The backcourt (if Johnson is what they say) will easily be top10....maybe even top 5...we have less talent than any other team in the Big 10
The backcourt (if Johnson is what they say) will easily be top10....maybe even top 5...we have less talent than any other team in the Big 10
I think the focus should be on the number of league wins versus just a .500 record which can be padded with a easy out of conference record.I would like to see Rutgers win at least 5 B1G games which would be a sign of progress.Pikiell would get serious consideration for Big 10 coach of the year honors in RU finished above 500
...and by a decent marginwe have less talent than any other team in the Big 10
The backcourt (if Johnson is what they say) will easily be top10....maybe even top 5...
Did you watch any games in November and December when the only guy missing was Doorson?
Freeman was also missing and he was putting up similar numbers to what Kadeem Jack did.
because teams need to gel....this program needs to learn to win, its has lost 40 of its last 47 games...it does not know how to win, it has lost like 32 of 33 league games. Its going to be a process moving from where they were under Jordan to get better and learning how to compete under Pikiell...also you act like every other team does not improve. Pikiell will give the program a fighters chance, he puts us back in the game again competitive wise from the mess under Jordan, he isnt going to be a miracle worker with wins with a program that is the least talented in league
The bench is a problem I admit that . But there are probably going to be 4-5 teams minimum whos starting 5 will be equal to or worse than ours.Johnson hasnt played a minute I wouldnt project anything...we only have his time at KSU which was spotty.
and even if the backcourt may be in the top half of the league, when every other position plus bench is better at the other schools then you realize, we have the least talented team in the league
because teams need to gel....this program needs to learn to win, its has lost 40 of its last 47 games...it does not know how to win, it has lost like 32 of 33 league games. Its going to be a process moving from where they were under Jordan to get better and learning how to compete under Pikiell...also you act like every other team does not improve. Pikiell will give the program a fighters chance, he puts us back in the game again competitive wise from the mess under Jordan, he isnt going to be a miracle worker with wins with a program that is the least talented in league
The bench is a problem I admit that . But there are probably going to be 4-5 teams minimum whos starting 5 will be equal to or worse than ours.
Here is the reality...
We have NO idea on what we have
If we get Thiam and the twins...We have a bunch of 3 and 4 star recruits that have all SHOWN flashes of really good potential....but we don't know what they have
A good coach really could put this team together and make a run with it. Now, what's a run? Maybe .500 this year (more than that is a lot, team has to learn to win close games even if it is competitive)...and a NIT/NCAA bubble in the second year.
But that requires
-a total buy in to the new staff
-team commitment to S&C
-team commitment to working hard in this off season
-buying into the team concept. Guys who got lots of minutes in necessity need to adjust to lesser minutes and possible being passed on the depth chart...means accepting their roles
Steve P has some raw athleticism nad basketball talent to work with. This will test quickly what kind of coach he is and can be...
Who are "they"? Eddie Jordan is the only one to tout Johnson as "better than Corey". Even if they can both score some points, the backcourt is woefully undersized for this league.The backcourt (if Johnson is what they say) will easily be top10....maybe even top 5...
In which league? Certainly not ours.The bench is a problem I admit that . But there are probably going to be 4-5 teams minimum whos starting 5 will be equal to or worse than ours.
Where i, and BAC, could be wrong is if players buy in to solid strength and conditioning and a strong commitment to improvement in the off season. If Sanders and Johnson come in to camp in super shape and are + defenders AND Sanders has an improved outside shot we may be wrong.
Just look at the bottom of the standings and pick them. Minnesota and Illinois were trainwrecks at the end of the season just like us. Penn State and Nebraska each lose their best player off of mighty 7-11 and 6-12 campaigns.Name more than 1
we have less talent than any other team in the Big 10
We have a lot of the same pieces back and Johnson played with us last year so it shouldn't take long to "gell". Although I do agree teams need to learn to play together. I just don't think a team that returns as many players as we do should need as long, but you have a fair point. Learning how to win isn't a real thing. What has happened in previous years doesn't matter. This is a new team with a new coach and a new identity. Just like when the team recruited guys like Mack and Rosario from St. Anthony's and people said well they "know how to win". How did that work out? Winning is talent + good coaching. There is enough talent on this team to win 14 games.because teams need to gel....this program needs to learn to win, its has lost 40 of its last 47 games...it does not know how to win, it has lost like 32 of 33 league games. Its going to be a process moving from where they were under Jordan to weget better and learning how to compete under Pikiell...also you act like every other team does not improve. Pikiell will give the program a fighters chance, he puts us back in the game again competitive wise from the mess under Jordan, he isnt going to be a miracle worker with wins with a program that is the least talented in league
Meant that after his third year RU fans will be thinking Pikiell is the coach that will be bringing RU to the tourney on a constant bases.Expecting constant NCAA appearances after the third year of Pikiell is truly wishful thinking.It would take top twenty recruiting classes the next 3 years to put Rutgers anywhere near getting a NCAA bid .
Just look at the bottom of the standings and pick them. Minnesota and Illinois were trainwrecks at the end of the season just like us. Penn State and Nebraska each lose their best player off of mighty 7-11 and 6-12 campaigns.
We have a lot of the same pieces back and Johnson played with us last year so it shouldn't take long to "gell". Although I do agree teams need to learn to play together. I just don't think a team that returns as many players as we do should need as long, but you have a fair point. Learning how to win isn't a real thing. What has happened in previous years doesn't matter. This is a new team with a new coach and a new identity. Just like when the team recruited guys like Mack and Rosario from St. Anthony's and people said well they "know how to win". How did that work out? Winning is talent + good coaching. There is enough talent on this team to win 14 games.
The bench is a problem I admit that . But there are probably going to be 4-5 teams minimum whos starting 5 will be equal to or worse than ours.
The backcourt (if Johnson is what they say) will easily be top10....maybe even top 5...
After 25 years of futility, there are still some fans that continue to say Rutgers has talent compared to league competition.The won/loss record continues to say no to that conclusion.really? what is this based on...not reality
I'm sure the staff has it figured out as far as what really needs to be done and what are the alternatives. I think a few extra wins are a must because the type of recruits we need are only going to accept improvement to a point. Your not fixing the program as much as changing the concept and playing philosophy. It will be interesting and hopefully a little quicker then must fans think. I'd be happy if we can figure out how to not go 4-5 without scoring against anyone we play.None can ensure ultimate success at Rutgers based on recent history.Risks mist be taken because another 5 years of mediocre success will put Pikiell in a similar position to recent head coaches who have failed.To his credit Pikiell has stated that Rutgers must win quickly to change the perception of the program and enhance recruiting.
Once again I have not seen Johnson I can only trust the reports of multiple people, 35 points per game between the pair is not out of reason.Based on exactly what Seels?
The twins are supposedly visiting Nevada this weekend. the original list had California, RU, DePaul, Providence, Old Dominion and Providence. Shortly after East Carolina was added and I guess Nevada was also added. I know visits were made to East Carolina, RU and now Nevada. I think California was cancelled. I think this might go on for a while. I just hope that the Thiam situation will be finalized soon. As of now we still only have 9 scholarship players.