ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Light snow to rain event Sunday afternoon into Monday

It is great that you are so careful.
Oh, I don't know. But we have a doctrine called inequitable conduct, where the patent owner and their attorneys can be charged with misrepresenting facts when a patent is obtained. We are careful creatures by nature, but we often walk on egg shells to make sure we are not twisting facts or what another patent says. I spend a lot of my day looking over my shoulder and moving commas in and out of quotation marks. It's a wonderful life.
 
So... no. You're pretty much wrong about everything.

Time for you to go back on my Ignore list. Your attention seeking is tiresome. I've noticed it's also cyclical. You should talk to someone about mood disorders.
Hits the nail on the head.
 
So... no. You're pretty much wrong about everything.

Time for you to go back on my Ignore list. Your attention seeking is tiresome. I've noticed it's also cyclical. You should talk to someone about mood disorders.

You say that as if I give a shit. As with most of our arguments, you started this one with a unprovoked childish shot at me, so the attention seeking was all on you - don't make stupid posts and maybe we won't have arguments. With everything I have going on right now, I have no patience for your schtick. Start an argument, lose it, then cry and take your toys home. Grow up.
 
These threads would be much more readable and informative if they didn't turn into bickering matches between people acting like nine year olds

The attacks get old, and as much as I appreciate RU#s' input, I can't for the life of me understand why he still tries to talk weather here. I enjoy the interplay between RU#s and RU4Real when they talk weather, because it's interesting to see two differing perspectives on what is essentially the same data... but the antagonism gets tiresome, especially from third parties who can't resist chiming in to snipe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RST95
Here we go again. People forecasting your snow blower needs to be tuned up and ready but in reality...
 
The attacks get old, and as much as I appreciate RU#s' input, I can't for the life of me understand why he still tries to talk weather here. I enjoy the interplay between RU#s and RU4Real when they talk weather, because it's interesting to see two differing perspectives on what is essentially the same data... but the antagonism gets tiresome, especially from third parties who can't resist chiming in to snipe.

Well, I'm about this close to not posting on weather anymore. It used to be fun and I know many folks appreciate it, but the amount of sniping and trolling (never initiated by me) has become tiresome. I get enough weather "fun" from Facebook and the various email updates I send out.
 
Oh, I don't know. But we have a doctrine called inequitable conduct, where the patent owner and their attorneys can be charged with misrepresenting facts when a patent is obtained. We are careful creatures by nature, but we often walk on egg shells to make sure we are not twisting facts or what another patent says. I spend a lot of my day looking over my shoulder and moving commas in and out of quotation marks. It's a wonderful life.

Have been somewhat involved with our patent attorneys over the years with respect to a couple of patents I have and challenges we've received from competitors, which our attorneys thought might be infringing said patents. Never had the pleasure of going to court, but a coworker in my area with a different patent has and it sounded a bit nerve wracking - our folks grilled him for hours to prepare him for what he might be asked. As you said, every little detail can be so important.
 
Well, I'm about this close to not posting on weather anymore. It used to be fun and I know many folks appreciate it, but the amount of sniping and trolling (never initiated by me) has become tiresome. I get enough weather "fun" from Facebook and the various email updates I send out.
[banana]
 
The attacks get old, and as much as I appreciate RU#s' input, I can't for the life of me understand why he still tries to talk weather here. I enjoy the interplay between RU#s and RU4Real when they talk weather, because it's interesting to see two differing perspectives on what is essentially the same data... but the antagonism gets tiresome, especially from third parties who can't resist chiming in to snipe.
I appreciate RU#'s weather threads and hope he keeps posting them. While he and bac seem to be able to civilly disagree about loving/hating winter weather, I can't for the life of me figure our why RU4Real, who is an entertaining poster too, and RU#'s get into fights on these threads. I just skip over them as noise in an otherwise useful thread. Kind of reminds me of:
 
You say that as if I give a shit. As with most of our arguments, you started this one with a unprovoked childish shot at me, so the attention seeking was all on you - don't make stupid posts and maybe we won't have arguments. With everything I have going on right now, I have no patience for your schtick. Start an argument, lose it, then cry and take your toys home. Grow up.
Dude you have a history. Please stop attacking others
 
  • Like
Reactions: MYHATINTHERING
Have been somewhat involved with our patent attorneys over the years with respect to a couple of patents I have and challenges we've received from competitors, which our attorneys thought might be infringing said patents. Never had the pleasure of going to court, but a coworker in my area with a different patent has and it sounded a bit nerve wracking - our folks grilled him for hours to prepare him for what he might be asked. As you said, every little detail can be so important.
We live for and love our minutiae. Fights over what does "on" mean, is a "coating" a "layer," and other hair-splitting are par for the course. Have seen witnesses with long and distinguished careers badgered into giving the "wrong" answer by opposing counsel who were cunning linguists.No wonder most folks don't like attorneys. I rarely handle contested cases, which makes for a happier life.
 
Slightly surprised the NWS in Philly extended the advisories a tier of counties southward, so they're now up for Middlesex, Mercer, lower Bucks and lower Montco for an inch or so of snow in the evening and a trace of freezing rain (the freezing rain is the reason for the advisory, as one needs 3" of snow in our area for an advisory to verify) before the changeover to plain rain after midnight. They're calling for 2-5" north of 78 (with the higher amounts really north of 80 - don't think anyone near 78 sees more than 2") before the changeover, where the Monday morning commute will likely be affected.

Think they could be a little bullish there, too - but they often are with the first widespread wintry precip. The NWS in NYC has no advisories up, except for Western Passaic, Orange and Putnam counties, i.e., not for the counties, like Union, Essex, and Bergen, next to Morris, Somerset, and Middlesex, which have advisories up. Someone's going to be wrong and my guess is it'll be the NWS in Philly.

http://www.weather.gov/phi/

.SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH 6 AM MONDAY/...
A break in the snow is possible early this evening as the lead short
wave passes eastward, but this break in precipitation will only be
temporary. A warm front will lift northward across the area tonight
as an area of low pressure moves into the Great Lakes region. A
couple of short wave/vorticity impulses will spread across the area
during the overnight, which will help enhance lift across the area
as low-mid level moisture spread through the region. This will lead
to an extended period of precipitation. The question becomes what the
P-types will be. As the precipitation first develops and spreads
across the area, it should start out as snow. However, as
temperatures begin to warm, especially aloft, we should begin having
a change over to a wintry mix. We extended the Winter Weather
Advisory a tier of counties southward, and have kept the advisory
the same for the counties that were already in it. Highest snow
amounts are expected to be across the northern areas from I-78/I-80
northward where 3-5 inches is possible. South of this area in the
advisory, a dusting to 1-2 inches is possible. With the freezing
rain, a trace to less than one-tenth of an inch of ice is expected
before a change over to all rain.

NWS has kept all the advisories up in NJ/NY/PA. Temps are already above freezing at the Jersey Shore and from about Philly over to Holmdel, so those areas should only see rain from here on out, as the 2nd batch of precip is on our doorstep. Right now, the approaching precip is light to moderate snow in eastern PA and I'd expect areas from Trenton to NYC to get at least another short shot of snow; some places could get up to an inch from today's earlier snow (1/4-1/2" for most) and tonight's second batch, before changing over to sleet, freezing rain, and then plain rain.

The potential for a thin glaze of freezing rain is the reason for the advisory for most of Central Jersey - honestly, I'll be suprised if it verifies. And the good news for commuters is that temps should be above freezing by 3-4 am for everyone south of 78 and probably by 6 am south of 80 (except maybe far NW sections), so even if there is 1-2" of slush in these northwestern areas, with temps above freezing, major roads, at least, should be ok.

StormTotalSnowWeb.png

StormTotalIceFcst.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zak57
Great to see the guy with all the history of bannings has weighed in with another inaccurate post. Read the thread. I only responded to attacks. Unprovoked ones.
Unprovoked?? You can't be serious. Coming from a person who calls others morons because they point out you been wrong! So many times!
 
NWS has kept all the advisories up in NJ/NY/PA. Temps are already above freezing at the Jersey Shore and from about Philly over to Holmdel, so those areas should only see rain from here on out, as the 2nd batch of precip is on our doorstep. Right now, the approaching precip is light to moderate snow in eastern PA and I'd expect areas from Trenton to NYC to get at least another short shot of snow; some places could get up to an inch from today's earlier snow (1/4-1/2" for most) and tonight's second batch, before changing over to sleet, freezing rain, and then plain rain.

The potential for a thin glaze of freezing rain is the reason for the advisory for most of Central Jersey - honestly, I'll be suprised if it verifies. And the good news for commuters is that temps should be above freezing by 3-4 am for everyone south of 78 and probably by 6 am south of 80 (except maybe far NW sections), so even if there is 1-2" of slush in these northwestern areas, with temps above freezing, major roads, at least, should be ok.

StormTotalSnowWeb.png

StormTotalIceFcst.png

Please keep posting. The last three years of my commute is better because of your posts.
 
We live for and love our minutiae. Fights over what does "on" mean, is a "coating" a "layer," and other hair-splitting are par for the course. Have seen witnesses with long and distinguished careers badgered into giving the "wrong" answer by opposing counsel who were cunning linguists.No wonder most folks don't like attorneys. I rarely handle contested cases, which makes for a happier life.

Didn't realize the IP world was so wild and kinky...

main-qimg-01e4a4ffa299bfee1c167b213ce65a7d-c
 
Unprovoked?? You can't be serious. Coming from a person who calls others morons because they point out you been wrong! So many times!

I called nobody in this thread a moron or any other names, even after a few unprovoked attacks. Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
 
I called nobody in this thread a moron or any other names, even after a few unprovoked attacks. Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
Oh you are patting yourself on your back because for once there is a thread you didn't attack anyone. But you did throw Bac under the bus today.
You can't hide from your past. You admit you like extreme weather. We're kiddy about Sandy because it was "historic" and never apologized on a complete wiff on a blizzard that never came even though the head of the head of NWS Mt Holly did.
You are one sick individual.
 
Well, folks - morning rush hour is here and it's... raining! Temps are in the 30s north of I94 and in the 40s south of 95. You have to get all the way up past Poughkeepsie to find consistently freezing temps and frozen precip.

The Model Masturbation has once again failed to produce a realistic result.
 
Well, folks - morning rush hour is here and it's... raining! Temps are in the 30s north of I94 and in the 40s south of 95. You have to get all the way up past Poughkeepsie to find consistently freezing temps and frozen precip.

The Model Masturbation has once again failed to produce a realistic result.
Your (ahem) all wet with excitement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MYHATINTHERING
There was some buzz going on from the milf's at Hillsborough Deli this morning about Tuesday night snow. Something about inches but I'm assuming it was roll size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Proud NJ Sports Fan
Have been somewhat involved with our patent attorneys over the years with respect to a couple of patents I have and challenges we've received from competitors, which our attorneys thought might be infringing said patents. Never had the pleasure of going to court, but a coworker in my area with a different patent has and it sounded a bit nerve wracking - our folks grilled him for hours to prepare him for what he might be asked. As you said, every little detail can be so important.

The critic John Simon wrote in yesterday's NYT Sunday book review that it's actually "nerve-racking." he didn't say why but my guess would be that the metaphor comes from being placed on the rack, a traditional torture device.

I hope you will stay, but I would certainly understand if you choose not to.
 
Well, folks - morning rush hour is here and it's... raining! Temps are in the 30s north of I94 and in the 40s south of 95. You have to get all the way up past Poughkeepsie to find consistently freezing temps and frozen precip.

The Model Masturbation has once again failed to produce a realistic result.


The one thing the models are.consistent in winter events is that they are TERRIBLE in the midrange
 
The critic John Simon wrote in yesterday's NYT Sunday book review that it's actually "nerve-racking." he didn't say why but my guess would be that the metaphor comes from being placed on the rack, a traditional torture device.

I hope you will stay, but I would certainly understand if you choose not to.

Yep, it definitely is "nerve-racking" and your reasoning is exactly correct. Funny thing is I just had a conversation about this with my 22-year old son (who gives me way more crap than anyone on this board, lol), but then still spelled it wrong here. Thanks for the vote of confidence...

http://grammarist.com/usage/rack-wrack/
 
The one thing the models are.consistent in winter events is that they are TERRIBLE in the midrange

They're terrible because in the realm where temperatures matter the models don't have the level of granularity they need to resolve down to under 50 miles or so.
 
Unprovoked?? You can't be serious. Coming from a person who calls others morons because they point out you been wrong! So many times!
not worth your time kemosbe, man I could tell you stories

that said, nothing more entertaining than watching grown men rest their laurels on 'weather threads' and keep getting it wrong

lol
 
There was some buzz going on from the milf's at Hillsborough Deli this morning about Tuesday night snow. Something about inches but I'm assuming it was roll size.
hahahahaha


It's December, it's going to be cold, wet at times, and we may have snow.
 
NWS has kept all the advisories up in NJ/NY/PA. Temps are already above freezing at the Jersey Shore and from about Philly over to Holmdel, so those areas should only see rain from here on out, as the 2nd batch of precip is on our doorstep. Right now, the approaching precip is light to moderate snow in eastern PA and I'd expect areas from Trenton to NYC to get at least another short shot of snow; some places could get up to an inch from today's earlier snow (1/4-1/2" for most) and tonight's second batch, before changing over to sleet, freezing rain, and then plain rain.

The potential for a thin glaze of freezing rain is the reason for the advisory for most of Central Jersey - honestly, I'll be suprised if it verifies. And the good news for commuters is that temps should be above freezing by 3-4 am for everyone south of 78 and probably by 6 am south of 80 (except maybe far NW sections), so even if there is 1-2" of slush in these northwestern areas, with temps above freezing, major roads, at least, should be ok.

StormTotalSnowWeb.png

StormTotalIceFcst.png

So, score it NWS-NYC 1 - NWS-Philly 0. Clearly, in hindsight, the advisories were really only needed for the Poconos, Sussex, Orange and maybe Putnam Counties, for snowfall, as those were the only places that got ~3" of snow in some locations (or close to it and not everywhere). Maybe the advisories could've been up for the Lehigh Valley, Hunterdon, Warren/Morris/Western Passaic, also, as they did get 0.05-0.10" of ice glaze in some locations and freezing rain really is pretty dangerous.

But the advisories for Bucks, Montco, Somerset, Middlesex, and Mercer were way overdone, as I thought they might be, when I said, yesterday, "Someone's going to be wrong and my guess is it'll be the NWS in Philly."

http://forecast.weather.gov/product...HI&product=PNS&format=CI&version=1&glossary=0

http://forecast.weather.gov/product...&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin
Oh you are patting yourself on your back because for once there is a thread you didn't attack anyone. But you did throw Bac under the bus today.
You can't hide from your past. You admit you like extreme weather. We're kiddy about Sandy because it was "historic" and never apologized on a complete wiff on a blizzard that never came even though the head of the head of NWS Mt Holly did.
You are one sick individual.

Since you're so far off base, figured I should set the record straight. Go find an example of a post of mine (outside of the CE board, where the lines are kind of drawn based on long histories, and any insult is typically a continuation from previous insults) where I've attacked anyone unprovoked. Can't say it has never happened, but I know it's pretty damn rare.

And my tweak of bac was more a way of pointing out T's trolling inconsistency and not throwing him under any bus, as he knows and would agree with, I'm sure. I actually pointed out T's inconsistency for not trolling bac, like he trolls me, and followed it up with a defense of bac starting the thread, in anticipation of a T swipe, which he obligingly supplied.

Not sure what "kiddy" is, but on Sandy, I was the first one to bring the threat to this board and was very vocal about people evacuating/retrieving valuables from low lying areas, several days in advance, as it was clear this was likely going to be beyond historic with respect to storm surge-related coastal flooding. Quite a few on this board thanked me, as did many on my email lists, since not everyone follows this stuff as closely and the advance warning helped at least some folks.

Finally, if I were Gary Szatkowski, I would've apologized for the busted NWS-Philly forecast for the Blizzard of 2015, too - as I've said countless times, I don't "make" my own forecasts, but I try to focus on providing info from the best forecasters, which almost always includes the NWS, as they're often the best, overall. However, since I was favoring the NWS forecast, clearly I busted, which I acknowledged at the height of the storm. Didn't think I needed to apologize for raising awareness of a potentially dangerous storm, which didn't quite pan out, especially since I do this in my not-so-ample spare time, partly for fun and partly to try to help people out.
 
Since you're so far off base, figured I should set the record straight. Go find an example of a post of mine (outside of the CE board, where the lines are kind of drawn based on long histories, and any insult is typically a continuation from previous insults) where I've attacked anyone unprovoked. Can't say it has never happened, but I know it's pretty damn rare.

And my tweak of bac was more a way of pointing out T's trolling inconsistency and not throwing him under any bus, as he knows and would agree with, I'm sure. I actually pointed out T's inconsistency for not trolling bac, like he trolls me, and followed it up with a defense of bac starting the thread, in anticipation of a T swipe, which he obligingly supplied.

Not sure what "kiddy" is, but on Sandy, I was the first one to bring the threat to this board and was very vocal about people evacuating/retrieving valuables from low lying areas, several days in advance, as it was clear this was likely going to be beyond historic with respect to storm surge-related coastal flooding. Quite a few on this board thanked me, as did many on my email lists, since not everyone follows this stuff as closely and the advance warning helped at least some folks.

Finally, if I were Gary Szatkowski, I would've apologized for the busted NWS-Philly forecast for the Blizzard of 2015, too - as I've said countless times, I don't "make" my own forecasts, but I try to focus on providing info from the best forecasters, which almost always includes the NWS, as they're often the best, overall. However, since I was favoring the NWS forecast, clearly I busted, which I acknowledged at the height of the storm. Didn't think I needed to apologize for raising awareness of a potentially dangerous storm, which didn't quite pan out, especially since I do this in my not-so-ample spare time, partly for fun and partly to try to help people out.
Ah, the bust of 2015, that one was priceless.
 
The Spanky, #s love fest is in full force.
One of them calls people morons and the moderator calls people trash.
Disgusting that both are allowed to continue this nonsense, especially a moderator who should be balanced but has his buddies he must defend. Not that their lifestyle is wrong. There is nothing wrong with that. But when one defends the other blindly...well we get the point.
 
Last edited:
I don't see any post from RU#s calling anyone a moron. And I do not understand the antipathy some posters have toward RU#s, who performs a valuable service. I do understand, WhiteBus, that you abhor snow while RU#s likes it, but all he's doing here is providing information that would be otherwise hard to get.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT