ADVERTISEMENT

OT: What do you guys pay for medical Benefits?

Retired after 39 years with the Post Office. Wife still working at Costco and took Social Security with reduced benefit. Also have income from an annuity and a payed off mortgage. Have Medicare parts A + B and Blue Cross/Blue Shield from the P.O. Not sure what I'm paying, but I know it's much less than what I'm getting in benefits.
Medicare part A cost zero and part B cost $144/ mth per person The Post Office sounds like it pays for the supplemental insurance and drug plan which normally cost about 250/mth per person. Most companies eliminated paying the supplemental insurance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
My parents had the supplement insurance covered by PSE&G and were just told they would now just be getting a dollar amount to buy their own coverage
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
My parents had the supplement insurance covered by PSE&G and were just told they would now just be getting a dollar amount to buy their own coverage
My father had his supplemental paid by Honeywell for over 25 years but they stopped it about a year ago since most current union employees don’t care about this benefit and not enough retire employees left living. I think they gave some $$ but not the real cost of the supplemental insurance. It was a nice benefit.
 
My father had his supplemental paid by Honeywell for over 25 years but they stopped it about a year ago since most current union employees don’t care about this benefit and not enough retire employees left living. I think they gave some $$ but not the real cost of the supplemental insurance. It was a nice benefit.
My parents will be okay

My dad has a pension and 5 kids that all have the ability to help when needed
 
Mine will change drastically in January of 2023 and I trying to gauge if I should retire based on my medical Benifits. In January of 2023 my plan will Change from the following. No contribution towards the medical plan out of pocket and you can go to any doctor you want. Copays are 5 dollars and pharmaceutical are either 2 for generic and 5 for premium. Those who do not retire will have to take the new plan that will be paying 2% of your base salary into it per year and. 20!dollar co pays to doctors office and 10 to 20 dollar co pays for pharmaceuticals. Base salary with none of the extras will be $170G a year in Jan of 23 but with the rest and OT you can really earn. I will be 46 and a half in Jan of 23 and right now I am leaning towards staying and working 10 more years and max out at 32 years and never working again. If I go before the new plan kicks in I retire with 135G a year and keep the medical as I have it now. So what should I do?
So- bottom line- Retire at 49 with a pension that pays $135k and full medical with no cost out of pocket and minimum copays or
work another 10 years with the current $170k base and most likely another bump before retirement, with overtime that will put you at let's say $200k but now pay $3400 per year and higher co pay and I assume your pension would then also go up if you go out later.
Only question would have to be is can you live a great retirement for 40 years on $135k per year or are you going to have to find another job for additional income. And how much do you love your current job?
If you stay 10 more years, you are gaining about $65k per year and who cares about the medical- $3400 per year is not bad at all to be honest.
Either option seems like a win/win to me.
Myself...like most of the country, do not have pensions and will be on our own for medical in retirement years. I don't begrudge at all- you earned it but I don't see any negatives in either decision you make.
 
So- bottom line- Retire at 49 with a pension that pays $135k and full medical with no cost out of pocket and minimum copays or
work another 10 years with the current $170k base and most likely another bump before retirement, with overtime that will put you at let's say $200k but now pay $3400 per year and higher co pay and I assume your pension would then also go up if you go out later.
Only question would have to be is can you live a great retirement for 40 years on $135k per year or are you going to have to find another job for additional income. And how much do you love your current job?
If you stay 10 more years, you are gaining about $65k per year and who cares about the medical- $3400 per year is not bad at all to be honest.
Either option seems like a win/win to me.
Myself...like most of the country, do not have pensions and will be on our own for medical in retirement years. I don't begrudge at all- you earned it but I don't see any negatives in either decision you make.
That basically sums it up and I see it your way as well. I will put my resume out there but it will be tough to beat what I have now since I really enjoy my job very much. Thank you and everyone else for your replies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRZEER and Greg2020
That basically sums it up and I see it your way as well. I will put my resume out there but it will be tough to beat what I have now since I really enjoy my job very much. Thank you and everyone else for your replies.
If you enjoy your job- keep working...your benefit payments are still going to be very reasonable and as you have found out- not easiest thing in the world to put out your resume and just get a $65k side job.Take those extra years and pay everything you can off. Retire before 60 and enjoy life.
 
you currently pay nothing for healthcare ?? Is thIs real? I’ve never heard of a company that pays all health insurance without any employee contribution, beyond co-pay. Is this common in 2020? What industries? Also, a defined benefit pension instead of 401K? Other than school teachers and police I suppose, I didn’t think that happened anymore.

but to answer your question, retire !
My company pays for 100% for Medical, Vision and Dental for my entire family. It a small it/communications company. The owner really takes care of his employees and put them before profits. He works right next to his guys. It is rare but there are still some people who still truly care about their employees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoobyCow
So- bottom line- Retire at 49 with a pension that pays $135k and full medical with no cost out of pocket and minimum copays or
work another 10 years with the current $170k base and most likely another bump before retirement, with overtime that will put you at let's say $200k but now pay $3400 per year and higher co pay and I assume your pension would then also go up if you go out later.
Only question would have to be is can you live a great retirement for 40 years on $135k per year or are you going to have to find another job for additional income. And how much do you love your current job?
If you stay 10 more years, you are gaining about $65k per year and who cares about the medical- $3400 per year is not bad at all to be honest.
Either option seems like a win/win to me.
Myself...like most of the country, do not have pensions and will be on our own for medical in retirement years. I don't begrudge at all- you earned it but I don't see any negatives in either decision you make.
If one can not live on 135K a year, something is very wrong. Most live on social security and interest, between 20k and 50K a year.
 
Basically nada. Not quite, though. A doctor's visit (pick your GP) costs $45 unless you are old, young or poor. Then it's a lot less. Free for kids 18 and under. Then, if you need tests, scans, surgery, whatever, all that is free. Also, once you have paid for 20 prescriptions, the rest are free for the year.

So that is the standard and that is what most Kiwis do. Being Yanks, we buy additional health insurance. We basically buy a low level of coverage, which runs us about $3000 a year for the two of us. It lets us skip the queue if we need surgery, and have it done at the private hospital instead of the public one. The deductible on surgery at that level is pretty substantial, but if you are willing to wait some and have it in the public hospital, it's free. Moms Skillethead just had cataract surgery and we paid about $300 to have it done right away.

I think the idea that you pick your GP, pay a moderate amount per visit unless you are young or poor, and then can buy insurance for premium care if you care to spend it, would make a solid approach for the US. Also, we cannot sue for medical misadventure. Most doctors are employed by the government and don't have to buy insurance. They can be put out of practice, but only very rarely sued.

We should probably put more money into our health system than we do (Kiwis tend to be a bit on the cheap side), but the structure of the system is solid.
Every developed nation should have something like that. I am a conservative.. mostly.. but a full national health plan just makes too much sense. The profit motive should be nowhere near health care... nor should advertising. The people who go into health care to make their fortune should be weeded out as well. There is room to pay health care workers well who actually perform health care services.. including doctors. The money is already in the system if you tear out all the middlemen.
 
Last edited:
That basically sums it up and I see it your way as well. I will put my resume out there but it will be tough to beat what I have now since I really enjoy my job very much. Thank you and everyone else for your replies.


You like your job then stay
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
That basically sums it up and I see it your way as well. I will put my resume out there but it will be tough to beat what I have now since I really enjoy my job very much. Thank you and everyone else for your replies.

Stick it out another 10 years, imo. You’re right, tough to beat what you have.

no one should begrudge him. Everyone gets to choose their lot in life. He chose the best situation for himself and is going to reap the rewards. Good for him, and thanks for your service, Chris.

I couldn’t work for Port Authority police, that’s for sure.
 
Every developed nation should have something like that. I am a conservative.. mostly.. but a full national health plan just makes too much sense. The profit motive should be nowhere near health care... nor should advertising. The people who go into health care to make their fortune should be weeded out as well. There is room to pay health care workers well who actually perform health care services.. including doctors. The money is already in the system if you tear out all the middlemen.

it sounds good in theory, but National healthcares sacrifice quality and there are instances of having to ration care. We have the best healthcare system in the world. We need to continue to improve access.
 
I think I gave up a .50 cent raise years ago in order to get benefits. Included ever since. Pretty basic coverage I imagine.

How much more would I be getting paid now would be a better question.
 
it sounds good in theory, but National healthcares sacrifice quality and there are instances of having to ration care. We have the best healthcare system in the world. We need to continue to improve access.

It's not like we don't ration healthcare here as well, it's just based on who can afford it.

We have the best health care for some people, and among the worst for others. Highest rate of maternal deaths, etc.

Also, being in NY/NJ we have a very skewed view of how available and easy it is to get treatment. There are plenty of places in the US that are very underserved, where it takes forever to get appointments and find specialists.

Seems simple enough to layer on supplemental insurance over national, like many other countries.
 
Rutgersal, Actually that's not true..

According to a 2017 publication from the Commonwealth Fund, The USA is ranked last out of 11 Countries.
“Among the 11 nations studied in this report – Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, France, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States—the U.S. ranks last, as it did in 2010, 2007, 2006, and 2014”

Most troubling, the U.S. Healthcare System fails to achieve better health outcomes than the other countries, and as shown in the earlier editions, the U.S. is last or near last on dimensions of access, efficiency, and equity"
 
Last edited:
If one can not live on 135K a year, something is very wrong. Most live on social security and interest, between 20k and 50K a year.
Heck- in NJ the property taxes could be 15-30k per year alone...Personally, when I retire, I would want to what would amount to more than $135k per year in the bank or invested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
I’m
Just going on what normal NJ cops say about PA cops. They are a running joke to them. Not exactly sure why, but it is what it is.
they are jealous of the kind of money they make and 90% could never get hired in PAPD.
 
Heck- in NJ the property taxes could be 15-30k per year alone...Personally, when I retire, I would want to what would amount to more than $135k per year in the bank or invested.
15-30k in property taxes is a choice, you don't need to live someplace with taxes that high even in NJ.

In any case, 135k a year is more than the vast majority of the country can dream of having in retirement (roughly $3m using the 4% rule), so it's obviously more than workable and a nice option to have for almost anyone.
 
I’m

they are jealous of the kind of money they make and 90% could never get hired in PAPD.
You mean Pennsylvania police department are paid more than $130,000 a year? I would think NJ cops are paid one of the highest in the country.
 
15-30k in property taxes is a choice, you don't need to live someplace with taxes that high even in NJ.

In any case, 135k a year is more than the vast majority of the country can dream of having in retirement (roughly $3m using the 4% rule), so it's obviously more than workable and a nice option to have for almost anyone.
I don’t disagree. And much easier to retire on 135k per year if you are 60 and have been earning 200 per for the past 10-15 years then to retire on 135k at 46.
And you are right, it is always a choice and as I told him earlier...it is a win/win either way.
I just can’t always assume that a yearly number that works for one person will work for someone else.
 
15-30k in property taxes is a choice, you don't need to live someplace with taxes that high even in NJ.

In any case, 135k a year is more than the vast majority of the country can dream of having in retirement (roughly $3m using the 4% rule), so it's obviously more than workable and a nice option to have for almost anyone.
$135k is okay for retirement, but you need to shoot for more if you want to stay in NJ. Obviously, it all depends on what you want during the golden years.
 
the U.S. is last or near last on dimensions of access, efficiency, and equity"

well that part is skewed with how large the united states is in area. Andy countries as vast as the united states with disperse populations score better? Aussies may not count because the vastness in the middle is basically empty. Where does Canada score on those measures? They have vast swaths of land with no one in it to survey as well.
 
Do they not have the right relatives and political connections? (your comment does not mean what you think it means)
That’s simply not true one bit let me explain. In 1998 I took this test when I was a Junior at RU. We had to pay the PA in order to take it. It was a pass fail test and you needed college and or 4 years of military service to take the test. 28 thousand people took the test. I graduated in 99 and took a job with my home town police department. In late 2000 A computer program picked my name and many other candidates names and we began the process to come here. To hire 55 they pulled 1000 names. Of the 55 that went to seagirt 48 were already cops including 36 NYPD cops who came here for better pay Benifits and work rules. Is there politics here? Of course there is it’s a huge Bistate agency but since 1998 to get on my police department you take a test that you had to pay to take and a computer randomly selects you to start the process. The last test this agency gave 3 years ago had over 45 thousand people take it. It’s the biggest blessing in Law Enforcement. I have earned 2 Masters degrees 85 percent on there dime. They paid 85 percent of my EDS degree. Unfortunately they won’t pay the 5800 a class left to finish off the PHD but hey they have truly taken cared of me and my family. There is as much politics here as any other agency. I certainly did not know anyone I’m just an Elizabeth kid.
 
That’s simply not true one bit let me explain. In 1998 I took this test when I was a Junior at RU. We had to pay the PA in order to take it. It was a pass fail test and you needed college and or 4 years of military service to take the test. 28 thousand people took the test. I graduated in 99 and took a job with my home town police department. In late 2000 A computer program picked my name and many other candidates names and we began the process to come here. To hire 55 they pulled 1000 names. Of the 55 that went to seagirt 48 were already cops including 36 NYPD cops who came here for better pay Benifits and work rules. Is there politics here? Of course there is it’s a huge Bistate agency but since 1998 to get on my police department you take a test that you had to pay to take and a computer randomly selects you to start the process. The last test this agency gave 3 years ago had over 45 thousand people take it. It’s the biggest blessing in Law Enforcement. I have earned 2 Masters degrees 85 percent on there dime. They paid 85 percent of my EDS degree. Unfortunately they won’t pay the 5800 a class left to finish off the PHD but hey they have truly taken cared of me and my family. There is as much politics here as any other agency. I certainly did not know anyone I’m just an Elizabeth kid.
Most of the guys/gals I have met or dealt with over the years from PAPD were stand up and squared away individuals. PAPD attracts very high level of candidates for many reason but especially bc of the fantastic benefits and pay There is nepotism in any and every public employee sector job, doesn’t mean the candidates are qualified or in this case over qualified.
 
Do they not have the right relatives and political connections? (your comment does not mean what you think it means)
I mean a large portion of police officers at the local levels are not the brightest individuals in society. 60% of my municipal police academy class were complete idiots and I would look at them daily and be amazed they were going to be handed a gun.
 
Most of the guys/gals I have met or dealt with over the years from PAPD were stand up and squared away individuals. PAPD attracts very high level of candidates for many reason but especially bc of the fantastic benefits and pay There is nepotism in any and every public employee sector job, doesn’t mean the candidates are qualified or in this case over qualified.
Nepotism is not limited to the public sector and it is not necessarily a bad thing either

If you have someone that you think is a good employee and they have someone they know and who has the qualifications what is wrong with hiring the person they recommend
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020 and JRZEER
Nepotism is not limited to the public sector and it is not necessarily a bad thing either

If you have someone that you think is a good employee and they have someone they know and who has the qualifications what is wrong with hiring the person they recommend
I have no issues with nepotism
 
I just can’t always assume that a yearly number that works for one person will work for someone else.

I guess my point is that anyone can make this number work. It might not be everything they dreamed of, but it is a number that allows most anyone a pretty good life, better than the majority of the country will ever have.
 
you currently pay nothing for healthcare ?? Is thIs real? I’ve never heard of a company that pays all health insurance without any employee contribution, beyond co-pay. Is this common in 2020? What industries? Also, a defined benefit pension instead of 401K? Other than school teachers and police I suppose, I didn’t think that happened anymore.

but to answer your question, retire !

I just retired at the end of 2019 - we had a defined benefit plan pension which was pretty sweet - will be paid about half my base salary forever (with 50% of that to the wife should I die or have an unfortunate accident, should I piss her off too much, lol). No way did I want a lump sum - have plenty of other $$ at risk - liked the idea of guaranteed income. They're switching over to an employee contribution model now. Plus they gave me a very nice package to leave and hired me back for 8 hrs/wk at a higher rate than my base, which keeps me busy and brings in a little cash. I would not have liked working in the COVID world, remotely - was a manager of managers with groups 20-50 the past 20 years and really enjoyed in person interactions, coaching, teaching, learning, etc. Medical went up a bit to about $400/month and that will double after 1.5 years (until medicare).
 
That’s simply not true one bit let me explain. In 1998 I took this test when I was a Junior at RU. We had to pay the PA in order to take it. It was a pass fail test and you needed college and or 4 years of military service to take the test. 28 thousand people took the test. I graduated in 99 and took a job with my home town police department. In late 2000 A computer program picked my name and many other candidates names and we began the process to come here. To hire 55 they pulled 1000 names. Of the 55 that went to seagirt 48 were already cops including 36 NYPD cops who came here for better pay Benifits and work rules. Is there politics here? Of course there is it’s a huge Bistate agency but since 1998 to get on my police department you take a test that you had to pay to take and a computer randomly selects you to start the process. The last test this agency gave 3 years ago had over 45 thousand people take it. It’s the biggest blessing in Law Enforcement. I have earned 2 Masters degrees 85 percent on there dime. They paid 85 percent of my EDS degree. Unfortunately they won’t pay the 5800 a class left to finish off the PHD but hey they have truly taken cared of me and my family. There is as much politics here as any other agency. I certainly did not know anyone I’m just an Elizabeth kid.
Our former deputy director had a similar educational background, but he completed his PhD. We bumped him from Lt to Captain/Deputy Director to stick around a few years while we prepped our transition process. He eventually retired and got a job at a large regional HS in Hunterdon Co as head of security (more of the strategic lead, not an everyday onsite employee). I forgot whether he is directly employed by the district or via a consulting firm. Anyway, he loves the new gig and makes boatload (on top of the township pension/HC benefits). You should think about stuff like this if you are interested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRZEER
If one can not live on 135K a year, something is very wrong. Most live on social security and interest, between 20k and 50K a year.

An issue with retiring at 49 is that you are likely to live another 35 years during which time inflation will erode the value of the $135K in real terms (assuming he doesn't have a cost of living annual increase on top of all the other perks). Not sure why he asked his original question if he loves his job, keep working seems pretty obvious.

Whenever you have a "public" job that generates far more candidates for each available job and it becomes almost like a lottery, you have to ask the logical question, why is the comp package so generous? If they cut costs, would they have trouble filling those positions? That's what management is supposed to be doing to keep things efficient. There are horror stories from the MTA and LIRR in particular, about these guys closing their eyes so that they will get the same as they approach retirement. Not in the public's best interest to say the least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus10
An issue with retiring at 49 is that you are likely to live another 35 years during which time inflation will erode the value of the $135K in real terms (assuming he doesn't have a cost of living annual increase on top of all the other perks). Not sure why he asked his original question if he loves his job, keep working seems pretty obvious.

Whenever you have a "public" job that generates far more candidates for each available job and it becomes almost like a lottery, you have to ask the logical question, why is the comp package so generous? If they cut costs, would they have trouble filling those positions? That's what management is supposed to be doing to keep things efficient. There are horror stories from the MTA and LIRR in particular, about these guys closing their eyes so that they will get the same as they approach retirement. Not in the public's best interest to say the least.
Pretty sure their pension has a COL yearly increase.
 
I just retired at the end of 2019 - we had a defined benefit plan pension which was pretty sweet - will be paid about half my base salary forever (with 50% of that to the wife should I die or have an unfortunate accident, should I piss her off too much, lol). No way did I want a lump sum - have plenty of other $$ at risk - liked the idea of guaranteed income. They're switching over to an employee contribution model now. Plus they gave me a very nice package to leave and hired me back for 8 hrs/wk at a higher rate than my base, which keeps me busy and brings in a little cash. I would not have liked working in the COVID world, remotely - was a manager of managers with groups 20-50 the past 20 years and really enjoyed in person interactions, coaching, teaching, learning, etc. Medical went up a bit to about $400/month and that will double after 1.5 years (until medicare).

Congratulations.

May I ask what you contributed to the pension
 
An issue with retiring at 49 is that you are likely to live another 35 years during which time inflation will erode the value of the $135K in real terms (assuming he doesn't have a cost of living annual increase on top of all the other perks). Not sure why he asked his original question if he loves his job, keep working seems pretty obvious.

Whenever you have a "public" job that generates far more candidates for each available job and it becomes almost like a lottery, you have to ask the logical question, why is the comp package so generous? If they cut costs, would they have trouble filling those positions? That's what management is supposed to be doing to keep things efficient. There are horror stories from the MTA and LIRR in particular, about these guys closing their eyes so that they will get the same as they approach retirement. Not in the public's best interest to say the least.
Good point on the inflation issue.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT