And you don't even know the difference between forecasting (which is all about what's going on in the atmosphere and what's going to fall from the sky, when and where and why) and evaluating column-induced hydrometeor melting and microphysics and surface melting vs. accumulation, which the vast majority of mets don't know that much about and neither do you. But I do.You are trying to tell mets how to forecast. You are clinging to the snowier models when 90% of the models are quite similar
People actually care abow how much snow falls AS IN ACCUMULATING
Your hubris knows no end. Im not trolling just take a loss on this considering you are the only on Americanwx taking this bizarre stand. The forecast is pretty cut and dry right now
We appreciate you numbers ! Some of us make plans and want to know the forecast !And you don't even know the difference between forecasting (which is all about what's going on in the atmosphere and what's going to fall from the sky, when and where and why) and evaluating column-induced hydrometeor melting and microphysics and surface melting vs. accumulation, which the vast majority of mets don't know that much about and neither do you. But I do.
I'm also not clinging to anything: just pointing out the differences among the models along 95, which is called analysis. Yes, things have trended warmer and wetter over the past 2 days, but so be it - have you seen me post anything out of the ordinary with regard to a forecast? Didn't think so, as my 1-2" call for 95 from Trenton to NYC is in line with many pros, even if not the NWS, but that happens. Will I be wrong? Maybe, maybe not, but if I am, I'll gladly acknowledge it.
Why don't you go ahead and engage me in a scientific discussion on the weather board and see how fast people laugh you out of existence and how fast the mods ban you, since you'll go troll at some point, like they always do, as that's your nature, when you can't win an argument.
And you don't even know the difference between forecasting (which is all about what's going on in the atmosphere and what's going to fall from the sky, when and where and why) and evaluating column-induced hydrometeor melting and microphysics and surface melting vs. accumulation, which the vast majority of mets don't know that much about and neither do you. But I do.
I'm also not clinging to anything: just pointing out the differences among the models along 95, which is called analysis. Yes, things have trended warmer and wetter over the past 2 days, but so be it - have you seen me post anything out of the ordinary with regard to a forecast? Didn't think so, as my 1-2" call for 95 from Trenton to NYC is in line with many pros, even if not the NWS, but that happens. Will I be wrong? Maybe, maybe not, but if I am, I'll gladly acknowledge it.
Why don't you go ahead and engage me in a scientific discussion on the weather board and see how fast people laugh you out of existence and how fast the mods ban you, since you'll go troll at some point, like they always do, as that's your nature, when you can't win an argument.
As our snowless streak continues, Mr. Wishcasting will get more and more desperate. Funny to watch a grown adult try to justify credentials when he has none.....and knows it.Wtf are you even talking about. So great I hit a nerve. I loved how you had to declare your credentials on that board. Your argument is over some minutiae thats not going to matter in this storm. I have no interest in discussing science with you especially given your "science" from 2020-2022
How about we stick to the forecast here instead of petty arguments. You have a beef that i said most models are aligned because you were rooting for the outliers to find someway to be true
Yes I am, but that's kind of a guess. Could be anywhere from 0-5" to be honest with 1-2" seeming most likely.We appreciate you numbers ! Some of us make plans and want to know the forecast !
It’s a shame what happened to this thread
Are you still calling for 1-2 inches in metuchen ?
Thanks! I mostly ignore them these day, but once in awhile when a specific argument comes up, I'll engage. Turns out several others who also get annoyed with the trolling got into it with them in this thread, not me for the most part. Back to the weather - just posted a thread about the upcoming flooding threat for Tues/Weds...#s I enjoy your posts. In fact, when a snow forecast is made, I come to this board to get the real scoop. Why not just put Bac and a few others on ignore.
Wrong again - we had a whopping 5.2" of snow in Metuchen last winter as did many along 95 outside of the NENJ/NYC urban heat island. Not cranky at all - even if we miss, I still greatly enjoy tracking. Enjoy your continued trolling.^^^^^ Someone is cranky after no meaningful snow for about 600 days and counting.
"which the vast majority of mets don't know that much about and neither do you. But I do."
Oh boy.
It's actually quite true. Would you like to discuss it in detail? It's a fascinating topic, IMO."which the vast majority of mets don't know that much about and neither do you. But I do."
Oh boy.
Hey, we are in the same boat. Trolling snow threads after 600 days of misses gets dull. The wishcasters like you need to win from time to time to keep it interesting! Also, my little one is hoping for at least one sled'able event this winter.Wrong again - we had a whopping 5.2" of snow in Metuchen last winter as did many along 95 outside of the NENJ/NYC urban heat island. Not cranky at all - even if we miss, I still greatly enjoy tracking. Enjoy your continued trolling.
It's actually quite true. Would you like to discuss it in detail? It's a fascinating topic, IMO.
Are you still calling for 1-2 inches in metuchen ?
Swing and miss for CNJ!
Well if that's all they're getting in Hillsborough the MILF's are just gonna stay home.
Well if that's all they're getting in Hillsborough the MILF's are just gonna stay home.
How cares about CNJ?
Based on that map I'm getting 2-4" which isn't the dusting/rain some have been downplaying.
It's not 8" but it's not nothing.
Swing and miss for CNJ!
Want to know why most meteorologists don't know a lot about that obscure topic?It's actually quite true. Would you like to discuss it in detail? It's a fascinating topic, IMO.
It's actually quite true. Would you like to discuss it in detail? It's a fascinating topic, IMO.
Philadelphia on 705 days without 1" of snow. Jan 29 will be 2 full years. Last year's measurement at the airport for a trace was such BS as the real Philadelphia had Zip-A-Do-Dah. I'm not routing for no snow of any measurement but I certainly don't want to shovel. The ocean higher temps killed this storm and it's not a true Nor'easter storm as the winds will shift the the south east.Wrong again - we had a whopping 5.2" of snow in Metuchen last winter as did many along 95 outside of the NENJ/NYC urban heat island. Not cranky at all - even if we miss, I still greatly enjoy tracking. Enjoy your continued trolling.
I assume because intimate knowledge of physical chemistry isn't really critical to learning about synoptic forecasting. I love P-chem, which is why I tend to make contributions on those boards where I have expertise. I can't hold a candle to pro mets on synoptics, but I know a ton about P-chem as it relates to things like melting, crystallization, snow/sleet physical properties and how they impact frozen precip removal (surface area to volume ratio is really important there), so I try to make contributions there. Let me know if I got that right or am way off base...Want to know why most meteorologists don't know a lot about that obscure topic?
Funny thing is we're well aligned on RU sports and I would still talk sports with bac any day of the week...
I assume because intimate knowledge of physical chemistry isn't really critical to learning about synoptic forecasting. I love P-chem, which is why I tend to make contributions on those boards where I have expertise. I can't hold a candle to pro mets on synoptics, but I know a ton about P-chem as it relates to things like melting, crystallization, snow/sleet physical properties and how they impact frozen precip removal (surface area to volume ratio is really important there), so I try to make contributions there. Let me know if I got that right or am way off base...