11 posts in support: I guess we know who's a big FSU supporter.
Someone still has to lay out what they bring to the table on the academic and research side which would benefit the CIC and convince the Big 10 presidents to vote for them.
This coming from a guy who's a moderator for a B1G school that will live and die athletics wise with NIL, yet constantly disparages it and essentially dissuades others from donating to current and future success of our program.
Again, stick to grilling and squashing message board squabbles, and let the big kids talk athletics.
I've already said what they bring academic wise - maybe your smoker is clouding your brain, so I'll repeat it for the people in the back.
Top 20 public. Finally getting state money allocated properly after decades of UF getting the lions share and having to fight tooth and nail for that.
Research dollars will go up exponentially with President McCoullugh at the helm, and the new land they've purchased allowing for expansion (campus is landlocked, smallest amongst the public schools in FL)
They'll be AAU in 7-10 years - not happening overnight, but well on the way to making that a reality.
Let me ask you this; what exactly did Nebraska bring to the table academic wise? Or moreover, would they have been admitted without their athletics program?
Or here at Rutgers; would we have been admitted if we were in Mississippi?
How about Oregon... what on earth do they bring, sans athletics and a massive brand?
Spoiler alert... it's about athletics. And money. This is a big boy conference doing big boy things in search of the almighty dollar.
Period. Stop. End of story.