ADVERTISEMENT

OT: New York Mets 2021-2022 Off Season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Funny how people always complaining on how the Mets should get players who played like the “beloved” 86 Mets. How they always loved how Dykstra and Backman played the game with fire and passion. But yet when they get a player with fire and passion, they complain about how Marcus Stroman is selfish, all about his brand, tweets stupid stuff and don’t know wtf he’s talking about and are happy as hell that he’s in Chicago.

Too bad because Stroman proved that he can pitch in NYC and was the dependable one after everyone else went down. pissed that he’s gone but I wish him well at Wrigley.

I’m sure those same fans will continue to romanticize the fire and passion of a wife beater who talked sh** in the media (Backman) and a convicted con man (Dykstra).
Agree - Imagine a guy like Dykstra is SM was around at that time.
 
K Bryant would be the perfect fit with no draft pick associated with him. There are a few others but I believe the Met's do not want to give up that pick this year as they are in a unique situation where the pick they have to give up is a high 1st round guy, not a 2nd or 3rd round guy like most years would be
The only QO offerees who are still unsigned (other than Conforto) are Correa, Freeman, Castellanos, and Story. Of these, the only one in whom I think the Mets might possibly have interest is Castellanos. But there's been no report of any serious interest thus far.

So I don't think this will be an issue.
 
I find it hard to sympathize with the players when I see the deals that get thrown around. Especially when I contrast it to the NFL.

And not the owners making oodles more than the players?? The MLB pie keeps growing for the owners and shrinking for the players. Revenue has tripled and has not seeped down. A very small amount of MLB players get monster deals so you need to think about the other 95% of the league.
 
I find it hard to sympathize with the players when I see the deals that get thrown around. Especially when I contrast it to the NFL.
I don’t blame the players at all. NFL knows it has players by the balls. No first contract guys drafted after the 2nd round can afford a lockout or missed season. And the guys in mega deals in the NFL usually only have about 7-10 real earning years- they won’t give that up either.
Baseball players have so much more leverage and use it. Owners make so much money that these contracts are peanuts to them. And going to a game in Pittsburgh is not 1/4 the price of a Met game even though their payroll is 1/4
 
Why do you say that? This is a meaningless deadline.

I would advise everyone to calm down until February 1. If no agreement by then, then be concerned. If no agreement by March 1, then be worried.
I’ll say that the one thing I think we see as non negotiable is the term of service teams Fvk young players on…

you are right on the timeline. I do think it pushes a couple of days into March though as owners will use that to try to leverage fans against the players.
 
Funny how people always complaining on how the Mets should get players who played like the “beloved” 86 Mets. How they always loved how Dykstra and Backman played the game with fire and passion. But yet when they get a player with fire and passion, they complain about how Marcus Stroman is selfish, all about his brand, tweets stupid stuff and don’t know wtf he’s talking about and are happy as hell that he’s in Chicago.

Too bad because Stroman proved that he can pitch in NYC and was the dependable one after everyone else went down. pissed that he’s gone but I wish him well at Wrigley.

I’m sure those same fans will continue to romanticize the fire and passion of a wife beater who talked sh** in the media (Backman) and a convicted con man (Dykstra).
Licata and Malusis have been reporting that Stroman was a problem in the locker room. Furthermore the locker room “ camaraderie “ last year was full bs. Locker room had many issues as per Licata and Malusis
 
I'm fine with the lockout - gives the Mets a chance to get their staff done.
 
Licata and Malusis have been reporting that Stroman was a problem in the locker room. Furthermore the locker room “ camaraderie “ last year was full bs. Locker room had many issues as per Licata and Malusis

 
And not the owners making oodles more than the players?? The MLB pie keeps growing for the owners and shrinking for the players. Revenue has tripled and has not seeped down. A very small amount of MLB players get monster deals so you need to think about the other 95% of the league.
Well I'll say I see blame on both sides.
 
Funny how people always complaining on how the Mets should get players who played like the “beloved” 86 Mets. How they always loved how Dykstra and Backman played the game with fire and passion. But yet when they get a player with fire and passion, they complain about how Marcus Stroman is selfish, all about his brand, tweets stupid stuff and don’t know wtf he’s talking about and are happy as hell that he’s in Chicago.

Too bad because Stroman proved that he can pitch in NYC and was the dependable one after everyone else went down. pissed that he’s gone but I wish him well at Wrigley.

I’m sure those same fans will continue to romanticize the fire and passion of a wife beater who talked sh** in the media (Backman) and a convicted con man (Dykstra).
What are your thoughts on Straw and Doc?
 
Blame? There is no reason to assign blame to anyone... yet.
Agreed, but listening to XM today it appears the players want 5 year FA, $100 million more in revenue and arbitration after year 2. Pretty significant asks for the small market teams.
 
Agreed, but listening to XM today it appears the players want 5 year FA, $100 million more in revenue and arbitration after year 2. Pretty significant asks for the small market teams.

And? The small market teams pocket money from the richer teams and don't put it back into their teams. It needs to be fixed. I'm looking at Pitt first and foremost for this. Their payrolls are ridiculous and as soon as someone makes more than a few million they trade them off. They'll never be competitive.

The players get screwed big time hardly making money before they hit 30.
 
Why do you say that? This is a meaningless deadline.

I would advise everyone to calm down until February 1. If no agreement by then, then be concerned. If no agreement by March 1, then be worried.
I don't think it is. The owners and union haven't been able to agree on anything lately. I think this one is gonna be bad.
 
I find it hard to sympathize with the players when I see the deals that get thrown around. Especially when I contrast it to the NFL.

You might side with the players if you realized that the owners make massive profits annually. Massive.
 
And? The small market teams pocket money from the richer teams and don't put it back into their teams. It needs to be fixed. I'm looking at Pitt first and foremost for this. Their payrolls are ridiculous and as soon as someone makes more than a few million they trade them off. They'll never be competitive.

The players get screwed big time hardly making money before they hit 30.
Small market teams like KC, Miami, Tampa and Milwaukee will no longer be competitive. KC won the WS in 15. Miami was in the playoffs in 2020 and Tampa and Milwaukee were in this year. Force them to into arb after two years and only allow them 5 years with a player almost guarantees they will become farm systems for the major markets. In the long run of the small markets cannot compete you will destroy the game.
 
They did not have massive losses. They only had a massive reduction in their profits, which, of course, is not at all the same thing.
According to Mike Ozanian from Forbes (he comes up with teams values every year) and disputed $3.5 billion loss. But it still was a $Billion
"The numbers based on the reporting I have done leading up to Forbesannual baseball valuations in April 2021 show baseball’s total revenue dropped about $6.5 billion in 2020, to just under $4 billion. Meanwhile, operating income (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) for the league’s 30 teams was a negative $1 billion versus a positive $1.5 billion the prior year."
 
2020 was a single year. But let’s take the Pirates and their $39 mil payroll. You don’t think they made somewhere between 10-15 x that in other years?
 
They also had massive loses last year. players got paid.
That was the one in year in the last 25 that they might not have turned a profit. In anything close to a normal year the owners make tons of money. Just think of this, the Marlins sold for $1.2 billion a few years ago. They play in front of 12 people per game. They still make money.
 
That was the one in year in the last 25 that they might not have turned a profit. In anything close to a normal year the owners make tons of money. Just think of this, the Marlins sold for $1.2 billion a few years ago. They play in front of 12 people per game. They still make money.
Have you seen all the contracts signed this week? The players make money and take zero risk. No different then any other business.
 
Have you seen all the contracts signed this week? The players make money and take zero risk. No different then any other business.
Zero is is a strange way to put it. They have a talent that produces money for the owners. Yes, they are paid great but the owners only make their money because of the players.
yes, owners do deserve to make their money but you can’t say it is zero risk for players- they took the risk when they first started their careers.
 
Have you seen all the contracts signed this week? The players make money and take zero risk. No different then any other business.
Zero risk ? You wanna stand in there vs. an Aroldis Chapman fastball ?
Meanwhile, check out the estimated value of the Yankee fanchise when you were a kid and compare it to what the club is valued at today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Worm
Zero risk ? You wanna stand in there vs. an Aroldis Chapman fastball ?
Meanwhile, check out the estimated value of the Yankee fanchise when you were a kid and compare it to what the club is valued at today.
Could have made more money investing in IBM in 1966 then investing the NY Yankees
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT