Ha. You really me miss the CE Board don't you.
Assuming I'm reading your intent through that word jumble ..no, not at all.
Ha. You really me miss the CE Board don't you.
Yeah right. Nice try. We all know better. Give it upAssuming I'm reading your intent through that word jumble ..no, not at all.
Because what? Controlling the virus is more valued by the electorate? Does the electorate not care about businesses that are in jeopardy?I think it's a first Tuesday in November thing.
Are people on unemployment really fretting it?
As I note above, I'd be more aggressive in reopening, but we've also seen the reddest of red states have to delay or even roll back their reopenings. I think some want to make it out as if their are no ramifications to opening up certain segments of the economy.
I think the cure for the most vulnerable of businesses comes from the federal level via PPE. This $1200 stimulus, and the executive order tax cut is just not targeting those who need the most help.
Denmarks population is about half of Swedens yet had 10% of the CoVid cases that Sweden had AND has 0 current deaths.
Bow down to Denmark bi*$%es!
I post facts all the time, you just complain and say they're fake. Still waiting on that Belgium source. Proof that I have a "former"?@Greg2020 is a banned CE and TKR troll under a "former". The mods know this yet they keep letting him post. Never posts facts just stirs the pot.
lock him up!!!
The large indoor house parties, even if more common then reported, are not equivalent to indoor bars having large gatherings multiple times a week, week after week.
Aren't you religious? Do you pray? Would you like to rephrase that?Only sheep kneel or bow down
He doesn't get it or won't listen and hasn't since this started. His MO is to whine about his pet topics, call Murphy names, and post poorly sourced Twitter posts. I get that he's pissed about gyms, restaurants and other things - we're all pissed at the situation, but his approach has not been very constructive. It detracts from the usefulness of the thread. He'll likely call me names for making this post.
The way I am wearing a mask is no big deal.
I think it is a problem going to events and wearing a mask but right now in and out of stores or putting it on when you come within a certain distance from someone you are not generally around is no big deal
Yeah it's no big deal for you or me.
But for the people who work in the store and have to wear a mask all day long it's a much bigger deal.
Try to put yourself in someone else's shoes.
Not saying masks should not be used.
The way I am wearing a mask is no big deal.
I think it is a problem going to events and wearing a mask but right now in and out of stores or putting it on when you come within a certain distance from someone you are not generally around is no big deal
I agree but there have always been certain jobs where people had to wear something that is uncomfortable to wear for long periods of time.
Nobody is wearing a mask once a vaccine comes out. That’s mentioned in that article. Although I hope people that are sick with any virus keep this habit if they do need to venture out of the house.
Those articles don’t say there are less cases. It says the rate of cases is different. Maybe the urban areas are declining more rapidly because people who are most at risk due to behavior or other factors have already been exposed whereas in rural areas they have not. Also if rural area cases are low higher percentage increases are to be expected and may not really be very meaningful . I favor mask wearing inside but these articles as written don’t prove anything.More to help convince the doubters about masks, as observations from both Tennessee and Kansas show that counties with mandatory mask orders have significantly less cases than counties without such orders. Of course in a perfect world we'd have more granular data on exactly how many people were wearing masks and several other factors, but even in the absence of that, the likelihood that this result is due to chance or some unexplained other factor is low, especially given the mountain of evidence we have that masks significantly help reduce transmissions.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news...izations-200-arewi/529494/#/questions/2791802
Hospitals that primarily treated patients from areas without mask requirements on average saw a more than 200% increase in hospitalized COVID-19 patients since July 1, while hospitals that treat more patients from areas of the state with face mask requirements have seen their number of coronavirus patients stabilize or decline.
https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article244839757.html
The state’s 15 counties with mandatory mask orders — including Wyandotte and Johnson counties in the Kansas City area — have seen a greater decline in coronavirus cases than the remaining 90 counties that don’t mandate them.
Since July 12, not long after counties were given the option of accepting or rejecting Gov. Laura Kelly’s mask mandate, those with mask orders have seen cases decline from about 26 to 16 per 100,000 population. Cases in counties with no mask mandate have stayed relatively flat.
You are wrong..we definitely will. Most doctors are saying..it will take a long time of vaccine application before anything gets lifted
Common sense
Those articles don’t say there are less cases. It says the rate of cases is different. Maybe the urban areas are declining more rapidly because people who are most at risk due to behavior or other factors have already been exposed whereas in rural areas they have not. Also if rural area cases are low higher percentage increases are to be expected and may not really be very meaningful . I favor mask wearing inside but these articles as written don’t prove anything.
The article says years. There won’t be broad mask use for years. There is barely broad use now in many places. Next summer you won’t see many masks.
More to help convince the doubters about masks, as observations from both Tennessee and Kansas show that counties with mandatory mask orders have significantly less cases than counties without such orders. Of course in a perfect world we'd have more granular data on exactly how many people were wearing masks and several other factors, but even in the absence of that, the likelihood that this result is due to chance or some unexplained other factor is low, especially given the mountain of evidence we have that masks significantly help reduce transmissions.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news...izations-200-arewi/529494/#/questions/2791802
Hospitals that primarily treated patients from areas without mask requirements on average saw a more than 200% increase in hospitalized COVID-19 patients since July 1, while hospitals that treat more patients from areas of the state with face mask requirements have seen their number of coronavirus patients stabilize or decline.
https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article244839757.html
The state’s 15 counties with mandatory mask orders — including Wyandotte and Johnson counties in the Kansas City area — have seen a greater decline in coronavirus cases than the remaining 90 counties that don’t mandate them.
Since July 12, not long after counties were given the option of accepting or rejecting Gov. Laura Kelly’s mask mandate, those with mask orders have seen cases decline from about 26 to 16 per 100,000 population. Cases in counties with no mask mandate have stayed relatively flat.
Nobody is wearing a mask once a vaccine comes out. That’s mentioned in that article. Although I hope people that are sick with any virus keep this habit if they do need to venture out of the house.
High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was found in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure, treated in a RICU. Patients with severe vitamin D deficiency had a significantly higher mortality risk. Severe vitamin D deficiency may be a marker of poor prognosis in these patients, suggesting that adjunctive treatment might improve disease outcomes.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40618-020-01370-x
I forgot you are a snowflake that whines about any slight inconvenience
Pretty sure they just shut down Auckland not the whole country. For those 102 days they had bars, and fans in the stands. New Zealand is amazing we suck.New Zealand just got their first Covid-19 cases in 102 days, four of them, and they proceeded to shutdown their country again. Four cases.
#Move.Pretty sure they just shut down Auckland not the whole country. For those 102 days they had bars, and fans in the stands. New Zealand is amazing we suck.
You're right they did, but I still think its an overreaction, but this is a country that is prone to doing that, living scared. But I would not compare us to them, they're an island that makes it easier to control diseases, we're nothing close to them.Pretty sure they just shut down Auckland not the whole country. For those 102 days they had bars, and fans in the stands. New Zealand is amazing we suck.
New Zealand is a proud country. I wouldn't say they are living scared. They ddi the right things and reaped the rewards. I agree we can't compare the USA to them though.You're right they did, but I still think its an overreaction, but this is a country that is prone to doing that, living scared. But I would not compare us to them, they're an island that makes it easier to control diseases, we're nothing close to them.
Enjoy your internal normalization
High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was found in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure, treated in a RICU. Patients with severe vitamin D deficiency had a significantly higher mortality risk. Severe vitamin D deficiency may be a marker of poor prognosis in these patients, suggesting that adjunctive treatment might improve disease outcomes.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40618-020-01370-x
Like the fact that CV has a 5% mortality rate? I'd file that under "fake"...I post facts all the time, you just complain and say they're fake. Still waiting on that Belgium source. Proof that I have a "former"?