ND isn’t Bama. If they remain independent they’ll end up ****ed six ways from Sunday
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Riley to the NFL is wishful thinking on your part. Riley current has a better life than just about any coach, college or pro. He makes over $10 million a year, lives in a gorgeous $20 million ocean front mansion, and has massive advertising opportunities in LA. He also has one of the richest of booster groups in college football that are now re-engaged with the program, and they give him the resources to get any player he wants.One more good year and he's gone for the NFL IMO.
We play 3 teams who are Pre Season Top 10 .
How many does PSU play ?
How many does Michigan play ?
It wasn't that long ago that people were saying Bama would never be Bama again. Love em or hate em there are basically a perennial top 15 team since Kelly.ND isn’t Bama. If they remain independent they’ll end up ****ed six ways from Sunday
WVU , Delaware and UMass this season-----that's awful.Michigan ooc scheduling philosophy is continually embarrassing. PSU's is def better - they did go to Auburn last year.
ND doesn't play a real tough schedule as it's padded with cupcakesWe have won 53 games over the last 5 years which ranks us 6th among all D-1 football schools.
Are we Georgia or Bama ?
Absolutely not and likely never will be again but we aren't USC who has won 33.
I'm not one to defend PSU often but WVU is a power 5 - when's the last time Mich had a P5 OOC? I'll answer it - Washington 2 years ago and before that you have to go back to you folks in 2019.WVU , Delaware and UMass this season-----that's awful.
that ACC game commitment hurts them and 2023 isn't different than last year with Tenn St and Central Michigan on the schedule, but Ohio State on it makes for interest along with USC and the ACC's Clemson .They have a hard time making an Oct/Nov schedule as a full independent.
In one of their last seasons before the ACC hybrid arrangement, two second half home games were Western Michigan and Tulsa.
not that much
So they agreed to a price that will increase everyone’s share ? There’s an added-value tipping point and we may have reached it.
I think all would agree that NDs popularity and relevance is on the decline, more so the former.
The only thing that forces ND to move is the ACC breaking up. And if that happens, I take either or both of Clemson/FSU first.
ND is a product of weak scheduling. Barely a top 25 program.We have won 53 games over the last 5 years which ranks us 6th among all D-1 football schools.
Are we Georgia or Bama ?
Absolutely not and likely never will be again but we aren't USC who has won 33.
ND doesn't play a real tough schedule as it's padded with cupcakes
I'd be willing to bet the strength of schedule for nd is far less than other teams in the top wins over the past 5yrs.
edit, just looked going back 5yrs
14
33
21
7
16
certainly not impressive to boast of top 6 finish
NCAA College Football Strength of Schedule Rankings & Ratings
NCAA College Football Strength of Schedule Rankings & Ratings from TeamRankings.com, your source for NCAAF computer power rankings.www.teamrankings.com
I don’t have anti-ND feelings relating to expansion. Would ND have such high ratings if they didn’t have their own network (nbc) and on national Tv for more than half their games ?You are letting anti-ND feelings seep in. ND is a more watched program (even last year) than either Clemson and FSU. There is zero chance that the BIG TV partners would be fine with taking on Clemson and/or FSU before ND (if ND joining was a possibility).
LOLND is a product of weak scheduling. Barely a top 25 program.
I know Delaney really wanted ND. As a fan I'm ambivalent and honestly tired of hearing/talking about what ND is going to do. Sure they'd be a great addition, but honestly I don't think it matters anymore to the future of the B1G. I think the idea that they could move their non-Football sports to the Big East much more likely than joining the B1G in football.With the astronomical B1G deal and north of $70M payout per team as annually (except Ore and Wash), would ND be worth adding any more ?
I know, ND had been perceived to be the Holy Grail of expansion, but isn’t their deal / broadcasting worth about $40M?
Adding them at full share and a 20th team at a half share minimum
would require at least $100M in added broadcast revenue a year for payouts to stay flat or grow, right ?
I get it, reading is a boreLOL.
agree, the BIG doesn't really need ND as much as some believe in fact, that dynamic has changed. Scheduling is going to become progressively harder for ND and the gap in monies will grow. As the conferences grow and mandate more conference games, that leaves the independents out.I know Delaney really wanted ND. As a fan I'm ambivalent and honestly tired of hearing/talking about what ND is going to do. Sure they'd be a great addition, but honestly I don't think it matters anymore to the future of the B1G. I think the idea that they could move their non-Football sports to the Big East much more likely than joining the B1G in football.
I'm much more interested in what's going to happen with FSU/Clemson/UNC/VA.
ND alum here. This is the scenario in which ND will join the BigTen. Bring some good academic schools from talent-rich southern states and ND will follow (same perhaps can be said for Stanford, but I don't see that happening). I like ND's independence just for the scheduling flexibility. I enjoy traveling to see games at new venues every year, including in the next few years at aTm, Bama, Arkansas, etc. Hell, this year, I'm going to Dublin for the Navy game and to the Clemson game, and possibly a game in NC. But, if ND is forced to join a conference at some point (and, I suspect that time will come), the BigTen is the best fit.When it becomes time for the ACC to fall apart, the BIG will offer ND, UVa, UNC and Duke. They will accept because both the $ and prestige will be a step up. If for some reason they don’t, there are 20 other ACC/B12 schools who will.
Need and want are two separate things. The B10 doesn't need ND but it wants ND and for good reason. It would juice everything more.agree, the BIG doesn't really need ND as much as some believe in fact, that dynamic has changed. Scheduling is going to become progressively harder for ND and the gap in monies will grow. As the conferences grow and mandate more conference games, that leaves the independents out.
writing is on the wall
Agreed for the past few years, but they do have either Texas or Oklahoma each year from 2024-2027.Michigan ooc scheduling philosophy is continually embarrassing. PSU's is def better - they did go to Auburn last year.
Interesting. Didn't know that. Maybe somebody backed out on Mich this year or last then.Agreed for the past few years, but they do have either Texas or Oklahoma each year from 2024-2027.
I get it, reading is a bore
if you look at the link I provided, I'll give just one example in osu, you'll see what Im saying
of the schools that finished in top 6, since that is where nd was, each of them had a harder strength of schedule than nd and still finished higher. OSU only had 1 yr in the last 5 where they were not top 3 in strength of schedule and finished 3.
ND plays a weaker schedule vs the top best winning percentages over the past 5 and 10yrs vs that group of 10 cited, not even debatable.
I don’t have anti-ND feelings relating to expansion. Would ND have such high ratings if they didn’t have their own network (nbc) and on national Tv for more than half their games ?
For the same reason RU was added (BTN added to a new cable market), FSU and SC would grow the pie (with smaller markets of course but they are very popular programs.
agree, the BIG doesn't really need ND as much as some believe in fact, that dynamic has changed. Scheduling is going to become progressively harder for ND and the gap in monies will grow. As the conferences grow and mandate more conference games, that leaves the independents out.
writing is on the wall
With the astronomical B1G deal and north of $70M payout per team as annually (except Ore and Wash), would ND be worth adding any more ?
I know, ND had been perceived to be the Holy Grail of expansion, but isn’t their deal / broadcasting worth about $40M?
Adding them at full share and a 20th team at a half share minimum
would require at least $100M in added broadcast revenue a year for payouts to stay flat or grow, right ?
Lets see TDIrish LOL at that.agree, the BIG doesn't really need ND as much as some believe in fact, that dynamic has changed. Scheduling is going to become progressively harder for ND and the gap in monies will grow. As the conferences grow and mandate more conference games, that leaves the independents out.
writing is on the wall
Am saying they’d be on natl tv less in the big10, ergo less eyeballs.Uh, they are on national TV a lot because they typically get higher ratings than most. Not the other way around.
And morons on this board think they’re irrelevantND had a crappy season last year with 4 loses (two are Marshall and Stanford)
Yet they finished 6th for weekly ratings with 3.3m per week - better than LSU, Texas, Clemson and PSU
ND doesn't play a real tough schedule as it's padded with cupcakes
I'd be willing to bet the strength of schedule for nd is far less than other teams in the top wins over the past 5yrs.
edit, just looked going back 5yrs
14
33
21
7
16
certainly not impressive to boast of top 6 finish
Lets see TDIrish LOL at that.
Am saying they’d be on natl tv less in the big10, ergo less eyeballs.
If this is true it's clear ND will do/influence as much as they possibly can to stay independent. And I don't blame them. But if I were the BIG I'd operate as if ND was never going to join a conference.I posted this in the Cal Stanford thread but I’ll put it too here.
They may be looking to buttress the ACC for down the line when others may leave.
Maybe it opens the chance to bring in the 4 corners schools down the line. I’ve always thought about WVU UCF UConn to the ACC possibly. Thinking about it if they add a western outpost now it could lay the groundwork for renuniting the corner schools with them. That would make the ACC a national conference in the future and most likely enough for ND to stay indy.
I posted this in the Cal Stanford thread but I’ll put it too here.
They may be looking to buttress the ACC for down the line when others may leave.
Maybe it opens the chance to bring in the 4 corners schools down the line. I’ve always thought about WVU UCF UConn to the ACC possibly. Thinking about it if they add a western outpost now it could lay the groundwork for renuniting the corner schools with them. That would make the ACC a national conference in the future and most likely enough for ND to stay indy.
Well ND can always join the B10 and bring them along if they're so concerned lol.
I'd of already given them the ultimatum and then moved scheduling to force them out.If this is true it's clear ND will do/influence as much as they possibly can to stay independent. And I don't blame them. But if I were the BIG I'd operate as if ND was never going to join a conference.
If NBC would want to have more B10 games on their schedule (now they will have some games), look for them to pressure the Irish to schedule more B10 games or enter into a scheduling agreement with the B10. USC now is a B10 game when played in LA. ND would have Navy, 6 ACC games, USC and maybe 1 or 2 other B10 (Purdue, Michigan perhaps) and a couple of G5 games? Do they keep Stanford now that Stanford will most likely be independent?But it's really about $$$ er... broadcast partner. The B1G would be the far better home for ND hockey than the ACC.
If NBC would want to have more B10 games on their schedule (now they will have some games), look for them to pressure the Irish to schedule more B10 games or enter into a scheduling agreement with the B10. USC now is a B10 game when played in LA. ND would have Navy, 6 ACC games, USC and maybe 1 or 2 other B10 (Purdue, Michigan perhaps) and a couple of G5 games? Do they keep Stanford now that Stanford will most likely be independent?
As long as the ACC stays together and ND has the scheduling agreement for football, they'll most likely stay independent. I am assuming that dropping Navy is non-negotiable.
If NBC would want to have more B10 games on their schedule (now they will have some games), look for them to pressure the Irish to schedule more B10 games or enter into a scheduling agreement with the B10. USC now is a B10 game when played in LA. ND would have Navy, 6 ACC games, USC and maybe 1 or 2 other B10 (Purdue, Michigan perhaps) and a couple of G5 games? Do they keep Stanford now that Stanford will most likely be independent?
As long as the ACC stays together and ND has the scheduling agreement for football, they'll most likely stay independent. I am assuming that dropping Navy is non-negotiable.