ADVERTISEMENT

COVID-19 Pandemic: Transmissions, Deaths, Treatments, Vaccines, Interventions and More...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry, no, I heard it took a long time to get test results back.

My thought on the spike in tests vs cases is based on:

A)That is what the data says.

B)It makes more sense that an increase in testing would create a backlog. I don't see the reasoning as to why an increase in positives would create a backlog. Unless they take longer to process?
I shared your opinion with my friend that maybe his doctor meant a spike in tests and he replied back "I think you're right".
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766 and RU-05
They had 800 positives in 5400 tests?

I'm wondering if there is not a backlog issue, if not that is scary.

Again, the ball is no longer in the hands of states like NJ, NY, MA, and PA. Which coincidentally all lean left. It's now in the hands of states like FL, TX, AZ, and Bama, which all lean right.

And I think there is a benefit there as this should, hopefully, no longer be seen as a partisan issue. We need to approach this the right way.
 
Last edited:
Been monitoring global CV data daily since February and noticing that while cases have been jumping globally for over a month, deaths have continued to decrease, even in areas where case growth has been sustained long enough to where an increase in deaths should be coming through in the numbers but isn't. Seeing this in some US states as well.

Is this a noted medical trend or just a weird data artifact due to bad reporting?

A big factor is an increase in testing. Our testing capacity had to climb from an embarrassingly low place, and many other countries are in the same boat. Initially some places were testing only emergency room cases (I encountered this personally in March); so as you go from testing critical cases to all cases, a mortalities per test rate begin to improve dramatically. To tie back to your original question, it very well could be that total cases are falling right along side total deaths, but we can’t depict that graphically because our testing rate is only growing.

That’s why you’re hearing a lot of networks talk about hospitalizations. It’s the best way to get even look at the scope of the crisis over the past few months. Cases up in Texas? Ok...that could just be because we’re testing more. Hospitalizations increasing? That’s probably evidence of more infections.
 
Update on the "engineered antibody" approach being pursued by Regeneron and other companies - they don't all do it the same way, but they all produce some sort of antibody "cocktail" to boost the ability of the body to neutralize the cell invasion/replication of the virus. This antibody cocktail can be infused into humans as a treatment for those ill with the virus or as a somewhat short term prophylactic for healthy people until a longer acting vaccine is available.

As per the quoted post, Regeneron used this approach with significant success in treating patients sick with the Ebola virus, so the approach should work. How well and for how long are the big questions. Regeneron has seen success in the lab and has selected their cocktail of antibodies to test in monkeys shortly, with potential human clinical trials to start in late June.

If successful, commercial launch would come in August with the potential to treat 20K sick patients per month or 200K healthy at-risk patients (more is needed for sick patients) - ramping up to millions should only take a few months. There are several other companies working in this area, too, with similar timelines. Crossing fingers, especially since if this or the convalescent plasma-antibody treatment in ongoing trials now is highly effective for seriously ill patients, it's a gamechanger, as it would give most people confidence to return to "somewhat normal" life (especially young/healthy people).

“The odds are very high this will work, especially when you have multiple programs and multiple manufacturers,” says James Crowe, a veteran immunologist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center who’s working with AstraZeneca Plc and others on Covid-19 treatments. Scott Gottlieb, former head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, also sounded optimistic in a recent interview with Bloomberg News, saying, “If I had to place one bet on a drug that could be available by the summer and could have activity and could have a profile that I think could change the contours of the infection, it would be the antibody approaches.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...JqQM4w5jnsXJpRhOUKFQlLBQMbRF5kX3TztXuDw09IloU

Regeneron announced they've started clinical trials for their antibody cocktail. They're convinced their mixture of 2 antibodies will be better than the single antibody products others have. They're also the only ones who have shown this antibody cocktail approach to be effective in the real world with Ebola 2 years ago. They've been my pick all along to be the leader for this technology - has the potential to be a cure for most, as well as a preventative for most. If safe/effective, approvals could come by the end of summer.

Scaling up to meet demands for treatment is doable, as the numbers are small, while scaling up to meet demands for prevention, will take many months; this could be a stopgap until vaccines are ready - most expect antibodies would only confer immunity for "months" so might be most appropriate for front line workers and the most vulnerable among us. Second link is from a few months ago, but does a great job explaining the science involved.

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/regeneron-starts-testing-covid-19-antibody-cocktail-humans

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/new-york-biotech-company-working-make-antibody-treatment-coronavirus-n1154566?fbclid=IwAR1FFGWD3eRNdUY7g7SYSHpXy-
 
Last edited:
We were ill prepared and to be clear this type of virus was expected sooner than later... when exactly did our ill preparedness start... How far back in years would you estimate ? 5-10-20 the problem should have been addressed?
It actually was addressed by the Obama Administration. There was a detailed playbook left for Trump who decided to ignore it.
 
My buddy is holed up in his house in Sea Bright with a high fever for the past few days, yesterday was when he was going to take the test to see if Covid-19 or not, just texted him what were the results and he replied he had to wait 3-5 days for them, when I questioned why the long wait (I'm under the assumption we whittled the waiting period significantly) he said his doctor said there has been a spike in new cases in NJ and hence the wait. Which is the first time I've heard this from anywhere.

I wonder if his doc blowing smoke up his ass to cover for the long wait.
That statement is not factual from wh
It actually was addressed by the Obama Administration. There was a detailed playbook left for Trump who decided to ignores ...So they claim and if true they should post it and have it verified... I find it highly suspect with the little Obama did during his time in the office. If it were so then the current guy dropped the ball but it’s as they say” water under the bridge”. Just make sure to wear a mask. I do.
 
Businesses would have shut down themselves if the government didn’t. Nobody wanted to leave their homes in the thick of things and many still do not want to go to restaurants and things like that. Sweden didn’t force shut downs and their economy still got smoked. At the end of the day, pandemics are bad for business with or without government involvement.

I disagree. The government, particularly in NJ and NY made things much worse then they had to be. Walmart and Target are always packed. In general people aren't afraid to go out as long as they have a mask. I don't have statistics to point to, but that is my take from what I'm observing. Unfortunately, we did shut down, so we'll never know for sure what would have happened. As for Sweden, I'm sure businesses were mostly hit by COVID because the rest of the world shut down.
 
You just don’t get coronavirus if you think all we had to do was stop concerts and large gatherings. There’s no further point in discussing this. Enjoy your day

If you don't get my point of doing what you can to limit harm, you are beyond help. It's a fairly easy concept. Have a nice day as well.
 
It actually was addressed by the Obama Administration. There was a detailed playbook left for Trump who decided to ignore it.
True and even more, Azar and the Dept of Health and Human Services conducted a pandemic simulation, called Crimson Tide last year to evaluate whether we were ready (no) for a pandemic, plus the CSIS (highly respected bipartisan DC think tank) came out with a very detailed analysis of what was needed to protect human health/national security last year, also.

Having said that, though, every administration failed to spend serious money on developing the kind of testing/tracing/isolating infrastructure we needed to have in place or on greatly expanding the Federal stockpile of medical equipment/PPE. Even so, the Trump Administration did essentially nothing to improve upon either of these areas until March, wasting 6-8 weeks of time we could've been preparing.

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/t...entions-and-more.191275/page-124#post-4570673
 
NJ with 83 deaths still amongst the highest in the nation.

I think that says a couple things.

1)This was talked about a little the other day. While ventilators may keep a person alive for awhile, it's not saving many lives. So we are seeing deaths from people who were intubated a whiles back.

2)Covid fatality rates are even more cloudy at the present time as it takes some Covid victims a long time to die.

3)As an extension of the above, in order to determine if Covid is weakening we should be tracing the death back to time of initial symptom. We may see deaths now and think, look people are still dying from this, but these may be people who had been fighting this for a month(maybe more, I don't know).
 
Regeneron announced they've started clinical trials for their antibody cocktail. They're convinced their mixture of 2 antibodies will be better than the single antibody products others have. They're also the only ones who have shown this antibody cocktail approach to be effective in the real world with Ebola 2 years ago. They've been my pick all along to be the leader for this technology - has the potential to be a cure for most, as well as a preventative for most. If safe/effective, approvals could come by the end of summer.

Scaling up to meet demands for treatment is doable, as the numbers are small, while scaling up to meet demands for prevention, will take many months; this could be a stopgap until vaccines are ready - most expect antibodies would only confer immunity for "months" so might be most appropriate for front line workers and the most vulnerable among us. Second link is from a few months ago, but does a great job explaining the science involved.

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/regeneron-starts-testing-covid-19-antibody-cocktail-humans

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/new-york-biotech-company-working-make-antibody-treatment-coronavirus-n1154566?fbclid=IwAR1FFGWD3eRNdUY7g7SYSHpXy-

I have a lot of hope for this as well, the question is how long will trials take and get enough made to use for treatment for severely ill
 
NJ with 83 deaths still amongst the highest in the nation.

I think that says a couple things.

1)This was talked about a little the other day. While ventilators may keep a person alive for awhile, it's not saving many lives. So we are seeing deaths from people who were intubated a whiles back.

2)Covid fatality rates are even more cloudy at the present time as it takes some Covid victims a long time to die.

3)As an extension of the above, in order to determine if Covid is weakening we should be tracing the death back to time of initial symptom. We may see deaths now and think, look people are still dying from this, but these may be people who had been fighting this for a month(maybe more, I don't know).
I don’t think any reputable body of science has found that it’s weakened so far. Yes, I’ve seen the one off doctor here and there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LETSGORU91
You really are an idiot. You love to point out just the bad news. South Carolina has a total of 15k cases through all this. NJ 166k. NJ 12.5k deaths. SC 568.
Please Stop the BS. Even after adjusting for population differences SC has done a lot better than NJ and is fine. Stop spreading panic and misinformation.
stay drinking on the job.
 
stay drinking on the job.
I love when you get called out on your flawed posts and it goes directly to an insult with zero comment to refute it. It means you know you are wrong but were hoping to fool people. You are only fooling yourself.
When SC deaths approach half of what NJ is you would be correct and you can come back and say I told you so. But right now you are just a fear mongering clown with no real data to support your view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUBOB72
I love when you get called out on your flawed posts and it goes directly to an insult with zero comment to refute it. It means you know you are wrong but were hoping to fool people. You are only fooling yourself.
When SC deaths approach half of what NJ is you would be correct and you can come back and say I told you so. But right now you are just a fear mongering clown with no real data to support your view.
I just sent real data you absolute clown. No one said South Carolina is as bad as NJ. 678 cases today turns in 1,250 cases in 3 weeks clown.
 
I don’t think any reputable body of science has found that it’s weakened so far. Yes, I’ve seen the one off doctor here and there.
Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't, but the data can be helpful in deciding.

Also consider when people say "look deaths in TX are not aligning with deaths the way they were in NJ in the early stages". But maybe we have just gotten better at keeping people alive longer, not necessarily keeping them alive post covid, and TX will see those deaths further down the line.
 
So after California at #1 in new cases it goes:

Texas
Florida
Arizona
NC
Georgia
Alabama.

Bright side here is hopefully this gets us on the same page where we acknowledge this is a countrywide issue and not just a democratic state issue.

Conversely dems need to acknowledge that shutting down the economy again is not a real option.
 
More antibody treatment news. This one saying they might be ready as soon as September for emergency use.

Only crappy thing about antibody treatment is there isn’t much scale....looks like we’ll only be able to get into the millions of doses this year, not the hundreds of millions like we need. So we’ll only have enough for the high risk folks.

https://www.biospace.com/article/el...vid-19-antibody-treatment-ready-by-september/
 
Governor Kemp is practically opening up everything in Georgia with few restrictions,even allowing conventions.
When he first broke with Trump in late April,Mayor Bottoms all but predicted that the bodies would pile up to the extent that Stone Mountain could no longer be seen.Unfortunately for her,that did not happen.
 
To start I think watching Gottlieb is essential in these days when Fauci is off the scene, but watching him today I thought a couple things were interesting.

1)When discussing the spikes in Tx and Nashville, he keeps mentioning how they don't know the source, thus they can't trace it and stop it.

And I think this relates to why Murphy has been so heavy handed in getting our #'s down. If we are at the point where we have only 500(or less) new cases then that is easier to trace a source then if we had twice that many like we had 2 weeks ago.

2)There was other stuff but the board was shut down, I had a couple beers and now I forgot. Think it had something to do with Regeneron.
 
Governor Kemp is practically opening up everything in Georgia with few restrictions,even allowing conventions.
When he first broke with Trump in late April,Mayor Bottoms all but predicted that the bodies would pile up to the extent that Stone Mountain could no longer be seen.Unfortunately for her,that did not happen.
He's continuing to lift restrictions, but there still are a fair amount in place.

https://www.11alive.com/article/new...order/85-078f5a01-23b8-469f-acb7-17b6be5d964a


The idea that Ga and other southern states have been "open with few restrictions" is a false narrative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
Governor Kemp is practically opening up everything in Georgia with few restrictions,even allowing conventions.
When he first broke with Trump in late April,Mayor Bottoms all but predicted that the bodies would pile up to the extent that Stone Mountain could no longer be seen.Unfortunately for her,that did not happen.

They still have pretty low hospitalizations though, even though it’s been increasing. Really sounds like some states might end up learning the hard way.
 
I just sent real data you absolute clown. No one said South Carolina is as bad as NJ. 678 cases today turns in 1,250 cases in 3 weeks clown.
No one but you clown
I just sent real data you absolute clown. No one said South Carolina is as bad as NJ. 678 cases today turns in 1,250 cases in 3 weeks clown.
You sent incomplete data. You are a fear monger. You post like these open states are suddenly being overwhelmed. You present the facts that support you insane position that we have to shut everything down until there is vaccine. There is no need to wait for something that may never come. Get in your bunker if you afraid but stop posting like the worst is coming. That ship sailed. And disgusting that you wish for it to get worse.
 
So after California at #1 in new cases it goes:

Texas
Florida
Arizona
NC
Georgia
Alabama.

Bright side here is hopefully this gets us on the same page where we acknowledge this is a countrywide issue and not just a democratic state issue.

Conversely dems need to acknowledge that shutting down the economy again is not a real option.

The economy will mostly shut itself down. Not completely of course, but if we have a major resurgence, demand will shrink significantly. Perhaps supply too to the extent manufacturing is interrupted by workplace outbreaks.

A scared consumer is not a robust, spend-happy consumer. It was essential to get this right the first time; maybe it will be OK, but we were too busy playing politics to execute a thorough, coordinated national lockdown and reopening.
 
The economy will mostly shut itself down. Not completely of course, but if we have a major resurgence, demand will shrink significantly. Perhaps supply too to the extent manufacturing is interrupted by workplace outbreaks.

A scared consumer is not a robust, spend-happy consumer. It was essential to get this right the first time; maybe it will be OK, but we were too busy playing politics to execute a thorough, coordinated national lockdown and reopening.
I don't deny, but I'm hoping we get our act together before another major resurgence.

Despite the rising #'s most states outside AZ still have a buffer.
 
Just completed another section of the Appalachian Trail over the last six days, from Franklin, NC, to Fontana Dam, NC. I covered Springer Mountain to Franklin in early March. Was struck by how many Floridians and Georgians are visiting the mountains this week. No one in masks. That includes restaurant servers; well one restaurant exception at the Nantahala Outdoor Center where servers wore masks and tables were farther apart. NC's COVID-19 #s are climbing. State health director announced the possibility of reinstituting a stay-at-home order. Crazy times. No one is taking it seriously. Meanwhile, I was hoping to hit the trail again early next week, starting in the Roan Highlands (TN/NC) and hiking north thru VA. Now, with case numbers/hospitalizations rising, not so sure getting back on the trail would be wise.
 
Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't, but the data can be helpful in deciding.

Also consider when people say "look deaths in TX are not aligning with deaths the way they were in NJ in the early stages". But maybe we have just gotten better at keeping people alive longer, not necessarily keeping them alive post covid, and TX will see those deaths further down the line.
It's also likely NJ had tons of missed non-severe cases at the start due to lack of testing. The most accurate model so far (in terms of predicted deaths vs. actually occurring deaths) thinks almost 18 percent of NJ has been infected while only 1. something percent of Texas has been infected according to that model. Even accounting for population differences far more NJ residents infected, so it makes sense far more NJ deaths, as well as we have figured out some things that are at least more helpful in the few months (try to use cpap machine instead of ventilator, plasma, remsidivir, etc.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LETSGORU91
No one but you clown

You sent incomplete data. You are a fear monger. You post like these open states are suddenly being overwhelmed. You present the facts that support you insane position that we have to shut everything down until there is vaccine. There is no need to wait for something that may never come. Get in your bunker if you afraid but stop posting like the worst is coming. That ship sailed. And disgusting that you wish for it to get worse.
Where did my post say they would be overwhelmed? It didn't. How was the data incomplete? It wasn't. Any data you don't like results in you personally insulting people. You have no data on masks yet you spout off on them like your drunk ass knows what you're talking about. The first rule is never consume your own supply, and it's clear you have all day. I wouldn't be surprised if you posted here months ago when NJ just started having cases (you idiots we only have a few hundred cases we will be nothing like Italy). Also it's not my position to shut everything down until we have a vaccine and you will never find a post I wrote saying so. Talk about a narrative. You just made one up. I have never wished for anyone to get infected. You sick drunk putting such disgusting words in my mouth that I have never said.
 
It's also likely NJ had tons of missed non-severe cases at the start due to lack of testing. The most accurate model so far (in terms of predicted deaths vs. actually occurring deaths) thinks almost 18 percent of NJ has been infected while only 1. something percent of Texas has been infected according to that model. Even accounting for population differences far more NJ residents infected, so it makes sense far more NJ deaths, as well as we have figured out some things that are at least more helpful in the few months (try to use cpap machine instead of ventilator, plasma, remsidivir, etc.)
And yet you have zero data to support your viewpoint. Which is constant with your doom and gloom posts.
 
Where did my post say they would be overwhelmed? It didn't. How was the data incomplete? It wasn't. Any data you don't like results in you personally insulting people. You have no data on masks yet you spout off on them like your drunk ass knows what you're talking about. The first rule is never consume your own supply, and it's clear you have all day. I wouldn't be surprised if you posted here months ago when NJ just started having cases (you idiots we only have a few hundred cases we will be nothing like Italy). Also it's not my position to shut everything down until we have a vaccine and you will never find a post I wrote saying so. Talk about a narrative. You just made one up. I have never wished for anyone to get infected. You sick drunk putting such disgusting words in my mouth that I have never said.
No again you only give half ass data to support your views. The state's you posted about today are not overwhelmed. Aren't in trouble, never were. But you need keep spreading the fear. You dug a line in the sand that complete isolation is the only way out of this. You are 1000% wrong. Opening up is the way to get out of it.
 
The economy will mostly shut itself down. Not completely of course, but if we have a major resurgence, demand will shrink significantly. Perhaps supply too to the extent manufacturing is interrupted by workplace outbreaks.

A scared consumer is not a robust, spend-happy consumer. It was essential to get this right the first time; maybe it will be OK, but we were too busy playing politics to execute a thorough, coordinated national lockdown and reopening.
It's also likely NJ had tons of missed non-severe cases at the start due to lack of testing. The most accurate model so far (in terms of predicted deaths vs. actually occurring deaths) thinks almost 18 percent of NJ has been infected while only 1. something percent of Texas has been infected according to that model. Even accounting for population differences far more NJ residents infected, so it makes sense far more NJ deaths, as well as we have figured out some things that are at least more helpful in the few months (try to use cpap machine instead of ventilator, plasma, remsidivir, etc.)
Yes 48% of those New Jersey deaths due to the governors stupidity regarding nursing home residents... whose this “we” have figured some things out guy . .. sure as hell not you...
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
It’s amazing to me how many here take a politicalized stance on this. There’s either gloom and gloom. Or everyone else is blowing this way out of proportion. The truth almost always lies in the middle. I would think that the majority of people on a Rutgers message board are likely Rutgers graduates and would get this.
 
No again you only give half ass data to support your views. The state's you posted about today are not overwhelmed. Aren't in trouble, never were. But you need keep spreading the fear. You dug a line in the sand that complete isolation is the only way out of this. You are 1000% wrong. Opening up is the way to get out of it.
Where did I say complete isolation is the only way out of it? Please search for my post where I said that and link it? You won’t be able to because it never happened you drunk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT