C'mon.. yeah.. as worded is sounded racist and certainly, we have seen some real racist remarks on this board.. iirc, Waretown was one such poster that I instantly recall doing so. So if I saw that handle post the comment to which you replied I would be 100% behind you identifying it as racist.
But if you think about the use of the word "diversity" in the remark in this thread, it does not quite make sense. He talked about the crisis in schools and the crisis in cities NOW. Anyway, I assume he means NOW.
WAIT... just reviewed many of the previous posts and while they looked pretty bad.. but consider this one... about how someone had a big house in a diverse community.. and did not name the community..
This one sheds some light on what he means by diversity. People can say those against teh old Mount Laurel Decision are racist, and some opponents might very well be motivated by racism, but it is much broader than that.
It is about communities making rules for their towns designed to support a suburban-style environment. Lot sizes and zoning laws and so on. These rules developed over decades and, when successful, resulted in desirable communities with increasing home values and good schools and so on. And no suck zoning law could be race-based.
And then someone comes from the outside and tells them they are doing it all wrong. That they need high-density low-income housing... for "diversity".
Alpine NJ is one of the highest-income communities in New Jersey and is diverse. The
White population there is only 55% (about 63% of New Jersey is white). Now, I ask you, does anyone, regardless of race, in Alpine want a low-income housing project to be built near their homes? If you are a black person who bought a mansion in Alpine, do you want that?
And then you have this trend of leftists insisting that all single-family housing is racist. And that
"More than 50 years after passage of the Fair Housing Act, it’s time to sue the suburbs."
Bottom line: It is not necessarily racist to be against such introduction of high-density low-income housing in your communities. In many ways, it is just common sense. It is probably better to look at why there are low-income people at all. Are schools failing them? Why do they feel the need to have access to good schools in safe neighborhoods?
How about making their schools good and their neighborhoods safe? And the use of "their" is not race-based. "Their" means low-income people that want to move to the safe communities with good schools.