ADVERTISEMENT

COVID-19 Pandemic: Transmissions, Deaths, Treatments, Vaccines, Interventions and More...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Only if everyone is willing to give up any last trace of privacy. Otherwise, it's not going to work.
 
Ok, I won't use the word pimp any more, but the fact still remains that leronlimab is an mAb targeted at a human protein receptor in a patient's body, and like most other mAbs that do that, especially those modulating the immune response system, there is always both significant risk and potential lack of efficacy. This drug is not targeting the virus, per se, which is why the engineered antibodies are far more likely to be efficaceous and safe, since they should only be targeting the virus. Some of the engineered antibodies are indistinguishable from actual human antibodies. To expect more than modest success with any of these repurposed drugs is unwarranted.

Leronlimab is a CCR5 antagonist, phase 3 trials have been completed for HIV treatment and has been tested on over 800 patients. The most common side effects were minor. No drug-related serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities among participants were reported. There were also no clinically relevant drug-related effects on ECG among participants. This drug seems to be extremely safe and only has efficacy of treating CV-19 standing in the way.
 
The question that begs to be asked:Will a vaccine be introduced that is in truth a placebo?Since the yearly flu vaccine never guarantees protection,why wouldn't they attempt it?
 
Last edited:
You do realize that illegal immigrants don't have a taxpayer ID, so aren't able to get medicaid, social security, or this CARES act benefit, right?

As for the others who may miss out, I feel bad for them. As mentioned in the article, they are generally un the most vulnerable population. There are plenty of folks who don't need the help, but aren't going to turn down the $1200 checks/ debit cards for their household. Those are the people you should be mad at.

We're going to be in a cycle of tons of stimulus for quite a while. Powell was saying 2 years or something like that for this round of QE...
Well , who should the United States Government dispense stimulus money to first... legal , native born or naturalized citizens or illegals ? Whose fault is it not filing a tax return for both 2018-2019? Is that on government? Lastly, even after the initial issue with checks , people were told how and what to do in order to recover money from the program . When they failed in their efforts they then start the blame game . I want to see when legally born or naturalized US citizens don’t get their benefits first for that is when the real crap will hit the fan.
 
Well , who should the United States Government dispense stimulus money to first... legal , native born or naturalized citizens or illegals ? Whose fault is it not filing a tax return for both 2018-2019? Is that on government? Lastly, even after the initial issue with checks , people were told how and what to do in order to recover money from the program . When they failed in their efforts they then start the blame game . I want to see when legally born or naturalized US citizens don’t get their benefits first for that is when the real crap will hit the fan.
Ca. Is already giving illegals money.
 
Ok, I won't use the word pimp any more, but the fact still remains that leronlimab is an mAb targeted at a humanprotein receptor in a patient's body, and like most other mAbs that do that, especially those modulating the immune response system, there is always both significant risk and potential lack of efficacy. This drug is not targeting the virus, per se, which is why the engineered antibodies are far more likely to be efficaceous and safe, since they should only be targeting the virus. Some of the engineered antibodies are indistinguishable from actual human antibodies. To expect more than modest success with any of these repurposed drugs is unwarranted.
Well the early EIND results of 180 patients, say otherwise. Leronlimab has not only reduced or eliminated the cytokines storm and brought down Ig6 , it has regulated T 4, T6, and T8cells to reduce viral load and brings the immune system to homeostasis . It acts as an antiviral as well. Dr. Patterson ‘s paper reporting on the EIND results says Rantes is elevated 5 times in mild to moderate cases and 100 times in severe and critical patients. His company Incelldx, diagnostically measures the readings in 3, 5, 7 and 10 and 14 day intervals. Furthermore Leronlimab has shown to have no severe adverse side effects in 800 people that were part of its Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials for AIDS . Plus it is an injectable that can be given even before hospitalization. So your statement that the drug has significant risk and is not effective is pure hogwash. The only thing that will be proven to you before you can mention it is randomized blind trials. Which is absolutely correct and sound scientifically and medically . Those trials are almost done and by the end of June or early July the FDA will have the results and then we will know for sure if it is a treatment for Covid or not. But your being so dismissive is not fact based on the early use of the drug in 180 EIND’s to date .
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
Not sure this has been posted here yet—
Study out of the UK with a common steroid to reduce death numbers.


Pretty big news - first drug to show significant mortality reductions in a randomized, standard-of-care controlled clinical trial - link to the statement from the Recovery Trial is below. And it's really cheap and relatively easy to synthesize this corticosteroid, which has been around since the late 1950s with use mostly for arthritis and asthma; lots of good general info in the wiki link and the synthesis link. In hindsight, we could have been giving this to 60-80% of hospitalized patients instead of HCQ.

https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery_dexamethasone_statement_160620_final.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexamethasone

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topic... synthesized in a,17α-hydroxyl group is added.
 
Let’s see what happens after President Trump touts it lol

Was curious if that guy who constantly was touting HCQ if this would be his new thing? They would show him a study how HCQ was ineffective then he would respond by saying "they are not using it correctly, it should only be used within these parameters for it to be effective".. then that would change basically every week.

Either way, this looks very promising, having an easily available and cheap drug helping the cause could be huge.
 
Well , who should the United States Government dispense stimulus money to first... legal , native born or naturalized citizens or illegals ? Whose fault is it not filing a tax return for both 2018-2019? Is that on government? Lastly, even after the initial issue with checks , people were told how and what to do in order to recover money from the program . When they failed in their efforts they then start the blame game . I want to see when legally born or naturalized US citizens don’t get their benefits first for that is when the real crap will hit the fan.
Ca. Is already giving illegals money.
well it’s Cali... California like New Jersey has plenty of money evidently ...oh wait they’re shat ass broke until they boost our property taxes 30% ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caliknight
Thanks! Some chatter that they "stacked the deck" with cases more likely to get better, but that could be BS. Regardless, the results on12 patients is promising, but not nearly enough. And wow, 1.8 g is a horse pill - these monoclonal antibodies are pretty expensive to make so that's not going to be very cost effective. Also, yes that's about 0.9kg/2.0 pounds for 500 people, which is 90,000 kg for 5MM people, which if it's that good would be a near impossible task - making 90,000 kg of a synthetic small molecule is doable in a major factory in a year, but the mab processes are almost all way less productive than the chemical processes. Yikes.

I'm keeping and eye on the Keystone vaccine meeting that is being done online yesterday and today. A PhD from Moderna just spoke - they get good results in mice (which we already knew from their previous studies). Unfortunately she provided precious little info about the human trials - only have neutralizing antibody data for 4 people. I'm not sure why she even bothered presenting. I'm worried they will also will have a scalability problem - 100ug of mRNA per person x millions or billions is a lot of nucleic acid.

The talk right after, however, was from an academic lab in the UK. They are using "self applying" RNA. 1ug or less injected RNA (in nanoparticles) which can then be amplified in the cell. I think he said 1 liter could make 100 million doses at only 75 cents per dose! Very impressive. Clinical trial starts tomorrow.
 
Good news out of NY and sign things are getting better for now.

From CNN:

New York hospitals can now allow visitors, governor says


New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said hospitals across the state can now allow visitors as coronavirus numbers continue to improve.

"The numbers look very good," he said at a news conference. "We're going to allow hospitals to accept visitors at their discretion."

Cuomo said that if a hospital chooses to allow visitors, those guests must follow state guidelines, including wearing personal protective equipment and being subject to symptom checks. The visits may be time-limited.

Cuomo also added that group homes can allow visitors starting on Friday, if they follow similar guidelines.
 
Leronlimab is a CCR5 antagonist, phase 3 trials have been completed for HIV treatment and has been tested on over 800 patients. The most common side effects were minor. No drug-related serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities among participants were reported. There were also no clinically relevant drug-related effects on ECG among participants. This drug seems to be extremely safe and only has efficacy of treating CV-19 standing in the way.

Understood - I was talking more generally about risks from drugs targeted at human proteins likely being greater than those targeted at the actual virus. Also, safety information from HIV trials may not translate well to trials on COVID patients - which is why we need to see the controlled trial results.

Well the early EIND results of 180 patients, say otherwise. Leronlimab has not only reduced or eliminated the cytokines storm and brought down Ig6 , it has regulated T 4, T6, and T8cells to reduce viral load and brings the immune system to homeostasis . It acts as an antiviral as well. Dr. Patterson ‘s paper reporting on the EIND results says Rantes is elevated 5 times in mild to moderate cases and 100 times in severe and critical patients. His company Incelldx, diagnostically measures the readings in 3, 5, 7 and 10 and 14 day intervals. Furthermore Leronlimab has shown to have no severe adverse side effects in 800 people that were part of its Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials for AIDS . Plus it is an injectable that can be given even before hospitalization. So your statement that the drug has significant risk and is not effective is pure hogwash. The only thing that will be proven to you before you can mention it is randomized blind trials. Which is absolutely correct and sound scientifically and medically . Those trials are almost done and by the end of June or early July the FDA will have the results and then we will know for sure if it is a treatment for Covid or not. But your being so dismissive is not fact based on the early use of the drug in 180 EIND’s to date .

Sounds like Cytodyn has completed enrollment for its phase II, 75-patient randomized/controlled trial in mild to moderate COVID patients - do you know when results from that will be published? The EIND study is not controlled (it's emergency use data) - do you have a link to some paper or report on the EIND results to date? Surely you understand the skepticism given so many false claims out there on other drugs, combined with your "take my word for it" posts, which include no links to published research. Also, the phase II trial might not be statistically powered well enough (hence it only being phase II) to show definitive efficacy results, especially since most mild/moderate patients recover. Maybe the results will be great and we can all celebrate, but from my perspective I simply haven't seen much yet.

I also didn't say the drug had significant risk or was not effective, since I have no clue about either, clinically, since we haven't seen results from randomized controlled studies yet. I just said it's less likely to be safe and effective than an engineered antibody treatment which targets the virus.

https://www.biotech-capital.com/com...-to-moderate-symptoms-of-covid-19-921739.html
 
I'm keeping and eye on the Keystone vaccine meeting that is being done online yesterday and today. A PhD from Moderna just spoke - they get good results in mice (which we already knew from their previous studies). Unfortunately she provided precious little info about the human trials - only have neutralizing antibody data for 4 people. I'm not sure why she even bothered presenting. I'm worried they will also will have a scalability problem - 100ug of mRNA per person x millions or billions is a lot of nucleic acid.

The talk right after, however, was from an academic lab in the UK. They are using "self applying" RNA. 1ug or less injected RNA (in nanoparticles) which can then be amplified in the cell. I think he said 1 liter could make 100 million doses at only 75 cents per dose! Very impressive. Clinical trial starts tomorrow.
Hasn't this been the main concern with Moderna form the beginning? That, if viable, scaling production would be a huge roadblock?
 
Was curious if that guy who constantly was touting HCQ if this would be his new thing? They would show him a study how HCQ was ineffective then he would respond by saying "they are not using it correctly, it should only be used within these parameters for it to be effective".. then that would change basically every week.

Either way, this looks very promising, having an easily available and cheap drug helping the cause could be huge.
The joke in scientific circles has been, "but what about zinc?"
 
I fully suspect there is a lag to that chart as they take time to allocate new admissions to the specific date.

Otherwise how are cases, ICU beds and Vent use up?

This lag is exactly what we see on Florida's dash board in terms of death.

Maybe I'm wrong but the #'s don't add up for no new admissions.
I'm not in the hospital patient management business, but new admissions wouldn't necessarily be placed immediately in ICU for example, but perhaps 1-2 days if the conditioned worsened. ICU/ventilators #'s would actually be the lagging metric vs. new admissions.
 
Hasn't this been the main concern with Moderna form the beginning? That, if viable, scaling production would be a huge roadblock?
Well that and there's never been an approved mRNA vaccine before...as I said back in March, they would not be my bet to win this. And I'm still disappointed the US is not pursuing at least one weakened/deactivated virus vaccine - it's old school, but tried and true (and China has 3-4 of them under development).
 
Good news out of NY and sign things are getting better for now.

From CNN:

New York hospitals can now allow visitors, governor says


New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said hospitals across the state can now allow visitors as coronavirus numbers continue to improve.

"The numbers look very good," he said at a news conference. "We're going to allow hospitals to accept visitors at their discretion."

Cuomo said that if a hospital chooses to allow visitors, those guests must follow state guidelines, including wearing personal protective equipment and being subject to symptom checks. The visits may be time-limited.

Cuomo also added that group homes can allow visitors starting on Friday, if they follow similar guidelines.
Unless it’s Andy or Chrissie who , if it were their mother /father , family member , would be given much different guidelines or limitations... Cuomo dangling that carrot again for his poll numbers.
 
Getting out of here for 6 months and a day. Yea baby!
Are you moving to TX or AZ for full-time residency?. (Make it AZ, they may need your common sense and well-informed vote more :Wink:).

I have a couple friends that did a similar move to FL, and keep a "summer" home at Jersey Shore. I'd do the same when my last kid is out of NJ schools--but the wife has already mandated we stay as close as possible where kids/future grandkids live.:Sad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUBOB72
well it’s Cali... California like New Jersey has plenty of money evidently ...oh wait they’re shat ass broke until they boost our property taxes 30% ...
Illinois (where I am ) is not far behind on this trend. No money, but crank up the property taxes. Chicago raised property taxes and water/sewer cost greatly to get more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUBOB72
Are you moving to TX or AZ for full-time residency?. (Make it AZ, they may need your common sense and well-informed vote more :Wink:).

I have a couple friends that did a similar move to FL, and keep a "summer" home at Jersey Shore. I'd do the same when my last kid is out of NJ schools--but the wife has already mandated we stay as close as possible where kids/future grandkids live.:Sad:

Zero’ing in on Montana though Az is still a possibility.
 
well it’s Cali... California like New Jersey has plenty of money evidently ...oh wait they’re shat ass broke until they boost our property taxes 30% ...
Part of the reason for the high taxes in NY/NJ/CT is we get screwed every year and now we're getting screwed by Mitch and friends who won't fund states hardest hit by the coronavirus - which just happen to be states that contribute billions more in federal taxes than they get back in federal expenditures. And Mitch's Kentucky is near the top of those state "welfare" recipients. How about if, instead of being reimbursed for our far higher coronavirus costs, we just get back the $140BB in NY and $90BB in NJ we've overpaid over the last 5 years?

fyTxn9s.png


4gLGJDo.png
 
Part of the reason for the high taxes in NY/NJ/CT is we get screwed every year and now we're getting screwed by Mitch and friends who won't fund states hardest hit by the coronavirus - which just happen to be states that contribute billions more in federal taxes than they get back in federal expenditures. And Mitch's Kentucky is near the top of those state "welfare" recipients. How about if, instead of being reimbursed for our far higher coronavirus costs, we just get back the $140BB in NY and $90BB in NJ we've overpaid over the last 5 years?

fyTxn9s.png


4gLGJDo.png
The reason why taxes are so high in those states is overspending and ridiculous pension liabilities.
 
Part of the reason for the high taxes in NY/NJ/CT is we get screwed every year and now we're getting screwed by Mitch and friends who won't fund states hardest hit by the coronavirus - which just happen to be states that contribute billions more in federal taxes than they get back in federal expenditures. And Mitch's Kentucky is near the top of those state "welfare" recipients. How about if, instead of being reimbursed for our far higher coronavirus costs, we just get back the $140BB in NY and $90BB in NJ we've overpaid over the last 5 years?

fyTxn9s.png


4gLGJDo.png
 
Part of the reason for the high taxes in NY/NJ/CT is we get screwed every year and now we're getting screwed by Mitch and friends who won't fund states hardest hit by the coronavirus - which just happen to be states that contribute billions more in federal taxes than they get back in federal expenditures. And Mitch's Kentucky is near the top of those state "welfare" recipients. How about if, instead of being reimbursed for our far higher coronavirus costs, we just get back the $140BB in NY and $90BB in NJ we've overpaid over the last 5 years?

fyTxn9s.png


4gLGJDo.png

The reason why we get so little back is that we have a very weak congressional delegation. This was very evident during the Base Realignment and Closure the reason why Ft. Monmouth was closed was because if the Military pissed off the NJ Senators and Congressmen then there was very little backlash. This has been this way for years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT