Good night Doreen?Doreen must be ready to set the deli on fire again
I could do without all of it. The wings on the RJ were icing up last night on final into EWR. Hard pass.
That would've scared the crap out of me, given the history of planes icing up and crashes. I'm guessing you flew through a sub-32F layer aloft and it was raining from above that? Don't they circulate hot fluid to the wings to address that?
Icing generally happens in temps just above freezing, with high dew points.
If the temperatures are below freezing than the moisture in the atmosphere is already frozen / crystallized. No ice. At temps just above freezing, ice accumulates on the wings because of the relationship between Bernoulli and ideal gases.
Yes, that's something of a quiz. I await your solution. :)
Commercial jets pump engine bleed air (hot) through the wings. Turboprops have deicing boots which utilize pneumatic pulses to break up accumulated ice. It's not as effective, which is why a Q400 will be cancelled in bad weather before a jet.
We will get an inch or so Sunday night an inch or two on Tuesday followed by a bunch of rain which will wash it all away. Hence #'s gets his snow and I see it go away .Everyone is happy.
It actually looks like that Hispanic weather babe. @bac2therac - is that her?That’s Vanessa from the deli. She brought out the summer gear when the temperature heated up. I think she was ordering tongue from the deli guy.
It actually looks like that Hispanic weather babe. @bac2therac - is that her?
So much for the model consensus we had yesterday afternoon, lol - never thought it would last, but we have serious model mayhem right now. Models showing everything from 1-2" of snow/sleet, then mostly rain (GFS), to 6"+ of mostly snow (UK still) and a few in-between at 2-4/3-6" (Euro/CMC) or so. As usual my comments are generally for Philly to NYC near 95; in a setup like this, more snow/sleet is likely NW of 95 and less towards the coast.
I will say this: many pros are pessimistic on this storm bringing more than a few inches of snow, since the primary low is going to our west and the coastal looks weak - normally that means some snow then mostly rain. But given model variability and generally poor forecasting from the NWS and many pros this winter, I'll reserve judgment for a couple more days, i.e., I have no frickin' clue what's going to happen on this one yet.
Will update with the model outputs later. Way too busy at work. Bottom line is we're probably going to need another day or two to know what's likely to happen here. Many solutions still on the table. One comment: starting to see more model support for ~1" of snow Sunday night/Monday morning (and maybe 2" or so south of 276/195), which could be slightly to moderately impactful with temps <32F through the morning rush hour on Monday.
12ZGFS
12Z CMC
12Z UK
12Z Euro
And below is a really interesting comparison between how model output services can differ widely when sharing what should be identical information. In the parent post is the 12Z GFS-FV3 from Tropical Tidbits, which reports about 8-10" of snow for the Philly-NYC corridor, but it includes sleet and counts it the same way it reports snow, i.e., as 10" of either per 1" of liquid, which is flawed, as sleet is usually about 3" of sleet per 1" of liquid (but has the same frozen mass as the snow, just not the same depth). The map shows 8-10" of snow, which is really about ~2" of snow + 2" of sleet (equiv to about 7" of snow).
Second is the 12Z GFS-FV3 from Pivotal Weather, which only shows pure snow at 10" snow per 1" of liquid, but excludes sleet entirely. This is also highly flawed, as the map makes it look like a minor ~2" snowfall, when in reality, we're really talking about ~2" of snow + about 2" of sleet (equivalent to ~7" of regular snow), as per above. I think the TT maps are better, as they at least are truly showing the total mass of frozen precip, which is about 8-10" worth of snow (or 0.8-1.0" of liquid equivalent). At least for shoveling, plowing and driving (apart from visibility), mass is the far more important number, not depth. As if predicting "snowfall" isn't hard enough, lol.
12Z GFS-FV3
You’re up late kiddo.The 0Z models mostly held serve, being close to where they were at 12Z earlier today. Looking like snow to sleet to rain, but how much of each is the question. Right now, apart from the GFS (which only shows ~2" of snow, followed by a lot of rain), for Philly to NYC, every model is showing at least 3-4" of snow then 1-2" of sleet (for close to 1" of liquid equivalent in frozen form) or 4-8" of snow then not much sleet, followed, in all cases by 1/2" to 1" of plain rain.
We have not had modest model consensus like this 3-4 days out for any of the other storms that "missed" us this year (they generally had 1 or 2 models showing decent snow, but 2-3 others showing much less; we had pretty good consensus for 11/15 by about 3 days out). Of course, that may all go into the crapper in future model runs, but it's starting to look likely that we'll get a decent thump of snow/sleet on the front end of the storm, followed by a fair amount of rain. Having said that solutions from an inch or so of snow then all rain to several inches of snow/sleet, then a fair amount of rain to 6-10" of snow and some rain are all still on the table.
In addition, given the very fine line on column temperature between the precip types and that we're still 3+ days before the event, when model uncertainty is still pretty high, my thinking is we won't have a good handle on this until Sunday. Even then there could be last minute surprises, since a 2-hour delay in a changeover to rain could mean 2-3" more snow or vice-versa, since it's going to be a potent system with ~2" of total precip (liquid equivalent) in about 24 hours from very early Tuesday through very early Wednesday morning.
The model outputs are below. Note that the GFS and GFS-FV3 maps show snow and sleet (as 10:1 ratio snow, where sleet is much more dense at 3:1 ratio of sleet to liquid), whereas the CMC only shows snow, excluding sleet. I looked at the soundings (column temperature profile) for the CMC and the map should really be showing the 3-4" of snow it has, plus about 2" of sleet (equiv to about 7" more snow). The Euro and UK just show snow and I don't have soundings (profiles of the column temperature over time) to estimate how much sleet falls for those two models.
Also, keep in mind that we still might see 1/2" to 1" of snow before dawn on Monday - could impact the morning rush with temps below 32F.
0Z GFS
0Z CMC
0Z UK
0Z Euro
In case anyone wonders what a column profile "sounding" on a model looks like, see the graphic below for the CMC from 7 pm Tuesday, after about 1" of precip has fallen in the form of 3-4" of snow and then about 2" of sleet (equiv to 6-7" of snow, by mass) falls. The reason I say 3-4" of snow is because that's what the CMC model shows for pure snowfall.
The reason I say 2" of sleet is that after the snow is done, about 0.7" more precip falls with the sounding as cool or cooler than the one in the graphic, which has the snow melting at 700 mbar (9000' feet up, where the red column temperature line on the left side graphic crosses the slanted blue 0C freezing line and goes over 32F), due to temps in the mid-30s from about 9000 feet up to about 2500 feet up in the column, but then the melted snow falls through the final 2500 feet down to the surface (the red column temp line crosses back below 32F at about 900 mbar or 2500 feet up) at <32F, refreezing the liquid into sleet pellets which will accumulate at the 32-33F surface temp.
The surface temp and sub-32F layer just above it then quickly all go above 32F not long after 7 pm, meaning about 1" of plain rain falls from then on. The surface temp gets up to about 40F or so by early Weds and then slowly falls to below 32F by Wednesday evening, so no flash freeze of the slush resulting from rain being mostly absorbed into the snow/sleet pack is predicted. Remember, this is what the CMC model is saying and is not a forecast.
Again these clown maps are useless because of the strong possiblity of sleet and uncertainty of what falls where.
Yep. I don't sleep much when there's a potential winter storm, lol.You’re up late kiddo.
Yep. I don't sleep much when there's a potential winter storm, lol.
I was surprised to read the snowiest place on earth is in Japan.Yep. I don't sleep much when there's a potential winter storm, lol.
Again these clown maps are useless because of the strong possiblity of sleet and uncertainty of what falls where.
I've driven 50+ miles to see the snow/rain line a few times - one time, late at night, I got as far as Newton on 206 in Sussex County (the snow-rain line was around Dover) and they had nearly a foot of snow and it was pouring snow, so I stopped, filled my hatch up with snow, kept the heat off in the car, drove home to Edison, where it was all rain and built my then girlfriend a snowman that she woke up to. I did ok that morning, lol. Next winter I'm going to go somewhere in the snow belt for a major lake effect snowstorm and yeah, that area of northern Japan would be nice to visit.I was surprised to read the snowiest place on earth is in Japan.
Aomori... you should visit given your love of snow:D
Good thing you don't live in Syracuse
remember those maps include any snow from Monday system as well which at my last glance was looking like it was staying more to a south of Trenton event
I love that story!I've driven 50+ miles to see the snow/rain line a few times - one time, late at night, I got as far as Newton on 206 in Sussex County (the snow-rain line was around Dover) and they had nearly a foot of snow and it was pouring snow, so I stopped, filled my hatch up with snow, kept the heat off in the car, drove home to Edison, where it was all rain and built my then girlfriend a snowman that she woke up to. I did ok that morning, lol. Next winter I'm going to go somewhere in the snow belt for a major lake effect snowstorm and yeah, that area of northern Japan would be nice to visit.
sleet is the absolute worst....it doesnt move or melt
Sleet makes you fall on your ass with two pizzas in your arm after leaving Star, that end up on the sidewalk.Thanks. I find this stuff interesting.
Her dad is actually Tito Puenteyou mean Audrey Puente lol
I love that story!
I think if I was in a beautiful inn with a fire place, no obligations and endless supplies.
I would take it all in, go outside and play in 30 feet of snow, and have a ball
Sleet makes you fall on your ass with two pizzas in your arm after leaving Star, that end up on the sidewalk.
Or in your case two Jimmy Buff Dogs all the way.
Her dad is actually Tito Puente
Reminds me of when we had a house up at Mt. Snow: we'd sit in the jacuzzi soaking up beer until we were overheating,then go run outside and roll in the falling snow. In our swimsuits.I love that story!
I think if I was in a beautiful inn with a fire place, no obligations and endless supplies.
I would take it all in, go outside and play in 30 feet of snow, and have a ball
Reminds me of when we had a house up at Mt. Snow: we'd sit in the jacuzzi soaking up beer until we were overheating,then go run outside and roll in the falling snow. In our swimsuits.
The 0Z models mostly held serve, being close to where they were at 12Z earlier today. Looking like snow to sleet to rain, but how much of each is the question. Right now, apart from the GFS (which only shows ~2" of snow, followed by a lot of rain), for Philly to NYC, every model is showing at least 3-4" of snow then 1-2" of sleet (for close to 1" of liquid equivalent in frozen form) or 4-8" of snow then not much sleet, followed, in all cases by 1/2" to 1" of plain rain.
We have not had modest model consensus like this 3-4 days out for any of the other storms that "missed" us this year (they generally had 1 or 2 models showing decent snow, but 2-3 others showing much less; we had pretty good consensus for 11/15 by about 3 days out). Of course, that may all go into the crapper in future model runs, but it's starting to look likely that we'll get a decent thump of snow/sleet on the front end of the storm, followed by a fair amount of rain. Having said that solutions from an inch or so of snow then all rain to several inches of snow/sleet, then a fair amount of rain to 6-10" of snow and some rain are all still on the table.
In addition, given the very fine line on column temperature between the precip types and that we're still 3+ days before the event, when model uncertainty is still pretty high, my thinking is we won't have a good handle on this until Sunday. Even then there could be last minute surprises, since a 2-hour delay in a changeover to rain could mean 2-3" more snow or vice-versa, since it's going to be a potent system with ~2" of total precip (liquid equivalent) in about 24 hours from very early Tuesday through very early Wednesday morning.
The model outputs are below. Note that the GFS and GFS-FV3 maps show snow and sleet (as 10:1 ratio snow, where sleet is much more dense at 3:1 ratio of sleet to liquid), whereas the CMC only shows snow, excluding sleet. I looked at the soundings (column temperature profile) for the CMC and the map should really be showing the 3-4" of snow it has, plus about 2" of sleet (equiv to about 7" more snow). The Euro and UK just show snow and I don't have soundings (profiles of the column temperature over time) to estimate how much sleet falls for those two models.
Also, keep in mind that we still might see 1/2" to 1" of snow before dawn on Monday - could impact the morning rush with temps below 32F.
0Z GFS
0Z CMC
0Z UK
0Z Euro
In case anyone wonders what a column profile "sounding" on a model looks like, see the graphic below for the CMC from 7 pm Tuesday, after about 1" of precip has fallen in the form of 3-4" of snow and then about 2" of sleet (equiv to 6-7" of snow, by mass) falls. The reason I say 3-4" of snow is because that's what the CMC model shows for pure snowfall.
The reason I say 2" of sleet is that after the snow is done, about 0.7" more precip falls with the sounding as cool or cooler than the one in the graphic, which has the snow melting at 700 mbar (9000' feet up, where the red column temperature line on the left side graphic crosses the slanted blue 0C freezing line and goes over 32F), due to temps in the mid-30s from about 9000 feet up to about 2500 feet up in the column, but then the melted snow falls through the final 2500 feet down to the surface (the red column temp line crosses back below 32F at about 900 mbar or 2500 feet up) at <32F, refreezing the liquid into sleet pellets which will accumulate at the 32-33F surface temp.
The surface temp and sub-32F layer just above it then quickly all go above 32F not long after 7 pm, meaning about 1" of plain rain falls from then on. The surface temp gets up to about 40F or so by early Weds and then slowly falls to below 32F by Wednesday evening, so no flash freeze of the slush resulting from rain being mostly absorbed into the snow/sleet pack is predicted. Remember, this is what the CMC model is saying and is not a forecast.