Originally posted by bac2therac:
Originally posted by RU848789:
Originally posted by bac2therac:
RU #s...curious to hear why after talking with Dave Curran you say he doesn't get it
I was excited to talk meteorology with a met from TV, with a met degree, so I asked him a few questions about snow microphysics (snow crystal nucleation via supersaturation in the dendritic growth zone, followed by, largely vapor phase deposition-driven growth on those ice nuclei to form snowflakes), which is an area I know a lot about, since the physical-chemical processes are very similar to processes I've worked with in organic synthesis with organic molecule crystallization. He basically said he wasn't real knowledgable about that topic (way less than I was) and was more of a "forecaster" who knows models and basic science. He also was less familiar with building dynamic 3-D fluid dynamics (weather is an example) than I was. I would've expected a degreed meterologist to know more about these things. Doesn't mean he might not be a good forecaster, but other mets I've spoken to kind of cringe at the guys who don't know the underlying science real well.
but he made it to tv and its not like he is the most attractive man so he didn't get the job on his looks so he has to have made himself proficient in forecasting. Doesn't seem like he is a snow weenie, what I find on americanwx is some people are looking for ways for it to snow and get the most snow...rather than being objective. Yes its a snow lovers but I always like posters like Gaines and Martin on the Philly board because they cover all bases on what can go right and wrong.
meanwhile I love me some Amy Freeze...does she have a a degree or not?
He's not a fan of snow (I asked). I love the objective guys, too (the NWS guys and other pros, like Gaines, Rainshadow, famartin, jconsor, jbenedet, ORH, from the New England forum, usedtobe and more are the best and non-pros like donaldsutherland and doorman are great too) and am not a fan of the over the top weenies or the snow-mopes, who downplay everything...you know that's you - and you're likely close to being 5-posted, since they do tolerate the snow weenies more than the curmudgeons, which is probably unfair, but like any board, they're in business and the snow curmudgeons really piss the weenies off.
Anyway, not a fan of Amy at all, either for looks (butterface) or skills, as she's not a degreed met; she has one of those AMS "seals" which I'm sure I could get in a heartbeat (it's a 100 question test) and I shouldn't be forecasting on TV, either. Like Sam Champion, Lonnie Quinn and Al Roker, none of whom have met degrees (and it shows. Oddly enough, Janice Huff, who I also think is terrible, has a met degree from FSU. My faves are Lee Goldberg, Jeff Smith, Joe Cioffi, Craig Allen, and Nick Gregory. TWC also has some very good pros in Postell, Parker, and Cantore, who may be a ham, but he's a damn good met.