2.0 in Wayne? Not where I live!
What are the models currently saying about the possible upcoming storms?
Uhhh, it's the only thread I've started on a cold and possibly snowy pattern, because it's been an outrageously warm winter. And it certainly seems to be panning out, despite the sniping.So what you are saying is that it will be cold in the winter with a chance of snowy patterns until it gets warmer. Ingenious!
The first storm on Sunday night into Monday is being modeled to be a monster, but was shown as 250+ miles offshore earlier today, which would mean little to no precip in NJ (maybe a minor hit for eastern LI/SE New England), although there would be beach erosion/minor flooding impacts with a powerful 970 millibar storm (more powerful, pressure-wise than the blizzard), especially since Monday is a new moon.
However, 2 of 3 of tonight's model runs, so far, have brought the storm much closer to us (the NAM and the Canadian; the GFS is a miss), such that a few inches of snow would be likely SE of I-95 and in NYC and a major snowfall would be in order for eastern LI/SE New England. Given that the models seem to be biased this season towards the S/E, i.e., they predict storms a few days out to miss or graze us and then the storms actually hit us, as the track shifts to the N/W (snowstorms and rainstorms), one has to keep an eye on this first storm. This is only 48-54 hours away, so it's not like we shouldn't have a better idea of where it's headed.
Edit: of course, the Euro shows a whiff for both the Sunday night and Tues/Weds storms. That ensures the model watching will be dramatic, lol...
The first storm looks like a classic "Miller A" storm, which forms in the SW, strengthens as it traverses the Gulf States and then goes boom off the NC/SC coast and rides up the coast (or out to sea). In the wake of this storm, we will likely see a not quite classic "Miller B" storm early Tuesday into Wednesday, which dives down from the midwest/Great Lakes into the Ohio Valley and then the low "jumps" to the coast, somewhere from NC to DE and gives us a coastal storm. It's not clear how strong this storm will be or exactly where its track (it's just coming on shore in the Pac NW) will be, but there's potential for a long period of light to moderate snow, both as the storm approaches from the west (a southwest flow event, initially) and then as the coastal low takes over. Need to watch this one, too, as models don't have a good handle on it yet - right now a few inches of snow look to be possible.
After the 2nd storm, we look to get successive shots of pretty cold air, with highs unlikely to break 40 after this weekend and then unlikely to breat 32F next weekend, plus we'll likely get a clipper system next weekend that could bring some snow. And if 10 day model runs are to be believed (and they should be taken with a big grain of salt), there's a threat for another coastal low. Point is, as I said back on 1/30, when I started the thread, it looked like we were heading into a colder stormier pattern with numerous snow chances (and that looks like it's verifying, especially given that we've seen one snowstorm pan out so far). Going to be interesting to watch it all unfold. The NWS-NYC write-up was quite good, below.
Also, for what it's worth, Lee Goldberg tonight had a really interesting discussion of the continuing cold and likely snowy pattern for at least the next two weeks (and he even thought late Feb/early March would be favorable for snow). What's fascinating is that this might end up being the warmest Dec-Jan-Feb ever for the area (particularly Philly to NYC), but for the first time ever in a top 5 warm winter, we might get well above average seasonal snowfall. Here's the video.
Well it's a scattershot of RU#'s mini-me, so I was hoping to hear from the original.
At this point, with the current track, yes, just minor flooding (and gale force winds). Should the trend closer to the coast continue, coastal flooding could reach moderate levels.Minor coastal flooding possible with full moon correct?
This map is for both storms...1st event is non event check again....light snow no accumulation in my forecast for tomorrow...accumulating snow comes from Monday nightvinto Tuesday night
Spanky's looking for quality...Its in the other threadI
Winter storm warnings up for Suffolk County and much of SE New England and blizzard warnings are up for Cape Cod. Winter weather advisories are up for 2-4" for NYC and Nassau County. All of this is for the first storm on Monday. No advisories for NE NJ or coastal NJ. NWS in NYC and Philly have those locations getting an inch or two of snow tomorrow (sub-advisory level). Will not take much of a shift to put those locations into advisory snows. Most of the I-95 corridor from Philly to Central Jersey looking at an inch or less from the first storm, as of now. Need to watch this first storm closely.
Still uncertain on the 2nd storm (Mon night into Weds am): an inch or two to several inches are possible. Most of the models showing at least 2-3" though, so wouldn't be surprised to see advisories go up for tomorrow night for most locations, although they may wait for the output from tonight's model runs before pulling the trigger.
Looks like tonight's storm is pushing east of NJ coast? Been watching the radar loop for a while, and it looks like it is brushing southern Ocean County but pushing out to sea.
Just got back from a Super Bowl party (some great defense, but kind of sloppy, too - nice to see Peyton go out with a win) and checked in and no real change vs. what I wrote above. First storm is still mainly a NYC and eastward storm with maybe an inch or two, tops, for coastal areas in NJ and maybe 1/2" to an inch from I-95 towards the coast and could be nothing but flurries N/W of I-95. NYC looks to get 1-3" and LI looks to get 3-5" mostly, but 6" or more for much of Suffolk. Also, with snowfall being light, borderline surface temps will limit any accumulation, especially after 9 am or so, with the indirect sunlight. Difference now is the chance of it coming further NW is done, as opposed to 12 hours ago, when there was still a slight chance.
Bigger storm for everyone in NJ and eastern PA will be the 2nd storm, which looks like a general 1-3" or 2-4" event for almost everyone, starting Monday night and going into Tuesday.morning, so the Tuesday morning commute could be a tough one, as temps overnight will be in the 20s for everyone, meaning snow will accumulate. There is the potential for more snow, but that would only be where the mesoscale inverted trough deformation bands set up and those look like they'll set up from Philly southward (so those areas may get 4-6") - however, these are notoriously difficult to predict and it's possible they could hit Central/North Jersey.
Below is the NWS-NYC map for just the first storm (Monday) - the NWS-Philly map from previous posts is for both storms (Mon/Tues).
NWS in Philly finally did decide to go with a WWAdvisory for 1-3" of snow this morning/afternoon for Middlesex (really just the eastern half or even third, but they don't have halves), Monmouth and Ocean Counties (really just the parts within 10-15 miles of the coast). NWS in NYC also issued advisories for NENJ and continued them for NYC for 2-3" of snow today. Major bust potential, given the storm may not throw that much moisture that far inland and that temps will be in the 33-34F range, so accumulation will be difficult with light to moderate snow.
And for the 2nd storm they've issued winter storm watches for the counties south of 195/276 in NJ/PA for 4-8" of snow from Monday late night through Tuesday night, generally, as that's where they expect the inverted trough to set up (and really they mean 2-4" in the northern parts of counties like Ocean and Burlington). For the counties just north of 195/276, up to about 78, they're calling for maybe 1-2" of snow during that time; however, they're calling for 2-4" in NE NJ/NYC/LI for storm 2. No new maps up yet, but the ones in this thread will autoupdate. Confusing turn of events since they haven't issued updated discussions yet; or else I need some sleep, lol.
NWS-NYC hasn't updated their map for Union/Essex/Hudson/Bergen/Passaic the NJ counties they forecast for, but looking at their local county forecasts from about 1 pm today, they look like they're expecting a similar amount as the Mt. Holly adjacent counties, i.e., 1-2". Again, the potential range is from <1" to up to ~5", depending on where those bands set up (most likely south of 195, but further north, while unlikely, is possible).Essex/Hudson tomorrow, 1 to 2 inches total or even less?
NWS-NYC hasn't updated their map for Union/Essex/Hudson/Bergen/Passaic the NJ counties they forecast for, but looking at their local county forecasts from about 1 pm today, they look like they're expecting a similar amount as the Mt. Holly adjacent counties, i.e., 1-2". Again, the potential range is from <1" to up to ~5", depending on where those bands set up (most likely south of 195, but further north, while unlikely, is possible).
Oooooo, I'm gonna be watching that!... but I think there's high bust potential ...
At the risk of sending this thread off tangent, here's a pair for Spanky...Oooooo, I'm gonna be watching that!
Tonight's models coming in a little snowier for North Jersey/NYC/LI/Hudson Valley, with 2-5" instead of the 1-2" currently forecast for those areas by most. Nick Gregory said he's thinking he's going to have to extend the 2-4" swath he had over the 276/195 to 78 area (similar to what the NWS has) north by 50 miles or so. Lee Goldberg just said the same thing, basically. Oddly enough, still haven't seen any snowfall maps from NWS-NYC.
Will be interesting to see if the NWS issues advisories for most/all of North Jersey, the Poconos, NYC, LI and the lower Hudson Valley or perhaps just the next tier north of 78 (like Warren, Morris, Union, Essex, Hudson, NYC, LI), but not north of there. Most of this snow would be falling Tuesday afternoon/evening and into Wednesday morning. Most of Tuesday morning/early afternoon is expected to just have some intermittent light snow with minor accumulations
Warnings were downgraded to advisories for SE PA/South Jersey for 2-4" of snow (except Chester/Delaware, which still have warnings up) and the advisories are still up for the rest of NJ and eastern PA for 2-4" of snow (mostly this evening and overnight), except for Sussex/Warren/Poconos, which are predicted to get 1-2".
The interesting development, as I wondered about last night, was the NWS in NYC did issue advisories for NE NJ (Union/Essex/Hudson/Passaic/Bergen), NYC and LI for 3-5" of snow and advisories for the lower Hudson Valley and coastal CT for 2-4" of snow.
As per yesterday, significant bust potential exists as these forecasts are based on interactions between a surface low developing off the NJ/DE coast and an upper level low to the NW, forming an "inverted trough" and these are notoriously hard to forecast with regard to location and intensity.
If they could, the NWS would likely just put out 1-2" forecasts for the region, but tell everyone that you could get 3-5" in areas that get the heavier bands. Problem with that approach is anyone who gets the heavier snow will not be "ready" for it (especially if advisories weren't issued), whereas with the approach they've taken, everyone is on alert and if they get 1.5" instead of 3-4" it's not that big of a deal.
![]()
![]()
In other words, like sensible people, the NWS takes a preventive approach. There are two kinds of errors it can make: errors of overestimation and errors of underestimation. The NWS would rather commit a mistake of overestimation -- estimate 2-4 inches and get 1-2 -- than underestimation -- estimate 1-2 and get 2-4. Yes, overestimation does harm -- unnecessarily cancelled plans -- but underestimation would be worse, because people would fail to prepare properly for a threatening event that can cause harm. As the numbers increase -- four to eight as opposed to six to twelve -- the considerations increasingly favor leaning toward errors of overestimation.
Based on the 12Z models showing less precip (not all, but most), as I was saying earlier, bust potential is pretty high. I’m thinking a general area-wide 1-2” snowfall late this afternoon (not much will fall before then; we did get 1/2" in Metuchen overnight) through the evening is more realistic, with some localized spots getting 2-5” under impossible-to-predict mesoscale banding.
As Camden and I were discussing, though, I doubt the NWS reduces snowfall forecasts and drops the advisories until or unless it becomes obvious they won't verify, since I don't think they want people to let their guard down. Especially since wherever snow falls (even if it's only 1-2") after about 5 pm will see slippery conditions, as temps will be at or below 32F by then and the sun will be down.
By the way, it could get to around or even below 0F early Sunday morning (with a high around 15F) - should be awesome weather for our weekly soccer match at 8 am, lol. Also, there's a chance for a decent sized winter storm (mixed precip looking possible, as this one may be a coastal hugger or even go inland a bit)) on Monday, 2/15. Just a heads up...