side.
 
I knew you were busting his balls. He's the famous napping Screw. And let's face it, being a notorious sleeper is a pretty good quality, especially for the sleeper.

Sleeping on the water is the best. Except for when it's outrageously hot and humid (unless the boat has A/C). When possible, sleeping on deck on a boat is even better. I've had some pretty good naps while sail-tied to a stanchion on the high-side.

A number of years back I took two friends and two brothers-in-law on a canyon tuna trip on the Purple Jet out of Pt. Pleasant. We motored out, killed it on yellowfin and decided that everybody was too tired (and several were too sick) to do the nighttime chunking under the lights. It was cool, the seas were moving with a nice, gentle long-period swell (uh oh) and by 11pm the gentlest of misty drizzles began to... not fall, so much as drift across the boat.

The Purple Jet, at 40', doesn't have overwhelming accommodations and the two bunks and the dinette berth were occupied by those sadly Out of Commission. So I gathered up my sleeping bag and gunwale-walked around the house to the foredeck, laid out my bag, zipped myself in and dozed off.

I woke up in the middle of one of those "falling dreams", except that I very quickly realized that I was A) awake and B) actually falling. I shot my arm out of the bag and my hand grabbed what turned out to be a rail stanchion, just as I was sliding off the foredeck of the boat. I hauled myself back onto the deck still half asleep, crawled out of the bag and found myself looking out over 12-15' seas being pushed by what turned out to be 40 knot winds. Around midnight we had been overtaken by one of the outer bands of what had been Hurricane Bonnie.

The real adventure came when I realized that I wasn't going to be able to get back to the cockpit the way that I'd come out. The deck on the side of the house was only a few inches wide and the boat was rockin'. So I went to the cabin and started banging on one of the front windows, waking the mate, who was sleeping in the pilot chair. He opened the window and I crawled in. Scary thing was, nobody knew I was out there. If I'd gone in, there would have been no way out.
 
A number of years back I took two friends and two brothers-in-law on a canyon tuna trip on the Purple Jet out of Pt. Pleasant. We motored out, killed it on yellowfin and decided that everybody was too tired (and several were too sick) to do the nighttime chunking under the lights. It was cool, the seas were moving with a nice, gentle long-period swell (uh oh) and by 11pm the gentlest of misty drizzles began to... not fall, so much as drift across the boat.

The Purple Jet, at 40', doesn't have overwhelming accommodations and the two bunks and the dinette berth were occupied by those sadly Out of Commission. So I gathered up my sleeping bag and gunwale-walked around the house to the foredeck, laid out my bag, zipped myself in and dozed off.

I woke up in the middle of one of those "falling dreams", except that I very quickly realized that I was A) awake and B) actually falling. I shot my arm out of the bag and my hand grabbed what turned out to be a rail stanchion, just as I was sliding off the foredeck of the boat. I hauled myself back onto the deck still half asleep, crawled out of the bag and found myself looking out over 12-15' seas being pushed by what turned out to be 40 knot winds. Around midnight we had been overtaken by one of the outer bands of what had been Hurricane Bonnie.

The real adventure came when I realized that I wasn't going to be able to get back to the cockpit the way that I'd come out. The deck on the side of the house was only a few inches wide and the boat was rockin'. So I went to the cabin and started banging on one of the front windows, waking the mate, who was sleeping in the pilot chair. He opened the window and I crawled in. Scary thing was, nobody knew I was out there. If I'd gone in, there would have been no way out.
A close escape; pretty scary indeed. You almost violated rule #1 of ocean boating.

And given that, you understood better than most why I sail-tied myself to a stanchion for a nap. Which has it's own risks, I realize. But I always used slip-knots for such things just in case.
 
A close escape; pretty scary indeed. You almost violated rule #1 of ocean boating.

And given that, you understood better than most why I sail-tied myself to a stanchion for a nap. Which has it's own risks, I realize. But I always used slip-knots for such things just in case.

In '98, when that happened, I was between two distinct phases of my sailing life and was much more interested in power boating / fishing. You know the drill - sailing is time. When you're young and without commitment, sailing is attractive. When you're older, the kids are grown and the wife has entered that "For God's sake, will you just friggin' to to Costa Rica for a week, already" phase of her life, sailing is attractive. In between, when there are infants and then preschoolers and trips to Disney and then soccer and high school and etc., etc., sailing isn't practical. Fishing, with its relatively instant gratification, is a better play.

But I'm over that, now.
 
In '98, when that happened, I was between two distinct phases of my sailing life and was much more interested in power boating / fishing. You know the drill - sailing is time. When you're young and without commitment, sailing is attractive. When you're older, the kids are grown and the wife has entered that "For God's sake, will you just friggin' to to Costa Rica for a week, already" phase of her life, sailing is attractive. In between, when there are infants and then preschoolers and trips to Disney and then soccer and high school and etc., etc., sailing isn't practical. Fishing, with its relatively instant gratification, is a better play.

But I'm over that, now.
I get that completely.

Sailing is a whole lot of effort if all you really want to do is boat over to some waterfront bar and restaurant. Or even if you want to take a quick trip to Bermuda or something.

It's kind of ironic, 'cause I love going fast, but I find that there's just nothing quite like being at the helm, finding that balance point between the wind, current and waves, working towards some distant waypoint. It's almost sad when you get there.
 
So you can choose one, for personal use not sale: a single sports car or single sailboat of your choice. Go!

I'm out of my element with boats, but there's another race I'm looking forward to watching: Sailing The Arctic. I thought it was this year, but looks like it's tentatively scheduled for next summer. First of its kind through the Northwest Passage, from NY to Victoria, BC. Has a global warming element, of course, but I think it'll just be cool to see a race through such a remote part of the world, dodging icebergs and such. Should be interesting to follow even for non sail/boat guys.
 
I get that completely.

Sailing is a whole lot of effort if all you really want to do is boat over to some waterfront bar and restaurant. Or even if you want to take a quick trip to Bermuda or something.

It's kind of ironic, 'cause I love going fast, but I find that there's just nothing quite like being at the helm, finding that balance point between the wind, current and waves, working towards some distant waypoint. It's almost sad when you get there.

Feelin' it. Whenever we weren't on a race course I used to love driving the boat from the lee side of the cockpit. It was a more connected experience.

I used to fight with the owner all the time over spin trim. For some reason the J class guys feel like there needs to be a guy standing abeam the mast with the spinnaker sheet in his hand at all times, constantly pumping the line to optimize the shape of the sail. Off the course I would always try and show him how, if you just locked the sheet into the winch, you could steer the boat to the sail and it would ultimately go faster. He never really got it.
 
So you can choose one, for personal use not sale: a single sports car or single sailboat of your choice. Go!

I'm out of my element with boats, but there's another race I'm looking forward to watching: Sailing The Arctic. I thought it was this year, but looks like it's tentatively scheduled for next summer. First of its kind through the Northwest Passage, from NY to Victoria, BC. Has a global warming element, of course, but I think it'll just be cool to see a race through such a remote part of the world, dodging icebergs and such. Should be interesting to follow even for non sail/boat guys.

Boat. No question about it. Any boat? Boat of my choice? Hallberg-Rassy 44.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FanuSanu52
So you can choose one, for personal use not sale: a single sports car or single sailboat of your choice. Go!
That first choice is a real-world decision for me. You know I've been wanting to get a Cayman GT4. But you didn't know I want to sell the house, buy a 55-60 foot sailing yacht and head for BVI (or someplace like that). No point in buying a Cayman if I'm not living on land. But if I move out West, the Cayman makes perfect sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FanuSanu52
Feelin' it. Whenever we weren't on a race course I used to love driving the boat from the lee side of the cockpit. It was a more connected experience.

I used to fight with the owner all the time over spin trim. For some reason the J class guys feel like there needs to be a guy standing abeam the mast with the spinnaker sheet in his hand at all times, constantly pumping the line to optimize the shape of the sail. Off the course I would always try and show him how, if you just locked the sheet into the winch, you could steer the boat to the sail and it would ultimately go faster. He never really got it.
We'd bounce between the two. Sometimes full time trimming, sometimes just lock it down and sail to it.
 
That first choice is a real-world decision for me. You know I've been wanting to get a Cayman GT4. But you didn't know I want to sell the house, buy a 55-60 foot sailing yacht and head for BVI (or someplace like that). No point in buying a Cayman if I'm not living on land. But if I move out West, the Cayman makes perfect sense.

Yeah, I have a few local roads I'd love to open up a GT4 on. Don't see supercars quite as often as in rich areas of NJ, but usually when I do, it's an entire fleet - clubs just out having a great time.
 
Yeah, I have a few local roads I'd love to open up a GT4 on. Don't see supercars quite as often as in rich areas of NJ, but usually when I do, it's an entire fleet - clubs just out having a great time.
Thing about being out West is, unlike around here, there are roads where it's tough for a state trooper to hide. And from what I hear, the roads are mostly in much better shape.

I myself had a bit of a run in w/a NJ state trooper about six weeks or so ago. Apparently they frown on people driving 125mph on the NJ turnpike, even in the wee hours of the morning. Go figure. [laughing]
 
That's a nice looking boat.

I did a Block Island to Highlands delivery of a HR36 once. There were two of us, we hit weather as soon as we rounded Montauk and the boat took a beating but held together really well and had a great motion in steep seas (8-10'). I was sold - those Swedes build serious shit. Actually, all of the Nordic boats are pretty much grenade-proof.

I love a nice Beneteau, but the newer ones scare me. They're all Juan K. designed, racer wannabes, even at the high end (take a look at the new 62). Plumb bow, sharp entry, fine lines, and incredibly beamy at the stern. Yeah, they go like stink downwind, but can you imagine flogging one to weather up here in the North Atlantic? Ouch.
 
Thing about being out West is, unlike around here, there are roads where it's tough for a state trooper to hide. And from what I hear, the roads are mostly in much better shape.

I myself had a bit of a run in w/a NJ state trooper about six weeks or so ago. Apparently they frown on people driving 125mph on the NJ turnpike, even in the wee hours of the morning. Go figure. [laughing]

They can hide very well, unfortunately. Was in Arizona back in the spring. Was driving an SUV, so nothing that would get me in trouble, but did end up getting a wonderful speeding ticket-by-mail. Didn't even know there was such a thing.
 
I did a Block Island to Highlands delivery of a HR36 once. There were two of us, we hit weather as soon as we rounded Montauk and the boat took a beating but held together really well and had a great motion in steep seas (8-10'). I was sold - those Swedes build serious shit. Actually, all of the Nordic boats are pretty much grenade-proof.

I love a nice Beneteau, but the newer ones scare me. They're all Juan K. designed, racer wannabes, even at the high end (take a look at the new 62). Plumb bow, sharp entry, fine lines, and incredibly beamy at the stern. Yeah, they go like stink downwind, but can you imagine flogging one to weather up here in the North Atlantic? Ouch.
Yeah, but they go like stink downwind. LOL

It is pretty hard to imagine one of those boats taking the kind of pounding we'd see beating in ten foot seas in the Cal 40. The hulls would be okay, but I'd expect stuff to break loose all over the boat.

This reminds me of one year, we were running a bit late and motoring out to the start line for the Around Long Island race. Maybe eight foot seas coming in almost directly opposing our course to the start line. The pounding the hull was taking was crazy. Just absolutely slamming down over wave after wave. The whole boat was shuddering on each impact. Water crashing over the whole boat each time.

It was warm, so I went up and climbed up on the bow rail and was just riding it out while holding on the headstay, no foul weather gear. I think the owner was pretty freaked out, worrying I'd get knocked off. But I was up there for over an hour. Ah, those were the days.
 
Yeah, but they go like stink downwind. LOL

It is pretty hard to imagine one of those boats taking the kind of pounding we'd see beating in ten foot seas in the Cal 40. The hulls would be okay, but I'd expect stuff to break loose all over the boat.

This reminds me of one year, we were running a bit late and motoring out to the start line for the Around Long Island race. Maybe eight foot seas coming in almost directly opposing our course to the start line. The pounding the hull was taking was crazy. Just absolutely slamming down over wave after wave. The whole boat was shuddering on each impact. Water crashing over the whole boat each time.

It was warm, so I went up and climbed up on the bow rail and was just riding it out while holding on the headstay, no foul weather gear. I think the owner was pretty freaked out, worrying I'd get knocked off. But I was up there for over an hour. Ah, those were the days.

The other thing that scares me about the "new" cruising boats is their stability (for the other folks reading the thread, this is actually a learning point and not just boat porn).

The excess beam makes them initially stiff and they can definitely carry more sail, and thus go faster. BUT... In a survival storm, once the boat passes the moment of roll stability and winds up inverted, it's gonna stay that way. The main reason why the IMOCA boats have canting keels is so that if the boat should find itself with the bulb in the air, cranking it to the downwind stop will flip the boat upright in about 5 seconds. The wide-ass cruising boats not only have fixed keels but they have fixed keels on a much shorter draft, which means their lever arm is much, much shorter. If something like a Beneteau Oceanis 62 should roll, it will stay rolled until it sinks.

As for the rest... yeah. I'm the guy who always wants to be sitting on the bow pulpit when we go out through the Manasquan Inlet. :)
 
The other thing that scares me about the "new" cruising boats is their stability (for the other folks reading the thread, this is actually a learning point and not just boat porn).

The excess beam makes them initially stiff and they can definitely carry more sail, and thus go faster. BUT... In a survival storm, once the boat passes the moment of roll stability and winds up inverted, it's gonna stay that way. The main reason why the IMOCA boats have canting keels is so that if the boat should find itself with the bulb in the air, cranking it to the downwind stop will flip the boat upright in about 5 seconds. The wide-ass cruising boats not only have fixed keels but they have fixed keels on a much shorter draft, which means their lever arm is much, much shorter. If something like a Beneteau Oceanis 62 should roll, it will stay rolled until it sinks.

As for the rest... yeah. I'm the guy who always wants to be sitting on the bow pulpit when we go out through the Manasquan Inlet. :)
Speaking of stability... After your post about the IMOCA boats earlier this morning, I went looking at more of them and found some interesting photos (inversion tests) showing the undersides. Here are a couple showing what I assume are the canting keels, particular the first one:

Inversion_620.jpg


23576703534402163722.jpg
 
Speaking of stability... After your post about the IMOCA boats earlier this morning, I went looking at more of them and found some interesting photos (inversion tests) showing the undersides. Here are a couple showing what I assume are the canting keels, particular the first one:

Inversion_620.jpg


23576703534402163722.jpg

This is SAFRAN, which will be sailed by 29 year-old Morgan Lagraviere in his first Vendee Globe. It's the same boat seen in the second image in my post from this morning.

The inversion test is relatively new and is actually an active test. In it, the boat is inverted with the canting keel in the full perpendicular position. In calm waters the boat must demonstrate to be completely stable in this configuration. The skipper, who is on board the boat when it is inverted, must escape via the transom hatch into the water, then must re-enter the boat through the same escape hatch and manually activate the canting keel to windward, remaining on board while the boat rights itself, which it will do pretty quickly.

The video below shows the entire process and it's really fascinating. Note that the mast and rigging are not on the boat - this is done simply because when a boat is inverted and righted some damage to the rig will be incurred and the test isn't about unnecessary expense.

 
This is SAFRAN, which will be sailed by 29 year-old Morgan Lagraviere in his first Vendee Globe. It's the same boat seen in the second image in my post from this morning.

The inversion test is relatively new and is actually an active test. In it, the boat is inverted with the canting keel in the full perpendicular position. In calm waters the boat must demonstrate to be completely stable in this configuration. The skipper, who is on board the boat when it is inverted, must escape via the transom hatch into the water, then must re-enter the boat through the same escape hatch and manually activate the canting keel to windward, remaining on board while the boat rights itself, which it will do pretty quickly.

The video below shows the entire process and it's really fascinating. Note that the mast and rigging are not on the boat - this is done simply because when a boat is inverted and righted some damage to the rig will be incurred and the test isn't about unnecessary expense.

Watching that boat flip it looks REALLY light.

Does it still flip if the sails are up (down)? Could the currents put pressure on the submerged sails and keep it from righting itself?
 
This is SAFRAN, which will be sailed by 29 year-old Morgan Lagraviere in his first Vendee Globe. It's the same boat seen in the second image in my post from this morning.

The inversion test is relatively new and is actually an active test. In it, the boat is inverted with the canting keel in the full perpendicular position. In calm waters the boat must demonstrate to be completely stable in this configuration. The skipper, who is on board the boat when it is inverted, must escape via the transom hatch into the water, then must re-enter the boat through the same escape hatch and manually activate the canting keel to windward, remaining on board while the boat rights itself, which it will do pretty quickly.

The video below shows the entire process and it's really fascinating. Note that the mast and rigging are not on the boat - this is done simply because when a boat is inverted and righted some damage to the rig will be incurred and the test isn't about unnecessary expense.

Pretty cool how it rights itself with the canting keel.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT