ADVERTISEMENT

OT: 2021 NHL Regular Season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hughes, Kakko were not ready
I haven't seen much of Lauf to gauge yet.

I'd even say that Hughes and Kakko should have taken two years from their draft
Laf looks pretty lost out there. He had an even tougher adjustment than usual because he hadn’t played in a live game since last March then had no real preseason.
 
It's also pretty tough considering last year was what it was, and this year being a condensed 60 game season, plus the looming flat cap with pretty much every team in their own personal cap hell. Weird things are going to happen.

And don't forget the expansion draft. No way Lou gets the blame for the JT debacle. They went as far as to make sure there were approvals in place to get started with the new arena as part of the pitch. They offered him the max but I don't think Tavares was straight with them about his desire to play for his hometown team at the trade deadline that year. With the benefit of hindsight they should have traded him then.

With regard to Wilde and a second for Palms that sounds about right for a rental of his ability. Naturally I would like it to be cheaper but Wilde has been a little slow developing at Bridgeport and Bolduc is probably considered the better D prospect at this time. They have two seconds in the next two drafts due the Toews trade.
 
There is a lot of disagreement on here between fans of the various area teams, but I think the one thing we have found consensus on is that except for some exceptional cases, it would be best to not start these top picks in the NHL in their post draft season.

The Rangers are a perfect example of that with Kakko and Lafreniere struggling while players like Fox and Miller step in at a completely different comfort level after a few years of seasoning in the NCAA.
If most fans think Lafreniere shouldn't be in the NHL this year, then most fans aren't as well-versed as they think they are. He isn't eligible for the AHL, the only places he can play are with the Rangers or to continue playing in the QMJHL which obviously isn't challenging him at all considering he put up more than two points a game last year. He even put up more than a point per game in that league as a 16-year old! You don't get better by continuing to play against kids that you've already been dominating for three years. If anything, it's counterproductive.
 
If most fans think Lafreniere shouldn't be in the NHL this year, then most fans aren't as well-versed as they think they are. He isn't eligible for the AHL, the only places he can play are with the Rangers or to continue playing in the QMJHL which obviously isn't challenging him at all considering he put up more than two points a game last year. He even put up more than a point per game in that league as a 16-year old! You don't get better by continuing to play against kids that you've already been dominating for three years. If anything, it's counterproductive.
There is no law against Canadian kids attending school and playing NCAA hockey.
 
There is no law against Canadian kids attending school and playing NCAA hockey.
Well you seem to be saying the Rangers should have handled it differently, but that decision would have had to come from Lafreniere himself, and he would have had to make that decision way back in 2017 before he even signed with Rimouski because you can't go from the CHL to NCAA. That would have been a disastrous decision for him to make though because he was only 16, so for him to end up in the NCAA he first would have had to play a few years in probably the USHL, so again we run into a scenario where his development is halted because he'd be putting up video game numbers against non-challenging competition. No QMJHL 1st overall pick is ever going to turn down that opportunity to instead play in a weaker junior league just so he can go to college so that he can delay his NHL rookie year. Even though he hasn't looked good this year, none of the alternatives are better than how he and the Rangers have handled things.
 
Well you seem to be saying the Rangers should have handled it differently, but that decision would have had to come from Lafreniere himself, and he would have had to make that decision way back in 2017 before he even signed with Rimouski because you can't go from the CHL to NCAA. That would have been a disastrous decision for him to make though because he was only 16, so for him to end up in the NCAA he first would have had to play a few years in probably the USHL, so again we run into a scenario where his development is halted because he'd be putting up video game numbers against non-challenging competition. No QMJHL 1st overall pick is ever going to turn down that opportunity to instead play in a weaker junior league just so he can go to college so that he can delay his NHL rookie year. Even though he hasn't looked good this year, none of the alternatives are better than how he and the Rangers have handled things.
This year was a mess anyway because you couldn’t know much in advance which leagues would even play and when, and as you said Laf is a special case because of his last two years in juniors.
That doesn’t change the overall point that if there are options, it should be a rare case that kids go right to the NHL post draft instead of being an automatic for the top picks like it is starting to become.
 
This year was a mess anyway because you couldn’t know much in advance which leagues would even play and when, and as you said Laf is a special case because of his last two years in juniors.
That doesn’t change the overall point that if there are options, it should be a rare case that kids go right to the NHL post draft instead of being an automatic for the top picks like it is starting to become.
That's fair, the problem is that for the occasional teenager who is too good for junior but perhaps not ready for the NHL, there just aren't any other options.
 
That's fair, the problem is that for the occasional teenager who is too good for junior but perhaps not ready for the NHL, there just aren't any other options.
In hindsight, I probably would have had Lafreniere go to the WJC, even (and maybe partially because) he didn’t have anything to prove their either, just to get his conditioning and confidence up before the NHL season since it had been so long since live games were happening.
 
I agree, Lafreniere made some horrible decisions. The decisions he made ended up with him being the #1 draft pick. He could have done so much better.
 
Tyce Thompson to make his NHL debut tonight for Devils. Still no Palms trade, I really hope there is a bidding war.
 
Bad game by Zajac. I know we have no shot at the playoffs, so technically the loss is a better option, but I still can't root for losses. This team needs to learn how to keep leads and win a lot more games.
 
There is a lot of disagreement on here between fans of the various area teams, but I think the one thing we have found consensus on is that except for some exceptional cases, it would be best to not start these top picks in the NHL in their post draft season.

The Rangers are a perfect example of that with Kakko and Lafreniere struggling while players like Fox and Miller step in at a completely different comfort level after a few years of seasoning in the NCAA.
Let’s discuss the options here, it’s a very good and interesting question.
Europeans inferior men’s leagues where Kravtsov and now Lindkvist are playing on big ice...is it better than juniors or college ranks? Big ice is always a detriment imo.
Is college better than Juniors?
Devs Hughes played USA developmental with no real juniors or college.
I’d say high level college is better than 18
U developmental or juniors.
Obviously you can go straight to AHL, but like it or not, the expectations for first 5 picks are NHL ready
 
Let’s discuss the options here, it’s a very good and interesting question.
Europeans inferior men’s leagues where Kravtsov and now Lindkvist are playing on big ice...is it better than juniors or college ranks? Big ice is always a detriment imo.
Is college better than Juniors?
Devs Hughes played USA developmental with no real juniors or college.
I’d say high level college is better than 18
U developmental or juniors.
Obviously you can go straight to AHL, but like it or not, the expectations for first 5 picks are NHL ready
I don’t know about the SHL but, despite Michelletti saying the opposite over and over, Kravstov would already have experience playing on NHL size rinks because the KHL made a push towards that a while ago and only two teams in that league currently have larger rinks.

Where a kid should play post draft really matters a lot on what the kid has done already. In Hughes case, most of the players he was with in the UNDTP program went to the NCAA so he probably should have gone there. Playing with bigger 21-22 year olds would have been a good transition to playing with men in the NHL.
 
Let’s discuss the options here, it’s a very good and interesting question.
Europeans inferior men’s leagues where Kravtsov and now Lindkvist are playing on big ice...is it better than juniors or college ranks? Big ice is always a detriment imo.
Is college better than Juniors?
Devs Hughes played USA developmental with no real juniors or college.
I’d say high level college is better than 18
U developmental or juniors.
Obviously you can go straight to AHL, but like it or not, the expectations for first 5 picks are NHL ready
The USNDP does play against college teams, so Hughes and others in the program, did get some of that experience.

I'm not sure about Lafer as I don't watch the Rag's often, but Hughes despite the modest #'s looks very good. He still looks like a tiny little kid, so I understand the thought that more physical development would do him well, but I don't know if him crushing the college ranks is a real benefit. At least playing in the NHL he is gaining that experience, and in years 3 and 4 post draft I think that will prove to be a benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robcac26
Palms and Zajac to the islanders for a first, two guys I've never heard of, and a conditional 4th.
A.J. Greer was a 2nd round pick of the Avs in 2015, played a bit for them, 37 games over parts of 3 years. The other guy, Mason Jobst, played in the USHL, then went to Ohio State, more of a career minor leaguer.
 
The USNDP does play against college teams, so Hughes and others in the program, did get some of that experience.

I'm not sure about Lafer as I don't watch the Rag's often, but Hughes despite the modest #'s looks very good. He still looks like a tiny little kid, so I understand the thought that more physical development would do him well, but I don't know if him crushing the college ranks is a real benefit. At least playing in the NHL he is gaining that experience, and in years 3 and 4 post draft I think that will prove to be a benefit.
Agreed, I think a lot of people are looking at it short-term and evaluating these decisions based on how the players look in their first year or two. The goal is to have as good of a career as possible, not just a good rookie and sophomore year. At some point you have to jump into the deep end and just because you're not putting up big numbers right away doesn't necessarily mean it was too soon. It's also unrealistic to expect anyone who is being offered an NHL contract to tell the GM that they're going to hold off a few years and go play in college instead.
 
Wow. Great trade for the Isles. The only thing I don’t like is that Lou didn’t get the Devils to take Ladd’s horrendous contract off of his hands.
LGI!
 
Devils now have the Isles 1st and 2nd round picks in this years draft. Devils are also paying 50% of Palms and Zajac's salary for the rest of this season. I like the deal for the Isles but would have preferred a FWD and a defenseman instead of two forwards. I assume Palms will step in with Barzal and Eberle. Not sure where Zajac will fit. Maybe on a line with Pageau and Walstrom. Given that the Devils are paying 50% of the two salaries I am not sure if the Isles have cap space for one more move.
 
The prospects just look like filler, the only thing worth a damn is the 1st rounder, but the market or Palms was last year so he alone wasn't going to get you that and Zajac would probably only fetch a 3rd, it works out. For Islanders too.
 
No surprise about Zajac, in short Lou loves him and has always thought he would be a great playoff performer.
Of course I would have loved better prospect(s) in the deal. I think it shows how coveted the Devils think that #1 pick will be. It also makes me sick to think about the deals they probably said no to last year. They better find a gem with that pick.
 
Those definitely were not the prospects I expected to be dealing to the Devs, especially with them taking 50% of salary on Palmeri & Zajac. No Bellows, no Beauvilier, no Wahlstrom, didn't even deal Dal Colle or *gasp* Ladd 🤣 They must have big plans on those draft markers.
 
Those definitely were not the prospects I expected to be dealing to the Devs, especially with them taking 50% of salary on Palmeri & Zajac. No Bellows, no Beauvilier, no Wahlstrom, didn't even deal Dal Colle or *gasp* Ladd 🤣 They must have big plans on those draft markers.

Bellows isnt a top prospect either.

Wallstrom is and they wouldn't trade him.

I think Zajac will re-sign with NJ this summer, 1-yr

He will be very useful for the Islanders
 
  • Like
Reactions: TM94goRU
It is apparent to me Lou just took Tom Fitzgerald to school. With the "weak" draft this year, this is a very underwhelming trade from the Devil's perspective. In the future it could be used to fire Fitzgerald. Very bad assest management, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUaMoose
The "prospects" probably will never play for the Devil's. This trade is a joke from the Devil's perspective. Mason Jobst is a 27 year old minor leaguer who is 5 ft. 8 in. tall.
What does TF do for an encore? Give Murray and Kulikov away for a bag of pucks? Unless he somehow turns this into chicken salad, he should be fired.
He has bad foresight. Palms needed to be traded last year. Last year maybe you get Wallstrom from Lou. Great trade for the Islanders. To quote TF, I hope the pick is 32. WTH- this would be outrageous in a fantasy league, imo.
 
Bellows isnt a top prospect either.

Wallstrom is and they wouldn't trade him.

I think Zajac will re-sign with NJ this summer, 1-yr

He will be very useful for the Islanders
Bellows appears to be a much better prospect than anything you got. Perhaps if you got him you only get a 2nd round pick. While a good short term move by the Isles it is difficult to see how they retain either past year end.
 
Those definitely were not the prospects I expected to be dealing to the Devs, especially with them taking 50% of salary on Palmeri & Zajac. No Bellows, no Beauvilier, no Wahlstrom, didn't even deal Dal Colle or *gasp* Ladd 🤣 They must have big plans on those draft markers.
I suspect the market for Palms was a 2nd rounder.

Zajac was unlikely to waive his no trade clause for anyone but the Islanders...so adding Zajac likely bumped it to a 1st rounder and since it was unlikely Zajac would go elsewhere, Fitzgerald didn't have much leverage.

Everything else is clearly filler.

So end of the day, I think the Islanders did really well...but no reason we couldn't see Travis back in NJ on a one or two year deal this offseason and Palms was gone anyway since contract talks were far apart.

Let's see what Buffalo gets for Hall...that'll tell us how well Fitz did or did not do.
 
Devils have been "rebuilding" for six, seven years now. They've had the first overall pick in 2017 & 2019, the 7th overall last year and they still stink. They'll probably have their own top 5 pick this year plus a 25-30 from the Islanders. When will all this draft capital pay dividends ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TM94goRU
Devils have been "rebuilding" for six, seven years now. They've had the first overall pick in 2017 & 2019, the 7th overall last year and they still stink. They'll probably have their own top 5 pick this year plus a 25-30 from the Islanders. When will all this draft capital pay dividends ?
I'm a pretty optimistic guy, but I'm thinking we are getting close.

Hughes has struggled to put up points, but his ability to create chances is impressive. He's near dominant in most possession metrics(granted he get's the prime offensive minutes).

The other #1 you speak of has played 5 games.

Even with Hughes modest offensive production and Nico barely playing we are right at the top of the league in points by players 23 and younger, and our overall 5v5 metrics aren't bad. (We do stink on specials though and that is as big problem as any).

Smith looks great. Blackwood looks very good. Zacha showing real signs, Bratt, Sharangovic, Kuokkanen, the list is pretty long. Plus lots of recent picks including 3 1st rounders still waiting to enter the league. 2 more 1st rounders this year.

It's been a slog, wins and losses this year are disappointing, but the underlying #'s, both on ice metrics as well as recent picks, look good.
 
Bellows appears to be a much better prospect than anything you got. Perhaps if you got him you only get a 2nd round pick. While a good short term move by the Isles it is difficult to see how they retain either past year end.
Meh, Bellows turns 23 in June and has yet to find his NHL groove, I know some guys take longer, but we have numerous players around that age, and many of them are actually producing.

Rather the 1st rounder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT