still far less disruptive to the environment than the turbines or precious metals mining and waste from battery and E production efforts. It's not close
Well, this isn't really true, is it?
For one thing, uranium mining is a very messy thing - it's strip mined, and only strip mined. The uranium enrichment process results in unstable byproducts that need to be somehow disposed of. There are prodigious heavy metals (cadmium, tungsten, nickel, lead) used in the manufacture of fuel & control rods.
Then you've got the immediate environmental impact. The average nuke plant kills about a million fish per year, directly, via their cooling intakes. The outflow of the cooling towers is pumped back into the local water source and raises the ambient temperature of the water considerably - enough to do a great deal more damage to fish stocks.
Once a nuke facility is built, then a nuke facility it remains, whether it's operational or not. That's because things like the containment building, fuel storage pools, etc., can never be dismantled or disturbed.
The point is, you can't differentiate between wind, solar and nuclear on the basis of "Well, all them wind turbines has got to be built and the metals for batteries have to be mined by little brown kids and nuclear plants is just wished into existence" when a) that's not true and b) you don't give a shit about little brown kids, anyway, outside of using them as a prop for this discussion.
All energy production has associated costs. Renewable energy production methods continue to get more efficient. It was only about 10-15 short years ago that you could put about 300 watts of solar on a sailboat and charge the battery enough to run the GPS and autopilot. Now you can put 1200 - 1500 watts of solar in that same footprint and run the nav gear, the autopilot, the refrigerator & freezer, iPhones, laptops, sat links, wi-fi, sound systems and all the lights. Add the ubiquitous wind generator and now you've got power to run the AC and water maker. All these things will get even more efficient, over time - and the use of fossil fuels will decline, commensurately.
It's a process. We're in the mix.