Worst case scenario was lose to PSU.Our worst case scenario; Michigan wins but Illinois loses and we still don't get the double bye.
Just realized that would be massive if Nebraska pulls it off…Nebraska beating Wisconsin early with no mcgeown
Michigan winning is very bad for us.Worst case scenario was lose to PSU.
NoMichigan winning is very bad for us.
Most projections have us and UM fighting for a bid. Even if we are both in they could secure a better seed and force us into a play in game.
Double byeMost projections have us and UM fighting for a bid. Even if we are both in they could secure a better seed and force us into a play in game.
Well it seems like it would be a possible loss scenario in that we could lose to the 12/13 seed?Illinois winning tonight would either set us up for a game against Iowa that can't be a bad loss, or a game against a 12/13 seed playing its third game in three days. That should be a no-lose scenario for our resume.
That's why I said it should be a no-lose situation. We should not lose to Northwestern, Nebraska, or Minnesota if they are playing their third game in three days. But things do happen.Well it seems like it would be a possible loss scenario in that we could lose to the 12/13 seed?
Our worst case scenario was Penn State 60, Rutgers 59Our worst case scenario; Michigan wins but Illinois loses and we still don't get the double bye.
The play in game is not a bad thing if you want to make a Sweet 16 run. Coming out of the play in games, you can make the Sweet 16 without having to face a 1 2 or 3 seed.Most projections have us and UM fighting for a bid. Even if we are both in they could secure a better seed and force us into a play in game.
Now I’m even questioning Lunardi.
Yes, but you will notice this post was made after the win, so I was looking ahead not behind.Our worst case scenario was Penn State 60, Rutgers 59
He claimed we absolutely were not a tournament team after the Merrimack game, formed a bias from all the way in November. His case is falling apart every day.
This guy has been saying the same things for weeks and I don’t get it. Why play the games if the only thing that matters is metrics. Houston has beaten no one and they are like top five in net. At some point you have to beat someone with a pulse and it’s not just about not losing to crappy teams.
I wonder if we are actually in for most, but the NET will keep us in first four. So these guys just put us in that box, because the NET will lead us there.He claimed we absolutely were not a tournament team after the Merrimack game, formed a bias from all the way in November. His case is falling apart every day.
Pretty much. At some point these people have to stop moving goalpostsHe claimed we absolutely were not a tournament team after the Merrimack game, formed a bias from all the way in November. His case is falling apart every day.
Michigan St had a similar NET last year and made field
This guy has been saying the same things for weeks and I don’t get it. Why play the games if the only thing that matters is metrics. Houston has beaten no one and they are like top five in net. At some point you have to beat someone with a pulse and it’s not just about not losing to crappy teams.
Agreed, just want to avoid Dayton if possible. Certainly don’t wanna see, say Memphis, if they get bounced out of the AAC tournament earlywe will be fine but this is why I didnt want Michigan winning today, better for them to be out of the picture
relax though the teams that are out are pretty weak at this point.
I think we headed for DaytonAgreed, just want to avoid Dayton if possible. Certainly don’t wanna see, say Memphis, if they get bounced out of the AAC tournament early
Would give Illinois motivation to beat Iowa.Not good for us
Why Nebraska can move above 135 and Nebraska's road win from Q3 to Q2.Not good for us