You consistently post absolute crap about the virus. By far the biggest reason our area had so many more cases and deaths is two-fold as I've said repeatedly: this area had, by far, the most travelers arriving from Europe bringing the virus in Feb/March, which, combined with the utter failure of the Federal Government to provide testing capability (and medical supplies/PPE) left this area flying completely blind into a pandemic with tens of thousands of unknown cases by early March when the first tests were run in NY and NJ and we didn't have more than 1000 tests per day until about mid-March when things started shutting down, during a time we should have had 20,000 tests per day.
Given the very high population and commuting densities in this area, it's no wonder that we then saw the most explosive exponential growth on the planet throughout March into April. That growth is what led to the very high death rates and as I've posted a few times before, NJ has an average % of nursing home/LTC deaths, while NY has one of the best on a % basis. The death rates in the states spiking now will likely be significantly lower than those we saw in the NE US, but that is only due to the ready availability of testing letting them know who's ill, combined with most cases now being in younger people, since older people now know to distance themselves and wear masks (very few were wearing masks in the first wave due to another Administration failure of not having secured enough masks for the general public, while other countries with 1/100th the death rate of the US did), plus improved medical procedures/treatments, which were developed on the guinea pigs in NY/NJ.
Furthermore, that article is horribly wrong on Sweden, too, saying, "Sweden suffered far fewer deaths per capita than several European neighbors that instituted strict lockdowns—including Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom." And he also said, "Indeed, Sweden’s death rate is remarkably close to that of France." Sweden's per capita death rate is 547/1MM - if he (or you) think that's "far fewer" than Italy's 578 (difference is 31), Spain's 608 (difference is 61), or the UK's 658 (difference is 117) and "remarkably close" to France's 460/1MM (difference is 87), you guys need to have your math cards revoked. Yes, Belgium's is 844/1MM, so he got one minor detail correct.
If this guy wants to write an expose, he should write one on why the US has done so badly vs. the countries that have done far, far better, using essentially our playbook, which we ignored.