More like Johnny CentimetersCompared to John Holmes, sure. I'll cop to that. But I suspect that's true for most.
Also, Holmes died young, of the hiv. So not all apparent blessings are, indeed, so.
More like Johnny CentimetersCompared to John Holmes, sure. I'll cop to that. But I suspect that's true for most.
Also, Holmes died young, of the hiv. So not all apparent blessings are, indeed, so.
Doesn’t a shed increase property taxes?
I've enjoyed reading the first 3 pages of this thread and look forward to the next 7. Trollers and non-trollers unite for my personal entertainment. Thank you.
That's the spiritI've enjoyed reading the first 3 pages of this thread and look forward to the next 7. Trollers and non-trollers unite for my personal entertainment. Thank you.
You truly don't understand simple math. We're talking about snow per unit time. For NB, the average is about 25.8" per season and 7.1" per the month of January (and varying amounts for other months), so if we're only talking about half of January, which is the premise here, then one would expect to get about 3.55" of snow over that half of January (and I proposed 5" being " significantly above normal for half of January"). So if a foot falls in the last half of January, that's the same amount per unit time as 2 feet over a whole month. It's pretty simple stuff. It doesn't matter whether it's one storm or three 4" storms - same amount either way.Lol one storm that gives a foot is one storm that gives a foot..its not 2 feet in a month...you dont even make sense. One storm can skew everything. It just means we hot hit with a big storm. Clock is ticking..tick tock tick tock
I've never compared a 2" storm to a blizzard - that would be stupid.I mean I get the OT posts. I fully understand our weather guys starting a thread about a big storm coming up. I even understand "maybe a big storm" - but treating 2 inch storms like they're a blizzard deserves some fun poked at it.
Are you seriously not considering the fact that you and T trolled the thread in posts 2 and 3 in this thread, immediately after the RU848789 bat signal went up amongst your little clique? The thread would be about 10 posts long if you guys didn't troll it, causing people to respond and so on. At least own it.The fact is this would be about 5 posts if Numbers minions didn't rush into defend his honor..like clockwork
You're missing the difference between a specific forecast for an event more than a week away, which is largely futile, given chaos theory and the accumulating uncertainty in numerical models as one goes further out in time, vs. a general trend forecast for temp and/or precip in a longer range time period (in this case roughly days 7-23 from the time the trend forecast was made. A trend forecast doesn't say anything at all about what is going to occur on any specific day, but uses teleconnection indices to predict the general trends for that period of time. They're completely different.That fact that #'s is so against forecast past a week but calling it a "trend" makes it work for him. Last year's trend thread didn't work out either.
Back to the weather. Pattern still looks cold and potentially wintry from now through the end of January with the initial focus on a potential winter storm on Sunday night into Monday, which is 5-6 days out. Models are definitely not in sync at all with a wide variety of solutions, including the GFS and Euro showing a major winter storm hugging the coast or just inland and bringing heavy snow to areas a bit inland of 95 and a bit of snow to mostly rain for the big cities.Haven't done a pattern thread in awhile, but things are aligning pretty well from a teleconnections perspective to establish a colder and possibly stormier than normal pattern for the 2nd half of January and whenever that kind of pattern forms, there is a greater probability of above average snowfall. Have done a bunch of these threads over the years and more often than not they have delivered on increased snowfall for our area (but definitely not every time). As always, I'm not a meteorologist, but when quite a few mets are predicting such a pattern, it's worth paying attention to.
With regard to what the thinking is behind this, there are links to a post by an excellent young met on AmericanWx (brooklynwx99) and a video by WxRisk (DT), below. Essentially, the medium range models are showing a robust ridge forming in the PacNW, coupled with an Aleution upper level low, forcing the polar jet stream up and over that ridge and then spilling SE as a trough drawing cold air from Canada (via Siberia) into the eastern half of the US and then sometimes heading NE driving potential storms towards our area. In the GIF below, from brooklynwx99, you can see the persistent ridge at 500 mbar (mid-level of the atmosphere) near Alaska (in orange) and the persistent resulting trough in the eastern US (in blue).
From a global perspective, the MJO (Madden-Julian Oscillation), a measure of equatorial convection from the Indian Ocean through the Pacific, is what is fueling this jet stream combination above, as the MJO enters phases 8 and then 1. In turn, the "teleconnections" that are favorable for cold/snow in the eastern US are a -NAO, a -AO, a -EPO and a +PNA, all of which are predicted to occur starting by mid-January and lasting through the end of the month (at least). The video, in particular, describes the MJO and the teleconnections in much better detail with excellent graphics, so I won't bother to try to provide more detail here, as I can't do it better than WxRisk did anyway.
In addition, there will likely be a "split flow" with the subropical jet stream being active in sending moisture from the Pacific across the southern US, leading to potential "phasing" of the two jet streams, which is often a key ingredient in major east coast snowstorms - the AmericanWx post describes this in very nice detail with graphics.
The first chance for a signficant storm is about a week from now, with the various global models all showing a winter storm of some sort next Sunday, but differing greatly in the details, such that anything from nada to a significant winter storm is possible. And there are additional signals after that for significant winter storms. Way, way, way too early to predict anything specific for any location, but this is the kind of pattern that needs to be watched closely. So, let's see what happens.
I know some will say, big deal, it usually snows in January, which is true, but this is about potentially getting more snow than usual and a greater probability of a significant snowstorm or two. All through December the pattern was warm and hostile for cold/snow in the eastern US, as we had a persistent ridge in the SE US pumping warm air into our area, so we got no snow at all. This pattern starting changing in early January a bit, but was still not particularly favorable for cold and/or snow and we got nothing until Friday for most of us, while the big storm for VA/DE/MD and SENJ on Monday just shows that it's always possible to get snow in a bad to neutral pattern in winter.
https://www.33andrain.com/topic/204...n-winter-21-22/?do=findComment&comment=299689
Social media lighting up about possible measurable / potentially big snowstorm Sunday night into Monday. Even TV Mets chatting about it with the “way too early” comments etc.Back to the weather. Pattern still looks cold and potentially wintry from now through the end of January with the initial focus on a potential winter storm on Sunday night into Monday, which is 5-6 days out. Models are definitely not in sync at all with a wide variety of solutions, including the GFS and Euro showing a major winter storm hugging the coast or just inland and bringing heavy snow to areas a bit inland of 95 and a bit of snow to mostly rain for the big cities.
However, the model uncertainty this far out is quite high, so the important thing we're seeing is the depiction of a potentially significant winter storm, such that snows for the 95 corridor are certainly still possible. In fact, the ensemble mean track is further offshore and snowier for the 95 corridor/coast and ensembles are often used by more pros at this point than any individual operational model. Still too early for a thread, IMO, but if we start to see some model alignment in the next day or so, a thread would make sense. Here's what the NWS-NYC had to say a few minutes ago...
Also, no matter what, we're going to have an astronomical high tide on Monday, so if we do get a strong coastal storm, coastal erosion and flooding could become an issue.
Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service New York NY
352 PM EST Tue Jan 11 2022
LONG TERM /THURSDAY THROUGH TUESDAY/...
Meanwhile, another shortwave moves onshore along the Pacific
Northwest on Thursday before digging south across the Central
US this weekend. In collaboration with neighbors, nudged PoPs
up a bit over NBM Sunday night and Monday as 12z guidance has
come into better agreement this cycle that a surface low
develops over the Southeast this weekend before moving north and
east. Global ensemble means track the low near the 40/70
benchmark early Monday, which would help keep the region cold
enough for all snow. However, with uncertainty as to the exact
strength and position of the low, the finer details will still
need to be resolved. Given a bit better consistency/convergence
with models and their respective ensembles systems, the
potential exists for a storm system to impact the region late
this weekend into early next week.
Back to the weather. Pattern still looks cold and potentially wintry from now through the end of January with the initial focus on a potential winter storm on Sunday night into Monday, which is 5-6 days out. Models are definitely not in sync at all with a wide variety of solutions, including the GFS and Euro showing a major winter storm hugging the coast or just inland and bringing heavy snow to areas a bit inland of 95 and a bit of snow to mostly rain for the big cities.
However, the model uncertainty this far out is quite high, so the important thing we're seeing is the depiction of a potentially significant winter storm, such that snows for the 95 corridor are certainly still possible. In fact, the ensemble mean track is further offshore and snowier for the 95 corridor/coast and ensembles are often used by more pros at this point than any individual operational model. Still too early for a thread, IMO, but if we start to see some model alignment in the next day or so, a thread would make sense. Here's what the NWS-NYC had to say a few minutes ago...
Also, no matter what, we're going to have an astronomical high tide on Monday, so if we do get a strong coastal storm, coastal erosion and flooding could become an issue.
Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service New York NY
352 PM EST Tue Jan 11 2022
LONG TERM /THURSDAY THROUGH TUESDAY/...
Meanwhile, another shortwave moves onshore along the Pacific
Northwest on Thursday before digging south across the Central
US this weekend. In collaboration with neighbors, nudged PoPs
up a bit over NBM Sunday night and Monday as 12z guidance has
come into better agreement this cycle that a surface low
develops over the Southeast this weekend before moving north and
east. Global ensemble means track the low near the 40/70
benchmark early Monday, which would help keep the region cold
enough for all snow. However, with uncertainty as to the exact
strength and position of the low, the finer details will still
need to be resolved. Given a bit better consistency/convergence
with models and their respective ensembles systems, the
potential exists for a storm system to impact the region late
this weekend into early next week.
#BrokeBackBAC&FriendsDude, why did you create that image? I think I just went blind.
Thank you #’s. Screw the trolls!Haven't done a pattern thread in awhile, but things are aligning pretty well from a teleconnections perspective to establish a colder and possibly stormier than normal pattern for the 2nd half of January and whenever that kind of pattern forms, there is a greater probability of above average snowfall. Have done a bunch of these threads over the years and more often than not they have delivered on increased snowfall for our area (but definitely not every time). As always, I'm not a meteorologist, but when quite a few mets are predicting such a pattern, it's worth paying attention to.
With regard to what the thinking is behind this, there are links to a post by an excellent young met on AmericanWx (brooklynwx99) and a video by WxRisk (DT), below. Essentially, the medium range models are showing a robust ridge forming in the PacNW, coupled with an Aleution upper level low, forcing the polar jet stream up and over that ridge and then spilling SE as a trough drawing cold air from Canada (via Siberia) into the eastern half of the US and then sometimes heading NE driving potential storms towards our area. In the GIF below, from brooklynwx99, you can see the persistent ridge at 500 mbar (mid-level of the atmosphere) near Alaska (in orange) and the persistent resulting trough in the eastern US (in blue).
From a global perspective, the MJO (Madden-Julian Oscillation), a measure of equatorial convection from the Indian Ocean through the Pacific, is what is fueling this jet stream combination above, as the MJO enters phases 8 and then 1. In turn, the "teleconnections" that are favorable for cold/snow in the eastern US are a -NAO, a -AO, a -EPO and a +PNA, all of which are predicted to occur starting by mid-January and lasting through the end of the month (at least). The video, in particular, describes the MJO and the teleconnections in much better detail with excellent graphics, so I won't bother to try to provide more detail here, as I can't do it better than WxRisk did anyway.
In addition, there will likely be a "split flow" with the subropical jet stream being active in sending moisture from the Pacific across the southern US, leading to potential "phasing" of the two jet streams, which is often a key ingredient in major east coast snowstorms - the AmericanWx post describes this in very nice detail with graphics.
The first chance for a signficant storm is about a week from now, with the various global models all showing a winter storm of some sort next Sunday, but differing greatly in the details, such that anything from nada to a significant winter storm is possible. And there are additional signals after that for significant winter storms. Way, way, way too early to predict anything specific for any location, but this is the kind of pattern that needs to be watched closely. So, let's see what happens.
I know some will say, big deal, it usually snows in January, which is true, but this is about potentially getting more snow than usual and a greater probability of a significant snowstorm or two. All through December the pattern was warm and hostile for cold/snow in the eastern US, as we had a persistent ridge in the SE US pumping warm air into our area, so we got no snow at all. This pattern starting changing in early January a bit, but was still not particularly favorable for cold and/or snow and we got nothing until Friday for most of us, while the big storm for VA/DE/MD and SENJ on Monday just shows that it's always possible to get snow in a bad to neutral pattern in winter.
https://www.33andrain.com/topic/204...n-winter-21-22/?do=findComment&comment=299689
Thank him for the event thread as those are very important and appreciated...Thank you #’s. Screw the trolls!
I dare you to post that on the weenie board.
They are not going to like it any more on there! Although they seem to be depressed about this storm already.Banned on 33andrain. Ill be found on Americanwx now
Banned on 33andrain. Ill be found on Americanwx now
He wasn't banned for weather posts this time - he was banned for posts in a C**** thread, which shouldn't surprise anyone. Cold rain is certainly possible, although focusing on rainy solutions won't make posters popular over there, but as long as such posts are made with some meteorological reasoning (easy to do for this storm where rain is very possible), they won't get posters banned on either weather board. But he's been banned before from both sites (at least thread-banned) for trolling people in winter storm threads, like he does here at times. And T would be banned immediately on those boards.They are not going to like it any more on there! Although they seem to be depressed about this storm already.
He wasn't banned for weather posts this time - he was banned for posts in a C**** thread, which shouldn't surprise anyone. Cold rain is certainly possible, although focusing on rainy solutions won't make posters popular over there, but as long as such posts are made with some meteorological reasoning (easy to do for this storm where rain is very possible), they won't get posters banned on either weather board. But he's been banned before from both sites (at least thread-banned) for trolling people in winter storm threads, like he does here at times. And T would be banned immediately on those boards.
Is there a reason why 33&R doesn't have the traditional "model discussions" where everybody posts the graphics from every single model run and discusses them ad nauseum? Those were the only threads I really liked.
Did they start a storm specific thread yet?
Is there a reason why 33&R doesn't have the traditional "model discussions" where everybody posts the graphics from every single model run and discusses them ad nauseum? Those were the only threads I really liked.
Not as of yesterday evening.
I think they dont like to do it before 72 hours out. The other board has a thread with some model outputs. This one really seems to run west
They have a thread for long range threats and when a threat becomes closer in time, they start a single thread for that threat, like they did yesterday for this threat. And everything goes in that thread, regardless of where one is from, as opposed to AmericanWx, where they have geographically based subforums, which have single threads for specific threats before the event starts and then single threads for observations once an event starts. Plenty of model discussions and maps within the event threads on each site, but they do kind of discourage posting snowfall maps without some discussion of what led to that outcome.Is there a reason why 33&R doesn't have the traditional "model discussions" where everybody posts the graphics from every single model run and discusses them ad nauseum? Those were the only threads I really liked.
yes, they started it yesterday evening around 9 pm...linked it in my event thread here...Not as of yesterday evening.
yes, they started it yesterday evening around 9 pm...linked it in my event thread here...
https://www.33andrain.com/topic/2076-116-17-high-impact-winter-weather-event/
Screw the trolls!
A major winter storm is now very likely for the NE US and parts of the SE and Mid-Atlantic, too.
For 33andrain, it's more based on likelihood of impacting the NE US, IMO (they want to be "national" but the vast majority of their posters are in the NE). They didn't start the 1/3 coastal event until about 36 hours before the event, when it became apparent that DC to AC were likely getting snow and they started the 1/7 thread about 3 days before the event when models came into some agreement on a winter storm. For the coming event they started the thread about 5 days in advance since the models are pretty much all in agreement on a significant winter storm, even if the outcomes are all over the place.I think they dont like to do it before 72 hours out. The other board has a thread with some model outputs. This one really seems to run west
Charlottesville is likely in the bullseye for heavy snow (a foot is very possible) regardless of an inland or coastal track.Been trying to find out the probability for this for Virginia: Tyler's been texting me from Charlottesville asking me about it. I don't know why he's worried, his college is virtual for the first 2 weeks of the semester. Of course they're nuts when these storms approach: he got down there last Thursday from here and the stores were picked clean of essentials even though the forecast was only for 1-2".
That's when I start lol - probably why I'm sometimes the only one posting there after 1 am...Yep, I just saw it. Apologies, 9PM is past my drinking hour.