ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Winter Storm Thursday 2/20: Very Likely Somewhere Between A Non-Event and a Minor Event (oof)

RU848789

Legend
Gold Member
Jul 27, 2001
63,661
42,594
113
Metuchen, NJ
Well, we're 4+ days out from the start of the likely storm late Wednesday evening and we're seeing some shifting around in the models, as usual, but the signal for at least a significant (4-8" is my definition of "significant") to major storm (8-14" is my definition of major) has increased, while the signal for an historic storm (14-24" is my definition of historic; we've had 24 such storms in 155 years in NYC, for example and similar numbers for NB) has decreased a bit, i.e., we might be looking at a higher floor, but a lower ceiling. Note I'm using the Kuchera snowfall estimates as this is likely going to be a pretty cold storm with temps in the 20s, so >10:1 ratios are very likely.

This is because the two outliers showing just a coastal scraper (significant snow only for SENJ really with minor to moderate snow for 95 and NW), the GFS and the Euro-AIFS (AI model), came NW significantly and now show a significant storm (AIFS) to a major storm (GFS) for just about the whole Philly-NJ-NYC region. On the other hand, the Euro which has been showing historic snowstorms for the region for a few days has backed off significantly showing only 3-6" for 95 and NW and 6-10" towards the coast; no idea if that's a blip or not. On the other other hand, the CMC continues to show a major snowstorm, while the UK is showing an historic snowstorm, as is the ICON. The fact that all of the models are at least showing a significant storm and most are showing at least a major storm with a couple of those showing historic storms tells me that the floor has been raised, but the ceiling has come down some. Also, the ensemble means continue to indicate at least a significant snowstorm.

None of this means that there can't still be major changes, since we're still 4+ days out, but the chances of a complete out to sea miss or a snow to mostly rain cutter are both very low now, whereas there is still a decent chance of a coastal scraper (minor snow for 95 and significant snow only towards the coast) or an inland runner that puts down 6"+ for most, but then turns the precip to mostly sleet/rain for 95 and SE of 95, while hammering areas well to the NW of 95 with a major snowstorm.

I'm not going to microanalyze the global models other than to say numerical weather prediction is still chaotic, meaning uncertainties 4 days out are still moderately high and the difference between a coastal scraper and inland runner is only about 100-150 miles in the track forecast, which isn't bad, actually since the "storm" won't even be on the map for 3 days (the pieces that form it are all pretty far away still and have to come together just right for a major snowstorm. Also keep in mind that if we get a major to historic (still on the table) snowstorm, which becomes quite powerful, blizzard conditions or close to it would be possible with gusty winds, plus minor coastal flooding could be an issue for a powerful coastal storm (this looks like a "Miller A" that skirts across the Gulf states then heads NE up the east coast). All of the relevant maps and deeper discussion are in the AmericanWx thread below and I included a link to Tomer Burg's nice explanation of the meteorology and some potential outcomes.

https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic...time-between-18z-wed-219-12z-fri-221/page/16/



2/16: Changed thread title from "OT: Significant to Major Snowstorm Possible for Thursday 2/20" to current thread title
2/17: Changed thread title from "Winter Storm Thursday 2/20: Could range from a miss (most likely) to a minor event (possible) to a moderate event (unlikely)" to current thread title
 
Last edited:
At this point the most you can glean from anything is that there is a storm signal without even looking at precip type. Need to wait until key atmospheric players are sampled on the continent before the forecast can be refined.
 
Just heard from Tyler down in VA: they're fear-casting down there. I told him to wait until Monday until being able to put any credence in these forecasts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FastMJ
Well 5 days before ain't it...
I posted this thread a little over 4 days before the start of the event. Have posted threads on most previous big storms about 5 days before. The point with potential big storms is people like to have a heads up in case they have travel or other concerns, so they con consider changing plans, even without knowing for sure if the big storm will be the outcome. It's a heads up outlining the range of possibilities, not a forecast.
 
At this point the most you can glean from anything is that there is a storm signal without even looking at precip type. Need to wait until key atmospheric players are sampled on the continent before the forecast can be refined.
Every player should be on shore by Monday, but there's talk of a recon flight by NOAA before that to try to get some better initial conditions for the models. You'd probably appreciate the post made by one of my favorite mets, where he does an excellent job of explaining (and illustrating with graphics) why the pattern has so much potential, given how the pattern is associated strongly with most 18"+ NYC snowstorms, but he also cautions folks that we're not there yet, of course, noting that if the projected setup we've seen in many models is actually in place come Monday, then we should start to have high confidence in a good snowstorm. Until then we should just recognize that there's a lot of potential there, but it's way too early to make a forecast.

https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic...9-12z-fri-221/?do=findComment&comment=7646958
 
Potential = irresponsible at this point. You know better but you’re a snow lover…
You can't be serious. Way more info is out there all over social media. I'm not making forecasts and I'm not posting and hyping all the crazy snowfall maps - that would be irresponsible - but discussing the current state of the modeling and potential outcomes doesn't seem irresponsible to me at all.
 
WHgNIW2.jpeg
 
Well, we're 4+ days out from the start of the likely storm late Wednesday evening and we're seeing some shifting around in the models, as usual, but the signal for at least a significant (4-8" is my definition of "significant") to major storm (8-14" is my definition of major) has increased, while the signal for an historic storm (14-24" is my definition of historic; we've had 24 such storms in 155 years in NYC, for example and similar numbers for NB) has decreased a bit, i.e., we might be looking at a higher floor, but a lower ceiling. Note I'm using the Kuchera snowfall estimates as this is likely going to be a pretty cold storm with temps in the 20s, so >10:1 ratios are very likely.

This is because the two outliers showing just a coastal scraper (significant snow only for SENJ really with minor to moderate snow for 95 and NW), the GFS and the Euro-AIFS (AI model), came NW significantly and now show a significant storm (AIFS) to a major storm (GFS) for just about the whole Philly-NJ-NYC region. On the other hand, the Euro which has been showing historic snowstorms for the region for a few days has backed off significantly showing only 3-6" for 95 and NW and 6-10" towards the coast; no idea if that's a blip or not. On the other other hand, the CMC continues to show a major snowstorm, while the UK is showing an historic snowstorm, as is the ICON. The fact that all of the models are at least showing a significant storm and most are showing at least a major storm with a couple of those showing historic storms tells me that the floor has been raised, but the ceiling has come down some. Also, the ensemble means continue to indicate at least a significant snowstorm.

None of this means that there can't still be major changes, since we're still 4+ days out, but the chances of a complete out to sea miss or a snow to mostly rain cutter are both very low now, whereas there is still a decent chance of a coastal scraper (minor snow for 95 and significant snow only towards the coast) or an inland runner that puts down 6"+ for most, but then turns the precip to mostly sleet/rain for 95 and SE of 95, while hammering areas well to the NW of 95 with a major snowstorm.

I'm not going to microanalyze the global models other than to say numerical weather prediction is still chaotic, meaning uncertainties 4 days out are still moderately high and the difference between a coastal scraper and inland runner is only about 100-150 miles in the track forecast, which isn't bad, actually since the "storm" won't even be on the map for 3 days (the pieces that form it are all pretty far away still and have to come together just right for a major snowstorm. Also keep in mind that if we get a major to historic (still on the table) snowstorm, which becomes quite powerful, blizzard conditions or close to it would be possible with gusty winds, plus minor coastal flooding could be an issue for a powerful coastal storm (this looks like a "Miller A" that skirts across the Gulf states then heads NE up the east coast). All of the relevant maps and deeper discussion are in the AmericanWx thread below and I included a link to Tomer Burg's nice explanation of the meteorology and some potential outcomes.

https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic...time-between-18z-wed-219-12z-fri-221/page/16/

Well, that went downhill fast. In 12 hours we went from every model showing a significant to major (or more) storm at 12Z to all but one of them showing nothing more than a coastal scraper (several inches towards the coast with little to no snow along/NW of 95). Not sure what's more unprecedented, most of the models showing a major to historic storm over the last 48 hours (which is extremely rare 4.5-6 days out) or that near consensus going into the shitter 4 days before the event for almost every model.

I'm dumbfounded and all of the mets/experts on the weather boards are even more dumbfounded. But, the saving grace for snow lovers could be that, oddly enough, the Euro, which was the least snowy model at 12Z (3-6" N of 78/6-12" S of 78) is now the most snowy model at 0Z with a general 6-12" for the region (except 4-6" N of 80). And the Euro ensemble mean (the best tool 4 days out, according to many pros) is still quite snowy. Details on the rest, below.
  • The GFS went from a major snowstorm for all at 12Z to <1" near 95 and a few inches near the coast.
  • The CMC went from a major snowstorm at 12Z to showing almost a complete miss at 0Z with just minor snowfall near the coast
  • The UK went from an historic snowstorm at 12Z to showing almost a complete miss at 0Z with just minor snowfall near the coast
  • The ICON went from an historic snowstorm at 12Z to showing a minor snow along 95 and significant snow near the coast at 0Z.
  • If a much less snowy outcome isn't a blip and is somewhat close to where we end up, it would prove to be perhaps the biggest modeling coup ever - for the Euro AIFS, which for days has been showing a coastal scraper or complete miss (apart from 12Z today, where it did show 3-5/4-8" snow for most) and has never shown a major storm unlike every other model (multiple runs).
However, we're still 4 days out and just like the last 2 days of very snowy model runs, for the most part, weren't a guarantee of a snowy outcome (although they were certainly a strong signal for that), tonight's model implosion is also no guarantee that we'll only see somewhere between a minor/moderate event to a complete miss, meaning significant to major snowfall is still possible, even if now less likely. The players won't all be over North America until Monday (meaning better data inputs) and the setup, while usually good for snow in our area, hasn't gone away and it would only take some fairly minor tweaks upstream (especially a more meridional PNA ridge out west) or in the 24 hours before the event when the northern upper low and the southern surface low potentially can "phase" together to form a major storm that comes up the coast (phasing is often very finicky and obviously complex). So we track some more, although I'm tempted to not look at any models tomorrow and see where we are on Monday, lol.
 
And I'm flying out of Newark to go on vacation late Wednesday night. Changed from mid day Thursday
A couple years ago we did the same. Moved our flight up a day early due to a potential snowstorm and it was a blessing. Got out just in time and next day all the flights were a mess. Flying out Saturday from Philly so hopefully whatever we get is cleared up by then
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU848789
And I'm flying out of Newark to go on vacation late Wednesday night. Changed from mid day Thursday
Smart move if it isn't a major inconvenience for you to change, even with the storm looking a lot less imposing last night, especially since the 6Z models this morning look a bit snowier.
 
A couple years ago we did the same. Moved our flight up a day early due to a potential snowstorm and it was a blessing. Got out just in time and next day all the flights were a mess. Flying out Saturday from Philly so hopefully whatever we get is cleared up by then

Smart move if it isn't a major inconvenience for you to change, even with the storm looking a lot less imposing last night, especially since the 6Z models this morning look a bit snowier.

Flying down to New Orleans for a friend's 40th. We were supposed to fly 12:30 Thursday but with all this nonsense we switched to 9:30 Wednesday night. Cost me $45 total for two of us and we upgraded to first class
 
I'm not making forecasts and I'm not posting and hyping all the crazy snowfall maps - that would be irresponsible.
1. Yes you're making forecasts. You made one Friday night Saturday AM that you would get 1.4 in vs the NWS 1.1inch

2. You have a map on your very first post!

3. Why are you dumfounded at all? This happens all the time!

4. Dan Zarrow is no longer a reliable forecaster.

Other than a brief mention of "possible" snow Thursday there has never been a mention of "significant" snow on the Philadelphia stations about Thursday.
I know you love snow. We all know!!!! You need patience. This initial hype was too good to be true!
 
Well, that went downhill fast. In 12 hours we went from every model showing a significant to major (or more) storm at 12Z to all but one of them showing nothing more than a coastal scraper (several inches towards the coast with little to no snow along/NW of 95). Not sure what's more unprecedented, most of the models showing a major to historic storm over the last 48 hours (which is extremely rare 4.5-6 days out) or that near consensus going into the shitter 4 days before the event for almost every model.

I'm dumbfounded and all of the mets/experts on the weather boards are even more dumbfounded. But, the saving grace for snow lovers could be that, oddly enough, the Euro, which was the least snowy model at 12Z (3-6" N of 78/6-12" S of 78) is now the most snowy model at 0Z with a general 6-12" for the region (except 4-6" N of 80). And the Euro ensemble mean (the best tool 4 days out, according to many pros) is still quite snowy. Details on the rest, below.
  • The GFS went from a major snowstorm for all at 12Z to <1" near 95 and a few inches near the coast.
  • The CMC went from a major snowstorm at 12Z to showing almost a complete miss at 0Z with just minor snowfall near the coast
  • The UK went from an historic snowstorm at 12Z to showing almost a complete miss at 0Z with just minor snowfall near the coast
  • The ICON went from an historic snowstorm at 12Z to showing a minor snow along 95 and significant snow near the coast at 0Z.
  • If a much less snowy outcome isn't a blip and is somewhat close to where we end up, it would prove to be perhaps the biggest modeling coup ever - for the Euro AIFS, which for days has been showing a coastal scraper or complete miss (apart from 12Z today, where it did show 3-5/4-8" snow for most) and has never shown a major storm unlike every other model (multiple runs).
However, we're still 4 days out and just like the last 2 days of very snowy model runs, for the most part, weren't a guarantee of a snowy outcome (although they were certainly a strong signal for that), tonight's model implosion is also no guarantee that we'll only see somewhere between a minor/moderate event to a complete miss, meaning significant to major snowfall is still possible, even if now less likely. The players won't all be over North America until Monday (meaning better data inputs) and the setup, while usually good for snow in our area, hasn't gone away and it would only take some fairly minor tweaks upstream (especially a more meridional PNA ridge out west) or in the 24 hours before the event when the northern upper low and the southern surface low potentially can "phase" together to form a major storm that comes up the coast (phasing is often very finicky and obviously complex). So we track some more, although I'm tempted to not look at any models tomorrow and see where we are on Monday, lol.

Only 3 of the global models run far enough out at 6Z to encompass Thursday's storm, but overall those 3 are snowier than last night's 0Z runs. The Euro is about the same as last night, i.e., 7-9" along 95 from Wilmington to NYC (less NW of there and more SE), while the GFS is somewhat snowier (2-3" along 95 at 6Z vs. <1" at 0Z) and the 6Z ICON is significantly snowier, looking much like the 6Z Euro with 7-9" along 95 (vs. 3-4" along 95 at 0Z).

Also, it should be noted that the Euro-AIFS model shifted the snow shield a fair amount NW at 0Z last night (didn't have that data when I posted) and it now shows about 6" along 95 (less NW/more SE) vs. about 3" along 95 at 18Z; and the 6Z AIFS just came in even a little snowier than 0Z with maybe 7-8" along 95. This is important as the AIFS has consistently been showing little to no snow for days along 95.

Bottom line is things look to have shifted a bit snowier at 6Z this morning, but it's still way too early for a forecast, given how exquisitely fragile this setup is and how wildly precip amounts are fluctuating from run to run.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GeoRingoes
1. Yes you're making forecasts. You made one Friday night Saturday AM that you would get 1.4 in vs the NWS 1.1inch

2. You have a map on your very first post!

3. Why are you dumfounded at all? This happens all the time!

4. Dan Zarrow is no longer a reliable forecaster.

Other than a brief mention of "possible" snow Thursday there has never been a mention of "significant" snow on the Philadelphia stations about Thursday.
I know you love snow. We all know!!!! You need patience. This initial hype was too good to be true!
C'mon, those are just fun guesses for my house (and it was 1.4" vs. the NWS 2" forecast). And those maps are NWS forecasts not mine, although I do select those to share usually, but along with others often. What happened last night with the models does not "happen all the time" - grizzled veteran mets were saying they hadn't seen anything like it.

And I can't comment on what the Philly folks have said, but the NYC mets have all mentioned the possibility of significant snow for Thursday. Also, the NWS this morning is fairly bullish on at least a few to several inches for most especially along/SE of 95.

Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service Mount Holly NJ
638 AM EST Sun Feb 16 2025

.LONG TERM /WEDNESDAY THROUGH SATURDAY/...
Guidance has come into pretty good agreement of the track of
the low. A large cluster of guidance depicts the center of the
surface low progressing off the coast in northern FL, then
staying close to the coast up through the Outer Banks, before
tracking northeastward, further away from the coast. There is
not only good agreement between models, but this is also close
to the consensus track from the Saturday morning model run.
However, where there remains uncertainty is some models depict
this as a slow moving system that is thus able to advect
moisture much further inland and thus has a larger footprint of
precip to the left of the low, bringing snow to our area from
wEdnesday night through Thursday evening. Other guidance shows a
fast moving system, affecting our region from the later half of
the day on Wednesday through Thursday morning.

The probabilities from the National Blend of Models (NBM)
haven`t changed much from the previous shift: a 20 to 40 percent
probability for more than 4 inches of snow north and west of
the I-95 corridor and a 40 to 70 percent probability for more
than 4 inches of snow across the I-95 corridor and coastal
plains in the 48 hour period from 7 am Wednesday through 7 am
Friday; a 20 to 30 percent probability for more than 8 inches of
snow north and west of the I- 95 corridor and a 30 to 50
percent probability for more than 8 inches of snow across
southern New Jersey, the eastern shores of Maryland and Delaware
in the 48 hour period from 7 am Wednesday through 7 am Friday;
and a 20 to 30 percent probability for more than 12 inches of
snow for the coastal plains.
 
You can't be serious. Way more info is out there all over social media. I'm not making forecasts and I'm not posting and hyping all the crazy snowfall maps - that would be irresponsible - but discussing the current state of the modeling and potential outcomes doesn't seem irresponsible to me at all.
No you are the one that appears crazy

Hive mentality on a weather message board is FULL of biases...7-10 day model runs and then as each day tick closer we get LESS agreement in the models, massive cutbacks in certain models were a good indicator YESTERDAY AFTERNOON the historical storm was off the table but you were still in denial about that and needed until last night model bloodbath to learn the hard lesson. Run to run snowfall clown maps are worthless beyond 4 days that you are living and dying with which ones are snowing seems borderline obsessive. You are rooting so hard for a 18-24 inch storm aren't you

We still may have a nice minor or even moderate snow event Thursday. Its still 4 days away and the models long and midrange and we have receipts on that
 
1. Yes you're making forecasts. You made one Friday night Saturday AM that you would get 1.4 in vs the NWS 1.1inch

2. You have a map on your very first post!

3. Why are you dumfounded at all? This happens all the time!

4. Dan Zarrow is no longer a reliable forecaster.

Other than a brief mention of "possible" snow Thursday there has never been a mention of "significant" snow on the Philadelphia stations about Thursday.
I know you love snow. We all know!!!! You need patience. This initial hype was too good to be true!
Nailed him....he thinks if he throws in every caveat in the book he could make any ridiculous declaration he wants

That's he acts so shocked and dumbfounded is so laughable. He does everything

Maps 7 days or 5 days is absurd but he can read Clown maps and they look pretty

Numbers was weenie tagged for a post Friday on Americanwx and someone even posted a weeniemobile in response to a post

The icon is a garbage model referenced by only weather weenies but he keeps referencing it

Ensembles have shown many misses on this storm. Remember when he used to be an ensemble guy

More respected weather posters some mets on americanwx were advising things they didn't like about the set up

TODAY We are just getting into the far ranges where we can get an idea with what happens on Thursday

HYPE begins with posts by Numbers here and other weenie boards. Don't know why he can't admit that
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUkhoury
Remember 48 hours before Wednight rain event we were getting 2-3 inches of snow

48 hours before yesterday barely less than inch grassy surface event we were getting 2-3 inches of snow

Are people paying attention yet
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT